Examining validity in computerized dynamic assessment

Aljaafreh, Ali, James P. Lantolf (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78: 465–483.Search in Google Scholar

Chapelle, Carol A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on Applied Linguistics in the Age of Information and Communication Technology. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.7Search in Google Scholar

Chapelle, Carol A., Dan Douglas (2006). Assessing Language Through Computer Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511733116Search in Google Scholar

Birjandi, Parviz, Saman Ebadi (2012). Microgenesis in dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ sociocognitive development via web 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32: 34–39.Search in Google Scholar

Feuerstein, Reuven, Ya’acov Rand, John E. Rynders (1988). Don’t Accept Me As I Am: Helping “Retarded” People to Excel. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-6128-0Search in Google Scholar

Frederiksen, John R., Alan Collins (1989). A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher 18(9): 27-32.Search in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Ellen L. (2001). The effects of adding dynamic assessment components to a computerized preschool language screening test. Communication Disorders Quarterly 22: 217–226.Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, James P., Matthew E. Poehner (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1: 49–74.Search in Google Scholar

Lantolf, James P., Steve L. Thorne (2006). Sociocultural Theory and the Genesis of Second Language Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, Zheng (2010). Interactive dynamic assessment with children learning EFL in kindergarten. Early Childhood Education Journal 37: 279–287.Search in Google Scholar

Loevinger, Jane (1957). Objective tests as instruments of psychological theory. Psychological Reports 3: 635-694 (Monograph supplement 9).Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, Tim (1997). “Interaction” in second language performance assessment. Whose performance? Applied Linguistics 18, 446-466.10.1093/applin/18.4.446Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, Tim (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing 18(4): 333-349.Search in Google Scholar

Messick, Samuel (1980). Test validity and ethics of assessment. American Psychologist, 35.11: 1012-1027.Search in Google Scholar

Messick, Samuel (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational Researcher 18(2): 5-11.Search in Google Scholar

Messick, Samuel (1990). Validity of test interpretation and use. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service. ETS-RR-90-1110.1002/j.2333-8504.1990.tb01343.xSearch in Google Scholar

Messick, Samuel (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing 13: 241-256.Search in Google Scholar

Moss, Pamela A. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice 22.4: 13-25.Search in Google Scholar

Poehner, Matthew E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal 91: 323–340.Search in Google Scholar

Poehner, Matthew E. (2008). Dynamic Assessment: A Vygotskian Approach to Understanding and Promoting Second Language Development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9Search in Google Scholar

Poehner, Matthew E. (2011). Validity and interaction in the ZPD: Interpreting learner development through L2 dynamic assessment. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 21(2): 244-263.Search in Google Scholar

Poehner, Matthew E., James P. Lantolf (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (CDA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3): 323–342.Search in Google Scholar

Porte, Graeme Keith (2010). Appraising Research in Second Language Learning: A Practical Approach to Critical Analysis of Quantitative Research (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/lllt.28Search in Google Scholar

Ratner, Carl (1997). Cultural Psychology: Theory and Methods. New York: Plenum.Search in Google Scholar

Shabani, Karim (2012). Dynamic assessment of L2 learners’ reading comprehension processes: A Vygotskian perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 32: 321-328.Search in Google Scholar

Shrestha, Prithvi, Caroline Coffin (2012). Dynamic assessment, tutor mediation and academic writing development. Assessing Writing 17: 55–70.Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, Robert J., Elena L. Grigorenko (2002). Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Teo, Adeline, Fu Jen (2012). Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning and Technology, 16.3: 10-20.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar