Revisiting the Notion of ‘Intensity’ Inherent in Common Article 3: An Examination of the Minimum Threshold Which Satisfies the Notion of ‘Intensity’ and a Discussion of the Possibility of Applying a Method of Cumulative Assessment

AKANDE, D. ‘Classification of Armed Conflicts: Relevant Legal Concepts’. In WILMSHURST, E (ed). International Law and the Classification of Conflicts. Oxford University Press, 201210.2139/ssrn.2132573Search in Google Scholar

AMBOS, K. ‘Chapter III: War Crimes’. In AMBOS, K. Treatise on International Criminal Law; Volume II; The Crimes and Sentencing. Oxford University Press, 201410.1093/law/9780199657926.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

BELLAL, Annyssa. ‘ICRC Commentary of Common Article 3: Some Questions Relating to Organized Armed Groups and the Applicability of IHL’ [online] Available at: <http://www.ejiltalk.org/icrc-commentary-og-common-article-3-some-questionsrelating-to-organized-armed-groups-and-the-applicability-of-ihl> Accessed 5 October 2017Search in Google Scholar

BELLAL, Annyssa (ed). The War Report 2014. Oxford University Press, 2015Search in Google Scholar

BRADLEY, Martha M. ‘An Analysis of the Notion “Organised Armed Group” and the Notion of “Intensity” in the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict’, 20 November 2017 (on file with the author)Search in Google Scholar

BRANFORD, William (ed). The South African Pocket Oxford Dictionary, 7th edn, Cape Town University Press, 1987Search in Google Scholar

CARSWELL, Andrew J. (ed). Handbook on International Rules Governing Military Operations, (2013) para 2.5 68-70 [online] Available at: <https://www.icrc.org/sites/default/files/topic/file_plus_list/043-handbook_on_international_rules_governing_military_operations.pdf> Accessed 14 October 2017Search in Google Scholar

CULLEN, Anthony. ‘Article 3 Common to the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the Threshold of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law’. In CULLEN, Anthony. The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law. Cambridge University Press, 201010.1017/CBO9780511712111Search in Google Scholar

CULLEN, A. ‘Key Developments Affecting the Scope of Internal Armed Conflict in International Humanitarian Law’. Mil L R, 2005, vol. 183, pp. 117 - 15810.1017/CBO9780511712111.005Search in Google Scholar

DINSTEIN, Y. Non-International Armed Conflicts in International Law. Cambridge University Press, 201410.1017/CBO9781107279391Search in Google Scholar

DÖRMANN, K, LIJNZAAD, L, SASSÒLI M, SPOERRI, P. (editorial committee) and International Committee of the Red Cross, ‘Commentary on the First Geneva Convention: Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in the Armed Forces in the Field’. Cambridge University Press, International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), 201610.1017/9781316755709Search in Google Scholar

DRAPER, G.I.A.D. ‘Humanitarian Law and Internal Conflicts’. Ga J Intl & Comp L, 1983, pp. 253 - 278 Executive Power Military Decree No 15 of 22 April 2016, 4-5 [online] Available at: <https://www.mindefensa.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/Mindefensa/Documentos/descargas/Prensa/Documentos/dir_15_2016.pdf> Accessed 2 August 2017. Search in Google Scholar

FARER, Tom. ‘Humanitarian Law and Armed Conflicts: Toward the Definition of International Armed Conflict’. Colum L Rev, 1971, vol. 71, pp. 37 - 7210.2307/1121272Search in Google Scholar

FLECK, Dieter. ‘The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict’. In FLECK, Dieter (ed). The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law. 3rd edn, Oxford University Press, 201310.1093/law/9780199658800.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

FOWLER, HW. A Dictionary of Modern English Usage. Oxford University Press, 1983,Search in Google Scholar

GARRAWAY, C. ‘Military Manuals, Operational Law and the Regulatory Framework of the Armed Forces’. In HAYASHI, N (ed). National Military Manuals on the Law of Armed Conflict FICHL Publication Series No 2 (2nd edn 2010)Search in Google Scholar

