Performance effects of privatisation: an empirical analysis of telecommunication companies in Germany and Romania

[1] Ancom. (2018). Piaţa serviciilor de comunicaţii electronice din România-Raport de date statistice -. Retrieved from https://statistica.ancom.org.ro:8000/sscpds/public/files/151_enSearch in Google Scholar

[2] Brown, J. D., Earle, J. S., & Telegdy, Á. (2010). Employment and wage effects of privatisation: evidence from Hungary, Romania, Russia and Ukraine. The Economic Journal, 120(545), pp. 683-708.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02300.xSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Cavaliere, A., & Scabrosetti, S. (2008). Privatization and efficiency: from principals and agents to political economy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(4), pp. 685-710.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00546.xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Clifton, J., Comín, F., & Díaz Fuentes, D. (2003). Privatisation in the European Union – Public Enterprises and Integration, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-1-4757-3733-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] Cuervo, A., & Villalonga, B. (2000). Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatization. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), pp. 581-590.10.2307/259311Search in Google Scholar

[6] Deutsche Telekom. (2018). Geschäftsbericht. Retrieved from https://www.telekom.com/de/investor-relations/service/downloadsSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), pp. 650-669.10.2307/259316Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dicken, P. (2011). Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. New York: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Distaso, W., Lupi, P., & Manenti, F. M. (2010). Static and Dynamic Efficiency in the European Telecommunications Market: The Role of Regulation on the Incentives to Invest and the Ladder of Investment. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Networking and Telecommunications: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 258-272). Hershey: IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

[10] European Commission. (2018). Eurostat Database. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/databaseSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Federal Statistical Office of Germany. (2018). Verbraucherpreisindizes. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesamtwirtschaftUmwelt/Preise/Verbraucherpreisindizes/Verbraucherpreisindizes.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Florio, M. (2003). Does Privatisation Matter? The long-term performance of British Telecom over 40 years. Fiscal Studies, 24 (2), pp. 197-234.10.1111/j.1475-5890.2003.tb00083.xSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Jackson, P. M., & Price, C. (1994). Privatisation and regulation: a review of the issues. In Jackson, P. M. and Price, C. M. (Eds.), Privatisation and regulation: A review of the issues, pp. 1-34, Harlow: Longman Group.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy: text & cases. Harlow: Pearson Education.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Megginson, W. L., & Netter, J. M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of economic literature, 39 (2), pp. 321-389.10.1257/jel.39.2.321Search in Google Scholar

[16] Nae, M. M., & Turnock, D. (2009). Romania’s revolution in telecommunications and information technology: a geographical approach. Human Geographies - Journal of Studies and Research in Human Geography, 3 (2), pp. 49-78.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Nestor, S. (2005). Falling Between the Cracks: privatisation and corporate governance in the European telecom industry. Corporate Governance, 13 (2), pp. 137-155.10.1111/j.1467-8683.2005.00413.xSearch in Google Scholar

[18] Newman, K. L. (2000). Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Academy of Management Review, 25 (3), pp. 602-619.10.5465/amr.2000.3363525Search in Google Scholar

[19] Parker, D. (1994). Nationalisation, privatisation, and agency status within government: testing for the importance of ownership. In Jackson, P. M. and Price, C. M. (Eds.), Privatisation and regulation: A review of the issues, pp. 149-169, Harlow: Longman Group.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Privatization Barometer. (2017). The PB Report 2015/2016. Retrieved from http://www.privatizationbarometer.com/PUB/NL/5/9/PB_AR2015-2016.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Romtelecom. (1999-2009). Annual Report. Bucharest.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Telekom Deutschland. (2018). Call Start. Retrieved from https://www.telekom.de/zuhause/tarife-und-optionen/telefonieren/call-startSearch in Google Scholar

[23] Telekom Romania. (2017). Consolidated financial statements. Retrieved from https://www.cosmote.gr/fixed/en/corporate/ir/financial-statements-of-ote-group-companiesSearch in Google Scholar

[24] van Dijk, M., & Mulder, M. (2005). Regulation of telecommunication and deployment of broadband (No. 131). CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Vickers, J., & Yarrow, G. (1988). Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., Gutierrez I., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). Privatization and Entrepreneurial Transformation: Emerging issues and a future research agenda. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), pp. 509-524.10.2307/259307Search in Google Scholar