The changing trend in songbirds’ abundance, variety and physical condition in Connecticut’s forestry habitat

Askins, R.A. 1994. Open corridors in a heavily forested landscape: Impact on shrubland and forest-interior birds. – Wildlife Society Bulletin, 22(2), 339–347.Search in Google Scholar

Askins, R.A. 2002. Restoring North America’s Birds: Lessons from Landscape Ecology. New Haven, Yale University Press. 352 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Askins, R.A., Folsom-O’Keefe, C.M., Hardy, M.C. 2012. Effects of vegetation, corridor width and regional land use on early successional birds on powerline corridors. – PloS One, 7(2), e31520.10.1371/journal.pone.0031520Search in Google Scholar

Bulluck, L.P., Buehler, D.A. 2006. Avian use of early successional habitats: Are regenerating forests, utility right-of-ways and reclaimed surface mines the same? – Forest Ecology and Management, 236(1), 76–84.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.337Search in Google Scholar

Butler, B.J. 2016. Forests of Connecticut, 2015. – Resource Update FS-83. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 4 p.Search in Google Scholar

Butler, B.J., Barnett, C.J., Crocker, S.J., Domke, G.M., Gormanson, D., Hill, W.N., Kurtz, C.M., Lister, T., Martin, C., Miles, P.D., Morin, R., Moser, W.K., Nelson, M.D., O’Connell, B., Payton, B., Perry, C.H., Piva, R.J., Riemann, R., Woodall, C.W. 2011. The Forests of Southern New England, 2007: A report on the forest resources of Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 48p.10.2737/NRS-RB-55Search in Google Scholar

Clark, G.A. Jr. 1979. Body weights of birds: A review. – The Condor, 81, 193–202.10.2307/1367288Search in Google Scholar

Confer, J.L., Pascoe, S.M. 2003. Avian communities on utility rights-of-ways and other managed shrublands in the northeastern United States. – Forest Ecology and Management, 185(1–2), 193–205.10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00255-XSearch in Google Scholar

Covell, D. 2006. Introduction. – Oehler, J.D., Covell, D.F., Capel, S., Long, B. (eds.). Managing Grasslands, Shrublands, and Young Forest Habitats for Wildlife: A Guide for the Northeast. Westboro, MA, The Northeast Upland Technical Committee and Massachusetts Division of Wildlife and Fisheries, 1–6.Search in Google Scholar

DeSante, D.F., Burton, K.M., Velez, P., Froehlich, D., Kaschube, D.R. 2014. Instructions for the establishment and operation of constant-effort bird-banding stations as part of the monitoring avian productivity and survivorship (MAPS) program. – MAPS manual. Point Reyes Station, California, The Institute for Bird Populations. 43 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Dettmers, R. 2003. Status and conservation of shrubland birds in the northeastern US. – Forest Ecology and Management, 185(1–2), 81–93.10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00248-2Search in Google Scholar

Devine, B. 2012. Important Bird Area Conservation Plan: Naugatuck State Forest. – Conservation plan. Plymouth, CT, Audubon Connecticut. 160 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, M., Gow, E., Roth, R.R., Johnson, M.S., Underwood, T.J. 2011. Wood Thrush (Hylocichla mustelina). The Birds of North America Online – Poole, A. (ed.). Ithaca, NY, Cornell Lab of Ornithology; Retrieved from the Birds of North America. [WWW document]. – URL http://0-bna.birds.cornell.edu.www.consuls.org/bna/species/246. [Accessed 1 October 2019].10.2173/bna.woothr.02Search in Google Scholar

Everglades National Park. 2002. Seaside Sparrow Banding Research. Digital image. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.flickr.com/photos/evergladesnps/9250338006/in/album-72157634251224116/. [Accessed 28 August 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Fayt, P., Machmer, M.M., Steeger, C. 2005. Regulation of spruce bark beetles by woodpeckers – a literature review. – Forest Ecology and Management, 206(1–3), 1–14.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.054Search in Google Scholar

Geibert, E.H. 1980. Songbird diversity along an urban power line right-of-way in Rhode Island. – Environmental Management, 4(3), 205–213.10.1007/BF01866454Search in Google Scholar

Gill, F.B. 2007. Ornithology. 3rd Edition. New York, W.H. Freeman and Company. 758 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Heckscher, C.M., Bevier, L.R., Poole, A.F., Moskoff, W., Pyle, P., Patten, M.A. 2017. Veery (Catharus fuscescens). – Rodewald, P. (ed.). The Birds of North America. Ithaca, NY Cornell Lab of Ornithology. Retrieved from the Birds of North America. [WWW document]. – URL https://doi-org.ccsu.idm.oclc.org/10.2173/bna.veery.03. [Accessed 1 October 2019].10.2173/bna.veery.03.[Accessed1October2019]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.A. 1999. Nonparametric Statistical Methods. 2nd Edition. New York, Wiley. 787 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, M.T. 2013. Assessing the status of forests interior and shrubland birds. – Connecticut Wildlife Magazine, 33(1), 4–5.Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, J.J., Latif, Q.S., Saab, V.A., Veblen, T.T. 2018. Spruce Beetle outbreaks guide American Three-toed Woodpecker Picoides dorsalis occupancy patterns in subalpine forests. – Ibis, 161(1), 172–183.10.1111/ibi.12596Search in Google Scholar

