[
Abasilim, U. D., Gberevbie, D. E., & Osibanjo, O. A. (2019). Leadership Styles and Employees’ Commitment: Empirical Evidence From Nigeria. SAGE Open, 9(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019866287
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahmed Iqbal Z, Abid G, Arshad M, Ashfaq F, Athar MA, Hassan Q. (2021). Impact of Authoritative and Laissez-Faire Leadership on Thriving at Work: The Moderating Role of Conscientiousness. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ, 11(3), 667-685. doi:doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030048
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahmed Iqbal Z, Abid G, Arshad M, Ashfaq F, Athar MA, Hassan Q. (2021, Jul 5). Impact of Authoritative and Laissez-Faire Leadership on Thriving at Work: The Moderating Role of Conscientiousness. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ, 11(3), 667-685. doi:doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11030048. PMID: 34563061; PMCID: PMC8314350
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alonderiene, R. and Majauskaite, M. (2016). Leadership style and job satisfaction in higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 140-164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0106
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Annebel H.B. De Hoogh, Lindred L. Greer, Deanne N. Den Hartog. (2015). Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? an investigation of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 687-701. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.01.001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aspers P, C. U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qual Sociol, 42(2), 139-160. doi:10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aydin, A., Sarier, Y. and Uysal, S. (2013). The effect of school principals’ leadership styles on teachers’ organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(2), 806-811.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. Collier Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bateh, J. (2016). Exploring leadership styles and faculty satisfaction in higher education. Virginia Beach: Virginia: DBC Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carter, D. and Baghurst . (2014). The influence of servant leadership on restaurant employee engagement. Journal of Business Ethics,, 124(3), 453-464. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1882-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaudhry A., Javed H. (2012). Impact of Transactional and Laissez Faire Leadership Style on Motivation. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci, 3(259).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiang, J. T.-J., Chen, X.-P., Liu, H., Akutsu, S., & Wang, Z. (2021). We have emotions but can’t show them! Authoritarian leadership, emotion suppression climate, and team performance. Human Relations, 74(7), 1082–1111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720908649
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chughtai, A. (2016). Servant leadership and follower outcomes: Mediating effects of organizational identification and psychological safet. The Journal of Psychology, 7, 866-880.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dai, Y. D., Chen, Y., & Kuan, W. (2013). Transformational vs transactional leadership: Which is better? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(5), 760–778. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-Dec-2011-0223
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eagly A.H., J.-S. M. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychol. Bull, 129, 569–591. doi:doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D. and Liden, R.C. (2019). Servant leadership: a systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111-132.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farh J. L., C. B. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context eds Li J. T., Tsui A. S., Weldon E. . London: Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gagné, M and Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination Theory and Work Motivation. J. Organiz. Behav., 26, 331–362. doi:doi:10.1002/job.322
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilbert, S., and Kelloway, E. K. (2018). Self-determined Leader Motivation and Follower Perceptions of Leadership. Leadersh. Organ. Development J, 39(5), 609–619. doi:doi:10.1108/lodj-09-2017-0262
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, L. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psycho. Assess., 4(26). doi:doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26., 4:26
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenleaf, R. (1998). The Power of Servant-Leadership: Essays. (L. Spears, Ed.) San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenleaf, R. (2002). Servant leadership: a journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. In Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness, 25th anniversary ed. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Habtamu Kebu Gemeda and Jaesik Lee. (2020). Leadership styles, work engagement and outcomes among information and. Heliyon. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03699
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Howard J. Shatz, Louay Constant, Francisco Perez-Arce, Eric Robinson, Robin Beckman, Haijing Huang, Peter Glick, Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar. (2015). Improving the Mongolian Labor Market and Enhancing Opportunities for Youth. Santa Monica: CA: RAND Corporation, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1092.html. Also available in print form.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyseni Duraku Z and Hoxha L. (2021). Impact of Transformational and Transactional Attributes of School Principal Leadership on Teachers’ Motivation for Work. Front. Educ, 6:659919. doi:doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.659919
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Irfan Ullah Khan, Muhammad Idris & Rohul Ul Amin. (2021). Leadership style and performance in higher education: the role of organizational justice. International Journal of Leadership in Education. doi:10.1080/13603124.2020.1854868
