[Adams R, Simmons D, Hartskeerl K, Koehler M. (2004). Surviving suppression: no detectable impacts of Class A foam on soil invertebrates and some Australian native plants. Bushfi re 2004: earth, wind & fi re: fusing the elements: conference proceedings, Department for Environment and Heritage, Adelaide, South Australia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Domene X, Colon J, Uras MV, Izquierdo R, Avila A, Alcaniz JM. (2010). Role of soil properties in sewage sludge toxicity to soil collembolans. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42, 1982 - 1990.10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.07.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiskesjo, G. (1985). The Allium test as standard in environmental monitoring.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hereditas 102: 99-112. Globally Harmonized System of Classifi cation and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), United Nations, 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamilton SJ, McDonald SF, Gaikowski MP, Buhl KJ. (1996). Toxicity of fi re retardant chemicals to aquatic organisms: Progress report. Information Report - Petawawa National Forestry Institute PI X. 123; pp. 132-144.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirzel J, Matus I. (2013). Eff ect of soil depth and increasing fertilization rate on yield and its components of two durum wheat varieties. Chilean J. Agric. Res. 73: 55-59.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hřibova Š, Zlamalova Gargošova H, Vavrova M. (2014). Ecotoxicological evaluation of fi refi ghting foams. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin (in press).]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO, 2005. Water quality - Determination of toxic effect of water constituents and waste to duckweed (Lemna minor) - Duckweed growth inhibition test. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO 20079.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISO, 2007. Soil Quality. Leaching Procedures for Subsequent Chemical and Ecotoxicological Testing of Soil and Soil Materials. Part 2. Bath Test Using a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 10 l/kg Dry Matter. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. ISO 21268-2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson AI. (1963). A Field Method for Measurement of Infi ltration. U. S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1544-F. p. F1-F27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koehler M, Adams R, Simmons D. (2005). Does application of fi refi ghting foam aff ect soil invertebrates? Victorian naturalist 122: 128-133.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lors C, Ponge JF, Martinez Aldaya M, Damidot D. (2011) Comparison of solid and liquid-phase bioassays using ecoscores to asses contaminated soils. Environ Pollut. 159: 2974-2981.10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.02821570756]Search in Google Scholar
[Vavřiček D, Kučera A. (2014). Lesnicka pedologie pro posluchače LDF Mendelu v Brně. Ustav geologie a pedologie. p. 176.]Search in Google Scholar
[LUFA Speyer [webpage on the Internet]. Analyses Data Sheet. Speyer, Germany: LUFA Speyer [updated 2013 May; cited 2014, Aug]. Available form: http://www.lufa-speyer.de/images/stories/bodanalyse.pdf ]Search in Google Scholar
[Methodological guideline of Department of Waste to determine the ecotoxicity of waste, Bulletin of the Ministry of Environment of the Czech Republic, part 4, April 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mijangos I, Garbisu C. (2010). Consequences of soil sampling depth during the assessment of the eff ects of tillage and fertilization on soil quality: a common oversight. Soil and TillageResearch 109: 169-173.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olorunfemi DI, Ogunsanwo MW. (2011). Evaluation of the diff erential growth conditions, heavy metal composition and cytogenetics of allium cepa by the use of chromosome aberration bioassay. Science World Journal 6: 21-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruggiero P, Pizzigallo MDR, Crecchio C. (2002). Eff ects of soil abiotic processes on the bioavailability of anthropogenic organic residues, in Ecological signifi cance of the interactions among clay minerals, organic matter and soil biota pp. 95-133, Elsevier Science B.V.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seow J. (2013) Environmental Considerations When Using Fire Fighting Foam in Fire Fighting Foams with Perfl uorochemicals - Environmental Review pp. 22-27. ]Search in Google Scholar