[Beven, K.J., Kirkby, M.J. 1979. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. – Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 24(1), 43–69. DOI: 10.1080/02626667909491834.10.1080/02626667909491834]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Browning, D.M., Beaupre, S.J., Duncan, L. 2005. Using partitioned Mahalanobis D2(k) to formulate a GIS-based model of timber rattlesnake hibernacula. – The Journal of Wildlife Management, 69(1), 33–44.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cam, N.V., Lam, P.V., Dien, H.C., Huong, T.T., Hien, N.T. 1997. Biological control of giant sensitive plant Mimosa pigra L. in Vietnam. – Report of ACIAR Project number 9313. Hanoi, National Institute for Plant Protection, VN Biological Control Research Center. 16 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, J.D., Dunn, J.E., Smith, K.G. 1993. A multivariate model of female black bear habitat use for a geographic information system. – Journal of Wildlife Management, 57(3), 519–526.]Search in Google Scholar
[Da Nang People’s Committee. 2018. Location and natural conditions. Da Nang city, Vietnam. [WWW document]. – URL https://danang.gov.vn. [Accessed 25 December 2018].]Search in Google Scholar
[Elith, J., Phillips, S.J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y.E., Yates, C.J. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. – Diversity and Distribution, 17, 43–57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Engler, R., Guisan, A., Rechsteiner, L. 2004. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. – Journal of Applied Ecology, 41(2), 263–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. – Environmental Conservation, 24(1), 38–49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guisan, A., Edwards, T.C., Hastie, T. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. – Ecological Modelling, 157(2–3), 89–100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Higgins, S.I., Richardson, D.M., Cowling, R.M., Trinder-Smith, T.H. 1999. Predicting the landscape-scale distribution of alien plants and their threat to plant diversity. – Conservation Biology, 13, 303–313.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirzel, A.H., Hausser, J., Chessel, D., Perrin, N. 2002. Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitatsuitability maps without absence data. – Ecology, 83(7), 2027–2036.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huberty, C.J. 1994. Applied Discriminant Analysis. New York, Wiley. 466 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. – Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22(2), 415–427.]Search in Google Scholar
[ISSG & IUCN. 2017. Global invasive species database. Invasive Species Specialist Group and The International Union for Conservation of Nature. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/. [Accessed 10 September 2017].]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenness, J. 2009. Mahalanobis distances (mahalanobis.exe) extension for ArcGIS 9.x. Jenness Enterprises. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/mahalanobis.htm. [Accessed 17 January 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenness, J., Brost, B., Beier, P. 2013. Land facet corridor designer: extension for ArcGIS. Jenness Enterprises. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.jennessent.com/arcgis/land_facets.htm. [Accessed 17 January 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Kvamme, K.L. 1992. A predictive site location model on the High Plains: an example with an independent test. – Plains Anthropologist 37, 19–40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lam, P.V., Son, N.H., Tan, T.Q., Dung, N.V., Khanh, P.H. 2001. Surveillance, evaluation of damage and proposals for effective control of Mimosa pigra in Nam Cat Tien and Tram Chim National Park. – Annual report. Hanoi, The National Institute of Plant Protection. 19 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Le, B.T., Nguyen, T.L.T., Adkins, S. 2011. Damage caused by Merremia eberhardtii and Merremia boisiana to biodiversity of Da Nang city, Vietnam. – 23rd Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference, Australia, September 2011. The Sebel Cairns, 161–169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Le, T.S. 2018. A stratified GIS-based model to identify optimal locations for establishing new permanent sample plots for Eucalyptus bosistoana and Eucalyptus globoidea in New Zealand. – Master thesis. Christchurch (New Zealand), University of Canterbury. 90 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Legenre P., Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology. Amsterdam, Elsevier Science. 852 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liang, L., Clark, J.T., Kong, N., Rieske, L.K., Fei, S. 2014. Spatial analysis facilitates invasive species risk assessment. – Forest Ecology and Management, 315, 22–29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Livingston, S.A., Todd, C.S., Krohn, W.B., Owen, R.B. 1990. Habitat models for nesting bald eagles in Maine. – Journal of Wildlife Management, 54(4), 644–653.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lonsdale, W.M. 1992. The biology of Mimosa pigra. – Harley, K.L.S. (ed.). A Guide to the Management of Mimosa Pigra. Canberra, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, 8–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manel, S., Dias, J.M., Buckton, S.T., Ormerod, S.J. 1999. Alternative methods for predicting species distribution: an illustration with Himalayan river birds. – Journal of Applied Ecology, 36, 734–747.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCullagh, P., Nelder, J.A. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. London, Chapman and Hall. 532 pp.10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6]Search in Google Scholar
