This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Adalı, E. and Işık, A., 2016. Air conditioner selection problem with COPRAS and ARAS methods. Manas Journal of Social Studies, 5(2), pp.124–138. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1f9/9b4c8ff39137f5f1f044df9572e5f62331b3.pdf?_ga=2.4748531.1193764185.1565108694-1821258113.1558350277AdalıE.IşıkA.2016Air conditioner selection problem with COPRAS and ARAS methodsManas Journal of Social Studies52124138https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1f9/9b4c8ff39137f5f1f044df9572e5f62331b3.pdf?_ga=2.4748531.1193764185.1565108694-1821258113.1558350277Search in Google Scholar
Adalı, E. and Işık, A., 2017. The multi-objective decision making methods based on MULTI-MOORA and MOORA for the laptop selection problem. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 13, pp.229–237. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40092-016-0175-5.pdfAdalıE.IşıkA.2017The multi-objective decision making methods based on MULTI-MOORA and MOORA for the laptop selection problemInternational Journal of Industrial Engineering13229237https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs40092-016-0175-5.pdf10.1007/s40092-016-0175-5Search in Google Scholar
Albadvi, A., Chaharsooghi, S.K. and Esfahanipour, A., 2007. Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(2), pp.673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.022AlbadviA.ChaharsooghiS.K.EsfahanipourA.2007Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEEEuropean Journal of Operational Research1772673683https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.02210.1016/j.ejor.2005.11.022Search in Google Scholar
Alomoush, M, I., 2010. Multicriteria selection of optimal location of TCSC in a competitive energy market, Journal of Electrical Engineering, 61(3), pp.129–140. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/jee/61/3/article-p129.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=4&tab_body=pdfAlomoushM, I.2010Multicriteria selection of optimal location of TCSC in a competitive energy marketJournal of Electrical Engineering613129140https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/jee/61/3/article-p129.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=4&tab_body=pdf10.2478/v10187-010-0019-2Search in Google Scholar
Ayhan, M.B., 2013. A fuzzy AHP for supplier selection problem: A case study in a gear motor company. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC), 4(3), pp.11–23. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1311/1311.2886.pdfAyhanM.B.2013A fuzzy AHP for supplier selection problem: A case study in a gear motor companyInternational Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains (IJMVSC)431123https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1311/1311.2886.pdf10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4302Search in Google Scholar
Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R.B Albadvi, A. and Aghdasi, M., 2010. PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), pp.198–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021BehzadianM.KazemzadehR.BAlbadviA.AghdasiM.2010PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applicationsEuropean Journal of Operational Research2001198215https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.02110.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021Search in Google Scholar
Bentes, A.V., Carneiro, J., Da Silva, J.F. and Kimura, H., 2012. Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP. Journal of Business Research, 65(12), pp.1790–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.039BentesA.V.CarneiroJ.Da SilvaJ.F.KimuraH.2012Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHPJournal of Business Research651217901799https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.03910.1016/j.jbusres.2011.10.039Search in Google Scholar
Bertolini, M., Braglia, M. and Carmignani, G., 2006. Application of the AHP Methodology in Making a Proposal for a Public Work Contract. International Journal of Project Management, 24, pp.422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.005BertoliniM.BragliaM.CarmignaniG.2006Application of the AHP Methodology in Making a Proposal for a Public Work ContractInternational Journal of Project Management24422430https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.00510.1016/j.ijproman.2006.01.005Search in Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, A. and Chakraborty, S., 2014. A DEA-TOPSIS-based approach for performance evaluation of Indian technical institutes. Decision Science Letters, 3(3), pp.397–410. http://www.growingscience.com/dsl/Vol3/dsl_2014_5.pdfBhattacharyyaA.ChakrabortyS.2014A DEA-TOPSIS-based approach for performance evaluation of Indian technical institutesDecision Science Letters33397410http://www.growingscience.com/dsl/Vol3/dsl_2014_5.pdf10.5267/j.dsl.2014.2.003Search in Google Scholar
Brans, J.P., 1982. L’ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEE. Organized by Nadeau, R. and Landry, M., L’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir, Québec, Canada, Presses de l’Université Laval, pp.183–213.BransJ.P.1982L’ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEEOrganized byNadeauR.LandryM.L’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’AvenirQuébec, CanadaPresses de l’Université Laval183213Search in Google Scholar
