Vector AR3-APP – A Good-Practice Example of Learning with Augmented Reality

1. Billinghurst, M. (2002). Augmented Reality in Education. New Horizons for Learning, December 2002. Retrieved from http://solomonalexis.com/downloads/ar_edu.pdf Search in Google Scholar

2. Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21-32. Search in Google Scholar

3. Carvalho, C. V. de Alencar, & Lemos, B.M. (2014). Possibilities of Augmented Reality Use in Mathematics Aiming at a Meaningful Learning. Creative Education, 5, 690–700. doi:10.4236/ce.2014.5908110.4236/ce.2014.59081 Search in Google Scholar

4. Chao, W., & Chang, R. (2018). Using Augmented Reality to enhance and Engage Students in Learning Mathematics. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(12), 455-464. doi:10.14738/assrj.512.590010.14738/assrj.512.5900 Search in Google Scholar

5. Chestnut, E. K., Lei, R. F., Leslie, S. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018). The myth that only brilliant people are good at math and its implications for diversity. Education Sciences, 8(2), 65.10.3390/educsci8020065 Search in Google Scholar

6. Coimbra, T., Cardoso, T., & Mateus, A. (2015). Augmented Reality: An Enhancer for Higher Education Students in Math’s Learning? Procedia Computer Science, 67, 332-39. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.27710.1016/j.procs.2015.09.277 Search in Google Scholar

7. Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The Effect of an Augmented Reality Enhanced Mathematics Lesson on Student Achievement and Motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 40-48. Search in Google Scholar

8. Fonseca D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., & Sánchez, A. (2013). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 434-445. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.03.00610.1016/j.chb.2013.03.006 Search in Google Scholar

9. Furner, J.M., & Gonzalez-DeHass, A. (2011). How do students’ mastery and performance goals relate to math anxiety? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(4), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/7520910.12973/ejmste/75209 Search in Google Scholar

10. Hegedus, S., Laborde, C., Brady, C., Dalton, S., Siller, H.-S., Tabach, M., Trgalova, J., & Armella, L. (2017). Uses of Technology in Upper Secondary Mathematics Education. Springeropen. Search in Google Scholar

11. Ibáñez, M.-B, & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented Reality for STEM Learning: A Systematic Review. Computers & Education, 123, 109-23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.00210.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002 Search in Google Scholar

12. ITU (2020a). EQUALS Gender Digital Inclusion Map. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/action/gender-equality/Pages/equalsGDImap.aspx Search in Google Scholar

13. ITU (2020b). About the ITU-D Digital Inclusion Programme. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Digital-Inclusion/Pages/about.aspx Search in Google Scholar

14. Kaliisa, R., Palmer, E., & Miller, J. (2017). Mobile learning in higher education: A comparative analysis of developed and developing country contexts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 1-16. doi:10.1111/bjet.1258310.1111/bjet.12583 Search in Google Scholar

15. Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and Geometry Education with Collaborative Augmented Reality. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2002 – Conference Abstracts and Applications, 37-41.10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00028-1 Search in Google Scholar

16. Kellems R. O., Eichelberger C., Cacciatore G., Jensen, M., Frazier, B., Simons, K., & Zaru, M. (2020). Using Video-Based Instruction via Augmented Reality to Teach Mathematics to Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 277-291. doi:10.1177/002221942090645210.1177/0022219420906452 Search in Google Scholar

17. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Selijefot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). Making it real: Exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3-4), 163-174.10.1007/s10055-006-0036-4 Search in Google Scholar

18. Kerres, M. (2018). Mediendidaktik: Konzeption und Entwicklung digitaler Lernangebote. De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110456837 Search in Google Scholar

19. Klopfer, E., & Yoon, S. (2004). Developing games and simulations for today and tomorrow’s tech savvy youth. TechTrends, 49(3), 41-49. Search in Google Scholar

20. Klopfer, E., & Sheldon, J. (2010). Augmenting your own reality: Student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New Directions for Youth Development, 2010(128), 85-94.10.1002/yd.378 Search in Google Scholar

21. Lietze, S., Brezowar, G., & Krizek, G. (2019). Bridging Diversity – A Good Practice Example of Student Support. Proceedings of the INTED2019 Conference, 11^th -13^th March 2019, Valencia, Spain, 498-502. ISBN: 978-84-09-08619-110.21125/inted.2019.0200 Search in Google Scholar

22. Lin, H.K., Chen M., & Chang, C (2015). Assessing the effectiveness of learning solid geometry by using an augmented reality-assisted learning system. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(6), 799–810. doi:10.1080/10494820.2013.81743510.1080/10494820.2013.817435 Search in Google Scholar

23. Martin-Gonzalez, A., Chi-Poot, A. & Uc-Cetina, V. (2016). Usability Evaluation of an Augmented Reality System for Teaching Euclidean Vectors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(6), 627-636. doi:10.1080/14703297.2015.110885610.1080/14703297.2015.1108856 Search in Google Scholar