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeremy R. L. Howells, Mine Karataş-Özkan, Çağla Yavuz, Muhammad Atiq. (2014, July). University management and organisational change: a dynamic institutional perspective. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 7(2), 251–270,. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jing Z., Jianshi G., Jinlian L., Yao T. (2017). A case study of the promoting strategies for innovation contest within a company. Sci. Res. Manage., 38, 57–65. doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2017.11.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Judge, T. A and Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational & transactional leadership: A met analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kahai S. S., Sosik J. J., Avolio B. J. (1997). Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system environment. Pers. Psychol, 50, 121–146. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00903.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leithwood, K., and Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational School Leadership for Large-Scale Reform: Effects on Students, Teachers, and Their Classroom Practices. Sch. Effectiveness Sch. Improvement, 17(2), 201–227. doi:doi:10.1080/09243450600565829
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li G., Liu H., Luo Y. (2018). Directive versus participative leadership: dispositional antecedents and team consequences. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol, 91, 645–664. doi:10.1111/joop.12213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linuesa-Langreo, J., Ruiz-Palomino, P. and Elche-Hortelano, D. (2017). New strategies in the new millennium: servant leadership as enhancer of service climate and customer service performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 766.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
M.Altansukh, Ts.Zaykhuu, I.Enkhbaatar, G.Myagmardulam, D.Altangerel, N.Jargalsaikhan, B.Erdenetuya, S.Khurel-Erdene. (2018). Barometer Survey on Labour Market Demand . Ulaanbaatar: Research Sector of Employment Policy, Research Institute of Labor and Social Protection.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (1996). Leadership roles and management functions in nursin. Philadelphia: PA: Lippincott.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marquis, B. L., & Huston, C. J. (1996). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, E., Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Ramsden, P. (2003). Variation in the experience of. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 247–259. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070309297
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Menon, S. and Suresh, M. (2021). Factors influencing organizational agility in higher education. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 307-332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohammed Aboramadan, Khalid Dahleez, Mohammed H. Hamad. (2021). Servant leadership and academics outcomes in higher education: the role of job satisfaction. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 562-584.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Leary, P., Wharton, N., & Quinlan, T. (2009). Job satisfaction of physicians in Russia. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 22(3), 221-231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Odumeru, J. A and Ogbonna, I. (2013). Transformational vs. transactional leadership theories: Evidence in literature. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(2), 355-361. Retrieved from https://www.irmbrjournal.com/papers/1371451049.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pizzolitto, E., Verna, I. & Venditti, M. (2022). Authoritarian leadership styles and performance: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Management Review Quarterly. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00263-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rahmani M, Roels G, Karmarkar US. (2018). Team leadership and performance: combining the roles of direction and contribution. Management Science, 64(11), 5234–5249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2911.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schaubroeck JM, Shen Y, Chong S. (2017). A dual-stage moderated mediation model linking authoritarian leadership to follower outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 203–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000165
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shen Y, Chou WJ, Schaubroeck JM. (2019). The roles of relational identification and workgroup cultural values in linking authoritarian leadership to employee performance. European Journal of Work and Psychological Organizations, 28(4), 498-509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1615453
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simon Shurville & Tom Browne. (2007). Introduction: ICT-driven change in higher education: Learning from e-learning. Journal of Organisational Transformation & Social Change, 3:3, 245-250. doi:10.1386/jots.3.3.245_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stone, G. R. (2004). Transformational versus servant leadership: a difference in leader focus. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 25(4), 349-361.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tziner, A and Shkoler, O. (2018). Leadership styles and work attitudes: Does age moderate their relationship? Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(3), 195–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.5093/jwop2018a21
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1228-1261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., De Windt, N. and Alkema, J. (2014). Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 544-562.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walumbwa, F.O., Muchiri, M.K., Misati, E., Wu, C. and Meiliani, M. (2018). Inspired to perform: a multilevel investigation of antecedents and consequences of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 249-261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang Q, Hou H and Li Z. (2022). Participative Leadership: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research. Front. Psychol, 13:924357. doi:doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924357
]Search in Google Scholar