Brans, J.P. and Mareschal, B., 1992. Promethee-V – MCDM problems with segmentation constraints. Information systems and operational research, 30(2), pp.85–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.11732186BransJ.P.MareschalB.1992Promethee-V – MCDM problems with segmentation constraintsInformation systems and operational research3028596https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1992.1173218610.1080/03155986.1992.11732186Search in Google Scholar
Brans, J.P. and Mareschal, B., 1995. The PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problems. Journal of Decision Systems, 4(3), pp.213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.1995.10511652BransJ.P.MareschalB.1995The PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problemsJournal of Decision Systems43213223https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.1995.1051165210.1080/12460125.1995.10511652Search in Google Scholar
Brans, J.P. and Mareschal, P., 1994. The PROMETHEE-GAIA decision support system for multicriteria investigations. Journal of Investigation Operative, 4(2), pp.107–117.BransJ.P.MareschalP.1994The PROMETHEE-GAIA decision support system for multicriteria investigationsJournal of Investigation Operative4210711710.1016/0167-9236(94)90048-5Search in Google Scholar
Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B. and Vincke, P., 1984. PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis. In J.P. Brans, editor, Operational Research’84, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp.477–490.BransJ.P.MareschalB.VinckeP.1984PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysisInBransJ.P.editor,Operational Research’84North-Holland, Amsterdam477490Search in Google Scholar
Brans, J.P., Mareschal, B. and Vincke, P., 1986. How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2), pp.228–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5BransJ.P.MareschalB.VinckeP.1986How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE methodEuropean Journal of Operational Research242228238https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-510.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5Search in Google Scholar
Brans, J.P. and Vincke, P., 1985. A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science, 31(6), pp.647–656BransJ.P.VinckeP.1985A preference ranking organisation method: The PROMETHEE method for MCDMManagement Science31664765610.1287/mnsc.31.6.647Search in Google Scholar
Brauers, W.K.M. and Zavadskas, E.K., 2006. The MOORA method and its applications to privatization in a transition economy. Control and cybernetics, 35(2), pp.445–469. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3cc0/3a4ced96c113cb8ea4bdef4fb8c85c6429c4.pdf?_ga=2.82634006.1280531091.1565892816-1821258113.1558350277BrauersW.K.M.ZavadskasE.K.2006The MOORA method and its applications to privatization in a transition economyControl and cybernetics352445469https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3cc0/3a4ced96c113cb8ea4bdef4fb8c85c6429c4.pdf?_ga=2.82634006.1280531091.1565892816-1821258113.1558350277Search in Google Scholar
Brauers, W.K.M. and Zavadskas, E.K., 2009. Multi objectives optimization with discrete alternatives on the basis of ratio analysis. Intellectual economics, 2(6), pp.30–41. https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/intellectual-economics/article/view/1193/1142BrauersW.K.M.ZavadskasE.K.2009Multi objectives optimization with discrete alternatives on the basis of ratio analysisIntellectual economics263041https://www3.mruni.eu/ojs/intellectual-economics/article/view/1193/1142Search in Google Scholar
Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), pp.233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9.BuckleyJ.J.1985Fuzzy hierarchical analysisFuzzy Sets and Systems173233247https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-910.1109/FUZZY.1999.793090Search in Google Scholar
Bulut, E., Duru, O., Keçeci, T. and Yoshida, S., 2012. Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: A process model for shipping asset management. Expert Systems and Applications, 39(2), pp.1911–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.056BulutE.DuruO.KeçeciT.YoshidaS.2012Use of consistency index, expert prioritization and direct numerical inputs for generic fuzzy-AHP modeling: A process model for shipping asset managementExpert Systems and Applications39219111923https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.05610.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.056Search in Google Scholar
Butowski, L., 2018. An integrated AHP and PROMETHEE approach to the evaluation of the attractiveness of European maritime areas for sailing tourism. Moravian Geographical Reports, 26(2), pp.135–148. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/mgr/26/2/article-p135.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=3&tab_body=pdfButowskiL.2018An integrated AHP and PROMETHEE approach to the evaluation of the attractiveness of European maritime areas for sailing tourismMoravian Geographical Reports262135148https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/mgr/26/2/article-p135.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=3&tab_body=pdf10.2478/mgr-2018-0011Search in Google Scholar
