Risk management and risk communication of an illegal use of sulphites in meat preparations

[1]European Commission, 2008. Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/?qid=1600853964474&uri=CELEX:32008R1331/ (8. 6. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[2]European Food Safety Authority – EFSA, 2021; Maxim L, Mazzocchi M, Van den Broucke S, et al. Scientific report on technical assistance in the field of risk communication. EFSA Journal. 2021; 19(4): 6574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6574.Search in Google Scholar

[3]Paşca C, Coroian A, Socaci S. Risks and Benefits of Food Additives–Review. Bulletin UASVM Animal Science and Biotechnologies. 2018; 75(2): 71–79. DOI: 10.15835/buasvmcn-asb:2018.0026.Search in Google Scholar

[4]Carocho M, Barreiro MF, Morales P, et al. Adding Molecules to Food, Pros and Cons: A Review on Synthetic and Natural Food Additives. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2014; 13(4): 377–399. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12065.Search in Google Scholar

[5]Jansen T, Claassen L, van Kamp I, et al. All chemical substances are harmful public appraisal of uncertain risks of food additives and contaminants. Food and chemical toxicology. 2020; 136: 110959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2019.110959.Search in Google Scholar

[6]Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Frewer LJ, et al. Communicating risks and benefits from fish consumption: impact on Belgian consumers’ perception and intention to eat fish”. Risk analysis. 2008; 28(4): 951–967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01075.x.Search in Google Scholar

[7]Bearth A, Cousin ME, Siegrist M. The Dose Makes the Poison: Informing Consumers Aboutthe Scientific Risk Assessment of Food Additives. Risk Analysis. 2016; (36): 130–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12410.Search in Google Scholar

[8]European Commission, 2011. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/SL/TXT/?qid=1600853876707&uri=CELEX:02011R1169-20180101/ (10. 3. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[9]Lester MR. Sulphite sensitivity: significance in human health. Journal of the American College of Nutrition. 1995; 14(3): 229–232. DOI: 10.1080/07315724.1995.10718500.Search in Google Scholar

[10]Garcia–Fuentes AR, Wirtz S, Vos E, et al. Short Review of Sulphites as Food Additives. European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety. 2015; 5(2): 113–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/EJNFS/2015/1155.Search in Google Scholar

[11]Vally H, Misso NL, Madan V. Clinical effects of sulphite additives. Clinical and experimental allergy: journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2009; 39(11): 1643–1651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03362.x.Search in Google Scholar

[12]Vally H, Misso NL. Adverse reactions to the sulphite additives. Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench. 2012; 5(1): 16–23. PMCID: PMC4017440.Search in Google Scholar

[13]Gunnison AF, Jacobsen DW. Sulfite hypersensitivity. A critical review. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 1987; 17(3): 185–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10408448709071208.Search in Google Scholar

[14]European Food Safety Authority – EFSA. “Follow-up of the re-evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E 228). EFSA Journal. 2022; 20(11): 7594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7594.Search in Google Scholar

[15]Mičović E. Recognizing invisible victimization regarding food safety and consumer protection. Doctoral Thesis. Maribor: University of Maribor, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[16]D’Amore T, Di Taranto A, Berardi G, et al. Sulphites in meat: Occurrence, activity, toxicity, regulation, and detection. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2020; 19(5): 2701-2720. DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12607.Search in Google Scholar

[17]Carrabs G, Smaldone G, Carosielli L, et al. Detection of Sulphites in Fresh Meat Preparation Commercialised at Retail in Lazio Region. Italian Journal of Food Safety. 2017; 6(2): 6482. DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2017.6482.Search in Google Scholar

[18]Armentia-Alvarez A, Fernandez-Casero A, Garcia-Moreno C, et al. Residual levels of free and total sulphite in fresh and cooked burgers. Food Additives & Contaminants. 2009; (2): 157-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02652039309374139.Search in Google Scholar

[19]Zubeldia LL, Gomar FJ. Presence of sulphites in minced meat and meat products prepared in industries of the Valencia Community. Revista Española de Salud Pública. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 1997; 71(4): 401-407.Search in Google Scholar

[20]Tomasevic I, Dodevska M, Simic M, et al. A decade of sulphites control in Serbian meat industry and the effect of HACCP. Food Additives & Contaminants. 2018; 11: 49-53. DOI: 10.1080/19393210.2017.1403492.Search in Google Scholar

