[
Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 1 billion words, 1990–present. Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aull, Laura L. and David West Brown. 2013. Fighting words: A corpus analysis of gender representations in sports reportage. Corpora 8 (1): 27–52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bäcklund, Ingegerd. 2006. Modifiers describing women and men in nineteenth-century English. In M. Kytö, M. Rydén and E. Smitterberg (eds.). Nineteenth-century English: Stability and change, 17–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, Paul. 2010. Will Ms ever be as frequent as Mr? A corpus-based comparison of gendered terms across diachronic corpora of British English. Gender and Language 4 (1): 125–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, Paul. 2015. Two hundred years of the American man. In T. M. Milani (ed.). Language and masculinities: Performances, intersections, dislocations, 34–52. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 2019. Register, genre, and style. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bolzendahl, Catherine I. and Daniel J. Myers. 2004. Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces 83 (2): 759–790.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2013. Language and gender. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garretson, Gregory and Henrik Kaatari. 2014. The computer as research assistant: A new approach to variable patterns in corpus data. In L. Vandelanotte, K. Davidse, C. Gentens and D. Kimps (eds.). Recent advances in corpus linguistics: Developing and exploiting corpora, 55–79. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hene, Birgitta. 1984. Den dyrkade Lasse och stackars lilla Lotta. En syntaktisk-semantisk studie av personbeskrivande adjektiv och adverb i populära ungdomsböcker (The adored Lasse and poor little Lotta. A syntactic-semantic study of adjectives and adverbs describing characters in popular youth literature). Umeå: Acta Universitatis Umensis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmes, Janet. 2001. A corpus-based view of gender in New Zealand English. In M. Hellinger and H. Bußmann (eds.). Gender across languages. Vol. 1, 115–136. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hosmer, David W. and Stanley Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The jamovi project. 2021. jamovi (Version 2.2) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kathon, Md Nazmus Saqueb. In preparation. #MeToo: Impact of the movement on the evaluation of males and females in American English.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Konnelly, Lex. 2020. “The woman in the background”: Gendered nouns in CNN and FOX media discourse. Journal of English linguistics 48 (3): 233–257.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lange, Claudia. 2012. Text types, language change, and historical corpus linguistics. In C. Lange, B. Weber and G. Wolf (eds.). Communicative spaces: Variation, contact, and change. Papers in honour of Ursula Schaefer, 401–416. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Kristen Schultz, Paula A. Tufiş and Duane F. Alwin. 2018. The cultural divide and changing beliefs about gender in the United States, 1974–2010. Sex Roles 79 (7–8): 393–408.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R: Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lilja, Sara. 2007. Gender-related terms in English depositions, examinations and journals, 1670–1720. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macalister, John. 2011. Flower-girl and bugler-boy no more: Changing gender representation in writing for children. Corpora 6 (1): 25–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, J. R. and Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Merriam-Webster dictionary. 2022. Merriam-Webster. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com (last accessed on 22 December 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newman, Matthew L., Carla J. Groom, Lori D. Handelman and James W. Pennebaker. 2008. Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. Discourse Processes 45 (3): 211–236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norberg, Cathrine. 2002. Whores and cuckolds: On male and female terms in Shakespeare’s comedies. Unpublished PhD thesis, Luleå University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norberg, Cathrine. 2016. Naughty boys and sexy girls: The representation of young individuals in a web-based corpus of English. Journal of English Linguistics 44 (4): 291–317.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OED. 2022. Oxford English dictionary online. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.oed.com (last accessed on 6th August 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pauwels, Anne. 2001. Spreading the feminist word: The case of the new courtesy title Ms in Australian English. In M. Hellinger and H. Bußmann (eds.). Gender across languages. Vol. 1, 137–152. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pauwels, Anne. 2003. Linguistic sexism and feminist linguistic activism. In J. Holmes and M. Meyerhoff (eds.). The handbook of language and gender. Vol. 13, 550–570. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearce, Michael. 2008. Investigating the collocational behaviour of man and woman in the BNC using Sketch Engine. Corpora 3 (1): 1–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Persson, Gunnar. 1990. Meanings, models and metaphors: A study in lexical semantics in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rayson, Paul, Geoffrey Leech and Mary Hodges. 1997. Social differentiation in the use of English vocabulary: Some analyses of the conversational component of the British National Corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 2 (1): 133–152.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romaine, Suzanne. 1999. Communicating gender. Mahwah, New Jersey and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Romaine, Suzanne. 2001. A corpus-based view of gender in British and American English. In M. Hellinger and H. Bußmann (eds.). Gender across languages. Vol. 1, 153–175. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2003. Do men and women really live in different cultures? Evidence from the BNC. In A. Wilson, P. Rayson and T. McEnery (eds.). Corpus linguistics by the Lune: A festschrift for Geoffrey Leech, 185–221. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2010. Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In D. Glynn and K. Fischer (eds.). Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics: Corpus-driven approaches, 101–133. Berlin: De Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sigley, Robert and Janet Holmes. 2002. Looking at girls in corpora of English. Journal of English Linguistics 30 (2): 138–157.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sveen, Hanna. 2005. “Honourable” or “highly-sexed”: Adjectival descriptions of male and female characters in Victorian and contemporary children’s fiction. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sveen, Hanna. 2010. Good-natured fellows and poor mothers: Defining social roles in British nineteenth-century children’s literature. In P. Pahta, M. Nevala, A. Nurmi and M. Palander-Collin (eds.). Social roles and language practices in Late Modern English, 211–227. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tannen, Deborah. 1990. You just don’t understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow & Co.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallin-Ashcroft, Anna-Lena. 2000. Great men and charming creatures: On male and female terms in eighteenth century novels. Unpublished PhD thesis, Umeå University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Winter, Bodo. 2020. Statistics for linguists: An introduction using R. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