GEISS, Robin. ‘Armed Violence in Fragile States: Low-Intensity Conflicts, Spill-Over Conflicts, and Sporadic Law Enforcement Operations by Third Parties’. International Review of the Red Cross, 2009, vol. 91, no. 873, p. 127 - 142 Geneva Academy, The War Report: Armed Conflicts in 2016 [online] Available at: https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/The%20War%20Report%202016.pdf> Accessed 24 October 201710.1017/S1816383109990208Search in Google Scholar

Geneva Convention I for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950) 75 UNTS 31 (First Geneva Convention)Search in Google Scholar

Geneva Convention II for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950) 75 UNTS 85 (Second Geneva Convention)Search in Google Scholar

Geneva Convention III Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950) 75 UNTS 135 (Third Geneva Convention)Search in Google Scholar

Geneva Convention IV Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War (adopted 12 August 1949, entered into force 21 October 1950) 75 UNTS 287 (Fourth Geneva Convention)Search in Google Scholar

GILL, Terry D. ‘Classifying Conflict in Syria’. Int’l L Stud, 2016, vol. 92, pp. 353-380Search in Google Scholar

GRAY, Christine. ‘The Meaning of Armed Conflict: Non-International Armed Conflict’. In O’CONNELL, Mary Ellen (ed). What is War: An Investigation in the Wake of 9/11 (Vol 37 International Humanitarian Law Series, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2012)Search in Google Scholar

HAQUE, AA. ‘The United States is at War with Syria (according to the ICRC’s New Geneva Convention Commentary)’ [online] Available at: <http://www.ejiltalk.org/theunited-states-is-at-war-with-syria-accoriding-to-the-icrc-new-geneva-conventioncommentary/> Accessed 14 June 2016Search in Google Scholar

ICRC, ‘How is the Term “Armed Conflict” Defined in International Humanitarian Law’ Opinion Paper, March 2008Search in Google Scholar

International Law Association ‘The Hague Conference (2010): Use of Force: Final Report on the Meaning of Armed Conflict in International Law’. In O’CONNELL, Mary Ellen (ed). What is War: An Investigation in the Wake of 9/11 (Vol 37 International Humanitarian Law Series, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2012)Search in Google Scholar

Juan Carlos Abella v Argentina, Report No 55/97, Case 11.137, Inter-Am CHR 271, OEA ser.L/V/11.98, Doc 6 rev (1998)Search in Google Scholar

KRESS, Claus, MÉGRET, Frédéric. ‘The Regulation of Non-International Armed Conflict: Can a Privilege of Belligerency be Envisioned in the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict’. International Review of the Red Cross, 2014, vol. 96, pp. 29 - 6610.1017/S1816383115000181Search in Google Scholar

KÜFFNER DOOR, Stefanie. ‘The Threshold of Non-International Armed Conflict - The Tadic Formula and its First Criterion Intensity’. Militair Rechtelijk Tijdschrift, 2009, vol. 102, pp. 301-311Search in Google Scholar

LE BOUTHILLIER, Y. ‘Article 32: Convention of 1969’. In CORTEN, O, KLEIN, P (eds). The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary: Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States), Merits (Judgment), 27 June 1986 [1986] ICJ Rep 14, 103Search in Google Scholar

MOIR, Lindsey. ‘The Concept of Non-International Armed Conflict’. In CLAPHAM, Andrew, GAETA, Paola, SASSOLI, Marco (eds). The 1949 Geneva Conventions: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2015Search in Google Scholar

MOIR, Lindsay. The Law of Internal Armed Conflict. Cambridge University Press, 200210.1017/CBO9780511495168Search in Google Scholar

Official Records of the Diplomatic Conference on the Reaffirmation and Development of International Humanitarian Law Applicable in Armed Conflicts, Geneva (1974- 1977), Vol VII, Federal Political Department, Bern, 1978; Final Record of the Diplomatic Conference of Geneva of 1949, Vol II, Section B (Federal Political Department Berne) 42-3 [online] Available at: <https://www.loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/RC-Fin-Rec_Dipl-Conf-1949.html> Accessed 26 August 2017Search in Google Scholar

PICTET, Jean S. The Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949: Commentary Published Under the General Editorship of Jean S Pictet, Director for General Affairs of the International Committee of the Red Cross (translated from the original French): I Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (International Committee of the Red Cross 1952)Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Alfred Musema Case No ICTR-96-13-A Judgment and Sentence Trial Chamber I 27 January 2000Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Boskoski and Tarculovski Case No IT-04-82-T Trial Chamber 10 July 2008Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Dusko Tadic aka ‘Dule’, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction Case No IT-94-1-A, A.Ch Appeals Chamber 19 July 1998Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Dusko Tadic a/k/a ‘Dule’ IT-94-1-T (Opinion and (Judgment)) Trial Chamber I 7 May 1997 The Prosecutor v Enver Hadzihasanovic Amir Kubara Case No IT-01-47-T Trial Chamber 15 March 2006Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Fatmir Limaj, Haradin Bala, Isak Musliu (Judgment) Case No IT-03-66-T Trial Chamber II 30 November 2005Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Georges Anderson Nderubumwe Rutanganda Case No ICTR-96-3-T judgment and sentence Trial Chamber I 26 May 2006Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Jean-Paul Akayesu Case No ICTR 96-4-T Judgment Chamber I 2 September 1998Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Kordic and Cerkez Case No IT-95-14/2-A Judgment Appeals Chamber 17 December 2004Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Matric Case No IT-95-1+R61 Trial Chamber, Judgment 8 March 1996Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Milosevic Case No IT-02-54-T Trial Chamber decision on motion for judgment of acquittal 16 June 2004Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Ramush Haradinaj Idriz Balaj Lahi Brahimaj Case No IT-04-84-T Trial Chamber 3 April 2008Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Sefer Halilovic Case No IT 01-48-T Trial Chamber Judgment 16 November 2005Search in Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Zejnil Delalic Zdravko Mucic, also known as ‘Pavo’, Hazim Delic Esad Landzo also known as ‘Zenga’ Case No IT-96-21-T Judgment Trial Chamber 16 November 1998Search in Google Scholar

RADIN, S. ‘Global Armed Conflict? The Threshold of Extraterritorial Non-International Armed Conflicts’. International Law Studies, 2013, vol. 89, p. 696-743Search in Google Scholar

SCHINDLER, Dietrich. ‘The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to The Geneva Conventions and Protocols’ (1979) 163 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International LawSearch in Google Scholar

SIVAKUMARAN, Sandesh. ‘The Influence of Teachings of Publicists on the Development of International Law’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2017, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 1-3210.1017/S0020589316000531Search in Google Scholar

SIVAKUMARAN, S. The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict. Oxford University Press, 2014Search in Google Scholar

SOREL, JM, BORE EVENO, V. ‘Article 31: Convention of 1969’. In CORTEN, O, KLEIN, P (eds). The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary: Volume I. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011Search in Google Scholar

The MOX Plant case (Ireland v The United Kingdom), Provisional Measures, Case No 10 ITLOS, 3 December 2001Search in Google Scholar

The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Judgment pursuant to art 74 of the judgment Case No ICC-01/04-01/00 Trial Chamber 14 March 2012Search in Google Scholar

THOMPSON, Della (ed). The Concise Oxford Dictionary, 9th edn, Clarendon Press, 1995Search in Google Scholar

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (adopted 23 May 1969, entered into force 27 January 1980) 1155 UNTS 331 (Vienna Convention)Search in Google Scholar

VITE, S. ‘Typology of Armed Conflicts in International Humanitarian Law: Legal Concepts and Actual Situations’. International Review of the Red Cross, 2000, vol. 91, p. 69-9410.1017/S181638310999021XSearch in Google Scholar