Büyüközkan, G. and Çifçi, G., 2012. A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), pp.2341–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061BüyüközkanG.ÇifçiG.2012A combined fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS based strategic analysis of electronic service quality in healthcare industryExpert Systems with Applications39323412354https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.06110.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.061Search in Google Scholar
Chandrakar, R. and Limje, S., 2018. A hybrid of QFD and AHP-TOPSIS for Durg dumping waste projects. Journal of Project Management, 3(3), pp.143–150. http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol3/jpm_2018_8.pdfChandrakarR.LimjeS.2018A hybrid of QFD and AHP-TOPSIS for Durg dumping waste projectsJournal of Project Management33143150http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol3/jpm_2018_8.pdf10.5267/j.jpm.2018.2.003Search in Google Scholar
Chang, D.Y., 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), pp.649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2ChangD.Y.1996Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHPEuropean Journal of Operational Research953649655https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-210.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2Search in Google Scholar
Celik, M., Deha, Er. I. and Ozok, A.F., 2009. Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, pp.190–198. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.3751&rep=rep1&type=pdfCelikM.DehaEr. I.OzokA.F.2009Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industryExpert Systems with Applications36190198http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.469.3751&rep=rep1&type=pdf10.1016/j.eswa.2007.09.004Search in Google Scholar
Durán, O. and Aguilo, J., 2008. Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems and Applications, 34(3), pp.1787–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.046DuránO.AguiloJ.2008Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a fuzzy-AHP approachExpert Systems and Applications34317871794https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.04610.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.046Search in Google Scholar
Geldermann, J., Spengler, T. and Rentz, O., 2000. Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: Iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), pp.45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00021-4GeldermannJ.SpenglerT.RentzO.2000Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: Iron and steel making industryFuzzy Sets and Systems11514565https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00021-410.1016/S0165-0114(99)00021-4Search in Google Scholar
Goswami, S. and Mitra, S., 2020. Selecting the best mobile model by applying AHP-COPRAS and AHP-ARAS decision making methodology. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 4(1), pp.27–42. http://www.growingscience.com/ijds/Vol4/ijdns_2019_30.pdfGoswamiS.MitraS.2020Selecting the best mobile model by applying AHP-COPRAS and AHP-ARAS decision making methodologyInternational Journal of Data and Network Science412742http://www.growingscience.com/ijds/Vol4/ijdns_2019_30.pdf10.5267/j.ijdns.2019.8.004Search in Google Scholar
Goumas, M. and Lygerou, V., 2000. An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(3), pp.606–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00093-4GoumasM.LygerouV.2000An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projectsEuropean Journal of Operational Research1233606613https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00093-410.1016/S0377-2217(99)00093-4Search in Google Scholar
Holst, A., 2019, August 30. Global pc unit shipments 2006–2019. Statista. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/273495/global-shipments-of-personal-computers-since-2006/HolstA.2019August30Global pc unit shipments 2006–2019StatistaRetrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/273495/global-shipments-of-personal-computers-since-2006/Search in Google Scholar
Hwang, C.L., Lai, Y.J. and Liu, T.Y., 1993. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers and Operational Research, 20(8), pp.889–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-VHwangC.L.LaiY.J.LiuT.Y.1993A new approach for multiple objective decision makingComputers and Operational Research208889899https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-VSearch in Google Scholar
Hwang, C.L. and Yoon, K., 1981. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag.HwangC.L.YoonK.1981Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and ApplicationsNew YorkSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9Search in Google Scholar
Jayant, A. and Sharma, J., 2018. A comprehensive literature review of MCDM techniques ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, VIKOR and TOPSIS applications in business competitive environment. International Journal of Current Research, 10(2), pp.65461–65477. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b370/ba1d421bcc7738c4b69d9a31cb61186afbf3.pdfJayantA.SharmaJ.2018A comprehensive literature review of MCDM techniques ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, VIKOR and TOPSIS applications in business competitive environmentInternational Journal of Current Research1026546165477https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b370/ba1d421bcc7738c4b69d9a31cb61186afbf3.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Kabir, G. and Sumi, R.S., 2014. Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from Bangladesh. Energy, 72, pp.717–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.098KabirG.SumiR.S.2014Power substation location selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and PROMETHEE: A case study from BangladeshEnergy72717730https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.05.09810.1016/j.energy.2014.05.098Search in Google Scholar
