[Barbati, A., Corona, P.M., Marchetti, M. 2007. European forest types. Categories and types for sustain able forest management reporting and policy. - European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blujdea, V.N.B., Pilli, R., Dutca, I., Ciuvat, L., Abrudan, I.V. 2012. Allometric biomass equations for young broadleaved trees in plantations in Romania. - Forest Ecology and Management, 264, 172-184.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolte, A., Villanueva, I. 2006. Interspecifi c competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fi ne roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). - European Journal of Forest Research, 125, 15-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[British Standard Institute 2009. BS EN 14774-2:2009: Solid biofuels - Determination of moisture content - oven dry method. Part 2: Total moisture - simplifi ed method. BS EN 14774-2:20092009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cairns, M.A., Brown, S., Helmer, E.H., Baumgardner, G.A. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world’s upland forests. - Oecologia, 111, 1-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Canham, C.D., Marks, P.L. 1985. The response of woody plants to disturbance: patterns of establish ment and growth. - Pickett T.A., White P.S. (eds). The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, 119-217.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cienciala, E., Černý, M., Apltauer, J., Exnerová, Z. 2005. Biomass functions applicable to European beech. - Journal of Forest Science, 51, 147-154.]Search in Google Scholar
[Claesson, S., Sahlén, K., Lundmark, T., 2001. Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. From stands in Northern Sweden with high stand densities. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 138-146.10.1080/028275801300088206]Search in Google Scholar
[Claveau, Y., Messier, C., Comeau, P.G. 2005. Interacting infl uence of light and size on aboveground biomass distribution in sub-boreal conifer with contrasting shade tolerance. - Tree Physiology, 25, 373-384.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cunningham, C., Zimmermann, N.E., Stoeckli, V., Bugmann, H. 2006. Growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) saplings in subalpine forests in Switzerland: Does spring climate matter? - Forest Ecology and Management, 228, 19-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curt, T., Coll, L., Prevosto, B., Balandier, P., Kunstler, G. 2005. Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition. - Annals of Forest Science, 62, 51-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[DeLucia, E.H., Sipe, T.W., Herrick, J., Maherali, H. 1998. Sapling biomass allocation and growth in the understory of a deciduous hardwood forest. - American Journal of Botany, 85, 955-963.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durkaya, B., Durkaya, A., Makineci, E., Ülküdür, M. 2013. Estimation of above-ground biomass and sequestered carbon of Taurus Cedar (Cedrus libani L.) in Antalya, Turkey. - iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6, 278-284.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elliott, K.J., Clinton, B.D. 1993. Equations for estimating biomass of herbaceous and woody vegetation in early-successional Southern Appalachian pine-hardwood forests. - Research Note SE-365, Forest Service, U.S.D.A. United States Department of Agriculture.10.2737/SE-RN-365]Search in Google Scholar
[Fotelli, M.N., Gessler, A., Peuke, A.D., Rennenberg, H. 2001. Drought affects the competitive interactions between Fagus sylvatica seedlings and an early successional species, Rubus fruticosus: responses of growth, water status and delta13C composition. - New Phytologist, 151, 427-435.10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00186.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Geudens, G., Staelens, J., Kint, V., Goris, R., Lust, N. 2004. Allometric biomass equations for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings during the first years of establishment in dense natural regeneration. - Annals of Forest Science, 61, 653-659.]Search in Google Scholar
[Götmark, F., Fridman, J., Kempe, G., Norden, B. 2005. Broadleaved tree species in conifer-dominated forestry: Regeneration and limitation of saplings in southern Sweden. - Forest Ecology and Management, 214, 142-157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Green, C., Tobin, B., O’Shea, M., Farrell, E.P., Byrne, K.A. 2007. Above- and belowground biomass mea surements in an unthinned stand of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchenisis (Bong) Carr.). - European Journal of Forest Research, 126, 179-188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarčuška, B. 2009. Growth, survival, density, biomass partitioning and morphological adaptations of na tural regeneration in Fagus sylvatica. A review. - Dendrobiology, 61, 3-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarčuška, B. 2011. Morphological plasticity of leaves in natural regeneration of Fagus sylvatica L.: effects of direct and diffuse light, ontogeny and shoot type. - Polish Journal of Ecology, 89, 339-353.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonckheere, I., Muys, B., Coppin, P. 2005. Allometry and evaluation of in situ optical LAI determination in Scots pine: a case study in Belgium. - Tree Physiology, 25, 723-732.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kobe, R.K., Hogarth, L.J. 2007. Evaluation of irradiance metrics with respect to predicting sapling growth. - Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37, 1203-1213.]Search in Google Scholar
[Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Moravčík, M., Lukac, M. 2010. Biomass partitioning and growth effi ciency in four naturally regenerated forest tree species. - Basic and Applied Ecology, 11, 234-243.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levy, P.E., Hale, S.E., Nicoll, B.C. 2004. Biomass expan sion factors and root: shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. - Forestry, 77, 421-430.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liang, S., Li, X., Wang, J. 2012. Advanced Remote Sen sing: Terrestrial Information Extraction and Applications. Amsterdam, Academic Press. 799 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundqvist, L., Fridman, E. 1996. Infl uence of local stand basal area on density and growth of rege ne ration in uneven-aged Picea abies stands. - Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 11, 364-369.]Search in Google Scholar