[MNRE & MARD. 2013. Circular no. 27/2013/TTLT-BTNMT-BNNPTNP. – The criteria for identifying invasive alien species and a list of invasive alien species. Hanoi, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. 6 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pallewatta, N., Reaser, J.K., Gutierrez, A.T. 2003. Invasive alien species in south-southeast Asia: National reports and directory of resources. Cape Town, Global Invasive Species Programme. 111 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peeters, E.T.H.M., Gardeniers, J.J.P. 1998. Logistic regression as a tool for defining habitat requirements of two common gammarids. – Freshwater Biology, 39(4), 605–615.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereira, J.M.C., Itami, R.M. 1991. GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression: a study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel. – Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57(11), 1475–1486.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peterson, A.T. 2001. Predicting species’ geographic distributions based on ecological niche modeling. – The Condor: Ornithological Applications, 103(3), 599–605.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pham, H.H. 1999. An Illustrated Flora of Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh, Tre Publishing House. 439 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P., Schapire, R.E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. – Ecological Modelling, 190(3–4), 231–259.]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, S.J., Dudík, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. – Ecography, 31(2), 161–175.]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 3 January 2019].]Search in Google Scholar
[Rotenberry, J.T., Preston, K.L., Knick, S.T. 2002. A minimalist approach to mapping species’ habitat: pearson’s planes of closest fit. – Scott, J.M., Heglund, P.J., Morrison, M.L., Haufler, J.B., Raphael, M.G., Wall, W.A., Samson, F.B. (eds.). Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale. Washington DC, Island Press, 281–289.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rotenberry, J.T., Preston, K.L., Knick, S.T. 2006. GIS-based niche modeling for mapping species’ habitat. – Ecology, 87(6), 1458–1464.]Search in Google Scholar
[Son, N.H., Lam, P.V., Cam, N.V., Thanh, D.V.T., Dung, N.V., Khanh, L.D., Forno, I.W. 2004. Preliminary studies on control of Mimosa pigra in Vietnam. – Julien, M., Flanagan, G., Heard, T., Hennecke, B., Paynter, Q., Wilson, C. (eds.). Research and Management of Mimosa pigra. Canberra, CSIRO Entomology, 110–116.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spitz, F., Lek, S. 1999. Environmental impact prediction using neural network modelling: an example in wildlife damage. – Journal of Applied Ecology, 36(2), 317–326.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tan, D.T., Thu, P.Q., Dell, B. 2012. Invasive plant species in the national parks of Vietnam. – Forests, 3, 997–1016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thai, V.Q. 2016. The status, solutions and policies on the management of invasive alien species. – Technical report. Da Nang, Department of Agriculture and Rural Development. 112 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thanh, D.V.T., Cam, N.V., Thuy, L.T.T., Van, N.T., Hoat, T.X., Nguyen, N.H. 1998. Primary results of study on usage of Phloeospora mimosae pigrae to control giant sensitive plant Mimosa pigra. – Annual report. Hanoi, The National Institute of Plant Protection. 7 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, L.M., van Manen, F.T., Schlarbaum, S.E., DePoy, M. 2006. A spatial modeling approach to identify potential butternut restoration sites in Mammoth Cave National Park. – Restoration Ecology, 14(2), 289–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thu, P.Q. 2003. Forest invasive species and their impacts on afforestation in Vietnam, the unwelcome guests. – The Asia-Pacific Forest Invasive Species Conference, China. Kunning, 17–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Triet, T., Kiet, L.C., Thi, N.T.L., Dan, P.Q. 2002. The invasion of Mimosa pigra in wetlands of the Mekong delta, Vietnam. – The 3rd International Symposium on the Management of Mimosa pigra, Australia. Canberra and Darwin, 45–51.]Search in Google Scholar
[Triet, T., Thi, N.T.L., Storrs, M.J., Kiet, L.C. 2001. The value of awareness and early intervention in the management of invasive alien species: a case-study on the eradication of Mimosa pigra at the Tram Chim National Park. – The Convention on Biological Diversity, Canada. Montreal, 37–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tsoar, A., Allouche, O., Steinitz, O., Rotem, D., Kadmon, R. 2007. A comparative evaluation of presence-only methods for modelling species distribution. – Diversity and Distribution, 13(4), 397–405.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tucker, C.J. 1979. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 8(2), 127–150.]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA Forest Service. 2003. A National Early Detection and Rapid Response System for Invasive Plants in the United States: Federal Interagency Committee for the Management of Noxious and Exotic Weeds. Washington DC, United States Department of Agriculture. 28 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Manen, F.T., Clark, J.D., Schlarbaum, S.E., Johnson, K., Taylor., G. 2002. A model to predict the occurrence of surviving butternut trees in the southern Blue Ridge Mountains. – Scott, J.M., P.J. Heglund, M.L. Morrison (eds.). Symposium on Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Scale and Accuracy. Covelo, Island Press, 491–497.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Manen, F.T., Young, J.A., Thatcher, C.A., Cass, W.B., Ulrey, C. 2005. Habitat models to assist plant protection efforts in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, USA. – Natural Areas Journal, 25(4), 339–350.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vietnam Government. 2014. Decision 1976/QD-TTg: Approving the planning for special-use forest system across the country to the year 2020, and a vision to 2030. Hanoi, Vietnam Government, 19–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walden, D., Finlayson, C.M., van Dam, R., Storrs, M. 1999. Information for a risk assessment and management of Mimosa pigra in Tram Chim National Park, Vietnam. – The EnviroTox’99 International Conference, Australia. Royal Australian Chemical Institute, 160–170.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zaniewski, A.E., Lehmann, A., Overton, J.McC. 2002. Predicting species spatial distributions using presence-only data: a case study of native New Zealand ferns. – Ecological Modelling, 157(2–3), 261–280.]Search in Google Scholar