24. Martin-Gutierrez, J., Ginters, E., & Perez-Lopez, D. (2012). Improving Strategy of Self-Learning in Engineering: Laboratories with Augmented Reality. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 832-839. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.24910.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.249 Search in Google Scholar

25. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality–virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies, 2351, 282-292. doi:10.1117/12.19732110.1117/12.197321 Search in Google Scholar

26. Mladenović, S., Kuvač, H., & Štula, M. (2012). Virtual Learning Environment. In Information Resources Management Association (Ed.), Virtual Learning Environments: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools and Applications (Vol. 1, pp. 1-16). IGI Global. Search in Google Scholar

27. Onyancha, R. M., Derov, M., & Kinsey, B.L. (2009). Improvements in spatial ability as a result of targeted training and computer-aided design software use: Analyses of object geometries and rotation types. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(2), 157–67. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01014.x10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01014.x Search in Google Scholar

28. Osberg, K. (1997). Spatial cognition in the virtual environment, Technical R-97-18. Seattle: HITLab. Retrieved from http://www.hitl.washington.edu/projects/education/puzzle/spatial-cognition.html Search in Google Scholar

29. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf Search in Google Scholar

30. Preuß, P., & Kauffeld, S. (2019). Visualisierung in der Lehre. In S. Kauffeld, & J. Othmer (Eds.), Handbuch Innovative Lehre (pp. 403-408). Springer. Retrieved from https://books.google.at/books?id=g_-ZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR6&dq=Handbuch+Innovative+Lehre&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjw7KCYufHmAhUEMewKHekmAEUQ6AEIKTAA#v=onepage&q=Handbuch%20Innovative%20Lehre&f=false10.1007/978-3-658-22797-5_29 Search in Google Scholar

31. Quintero, E., Salinas, P., González-Mendívil, E., & Ramírez, H. (2015). Augmented Reality App for Calculus: A Proposal for the Development of Spatial Visualization. Procedia Computer Science, 75, 301-305. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.25110.1016/j.procs.2015.12.251 Search in Google Scholar

32. Robimo GmbH. (2019). AR3 – Mathematik (be)greifbar. Lehrkonzept für die AR Applikation Vektor AR3 [Unpublished manuscript]. Vienna. Search in Google Scholar

33. Rach, S. (2014). Charakteristika von Lehr-Lern-Prozessen im Mathematikstudium: Bedingungsfaktoren für den Studienerfolg im ersten Semester. Münster; New York: Waxmann Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

34. Rizzo, A. A., Buckwalter, J. G., Bowerly, T., van der Zaag, C., Humphrey, L., Neumann, U., Chua, C., Kyriakakis, C., van Rooyen, & Sisemore, D. (2000). The virtual classroom: a virtual reality environment for the assessment and rehabilitation of attention deficits. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(3), 483-499.10.1089/10949310050078940 Search in Google Scholar

35. Ruthven, K. (2018). Instructional activity and student interaction with digital resources. In L. Fan, L. Trouche, C. Qi, S. Rezat, & J. Visnovska (Eds.), Research on Mathematics Textbooks and Teachers’ Resources (pp. 261-275). Cham: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

36. Sala, N. M. (2016). Virtual Reality and Education: Overview Across Different Disciplines. In D.H. Choi, A. Dailey-Herbert, & J. Simmons Estes (Eds.), Emerging Tools and Applications in Education (pp. 1-25). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-9837-6.ch001 Search in Google Scholar

37. Salinas, P. (2017). Augmented Reality: Opportunity for developing spatial visualization and learning calculus. In G. Kurubacak, & H. Altinpulluk (Eds.), Mobile Technologies and Augmented Reality in Open Education (pp. 54-74). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Search in Google Scholar

38. Sullivan, P., Mousley, J, & R. Zevenbergen (2004). Describing Elements of Mathematics Lessons that Accommodate Diversity in Student Background. Proceedings of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 28^th, Bergen, Norway, July 14-18, 2004. Vol. 4, 257-264. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED489650.pdf Search in Google Scholar

39. United Nations Technology Innovations Lab (UNTIL) (Ed.) (2019). Inclusion and Diversity. Tech it or leave IT. https://until.un.org/sites/default/files/UNTIL_Inclusion_and_Diversity_FINAL.pdf Search in Google Scholar

40. Wu, H., Lee, S.W., Chang, H., & Liang, J. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.02410.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024 Search in Google Scholar

41. Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Johnson, E. (2011). Augmented reality: An overview and five directions for AR in education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), 4(1), 119-140.10.18785/jetde.0401.10 Search in Google Scholar

42. Zhou, F., Duh, H.-L., & Billinghurst, M. (2008). Trends in augmented reality traching, interaction and display: A review of ten years in ISMAR. Proceedings of the Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 7^th IEEE/ACM International Symposium, 193-202. Cambridge: IEEE. Search in Google Scholar