[Madsen, P., Larsen, J.B. 1997. Natural regeneration of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) with respect to canopy density, soil moisture and soil carbon content. - Forest Ecology and Management, 97, 95-105.]Search in Google Scholar
[McKay, H.M., Jinks, R.L., McEvoy, C. 1999. The effect of desiccation and rough-handling on the survival and early growth of ash, beech, birch and oak seedlings. - Annals of Forest Science, 56, 391-402.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitt, R., Padari, A., Samsonov, M. 2014. Modelling of woody biomass on electricity pylons. - Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 60, 44-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Øyen, B,-H., Nilsen, P., Bøhler, F., Andreassen, K. 2011. Predicting individual tree and stand diameter increment responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) after mountain forest selective cutting. - Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 55, 33-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M. 2011. Individual biomass factors for beech, oak and pine in Slovakia: A comparative study in young naturally rege nerated stands. - Trees - Structure and Function, 25, 277-288.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Marušák, R. 2013. Aboveground net primary productivity in young stands of beech and spruce. - Forestry Journal, 59, 154-162.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pastorella, F., Paletto, A. 2013. A comparative analysis of image processing softwares to indirect esti mation of leaf area index in forest ecosystems. - Folia Oecologica, 40, 225-236.]Search in Google Scholar
[Penman, J., Gytarsky, M., Hiraishi, T., Krug, T., Kruger, T., Pipatti, D., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, T., Wagner, F. (eds). 2004. IPCC good practice guidance for land use, land use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES). Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petriţan, A.M., Lüpke, B., Petriţan, I.C. 2008. Infl uence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings. - European Journal of Forest Research, 128, 61-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Platt, K.H., Allen, R.B., Coomes, D.A., Wiser, S.K. 2004 Mountain beech seedling responses to removal of below-ground competition and fertiliser addition. - New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 28, 289-293.]Search in Google Scholar
[Price, D.T., Zimmermann, N.E., Van Der Meer, P.J., Lexer, M.J., Leadley, P., Jorritsma, I.T.M., Clark, D.F., Lasch, P., Mcnulty, S., Wu, J., Smith, B. 2001. Regeneration in gap models: priority issues for studying forest responses to climate change. - Global Environmental Change, 51, 475-508.]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. [WWW Document]. - URL http://www.R-project.org/ [Accessed 30 November 2014].]Search in Google Scholar
[Ritson, P., Sochacki, S. 2003. Measurement and pre diction of biomass and carbon content of Pinus pinaster trees in farm forestry plantations, south-western Australia. - Forest Ecology and Management, 175, 103-117.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ritter, E., Dalsgaard, L., Einhorn, K.S. 2005. Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. - Forest Ecology and Management, 206, 15-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruiz-Peinado, G.R., Montero, G., del Rio, M. 2012. Biomass models to estimate carbon stocks for hard wood tree species. - Forest Systems, 21, 42-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schall, P., Lödige, C., Beck, M., Ammer, C. 2012. Biomass allocation to roots and shoots is more sensitive to shade and drought in European beech than in Norway spruce seedlings. - Forest Ecology and Management, 266, 246-253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, A., Poulain, M., Klein, D., Krause, K., Peña-Rojas, K., Schmidt, H., Schulte, A. 2009. Allometric above-belowground biomass equations for Nothofagus pumilio (Poepp. & Endl.) natural regeneration in the Chilean Patagonia. - Annals of Forest Science, 66, 513-520.]Search in Google Scholar
[Skovsgaard, J.P., Nord-Larsen, T. 2012. Biomass, basic density and biomass expansion factor functions for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Denmark. - European Journal of Forest Research, 131, 1035-1053.]Search in Google Scholar
[Teobaldelli, M., Somogyi, Z., Migliavacca, M., Usoltsev, V.A. 2009. Generalized functions of biomass expansion factors for conifers and broadleaved by stand age, growing stock and site index. - Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 1004-1013.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., Korzukhin, M. 1997. Biomass estimations for 65 North American tree species. - Forest Ecology and Management, 97, 1-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ter-Mikaelian, M.T., Parker, W.C. 2000. Estimating biomass of white spruce seedlings with vertical photo imagery. - New Forest, 20, 145-162.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tognetti, R., Minotta, G., Pinzauti, S., Michelozzi, M., Borghetti, M. 1998. Acclimation to changing light conditions of long-term shade-grown beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings of different geographic origins. - Trees, 12, 326-333.]Search in Google Scholar
[ UNFCCC. 1992. United Nations Framework Con - vention on Climate Change. FCCC/INFORMAL/84. Retrieved February 2010. [WWW Document]. - URL www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdfl . [Accessed 30 November 2014].]Search in Google Scholar
[UNFCCC. 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. [WWW Document]. - URL http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf. [Accessed 30 November 2014].]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, S., Collet, C., Madsen, P., Nakashizuka, T., Nyland, R.D., Sagheb-Talebi, K. 2010. Beech regeneration research: From ecological to silvicultural aspects. - Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 2172-2182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, D.J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies in growth of fi eld crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rate and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. - Annals of Botany, 11, 41-76. ]Search in Google Scholar
