Learning Effectiveness and Students’ Perceptions in A Flexible Learning Course

1. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, P. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87-122. doi:10.1007/s12528-013-9077-310.1007/s12528-013-9077-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31(Supplement C), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.00110.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Chen, D.-T. (2003). Uncovering the provisos behind flexible learning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 25-30.Search in Google Scholar

4. Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners. Comput. Educ., 87(C), 83-89. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.02010.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education (9^th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

6. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

7. Horton, W. (2012). E-Learning by Design. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.10.1002/9781118256039Search in Google Scholar

8. Li, K. C. (2014). How flexible do students prefer their learning to be? Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 9(1), 35-46.10.1108/AAOUJ-09-01-2014-B004Search in Google Scholar

9. Li, K. C., & Wong, B. Y. Y. (2018). Revisiting the Definitions and Implementation of Flexible Learning. In K. C. Li, K. S. Yuen, & B. T. M. Wong (Eds.), Innovations in Open and Flexible Education (pp. 3-13). Singapore: Springer Singapore.10.1007/978-981-10-7995-5_1Search in Google Scholar

10. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=1688210.1177/016146811311500307Search in Google Scholar

11. Meyners, M. (2012). Equivalence tests – A review. Food Quality and Preference, 26(2), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.05.00310.1016/j.foodqual.2012.05.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Molina, A. I., Jurado, F., de la Cruz, I., Redondo, M. Á., & Ortega, M. (2009). Tools to Support the Design, Execution and Visualization of Instructional Designs. Paper presented at the Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-04265-2_33Search in Google Scholar

13. Oftedal, B., Urstad, K., Hvidsten, V., & Foss, B. (2015). Blended VS On-Campus Learning: A study of Exam Results in the Bachelor Degree in Nursing. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11(3). Retrieved from https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/319Search in Google Scholar

14. Rindermann, H., & Amelang, M. (1994). Entwicklung und Erprobung eines Fragebogens zur studentischen Veranstaltungsevaluation. Empirische Pädagogik, 8(2), 131-151.Search in Google Scholar

15. Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(3), 450.10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450Search in Google Scholar

16. Samarawickrema, R. G. (2005). Determinants of student readiness for flexible learning: Some preliminary findings. Distance Education, 26(1), 49-66.10.1080/01587910500081277Search in Google Scholar

17. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1997). Eight Common but False Objections to Discontinuation of Significance Testing in the Analysis of Research Data. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 37-64). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

18. Stiller, K., Bachmaier, R., & Köster, A. (2013). NiceDesign4KMU. Online-Weiterbildung „Mediengestaltung”. Evaluationsbericht.Search in Google Scholar

19. Tucker, R., & Morris, G. (2012). By Design: Negotiating Flexible Learning in the Built Environment Discipline. Research in Learning Technology, 20(1), n1. doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.1440410.3402/rlt.v20i0.14404Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53(Supplement C), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.00210.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21. Wellek, S. (2010). Testing statistical hypotheses of equivalence and noninferiority (2^nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.10.1201/EBK1439808184Search in Google Scholar

22. Wilson, K., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 33-53.10.1080/03075079712331381121Search in Google Scholar