Kilic, H.S., Zaim, S. and Delen, D., 2015. Selecting the best ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(5), pp.2343–2352. http://isiarticles.com/bundles/Article/pre/pdf/46451.pdfKilicH.S.ZaimS.DelenD.2015Selecting the best ERP system for SMEs using a combination of ANP and PROMETHEE methodsExpert Systems with Applications42523432352http://isiarticles.com/bundles/Article/pre/pdf/46451.pdf10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.034Search in Google Scholar
Kolios, A., Mytilinou, V., Lozano-Minguez, E. and Salonitis, K., 2016. A comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods under stochastic inputs. MDPI Journal of Energies, 9(566). https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/7/566/htm#B34-energies-09-00566KoliosA.MytilinouV.Lozano-MinguezE.SalonitisK.2016A comparative study of multiple criteria decision making methods under stochastic inputsMDPI Journal of Energies9566https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/7/566/htm#B34-energies-09-0056610.3390/en9070566Search in Google Scholar
Korhonen, P., Koskinen, L. and Voutilainen, R., 2006. A financial alliance compromise between executives and supervisory authorities. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(2), pp.1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.033KorhonenP.KoskinenL.VoutilainenR.2006A financial alliance compromise between executives and supervisory authoritiesEuropean Journal of Operational Research175213001310https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.03310.1016/j.ejor.2005.06.033Search in Google Scholar
Kowalski, K., Stagl, S., Madlener, R. and Omann, I., 2009. Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(3), pp.1063–1074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.049KowalskiK.StaglS.MadlenerR.OmannI.2009Sustainable energy futures: Methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysisEuropean Journal of Operational Research197310631074https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.04910.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.049Search in Google Scholar
Kucharski, A., 2014. Analysis of selected investment fund type ranking position – PROMETHEE method application. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządanie, 15(1), pp.41–53. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/eam/15/1/article-p41.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=1&tab_body=pdfKucharskiA.2014Analysis of selected investment fund type ranking position – PROMETHEE method applicationPrzedsiębiorczość i Zarządanie1514153https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/eam/15/1/article-p41.xml?rskey=6Byy3L&result=1&tab_body=pdf10.2478/eam-2014-0003Search in Google Scholar
Lee, A.H.I., Chen, W.C. and Chang, C. J., 2008. A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), pp.96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022LeeA.H.I.ChenW.C.ChangC. J.2008A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in TaiwanExpert Systems with Applications34196107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.02210.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.022Search in Google Scholar
Maletic, D., Maletic, M., Lovrencic, V., Al-Najjar, B. and Gomiscek, B., 2014. An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and sensitivity analysis for maintenance policy selection. Organizacija. 47(3), pp.177–188. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/orga/47/3/article-p177.xml?rskey=kfwM8g&result=3&tab_body=pdfMaleticD.MaleticM.LovrencicV.Al-NajjarB.GomiscekB.2014An application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and sensitivity analysis for maintenance policy selectionOrganizacija473177188https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/orga/47/3/article-p177.xml?rskey=kfwM8g&result=3&tab_body=pdf10.2478/orga-2014-0016Search in Google Scholar
Marzouk, M. and Abdelakder, E., 2019. On the use of multi-criteria decision making methods for minimizing environmental emissions in construction projects. Decision Science Letters, 8(4), pp.373–392. http://www.growingscience.com/dsl/Vol8/dsl_2019_16.pdfMarzoukM.AbdelakderE.2019On the use of multi-criteria decision making methods for minimizing environmental emissions in construction projectsDecision Science Letters84373392http://www.growingscience.com/dsl/Vol8/dsl_2019_16.pdf10.5267/j.dsl.2019.6.002Search in Google Scholar
Melón, M.G., Aragonés, B.P. and Carmen, G.C.M., 2008. An AHP-based evaluation procedure for innovative educational projects: A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study. Omega, 36(5), pp.754–765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.01.005MelónM.G.AragonésB.P.CarmenG.C.M.2008An AHP-based evaluation procedure for innovative educational projects: A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case studyOmega365754765https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.01.00510.1016/j.omega.2006.01.005Search in Google Scholar
