[BARINKA, Roman. Status humanitární intervence v mezinárodním právu. [Status of Humanitarian Intervention in International Law]. Právník. 2003, vol. 142, issue 9, pp. 855–900.]Search in Google Scholar
[BROWNLIE, Ian. “International Law and the Use of Force by States” Revisited. Europaeum, 2001. 37 p.10.1163/26660229-021-01-900000003]Search in Google Scholar
[CANNIZZARO, Enzo. Customary International Law on the Use of Force: Inductive Approach v. Value Oriented Approach. In: CANNIZZARO, Enzo, PALCHETTI, Paolo. Customary International Law on the Use of Force: Methodological Approach. Brill: Leiden, 2005, pp. 245–268.]Search in Google Scholar
[CASSESE, Antonio. A Follow – Up: A Forcible Humanitarian Countermeasures and Opinio Necessitatis. European Journal of International Law. 1999, vol. 10, issue 4, pp. 791–799.]Search in Google Scholar
[CORTEN, Olivier. The controversies over customary prohibition of the use of force: a methodological debate. European Journal of International Law. 2006, vol. 16, issue 5, pp. 803–822.]Search in Google Scholar
[DE HOOGH, André. Jus Cogens and the Use of Armed Force. In: WELLER, Marc (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law. Oxford: OUP, 2015, pp. 1161–1186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Declaration on Inadmissibility of Intervention in the Domestic Affairs of States and Protection of Their Independence and Sovereignty. G. A. Res. 2131, U. N. Doc. A/6014 (1965).]Search in Google Scholar
[Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. G. A. Res. 2625, U. N. Doc. A/8028 (1970).]Search in Google Scholar
[DÖRR, Oliver, SCHMALENBACH, Kirsten. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. A Commentary. Springer, 2012. 1412 p.10.1007/978-3-642-19291-3]Search in Google Scholar
[DUNKELBERG, Alonso et al. Mapping States’ Reactions to the Syria Strikes of April 2018 – A Comprehensive Guide. Just Security [online]. First version of 2018-05-07. Available at: https://www.justsecurity.org/55835/mapping-states-reactions-syria-strikes-april-2018-a-comprehensive-guide/]Search in Google Scholar
[FAIX, Martin, SVAČEK, Ondřej. International Law on the Use of Force: Need for Methodological Debate. The Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law. 2018, vol. 9, pp. 95–110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Following Air Strikes against Suspected Chemical Weapons Sites in Syria, Security Council Rejects Proposal to Condemn Aggression. United Nations [online]. 2018-05-14. Available at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2018/sc13296.doc.htm.]Search in Google Scholar
[FRANCK, Thomas. Interpretation and Change in the Law of Humanitarian Intervention. In: HOLZGREFE, J. L., KEOHANE, Robert (Eds.) Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas. Cambridge, CUP 2003, pp. 204–231.10.1017/CBO9780511494000.007]Search in Google Scholar
[General Principled Considerations on the Legal Basis for a Possible Military Operation in Syria [online]. Available at:]Search in Google Scholar
[GOWLLAND-DEBBAS, Vera. The Limits of Unilateral Enforcement of Community Objectives in the Framework of UN Peace Maintenance. European Journal of International Law. 2000, vol. 11, issue 2, pp. 361–383.]Search in Google Scholar
[HEIECK, John. A Duty to Prevent Genocide. Due Diligence Obligations among the P5. Edward Elgar, 2018. 264 p.10.4337/9781788117715]Search in Google Scholar
[ICJ, Asylum (Columbia v. Peru), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1950.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICJ, Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1971.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICJ, Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICJ, Legality of Use of Force (Serbia and Montenegro v Belgium), Oral Proceedings, Public Sitting (12 May 1999).]Search in Google Scholar
[ICJ, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). Merits, Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1986 (including Separate opinion of Judge Singh).]Search in Google Scholar
[ICJ, South West Africa, Second Phase, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1966.]Search in Google Scholar
