Open Access

Model of Local Economic Development in Hungarian Countryside


Cite

[1] Bajmócy, Z. (2011). Bevezetés a helyi gazdaságfejlesztésbe. Szeged: JATEPress.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bálint, L. (2012). Internal migration. In: Őri, P. & Spéder, Zs., eds., Demographic portrait of Hungary 2012 (pp. 123–134). Budapest: Demographic Research Institute HCSO.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bingham, R. D. & Mier, R., eds. (1993). Theories of local economic development. Newbury Park: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Carson, D. B. & Koch, A. (2013). Dividing the local: mobility, scale and fragmented development. Local Economy 28(3), 304–319. DOI: 10.1177/0269094212474869.10.1177/0269094212474869Search in Google Scholar

[5] Clarke, S. E. (2001). Well, maybe: taking context seriously in analysing local economic development. Economic Development Quarterly 15(4), 320–322. DOI: 10.1177/089124240101500405.10.1177/089124240101500405Search in Google Scholar

[6] Connolly, R. (2012). The determinants of the economic crisis in post-socialist Europe. Europe-Asia Studies 64(1), 35–67. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2012.635474.10.1080/09668136.2012.635474Search in Google Scholar

[7] Csepeli, Gy. & Örkény, A. (1999). International comparative investigation into the national identity. Review of Sociology 9 (Special Issue), 95–114.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Darvas, Zs. (2011). Exchange rate policy and economic growth after the financial crisis in Central and Eastern Europe. Eurasian Geography and Economics 52(3), 390–408. DOI: 10.2747/1539-7216.52.3.390.10.2747/1539-7216.52.3.390Search in Google Scholar

[9] Da Silva Machado, F. (2017) Rural change in the context of globalization: examining theoretical issues. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 66(1), 43–53. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.66.1.5.10.15201/hungeobull.66.1.5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Eskulics, Gy., Gelencsér, Zs., Horváth, Sz., Siklósi, R. & Szuromi, O. (2014). Egy hátrányos helyzetű település egyedi lehetőségei és törekvései a helyi gazdaságfejlesztés tekintetében. Jelenkori Társadalmi és Gazdasági Folyamatok 9(1–2), 29–37.10.14232/jtgf.2014.1-2.29-37Search in Google Scholar

[11] Faragó, L. (2017). Autopoietikus (társadalmi) terek koncepciója. Tér és Társadalom 31(1), 7–29. DOI: 10.17649/TET.30.2.2752.10.17649/TET.30.2.2752Search in Google Scholar

[12] Fischer, A. & McKee, A. (2017). A question of capacities? Community resilience and empowerment between assets, abilities and relationships. Journal of Rural Studies 54, 187–197. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.020.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.020Search in Google Scholar

[13] Garcilazo, E. (2011). The evolution of place-based policies and the resurgence of geography in the process of economic development. Local Economy 26(6–7), 459–466. DOI: 10.1177/0269094211417363.10.1177/0269094211417363Search in Google Scholar

[14] Gébert, J., Bajmócy, Z., Málovics, Gy. & Pataki, Gy. (2016). Eszközöktől a jóllétig. A helyi gazdaságfejlesztés körvonalai a képességszemléletben. Tér és Társadalom 30(2), 23–44. DOI: 10.17649/TET.30.2.2752.10.17649/TET.30.2.2752Search in Google Scholar

[15] G. Fekete, É. (2015). A vidéki munkanélküliség tömegessé válásától az új foglalkoztatási modellekig – Tizenöt év foglalkoztatási tárgyú kutatásai. Budapest: Herman Ottó Intézet.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Handlerné Makkos, D., Ónodi, Zs. & Schwertner, J. (2012). “Kincs ami nincs” – Esettanulmány mint módszer a helyi gazdaság-fejlesztési kezdeményezések értékelésében és tervezésében. Falu Város Régió 19(1–2), 25–31.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hildreth, P. (2011). What is localism, and what implications do different models have for managing the local economy? Local Economy 26(8), 702–714. DOI: 10.1177/0269094211422215.10.1177/0269094211422215Search in Google Scholar

[18] Hopkin, D. & Atkinson, H. (2011). The localism agenda. Local Economy 28(8), 625–626. DOI: 10.1177/0269094211422186.10.1177/0269094211422186Search in Google Scholar

[19] Horlings, L. G., Roep, D. & Wellbrock, W. (2018). The role of leadership in place-based development and building institutional arrangements. Local Economy 33(3), 245–268. DOI: 10.1177/0269094218763050.10.1177/0269094218763050604401430034073Search in Google Scholar