King, D.I., Chandler, R.B., Collins, J.M., Petersen, W.R., Lautzenheiser, T.E. 2009. Effects of width, edge and habitat on the abundance and nesting success of scrub-shrub birds in powerline corridors. – Biological Conservation, 142(11), 2672–2680.10.1016/j.biocon.2009.06.016Search in Google Scholar

King, D.I., Degraaf, R.M., Griffin, C.R. 2001. Productivity of early successional shrubland birds in clearcuts and groupcuts in an eastern deciduous forest. – Journal of Wildlife Management, 65(2), 345–350.10.2307/3802914Search in Google Scholar

King, D.I., Schlossberg, S. 2014. Synthesis of the conservation value of the early-successional stage in forests of eastern North America. – Forest Ecology and Management, 324, 186–195. DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.00110.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Krementz, D.G., Christie, J.S. 2000. Clearcut stand size and scrub-successional bird assemblage. – The Auk, 117(4), 913–924.10.1093/auk/117.4.913Search in Google Scholar

Lebbin, D.J., Parr, M.J., Fenwick, G.H. 2010. The American Bird Conservancy Guide to Bird Conservation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 456 pp.10.7208/chicago/9780226647296.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Liefert, J. 2008. Songbird banding in Naugatuck State Forest. – Connecticut Wildlife, 28(5), 4–5.Search in Google Scholar

Mann, H.B., Whitney, D.R. 1947. On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. – The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.10.1214/aoms/1177730491Search in Google Scholar

Marshall, M.R., DeCecco, J.A., Williams, A.B., Gale, G.A., Cooper, R.J. 2003. Use of regenerating clearcuts by late-successional bird species and their young during the post-fledging period. – Forest Ecology and Management, 183(1–3), 127–135.10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00101-4Search in Google Scholar

McKnight, T.L., Hess, D. 2008. Physical Geography: A Landscape Appreciation. 9th Edition. Boston, Prentice Hall. 720 pp.Search in Google Scholar

NOAA. 1975. The Coastline of the United States. [WWW document]. – URL https://shoreline.noaa.gov/_pdf/Coastline_of_the_US_1975.pdf. [Accessed 22 August 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Northeast Utilities. 2015. Northeast utilities specification for rights-of-way vegetation management. Hartford, Connecticut. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.eversource.com/content/docs/default-source/Tranmission/rights-of-way-guidelines.pdf. [Accessed 22 August 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Rodewald, A.D. 2001. Managing for forest songbirds. [WWW document]. – URL http://woodlandstewards.osu.edu/sites/woodlands/files/d6/files/pubfiles/Managing%20Forest%20Songbirds%20-%20Guide.pdf. [Accessed 9 June 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Schlossberg, S., King D.I. 2007. Ecology and management of scrub-shrub birds in New England: A comprehensive review. – Report submitted to Natural Resources Conservation Service, Resource Inventory and Assessment Division. Beltsville, Maryland, USA. 122 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Sibley, D.A. 2000. The Sibley Guide to Birds. 1st Edition. New York, Alfred A. Knopf. 544 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, R.L., Maxwell, B.D., Boik, R.J. 2006. Indirect effects of herbicides on bird food resources and beneficial arthropods. – Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 116(3–4), 157–164.10.1016/j.agee.2006.01.012Search in Google Scholar

Tefft, B.C. 2006. Managing shrublands and old fields. – Oehler, J.D., Covell, D.F. (eds.). Managing Grasslands, Shrublands, and Young Forest Habitats for Wildlife: A Guide for the Northeast. Massachusetts, Division of Fisheries & Wildlife: The Northeast Upland Habitat Technical Committee, 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Terwilliger Consulting Inc. 2015. Threats to Connecticut’s GCN species and their key habitats. – Connecticut Wildlife Action Plan (6, 21). Hartford, CT, The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Bureau of Natural Resources.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. QuickFacts: Connecticut. WWW document]. – URL www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/CT/PST045218. [Accessed 23 May 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Vitz, A.C., Rodewald, A.D. 2006. Can regenerating clearcuts benefit mature-forest songbirds? An examination of post-breeding ecology. – Biological Conservation, 127(4), 477–486.10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.011Search in Google Scholar

Wenny, D.G., DeVault, T.L., Johnson, M.D., Kelly, D., Sekercioglu, C.H., Tomback, D.F., Whelan, C.J. 2011. The need to quantify ecosystem services provided by birds. – The Auk, 128(1), 1–14. DOI:10.1525/auk.2011.10248.10.1525/auk.2011.10248Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Yoon, C.K. 1994. More than decoration, songbirds are essential to forests’ health: As birds like scarlet tanagers decline, so could trees on their migration path. – New York Times, 4.Search in Google Scholar