[ILA, Final Report on Aggression and the Use of Force, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[ILC, Identification of Customary International Law, ILC Report, A/71/10, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[ILC, Subsequent agreements and subsequent practice in relation to the interpretation of treaties, ILC Report, A/71/10, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[KLECZKOWSKA, Agata. Changing Customary Law. The Shape of the Prohibition of the Use of Force after the 2017 and 2018 Airstrikes in Syria. International Community Law Review. 2019, vol. 21, pp. 369–389.]Search in Google Scholar
[KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. Methodology of International Law [online]. In: The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Available at: www.opil.ouplaw.com]Search in Google Scholar
[LINDERFALK, Ulf. The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think About the Consequences? European Journal of International Law. 2008, vol. 18, issue 5, pp. 853–871.]Search in Google Scholar
[MIK, Cezary. Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law. Polish Yearbook of International Law. 2013, vol. 33, pp. 27–93.]Search in Google Scholar
[MOMANI, Bessma, HAKAK, Tanzeel. Syria. In: BELLAMY, Alex, DUNNE, Tim. The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford: OUP, 2016, pp. 895–910.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’CONNELL, Mary Ellen. Taking Opinio Juris Seriously, A Classical Approach To International Law on the Use of Force. In: CANNIZZARO, Enzo, PALCHETTI, Paolo. Customary International Law on the Use of Force: Methodological Approach. Brill: Leiden, 2005, pp. 9–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[ORAKHELASHVILI, Alexander. Changing Jus Cogens Through State Practice? In: WELLER, Marc (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Use of Force in International Law. Oxford: OUP, 2015, pp. 157–175.]Search in Google Scholar
[Policy Paper, Chemical Weapon Use By Syrian Regime: UK Government Legal Position [online], 29 August 2013. Available at:]Search in Google Scholar
[Policy Paper, Syria Action – UK Government Legal Position [online] 14 April 2018. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/syria-action-uk-government-legal-position/syria-action-uk-government-legal-position]Search in Google Scholar
[Report of the International Commission on State Sovereignty and Intervention: The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[RODLEY, Nigel. R2P and Internatinoal Law. A Paradigm Shift? In: BELLAMY, Alex, DUNNE, Tim. The Oxford Handbook of the Responsibility to Protect. Oxford: OUP, 2016, pp. 186–207.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHARF, Michael. Striking a Grotian Moment: How the Syria Airstrikes Changed International Law Relating to Humanitarian Intervention Chicago Journal of International Law. 2018, vol. 19, issue 2, pp. 1–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[SIMMA, Bruno. NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects. European Journal of International Law. 1999, vol. 10, issue 1, pp. 1–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[STAHN, Carsten. Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm? American Journal of International Law. 2007, vol. 101, issue 1, pp. 99–120.]Search in Google Scholar
[STARSKI, Paulina. Silence within the process of normative change and evolution of the prohibition on the use of force: normative volatility and legislative responsibility. Journal on the Use of Force and International Law. 2017, vol. 4, issue 1, pp. 14–65.]Search in Google Scholar
[Statement by President Trump on Syria. White House [online]. 2018-09-13. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/statement-president-trump-syria/]Search in Google Scholar
[SVAČEK, Ondřej. Dárfúr – přes humanitární intervenci k odpovědnosti chránit a mírovým operacím. [Darfur – From Humanitarian Intervention to Responsibility to Protect and Peace Operations]. Právo. 2008, vol. 1, issue 3, pp. 5–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[VÁLEK, Petr. Is Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention Compatible with the UN Charter? Michigan Journal of International Law. 2005, vol. 26, issue 4, pp. 1223–1255.]Search in Google Scholar
[VENTURA, Manuel. The Prevention of Genocide as a Jus Cogens Norm? A Formula for Lawful Humanitarian Intervention. In: JALLOH, Charles, OLUFEMI, Elias (eds.) Shielding Humanity: Essays in International Law in Honour of Judge Abdul G. Koroma. Boston/Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2015, pp. 289–351.]Search in Google Scholar