Mitra, S. and Goswami, S.S., 2019a. Selection of the desktop computer model by AHP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM methodology. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 6(1), pp.784–790. http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_20542876.pdfMitraS.GoswamiS.S.2019aSelection of the desktop computer model by AHP-TOPSIS hybrid MCDM methodologyInternational Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews61784790http://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_20542876.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Mitra, S. and Goswami, S.S., 2019b. Application of simple average weighting optimization method in the selection of best desktop computer model. Advanced Journal of Graduate Research, 6(1), pp.60–68. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bc72/cb3b02e433f9a4f2ac73a8081c23f70f05e0.pdfMitraS.GoswamiS.S.2019bApplication of simple average weighting optimization method in the selection of best desktop computer modelAdvanced Journal of Graduate Research616068https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/bc72/cb3b02e433f9a4f2ac73a8081c23f70f05e0.pdf10.21467/ajgr.6.1.60-68Search in Google Scholar
Mitra, S. and Kundu, S., 2017. Application of analytic hierarchy process for domestic refrigerator selection. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research, 5(12), pp.126–132. http://www.ijeter.everscience.org/Manuscripts/Volume-5/Issue-12/Vol-5-issue-12-M-21.pdfMitraS.KunduS.2017Application of analytic hierarchy process for domestic refrigerator selectionInternational Journal of Emerging Technologies in Engineering Research512126132http://www.ijeter.everscience.org/Manuscripts/Volume-5/Issue-12/Vol-5-issue-12-M-21.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Mitra, S. and Kundu, S., 2018. Application of TOPSIS for best domestic refrigerator selection. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3), pp.226–231. https://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_1212.pdfMitraS.KunduS.2018Application of TOPSIS for best domestic refrigerator selectionInternational Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews53226231https://ijrar.com/upload_issue/ijrar_issue_1212.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Naserizade, S.S., Nikoo, M.R. and Montaseri, H., 2018. A risk-based multi-objective model for optimal placement of sensors in water distribution system. Journal of Hydrology, 557, pp.147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.028NaserizadeS.S.NikooM.R.MontaseriH.2018A risk-based multi-objective model for optimal placement of sensors in water distribution systemJournal of Hydrology557147159https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.02810.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.028Search in Google Scholar
Ngai, E.W.T. and Chan, E.W.C., 2005. Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools Using AHP. Expert System Applications, 29(4), pp.889–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.025NgaiE.W.T.ChanE.W.C.2005Evaluation of Knowledge Management Tools Using AHPExpert System Applications294889899https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.02510.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.025Search in Google Scholar
Nikouei, M.A., Oroujzadeh, M. and Mehdipour-Ataei, S., 2017. The PROMETHEE multiple criteria decision making analysis for selecting the best membrane prepared from sulfonated poly(ether ketone)s and poly(ether sulfone)s for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Energy, 119, pp.77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.052NikoueiM.A.OroujzadehM.Mehdipour-AtaeiS.2017The PROMETHEE multiple criteria decision making analysis for selecting the best membrane prepared from sulfonated poly(ether ketone)s and poly(ether sulfone)s for proton exchange membrane fuel cellEnergy1197785https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.05210.1016/j.energy.2016.12.052Search in Google Scholar
Nourbakhsh, Z. and Yousefi, H., 2017. Presenting a conceptual model of data collection to manage the groundwater quality. Journal of Water and Land Development, 35(1), pp.149–160. https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/jwld/35/1/article-p149.xml?rskey=kfwM8g&result=5&tab_body=pdfNourbakhshZ.YousefiH.2017Presenting a conceptual model of data collection to manage the groundwater qualityJournal of Water and Land Development351149160https://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/jwld/35/1/article-p149.xml?rskey=kfwM8g&result=5&tab_body=pdf10.1515/jwld-2017-0079Search in Google Scholar
Peng, A.H. and Xiao, X.M., 2013. Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environment. Materials and Design, 47, pp.643–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.058PengA.H.XiaoX.M.2013Material selection using PROMETHEE combined with analytic network process under hybrid environmentMaterials and Design47643652https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.05810.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.058Search in Google Scholar
