Does Traditional Mean Good? A Pilot Study on University Students’ Perceptions of Different Types of Women and Men

Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2015). Detecting and experiencing prejudice: New answers to old questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 139-219.10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Beukeboom, C. J., & Burgers, C. (2019). How stereotypes are shared through language: A review and introduction of the Social Categories and Stereotypes Communication (SCSC) framework. Review of Communication Research, 7, 1-37.10.12840/issn.2255-4165.017Search in Google Scholar

Biernacka, E. (2013). The role of metonymy in political discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis. Milton Keynes: The Open University.Search in Google Scholar

Burgess, D., & Borgida, E. (1999). Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 665-692.10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1998). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(4), 679-696.Search in Google Scholar

Cook, R. J., Cusack, S., & Dickens, B. M. (2010). Unethical female stereotyping in reproductive health. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 109(3), 255-258.10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Curzan, A. (2003). Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486913Search in Google Scholar

Deignan, A. (2010). The cognitive view of metaphor: Conceptual metaphor theory. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities (pp. 44-56). London: Equinox.Search in Google Scholar

Díaz Pérez, J. C. (1997). Sobre la gramaticalización en el tratamiento nominal. Revista de Filología Románica, 14(1), 193-209.Search in Google Scholar

Diccionario de la lengua española de la Real Academia Española. Retrieved from http://dle.rae.es.Search in Google Scholar

Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(10), 1171-1188.10.1177/0146167200262001Search in Google Scholar

Dodds, P. S., Clark, E. M., Desu, S., Frank, M. R., Reagan, A. J., Williams, J. R., … Danforth, C. M. (2015). Human language reveals a universal positivity bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2389-2394.10.1073/pnas.1411678112Search in Google Scholar

Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of competence. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 1-35.10.1080/14792779543000002Search in Google Scholar

Eckes, T. (2010). Geschlechterstereotype: Von Rollen, Identitäten und Vorurteilen. In R. Becker & B. Kortendiek (Eds.), Handbuch Frauen- und Geschlechterforschung: Theorie, Methoden, Empirie (pp. 178-189). Wiesbaden: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275-298.10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011719Search in Google Scholar

Eringa, K., Caudron, L. N., Rieck, K., Xie, F., & Gerhardt, T. (2015). How relevant are Hofstede’s dimensions for inter-cultural studies? A replication of Hofstede’s research among current international business students. Research in Hospitality Management, 5(2), 187-198.10.1080/22243534.2015.11828344Search in Google Scholar

Farvid, P., Braun, V., & Rowney, C. (2017). ‘No girl wants to be called a slut!’: Women, heterosexual casual sex and the sexual double standard. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(5), 544-560.10.1080/09589236.2016.1150818Search in Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878-902.10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878Search in Google Scholar

Garaigordobil, M., & Aliri, J. (2013). Ambivalent sexism inventory: Standardization and normative data in a sample of the Basque Country. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 21(1), 173-186.Search in Google Scholar

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491-512.10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491Search in Google Scholar

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119-135.10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.xSearch in Google Scholar

Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., … López, W. L. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763-775.10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763Search in Google Scholar

Glick, P., Sakalli-Ugurlu, N., Ferreira, M. C., & Souza, M. A. de (2002). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward wife abuse in Turkey and Brazil. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 292-297.10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00068Search in Google Scholar

Green, R. J., Ashmore, R. D., & Manzi, R. Jr. (2005). The structure of gender type perception: Testing the elaboration, encapsulation, and evaluation framework. Social Cognition, 23(5), 429-464.10.1521/soco.2005.23.5.429Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2013). Values survey module 2013 manual. Retrieved from https://geerthofstede.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Manual-VSM-2013.pdf [Accessed 2020, December 15].Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, W. (1981). The etymology of the word faggot. Gay Books Bulletin, 6, 16-18.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, M. L. (2007). Hofstede - Culturally Questionable?, Oxford Business & Economics Conference, Oxford University, UK. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1389&context=commpapers [Accessed 2020, December 15].Search in Google Scholar

Kite, M. E., Deaux, K., & Haines, E. L. (2008). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & Michele A. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (pp. 205-236). Westport: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2000). Metaphor and emotion: Language, culture, and body in human feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z., & Radden, G. (1998). Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 37-78.10.1515/cogl.1998.9.1.37Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

LamaPoll. Retrieved from https://www.lamapoll.de/.Search in Google Scholar

López-Sáez, M., & Lisbona, A. (2009). Descriptive and prescriptive features of gender stereotyping: Relationships among its components. Revista De Psicología Social, 24(3), 363-379.10.1174/021347409789050560Search in Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The Great Chain of Being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (2001). Reconceptualizing the sexual double standard. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 13(2), 63-83.10.1300/J056v13n02_05Search in Google Scholar

Monto, M. A., & Supinski, J. (2014). Discomfort with homosexuality: A new measure captures differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 61(6), 899-916.10.1080/00918369.2014.870816Search in Google Scholar

Neuland, E. (2008). Jugendsprache: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Francke.Search in Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/.Search in Google Scholar

Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1-39.10.1080/10926480709336752Search in Google Scholar

Prentice, D. A., & Carranza, E. (2002). What women and men should be, shouldn’t be, are allowed to be, and don’t have to be: The contents of prescriptive gender stereotypes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 269-281.10.1111/1471-6402.t01-1-00066Search in Google Scholar

Pustka, E. (2015). Expressivität: Eine kognitive Theorie angewandt auf romanische Quantitätsausdrücke. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar

Ramos, M., Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Moya, M., & Ferreira, L. (2018). What hostile and benevolent sexism communicate about men’s and women’s warmth and competence. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 159-177.10.1177/1368430216656921Search in Google Scholar

Reiss, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Rodríguez González, F. (2002). El lenguaje de los jóvenes. Barcelona: Ariel.Search in Google Scholar

Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: The Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schope, R. D., & Eliason, M. J. (2004). Sissies and tomboys: Gender role behaviors and homophobia. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 16(2), 73-97.10.1300/J041v16n02_05Search in Google Scholar

Spence, J. T., & Buckner, C. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes: What do they signify? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44-62.10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb01021.xSearch in Google Scholar

Spencer, N. E. (2003). “America’s sweetheart” and “Czech-mate”: A discursive analysis of the Evert-Navratilova rivalry. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 27(1), 18-37.10.1177/0193732502239582Search in Google Scholar

Vonk, R., & Ashmore, R. D. (2003). Thinking about gender types: Cognitive organization of female and male types. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 257-280.10.1348/014466603322127247Search in Google Scholar

Vonk, R., & Olde-Monnikhof, M. (1998). Gender subgroups: Intergroup bias within the sexes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(1), 37-47.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199801/02)28:1<37::AID-EJSP844>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar

Williams, J., Satterwhite, R., & Best, D. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The five factor model. Sex Roles, 40(7), 513-525.10.1023/A:1018831928829Search in Google Scholar

Yu, N. (2008). Chapter 21: Metaphor from body and culture. In R. W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 247-261). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zaikman, Y., & Marks, M. (2014). Ambivalent sexism and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles, 71(9), 333-344.10.1007/s11199-014-0417-1Search in Google Scholar