[Apter, Michael. J., Kenneth C. P. Smith (1977). Humour and the theory of psychological reversals. Chapman, J. Antony, Hugh C. Foot, eds. It’s a Funny Thing Humour. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 182–210.10.1016/B978-0-08-021376-7.50021-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Attardo, Salvatore (2010). Humorous Texts: A Semantic and Pragmatic Analysis. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldick, Chris (2001). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berberović, Sanja, Nihada Delibegović Džanić (2009). Političari, dvorske dame i kajgana: teorija konceptualne integracije i politički humor. Brdar, Mario, Marija Omazić, Branimir Belaj, Branko Kuna, eds. Lingvistika Javne Komunikacije: Sociokulturni, Pragmatički i Stilski Aspekti. Zagreb, Osijek: HDPL, 139–153.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berberović, Sanja, Nihada Delibegović Džanić (2015). Bitno je biti...? – teorija konceptualne integracije i internetski politički memovi. Belaj, Branimir, ed. Dimenzije Značenja. Zagreb: Zagrebačka slavistička škola, 9–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergen, Benjamin (2004). To awaken a sleeping giant: cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. Achard, Michel, Suzanne Kemmer, eds. Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 23–35.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blevins, L. Teresa, (2010). Humor in Therapy: Expectations, Sense of Humor, and Perceived Effectiveness. PhD dissertation, University of Auburn. Available at: https://etd.auburn.edu/bitstream/handle/10415/2211/7-12-2010%20Blevins%20Fixed.pdf;sequence=2]Search in Google Scholar
[Caron, E. James (2002). From ethology to aesthetics: evolution as a theoretical paradigm for research on laughter, humor, and other comic phenomena. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 15(3): 245–281.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coulson, Seana (2005). Extemporaneous blending: conceptual integration in humorous discourse from talk radio. Style 39(2): 107–122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coulson, Seana, Cyma van Petten (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition 30(6): 958–968.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coulson, Seana, Marta Kutas (1998). Frame-shifting and sentential integration. USCD Cognitive Science Technical Report 98(3): 1–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delibegović Džanić, Nihada (2013). Who was born with a silver foot in his mouth? Modified idiomatic expressions in political cartoons. Jezikoslovlje 14.2-3: 323-336.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delibegović Džanić, Nihada, Sanja Berberović (2010). On politicians in big women’s sunglasses driving busses with their feet in mouths: late-night political humour and conceptual integration theory. Jezikoslovlje 11(2): 197–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delibegović Džanić, Nihada, Sanja Berberović (2017). #Forgiveusforwehavesinned: conceptual integration theory and political Internet humour. European Journal of Humour Research 5(2): 4–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delibegović Džanić, Nihada, Marija Omazić (2011). Conceptual blending in political cartoons, Tomović, Nenad, Jelena Vujić, eds. English Language and Literature Studies: Image, Identity, Reality. Belgrade: Faculty of Philology, University of Belgrade, 51–64.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dixon, F. Norman (1980). Humor: a cognitive alternative to stress? Sarason, G. Irwin, Charles. D. Spielberger, eds. Stress and Anxiety. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 281–289.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dynel, Marta (2011). Blending the incongruity-resolution model and the conceptual integration theory: the case of blends in pictorial advertising. International Review of Pragmatics 3(1): 59–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (1996). Blending as a central process of grammar. Goldberg, Adele, ed. Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 113–130.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22(2): 133–187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fauconnier, Gilles, Mark Turner (2002). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and The Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books. New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freud, Sigmund (1928). Humor. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 9: 1–6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gervais, Matthew, Wilson David Sloan (2005). The evolution and functions of laughter and humor: a synthetic approach. Quarterly Review of Biology 80: 395–430.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giora, Rachel (1995). On irony and negation. Discourse Processes 19(2): 239–264.