Polat, G., 2016. Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methods. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 22(8), pp.1042–1054. https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1960/1576PolatG.2016Subcontractor selection using the integration of the AHP and PROMETHEE methodsJournal of Civil Engineering and Management22810421054https://journals.vgtu.lt/index.php/JCEM/article/view/1960/157610.3846/13923730.2014.948910Search in Google Scholar
Polat, G., Damci, A. and Dermili, L., 2016. Urban renewal project selection using the integration of AHP and PROMETHEE approaches. Procedia Engineering, 164, pp.339–346. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1877705816339698?token=B741435AA44C25D079F221DBE3E0C2193EFDF30753523526E1ABC13625755EFC5FC37F0F17B73ED3142ACD4D51C4BBDC.PolatG.DamciA.DermiliL.2016Urban renewal project selection using the integration of AHP and PROMETHEE approachesProcedia Engineering164339346https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S1877705816339698?token=B741435AA44C25D079F221DBE3E0C2193EFDF30753523526E1ABC13625755EFC5FC37F0F17B73ED3142ACD4D51C4BBDC.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.628Search in Google Scholar
Qin, X.S., Huang, G.H., Chakma, A. and Nie, X.H., 2008. A MCDM-based expert system for climate-change impact assessment and adaptation planning. A case study for the Georgia basin, Canada. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), pp.2164–2179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.024.QinX.S.HuangG.H.ChakmaA.NieX.H.2008A MCDM-based expert system for climate-change impact assessment and adaptation planning. A case study for the Georgia basin, CanadaExpert Systems with Applications34321642179https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.02410.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.024Search in Google Scholar
Rostamzadeh, R. and Sofian, S., 2011. Prioritizing effective 7Ms to improve production systems performance using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (case study). Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), pp.5166–5177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.045RostamzadehR.SofianS.2011Prioritizing effective 7Ms to improve production systems performance using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (case study)Expert Systems with Applications38551665177https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.04510.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.045Search in Google Scholar
Roy, B., 1968. Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE). Revue Francaise d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO), 2(8), pp.57–75. http://www.numdam.org/article/RO_1968__2_1_57_0.pdfRoyB.1968Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples (la méthode ELECTRE)Revue Francaise d'Informatique et de Recherche Opérationelle (RIRO)285775http://www.numdam.org/article/RO_1968__2_1_57_0.pdf10.1051/ro/196802V100571Search in Google Scholar
Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.SaatyT.L.1980The Analytic Hierarchy ProcessNew YorkMcGraw-Hill10.21236/ADA214804Search in Google Scholar
Saaty, T.L., 2001. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.SaatyT.L.2001Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority TheoryPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaRWS PublicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Saaty, T.L., 2008. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.SaatyT.L.2008Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex WorldPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaRWS PublicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Saaty, T.L., 2010. Principia Mathematica Decernendi: Mathematical Principles of Decision Making. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: RWS Publications.SaatyT.L.2010Principia Mathematica Decernendi: Mathematical Principles of Decision MakingPittsburgh, PennsylvaniaRWS PublicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Sri Krishna, S., Sri Nivasulu Readdy, A. and Vani, S., 2014. A new car selection in the market using TOPSIS. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science, 2(4), pp.177–181. http://ijergs.org/files/documents/A-NEW20.pdfSri KrishnaS.Sri Nivasulu ReaddyA.VaniS.2014A new car selection in the market using TOPSISInternational Journal of Engineering Research and General Science24177181http://ijergs.org/files/documents/A-NEW20.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Tsoutsos, T., Drandaki, M., Frantzeskaki, N., Iosifidis, E. and Kiosses, I., 2009. Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of crete. Energy Policy, 37(5), pp.1587–1600. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Niki_Frantzeskaki/publication/46496901_Sustainable_energy_planning_by_using_multi-criteria_analysis_application_in_the_island_of_Crete/links/56c5d53408ae736e7049255c/Sustainable-energy-planning-by-using-multi-criteria-analysis-application-in-the-island-of-Crete.pdfTsoutsosT.DrandakiM.FrantzeskakiN.IosifidisE.KiossesI.2009Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of creteEnergy Policy37515871600https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Niki_Frantzeskaki/publication/46496901_Sustainable_energy_planning_by_using_multi-criteria_analysis_application_in_the_island_of_Crete/links/56c5d53408ae736e7049255c/Sustainable-energy-planning-by-using-multi-criteria-analysis-application-in-the-island-of-Crete.pdf10.1016/j.enpol.2008.12.011Search in Google Scholar
