Open Access

Design and Development of a Self-Assessment Tool and Investigating its Effectiveness for E-Learning


Cite

1. Anderson, L. (2002). Curricular Alignment: A Re-examination. Theory into Practice-Revising Bloom’s taxonomy.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_9Search in Google Scholar

2. Anderson, L.W. and Krathwohl, D.R. (eds.) (2001). A taxonomy for Learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.Search in Google Scholar

3. Baume, D. (2009). Writing and using Good learning outcomes. Leeds Metropolitain University Journal.Search in Google Scholar

4. Brahmawong, C. (1991). Techniques of Writing Self-Learning Modules. National Institute for Multimedia Education (NIME), Ministry of Education, Chiba, Japan.Search in Google Scholar

5. BYU Community (2013). Copyright 101. Retrieved December 01, 2012, from BYU Copyright Licensing: http://copyright101.byu.edu/Search in Google Scholar

6. Chang, N. (2009). Can Students Improve Learning with their use of an Instructor’s Extensive Feedback Assessment Process? In International Journal of Instructional technology and Distance Learning, 6(5), (pp. 49-63).Search in Google Scholar

7. Crump, C. (2005). Designing meaningful and fair tests and assignments: A handbook for teachers. Antigua & Barbuda: Printing and Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

8. Carless, D.; Joughin, G. and Mok, M.M.C. (2006). Learning-oriented Assessment: Principles and Practice. In Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), (pp. 395-398).Search in Google Scholar

9. El Mansour, B. and Mupinga, D.M. (2007). Students’ positive and negative experiences in hybrid and online classes. In College Student Journal, 41(1), (pp. 242-248).Search in Google Scholar

10. Ghosh, M. (2008). Creating Assessment Questions in an eLearning Course. Random Ideas. India.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kostons, D.; Van Gog, T. and Paas, F. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. In Learning and Instruction, 22, (pp. 121-132).10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004Search in Google Scholar

12. Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy. OHIO. The H.W. Wilson Company.Search in Google Scholar

13. Mandernach, B.J. (2003). Quality True-False Items. Retrieved 09 October 2012 from Park University Faculty Development Quick Tips.Search in Google Scholar

14. Marinagi, C. (2011). Web-based adaptive self-assessment in Higher Education. In A. Méndez- Vilas (ed.), Education in a technological world: communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts.Search in Google Scholar

15. Mayer, R.E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164603Search in Google Scholar

16. Mayer, R.E. (2002). Rote versus Meaningful Learning. In Theory into Practice, 41(4), (pp. 226-232). doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4aSearch in Google Scholar

17. Murayama, K. (2003). Test format and learning strategy use. In Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(1), (pp. 1-12).Search in Google Scholar

18. Nayak, B.K. (2010). Understanding the relevance of sample size calculation. In Indian Journal of Ophthalmol, 58(6), (pp. 469-470). Accessed on 17 November 2010. http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2010;volume=58;issue=6;spage=469;epage=470;aulast=Nayak10.4103/0301-4738.71673Search in Google Scholar

19. Park, O-C. (1996). Adaptive instructional systems. In D. H. Jonassen (ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, (pp. 138-153). New York: MacmillanSearch in Google Scholar

20. Reiner, C.M.; Bothell, T.W.; Sudweeks, R.R. and Wood, B. (2002). Preparing Effective Essay Questions -A Self Directed guide for Educators. New Forums Press.Search in Google Scholar

21. Riffell, S.K. and Sibley, D.H. (2003). Learning online: Student perceptions of a hybrid learning format. In Journal of College Science Teaching, 32(6), (pp. 394-399).Search in Google Scholar

22. Gagné, R.M. (2004). The Principles of Instructional Design. Cengage Learning.Search in Google Scholar

23. Roediger, H.L., III. and Butler, A. (2010). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. In Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, (pp. 20-27). http://people.duke.edu/~ab259/pubs/Roediger&Butler(2010).pdfSearch in Google Scholar

24. Schulz, A. (2005). Effectively using self assessments in online learning. 18th Annual conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Illinois: The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.Search in Google Scholar

25. The Independent-Samples t-Test. (n.d.). Available at http://oak.ucc.nau.edu/rh232/courses/EPS525/Handouts/Understanding%20the%20Independent%20t%20Test.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

26. Vella, J. (2002). Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of dialogue in educating adults (Rev. ed). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1027-5207
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Education, Curriculum and Pedagogy, other