From Corpus Data to Constructional Networks: Analyzing Language with the Usage-Based Construction Grammar Framework

1ABEILLÉ, Anne – BORSLEY, Robert D. – ESPINAL, Maria-Teresa (2006): The syntax of Comparative Correlatives in French and Spanish. In: S. Müller (ed.): Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, pp. 6–26. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

2BAAYEN, Harald R. (2011): Corpus linguistics and naive discriminative learning. In: Brazilian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 11. pp. 295–328.Search in Google Scholar

3BORSLEY, Robert D. (2003): On the Periphery: comparative correlatives in Polish and English. In: P. Bański – A. Przepiórkowski (eds.): Proceedings of Fifth Generative Linguistics in Poland Conference. Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences, pp. 15–28.Search in Google Scholar

4BORSLEY, Robert D. (2004): An Approach to English Comparative Correlatives. In: S. Müller (ed.): Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 70–92.Search in Google Scholar

5BRESNAN, Joan (2007): Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation. In: S. Featherston – W. Sternefeld (eds.): Roots: linguistics in search of its evidential base (Studies in Generative Grammar 96). Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 75–96.Search in Google Scholar

6BRESNAN, Joan – FORD, Marilyn (2010): Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English. In: Language, vol. 86, No. 1, pp. 168–213.Search in Google Scholar

7CASENHISER, Devin M. – GOLDBERG, Adele E. (2005): Fast mapping between a phrasal form and meaning. In: Developmental Science, vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 500–508.Search in Google Scholar

8CROFT, William – CRUSE, D. Alan (2004): Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 374 p.Search in Google Scholar

9CULICOVER, Peter W. – JACKENDOFF, Ray (1999): The View from the Periphery: The English Comparative Correlative. In: Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 543–571.Search in Google Scholar

10CULICOVER, Peter W. – JACKENDOFF, Ray (2005): Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford UP. 608 p.Search in Google Scholar

11DIESSEL, Holger (2015): Usage-based Construction Grammar. In: E. Dąbrowska – D. Divjak (eds.): Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 295–321.Search in Google Scholar

12DIKKEN, Marcel den (2005): Comparative Correlatives Comparatively. In: Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 497–532.Search in Google Scholar

13FRIED, Mirjam (2017): Construction Grammar in the Service of Slavic Linguistics, and Vice Versa. In: Journal of Slavic Linguistics, vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 241–276.Search in Google Scholar

14GOLDBERG, Adele E. (1995): Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 271 p.Search in Google Scholar

15GOLDBERG, Adele E. (2003): Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. In: TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 219–224.Search in Google Scholar

16GOLDBERG, Adele E. (2006): Constructions at Work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford UP. 280 p.Search in Google Scholar

17GRIES, Stefan Th. (2007): Coll.analysis 3.2a. A program for R for Windows 2.x.Search in Google Scholar

18GRIES, Stefan Th. (2009): Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs: 208). 1st edition. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 145 p.Search in Google Scholar

19GRIES, Stefan Th. (2011): Corpus data in usage-based linguistics: What’s the right degree of granularity for the analysis of argument structure constructions? In: M. Brdar – S. Th. Gries – M. Žic Fuchs (eds.): Cognitive linguistics: Convergence and expansion. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 237–256.Search in Google Scholar

20GRIES, Stefan Th. (2015): Quantitative designs and statistical techniques. In: D. Biber – R. Reppen (eds.): The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, pp. 50–71.Search in Google Scholar

21GRIES, Stefan Th. – HAMPE, Beate – SCHÖNEFELD, Doris (2005): Converging evidence: Bringing together experimental and corpus data on the association of verbs and constructions. In: Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 635–676.Search in Google Scholar

22GRIES, Stefan Th. – STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol (2004): Extending collostructional analysis. In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 97–129.Search in Google Scholar

23GRIES, Stefan Th. – STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol (2006): Corpus-based methods and cognitive semantics: The many meanings of to run. In: S. Th. Gries – A. Stefanowitsch (eds.): Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 57–99.Search in Google Scholar

24GRIES, Stefan Th. – STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol (2010): Cluster analysis and the identification of collexeme classes. In: S. Rice – J. Newman (eds.): Experimental and Empirical Methods in the Study of Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 73–90.Search in Google Scholar

25HANSEN, Björn – NEKULA, Marek – BANÁŠOVÁ, Monika (2011): Nová konstrukce „Karla Gotta nemusím“ v češtině a slovenštině: případ lexikalizace, pragmatikalizace nebo začínající degramatikalizace? In: Slovo a slovesnost, vol. 72, No. 2. pp. 243–267.Search in Google Scholar

26HILPERT, Martin (2013): Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 247 p.Search in Google Scholar

27HOFFMANN, Thomas (2006): Corpora and Introspection as Corroborating Evidence: The Case of Preposition Placement in English Relative Clauses. In: Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 165–195.Search in Google Scholar