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gross, J. James (2008). Emotion regulation. Lewis, Michael, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, Lisa Feldman Barret, eds. Handbook of Emotions (3rd ed.). New York, London: The Guilford Press, 497–512.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gruner, R. Charles (1997). The Game of Humor: A Comprehensive Theory of Why We Laugh. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harm, Jonathan, Sandrine Vieillard, André Didierjean (2014). Using humour as an extrinsic source of emotion regulation in young and older adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67(10): 1895–1909.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keltner, Dacher, George A. Bonanno (1997). A study of laughter and dissociation: distinct correlates of laughter and smiling during bereavement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 687–702.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koestler, Arthur (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laineste, Liisi., Piret Voolaid (2017). Laughing across borders: intertextuality of internet memes. The European Journal of Humour Research 4(4): 26–49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George (1987). Woman, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lazarus, S. Richard, Susan Folkman (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marín-Arrese, I. Juana (2008). Cognition and culture in political cartoons. Intercultural Pragmatics 5(1): 1–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, A. Rod (2007). The Psychology of Humour: An Integrative Approach. London: Elsevier Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCauley, Clark, Kathryn Woods, Christopher Coolidge, William Kulick (1983). More aggressive cartoons are funnier. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 817-823.]Search in Google Scholar
[McGraw, A. Peter, Caleb Warren (2010). Benign violations: making immoral behavior funny. Psychological Science 21(8): 1141–1149.]Search in Google Scholar
[McGraw, A. Peter, Caleb Warren, Lawrence E. Williams, Leonard Bridget (2012). Too close for comfort, or too far to care? Finding humor in distant tragedies and close mishaps. Psychological Science 20(10): 1–9.]Search in Google Scholar
[McGraw, A. Peter, Lawrence E. Williams, Caleb Warren (2014). The rise and fall of humor: psychological distance modulates humorous responses to tragedy. Social Psychological and Personality Science 5.5: 566-572.]Search in Google Scholar
[Michel, Alexandra (2017). The science of humor is no laughing matter. APS Observer 30(4): 22–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milner, M. Ryan (2013). Media lingua franca: fixity, novelty, and vernacular creativity in internet memes. Selected Papers of Internet Research, 3. (https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8725)]Search in Google Scholar
[Mindess, Harvey, Carolyn Miller, Joy Turek, Amanda Bender, Suzanne Corbin (1985). The Antioch Sense of Humour Test: Making Sense of Humour. New York: Avon Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morreall, John. (2016). Philosophy of Humor. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. (Winter 2016 Edition). Zalta N. Edward ed. URL=<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/humor/>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raskin, Victor (1985). Jokes. Psychology Today 19: 34-39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suls, M. Jerry (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons: An information-processing analysis. Goldstein, H. Jeffrey, Paul E. McGhee, eds. The Psychology of Humor: Theoretical Perspectives and Empirical Issues. New York: Academic Press, 81–100.10.1016/B978-0-12-288950-9.50010-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Veatch, C. Thomas (1998). A theory of humor. Humor: International Journal of Humour Research 11: 161–215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vrticka. Pascal, Jessica M. Black, Michelle Neely, Elizabeth Walter Shelly, Allan L. Reiss (2013). Humour processing in children: influence of temperament, age and IQ. Neuropsychologia 51.13: 2799–2811.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wild, Barbara, Frank A. Rodden, Wolfgang Grodd, Willibald Ruch (2003). Neural correlates of laughter and humour. Brain 126.10: 2121–2138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willinger, Ulrike, Andreas Hergovich, Michaela Schmoeger, Matthias Deckert, Susanne Stoettner, Iris Bunda, Andrea Witting, Melanie Seidler, Reinhilde Moser, Stefanie Kacena, David Jaeckle, Benjamin Loader, Christian Mueller, Eduard Auff (2017) Cognitive and emotional demands of black humour processing: the role of intelligence, aggressiveness, and mood. Cognitive Processing 18.2: 159–167.10.1007/s10339-016-0789-y]Search in Google Scholar