Turcksin, L., Bernardini, A. and Macharis, C., 2011. A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleet. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, pp.954–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104TurcksinL.BernardiniA.MacharisC.2011A combined AHP-PROMETHEE approach for selecting the most appropriate policy scenario to stimulate a clean vehicle fleetProcedia Social and Behavioral Sciences20954965https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.10410.1016/j.sbspro.2011.08.104Search in Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, K. and Waaub, J.P., 2004. Equity in international greenhouse gases abatement scenarios: A multi criteria approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 153(2), pp.489–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00170-XVaillancourtK.WaaubJ.P.2004Equity in international greenhouse gases abatement scenarios: A multi criteria approachEuropean Journal of Operational Research1532489505https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00170-X10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00170-XSearch in Google Scholar
Wang, J.J. and Yang, D.L., 2007. Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research, 34, pp.3691–3700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.017WangJ.J.YangD.L.2007Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcingComputers & Operations Research3436913700https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.01.01710.1016/j.cor.2006.01.017Search in Google Scholar
Yilmaz, B. and Dagdeviren, M., 2011. A combined approach for equipment selection: FPROMETHEE method and zero–one goal programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), pp.11641–11650. http://www.irantahgig.ir/wp-content/uploads/40014.pdfYilmazB.DagdevirenM.2011A combined approach for equipment selection: FPROMETHEE method and zero–one goal programmingExpert Systems with Applications3891164111650http://www.irantahgig.ir/wp-content/uploads/40014.pdf10.1016/j.eswa.2011.03.043Search in Google Scholar
Yoon, K., 1987. A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations. Journal of Operational Research Society, 38 (3), pp.277–286. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1987.44YoonK.1987A reconciliation among discrete compromise situationsJournal of Operational Research Society383277286https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1987.4410.1057/jors.1987.44Search in Google Scholar
Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), pp.338–353. https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S001999586590241X?token=7E8F7BB90871609078C2FA8FB927AD9370F843E3F43209FCC3CD2B59D0E7D1AF1CC306EBEE6BEB1B5A4AE6A475CFDFB4ZadehL.A.1965Fuzzy setsInformation and Control83338353https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S001999586590241X?token=7E8F7BB90871609078C2FA8FB927AD9370F843E3F43209FCC3CD2B59D0E7D1AF1CC306EBEE6BEB1B5A4AE6A475CFDFB410.21236/AD0608981Search in Google Scholar
Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. and Tamošaitien, J., 2008. Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervals. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 14(2), pp.85–93. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5268/356a08cb6df2830747c841a13a3e708f1421.pdfZavadskasE.K.KaklauskasA.TurskisZ.TamošaitienJ.2008Selection of the effective dwelling house walls by applying attributes values determined at intervalsJournal of Civil Engineering and Management1428593https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5268/356a08cb6df2830747c841a13a3e708f1421.pdf10.3846/1392-3730.2008.14.3Search in Google Scholar
Zavadskas, E.K. and Turskis, Z., 2010. A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-making. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), pp.159–172. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3846/tede.2010.10ZavadskasE.K.TurskisZ.2010A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision-makingTechnological and Economic Development of Economy162159172https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.3846/tede.2010.1010.3846/tede.2010.10Search in Google Scholar
Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z. and Vilutiene, T., 2010. Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 10(3), pp.123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60141-1ZavadskasE.K.TurskisZ.VilutieneT.2010Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) methodArchives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering103123141https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60141-110.1016/S1644-9665(12)60141-1Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, H., Peng, Y. and Li, W., 2013. Revised PROMETHEE II for improving efficiency in emergency response. Procedia Computer Science, 17, pp.181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.025.ZhaoH.PengY.LiW.2013Revised PROMETHEE II for improving efficiency in emergency responseProcedia Computer Science17181188https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.025.10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.025Search in Google Scholar