28HOFFMANN, Thomas (2011): Preposition Placement in English: A Usage-based Approach (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 320 p.Search in Google Scholar

29HOFFMANN, Thomas (2017): Construction Grammar as Cognitive Structuralism: The interaction of constructional networks and processing in the diachronic evolution of English comparative correlatives. In: English Language and Linguistics, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 349–373.Search in Google Scholar

30HOFFMANN, Thomas (2019): English Comparative Correlatives: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon-Syntax Interface (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 276 p.Search in Google Scholar

31HOFFMANN, Thomas – BRUNNER, Thomas – HORSCH, Jakob (2020): English Comparative Correlative Constructions: A Usage-based account. In: Open Linguistics, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 196–215.Search in Google Scholar

32HOFFMANN, Thomas – HORSCH, Jakob – BRUNNER, Thomas (2019): The More Data, The Better: AUsage-based Account of the English Comparative Correlative Construction. In: Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 1–36.Search in Google Scholar

33HOFFMANN, Thomas – TROUSDALE, Graeme (2013): Construction Grammar: Introduction. In: T. Hoffmann – G. Trousdale (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

34HORSCH, Jakob (2019): Slovak Comparative Correlatives: New Insights. In: Jazykovedný časopis, vol. 70, No. 2, pp. 180–190.Search in Google Scholar

35HORSCH, Jakob (2020): Vidíš tým lepšie, čím bližšie sa pozeráš: Slovak Comparative Correlative CC’ Constructions from a Construction Grammar perspective. In: Jazykovedný časopis, vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 25–40.Search in Google Scholar

36HORSCH Jakob (2021): Slovak Comparative Correlatives: A Usage-based Construction Grammar Account. In: Constructions and Frames, vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 193–229.Search in Google Scholar

37HORSCH Jakob (2023): The comparative correlative construction in World Englishes: a usage-based construction grammar approach. Eichstätt (Germany): Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. PhD thesis.Search in Google Scholar

38JURAFSKY, Dan (1992): An on-line computational model of human sentence interpretation: A theory of the representation and use of linguistic knowledge. Berkeley: University of California. PhD Thesis.Search in Google Scholar

39LANGACKER, Ronald W. (1987): Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford UP. 540 p.Search in Google Scholar

40LANGACKER, Ronald W. (1988): A usage-based model. In: B. Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.): Topics in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 261–288.Search in Google Scholar

41McENERY, Tony – XIAO, Richard – TONO, Yukio (2006): Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge. 406 p.Search in Google Scholar

42NUNBERG, Geoffrey – SAG, Ivan A. – WASOW, Thomas (1994): Idioms. In: Language, vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 491–538.Search in Google Scholar

43R CORE TEAM (2020): R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

44SCHMID, Hans-Jörg (2000): English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 486 p.Search in Google Scholar

45SCHMID, Hans-Jörg (2016): A Framework for Understanding Linguistic Entrenchment and Its Psychological Foundations. In: H.-J. Schmid (ed.): Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 9–35.Search in Google Scholar

46SCHMID, Hans-Jörg – Küchenhoff, Helmut (2013): Collostructional analysis and other ways of measuring lexicogrammatical attraction: theoretical premises, practical problems and cognitive underpinnings. In: Cognitive Linguistics, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 531–577.Search in Google Scholar

47ŠIMKOVÁ, Mária – GAJDOŠOVÁ, Katarína – KMEŤOVÁ, Beáta – DEBNÁR, Marek (2017): Slovenský Národný Korpus: Texty, Anotácie, Vyhľadávania. Bratislava: Mikula. 168 p.Search in Google Scholar

48STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol – Flach, Susanne (2017): The corpus-based perspective on entrenchment. In: H.-J. Schmid (ed.): Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 101–127.Search in Google Scholar

49STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol – GRIES, Stefan Th. (2003): Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. In: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 209–243.Search in Google Scholar

50STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol – GRIES, Stefan Th. (2005): Covarying Collexemes. In: Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–43.Search in Google Scholar

51STEFANOWITSCH, Anatol – GRIES, Stefan Th. (2008): Channel and constructional meaning: A collostructional case study. In: G. Christiansen – R. Dirven (eds.): Cognitive sociolinguistics: language variation, cultural models, social systems (Cognitive Linguistics Research 39). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 129–152.Search in Google Scholar

52THE DOCUMENT FOUNDATION (2022). LibreOfficeCalc 7.3.2.2. https://www.libre-office.org/discover/calc/.Search in Google Scholar

53TRAUGOTT, Elizabeth – TROUSDALE, Graeme (2013): Constructionalization and Constructional Changes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic & Historical Linguistics 6). Oxford: Oxford UP. 304 p.Search in Google Scholar

54WOODS, Anthony – FLETCHER, Paul – HUGHES, Arthur (1986): Statistics in Language Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. 336 p.Search in Google Scholar