[21]Iammarino M, Di Taranto A, Muscarella M. Investigation on the presence of sulphites in fresh meat preparations: Estimation of an allowable maximum limit. Meat Science. 2012; 90(2): 304-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.015.Search in Google Scholar

[22]Fernandes I, Rodrigues JA, Almeida CMM. Sulfites in Fresh Meat and Meat Preparations Commercialized in Portugal. Food Analytical Methods. 2021; (15): 172–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-021-02115-z.Search in Google Scholar

[23]FAO, 2021. Food fraud – Intention, detection, and management. Food safety technical toolkit for Asia and the Pacific No. 5. Bangkok: https://www.fao.org/food-safety/news/news-details/en/c/1391532/ (2.7.2022).Search in Google Scholar

[24]Kendall H, Clark B, Rhymer C, et al. A systematic review of consumer perceptions of food fraud and authenticity: a European perspective. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2019; 94: 79-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.10.005.Search in Google Scholar

[25]Anklam E, Battaglia R. Food analysis and consumer protection. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 2001; 12(5–6): 197–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00071-1.Search in Google Scholar

[26]Croall H. White collar crime, consumer and victimization. Crime, Law and Social Change. 2009; 51(1): 127–146. DOI: 10.1007/s10611-008-9147-z.Search in Google Scholar

[27]Pidgeon N. Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 1998; 59 (1): 5-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00114-2.Search in Google Scholar

[28]Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. Why study risk perception? Risk analysis. 1982; 2(2): 83–93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01369.x.Search in Google Scholar

[29]Leppin A. Communicating about risks: It’s more than just telling the numbers. WHO –International Training Workshop on Environment and Health, 19th-23rd March 2012, Riga, Latvia, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[30]Bitzios M, Jack L, Krzyzaniak SA, et al. Country-of-Origin Labelling, Food Traceability Drivers and Food Fraud: Lessons from Consumers’ Preferences and Perceptions. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2017; 8(3): 541-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2017.27.Search in Google Scholar

[31]European Food Safety Authority – EFSA, 2017. When Food Is Cooking Up a Storm–Proven Recipes for Risk Communications: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/corporate/pub/riskcommguidelines170524 (24. 4. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[32]Mack A, Schmitz T, Schulze Althoff G, et al. Steps in the risk management process, in: Luning PA, Devlieghere F, Verhé R, eds. Safety in the agri-food chain: Academic Publishers, Wageningen, 2006: 355–397.Search in Google Scholar

[33]Spink J, Moyer DC. Defining the Public Health Threat of Food Fraud. Journal of Food Science. 2011; 76(9). DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x.Search in Google Scholar

[34]Mantovani A. Characterization and Management of Uncertainties in Toxicological Risk Assessment: Examples from the Opinions of the European Food Safety Authority. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2018; 1800: 219-229. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_10.Search in Google Scholar

[35]Report on special control of additives in meat preparations: https://www.gov.si/novice/2019-10-09-poseben-nadzor-uvhvvr-nad-uporaboaditivov/ (24. 4. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[36]Statement on meat products and possible threats to consumer health: 2019 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3W5f3T69nU&t=122s (12. 12. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[37]State Administration Act, 2021. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 113/05 – Official Consolidated Text. Zakon o državni upravi (pisrs.si) (17. 5. 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[38]Mičović E, Vrdelja M, Ambrožič I, et al. Komuniciranje o tveganju kot del procesa zagotavljanja varne hrane in krme / Risk communication as part of system for ensuring food and feed safety. In: Trendi in izzivi v živilstvu, prehrani, gostinstvu in turizmu: zbornik prispevkov tretje mednarodne strokovne conference (Trends and challenges in food, nutrition, catering and tourism: proceedings of the third international professional conference). Biotehniški izobraževalni center, Ljubljana, 2014: 69-78.Search in Google Scholar

[39]Press conference, 2019. The Minister, Dr Pivec, presented findings of internal audit and review of the status, and recommendations regarding official control on sulphites in meat preparations: https://www.gov.si/novice/ministrica-dr-pivec-predstavila-ugotovitve-notranjega-nadzora-in-pregled-stanja-ter-priporocila-organiziranosti-uvhvvr/ (3. 5. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[40]Spink J, Embarek PB, Savelli CJ, et al. Global perspectives on food fraud: results from a WHO survey of members of the International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN). npj Science of Food. 2019; 3(12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-019-0044-x.Search in Google Scholar

[41]European Commission, 2002. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02002R0178-20190726&qid=1606473789446/ (20. 4. 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[42]Zakon o varstvu potrošnikov, 2018. (Consumer Protection Act) (ZVPot): http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO513 (20. 3. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[43]Consumer Protection against Unfair Business Practices Act, 2021. Zakon o varstvu potrošnikov pred nepoštenimi poslovnimi praksami: http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO5064 (20. 2.2022).Search in Google Scholar

[44]Cohen LE, Felson M. Social change and crime rate change: A routine activity approach. American Sociology Review. 1979; 44(4): 588–608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589.Search in Google Scholar

[45]Kovač P. Inspection and Control – Discussions, Case Law and Commentary of the Law, in: Kovač P, ed. Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, 2016: 257-277.Search in Google Scholar

[46]European Commission, 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/625: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32017R0625/ (20. 7. 2022).Search in Google Scholar

[47]Statement 2019a. Slovenian Consumers’ Association requires timely and comprehensive consumer information: https://novice.svet24.si/clanek/novice/slovenija/5da6dafde24ef/zps-zahteva-pravocasno-in-celovito-obvescanje-potrosnikov (28. 12. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[48]Holtfreter K, Van Slyke S, Blomberg TG. Social change in consumer fraud: from victim-offender interactions to global networks. Crime, Law & Social Change. 2006; 44(3): 251–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-006-9006-8.Search in Google Scholar

[49]Agnoli L, Capitello R, De Salvo M, et al. Food fraud and consumers’ choices in the wake of the horsemeat scandal. British Food Journal. 2016; 118 (8): 1898-1913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2016-0176.Search in Google Scholar

[50]Soon JM, Krzyzaniak SC, Shuttlewood Z, et al. Food fraud vulnerability assessment tools used in food industry. Food Control. 2019; 101: 225-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

[51]Gibson JE, Taylor DA. Can claims, misleading information, and manufacturing issues regarding dietary supplements be improved in the United States. The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2005; 314(3): 939–944. DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.085712.Search in Google Scholar

[52]European Food Safety Authority – EFSA, 2019. Special Eurobarometer wave EB91.3. Food safety in the EU: Eurobarometer 2019_Food safety in the EU_Report_final (europa.eu) (24. 4. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[53]Hooker C, Capon A, Leask J. Communicating about risk: strategies for situations where public concern is high but the risk is low. Public health research & practice. 2017; 27(1): e2711709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2711709.Search in Google Scholar

[54]FAO, WHO, 2016. Risk communication applied to food safety handbook: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/250083/ (10. 9. 2021).Search in Google Scholar

[55]Andersson MG, Elving J, Nordkvist E, et al. Communication inside Risk Assessment and Risk Management. In: COMRISK Final report, EFSA supporting publication. 2020; EN-1891. DOI: 10.2903/sp.efsa.2020.EN-1891.Search in Google Scholar

[56]Slovic P. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk analysis. 1993; 13(6): 675-682.Search in Google Scholar

[57]Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, et al. Risk as feelings. Psychological bulletin. 2001; 127(2): 267–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267.Search in Google Scholar

[58]Devcich DA, Pederson IK, Petrie KJ. You eat what you are: modern health worries and the acceptance of natural and synthetic additives in functional foods. Apetite. 2007; 48(3): 333–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.09.014.Search in Google Scholar

[59]Good J, Beardsworth A, Haslam C, et al. Dietary dilemmas: nutritional concerns of 1990s. British Food Journal. 1995; 97(11): 3–12. DOI: 10.1108/00070709510105050.Search in Google Scholar

[60]Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G, Roth C. Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk analysis. 2000; 20(3): 353–362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034.Search in Google Scholar

[61]Wehn U, Ajates R, Fraisl D, et al. Capturing and communicating impact of citizen science for policy: A storytelling approach. J Environ Manage. 2021; 1(295):113082. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113082.Search in Google Scholar

[62]Sante DG. The EU Food Fraud Network (europa.eu). 2021: https://food.ec.europa.eu/safety/eu-agri-food-fraud-network_en (24. 4. 2021).Search in Google Scholar