[20] Hribar, M. Š. & Lozej, Š. L. (2013). The role of identifying and managing cultural values in rural development. Acta Geographica Slovenica 53(2), 371–378. DOI: 10.3986/AGS53402.10.3986/AGS53402Search in Google Scholar

[21] Illés, S. (2016). A helyi gazdaságfejlesztéssel kapcsolatos általánosítási kísérletek. In: Schwarcz, Gy. & Nagy, N., eds., Önfenntartó falu, fenntartható vidék: Jó gyakorlatok, kreatív megoldások: Helyi gazdaságfejlesztés a Kárpát-medencében (pp. 34–40). Budapest: Nemzetstratégiai Kutatóintézet.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Illés, S. (2014). Local economic development and paternalism in rural Hungary. Paripex Indian Journal of Research 3(2), 122–123.10.15373/22501991/FEB2014/38Search in Google Scholar

[23] Illés, S. & Kincses, Á. (2018). Effects of economic crisis on international circulators to Hungary. Sociology and Anthropology 6(5), 465–477. DOI: 10.13189/sa.2018.060503.10.13189/sa.2018.060503Search in Google Scholar

[24] Katonáné Kovács, J., Varga, E. & Nemes, G. (2016). Understanding the process of social innovation in rural regions: some Hungarian case studies. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118, 22–29. DOI: 10.7896/j.1604.10.7896/j.1604Search in Google Scholar

[25] Kápolnai, Zs., Takács, K. & Takács, L. (2014). Helyi gazdaságfejlesztés Bazsi községben. Jelenkori Társadalmi és Gazdasági Folyamatok 9(1–2), 38–46.10.14232/jtgf.2014.1-2.38-46Search in Google Scholar

[26] Kincses, Á., Nagy, Z. & Tóth, G. (2013). The spatial structures of Europe. Acta Geographica Slovenica 53(2), 43–70. DOI: 10.3986/AGS53103.10.3986/AGS53103Search in Google Scholar

[27] Kis, K., Gál, J. & Véha, A. (2012). Effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability in local rural development partnerships. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 6(3–4), 31–38. DOI: 10.19041/Apstract/2012/3-4/4.10.19041/APSTRACT/2012/3-4/4Search in Google Scholar

[28] Kiss É., Jankó, F., Mikó, E. & Bertalan, L. (2017). Bridge and/or springboard: Sopron/Ödenburg, the Hungarian border town’s role in internal migration after 1989. Mitteilungen der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft 159, 199–220. DOI: 10.23781/moegg159-199.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kiss, J. P. (2018). Az ingázás mobilitási jellemzői a legutóbbi népszámlálások adatai alapján. Területi Statisztika 58(2), 177–199. DOI: 10.15196/TS580203.10.15196/TS580203Search in Google Scholar

[30] Kornai, J. (2000). What the change of system from socialism to capitalism does and does not mean. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(1), 27–42. DOI: 10.1257/jep.14.1.27.10.1257/jep.14.1.27Search in Google Scholar

[31] Korompai, A., Szabó, M. & Nováky, E. (2017). Supporting the absorbent national rural development planning by scenarios. European Countryside 9(3), 416–434. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2017-0025.10.1515/euco-2017-0025Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kovách, I. (2000). LEADER, as a new social order, and the Central- and East-European countries. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 181–189. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00140.10.1111/1467-9523.00140Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lampič, B. & Mrak, I. (2012). Globalization and foreign amenity migrants: the case of foreign home owners in the Pomurska region of Slovenia. European Countryside 4(1), 45–56. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0013-8.10.2478/v10091-012-0013-8Search in Google Scholar

[34] McElwee, G. & Whittam, G. (2012). A sustainable rural? Local Economy 27(2), 91–94. DOI: 10.1177/0269094211428865.10.1177/0269094211428865Search in Google Scholar

[35] Mezei, C. (2006). A helyi gazdaságfejlesztés fogalmi meghatározása. Tér és Társadalom 20(4), 85–96. DOI: 10.17649/TET.20.4.1079.10.17649/TET.20.4.1079Search in Google Scholar

[36] Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: a pragmatic approach. Los Angeles CA: Sage.10.4135/9781544304533Search in Google Scholar

[37] Nadler, R. (2012). Should I stay or should I go? International migrants in the rural town of Zittau/Saxony and their potential impact on regional development. European Countryside 4(1), 57–72. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0014-7.10.2478/v10091-012-0014-7Search in Google Scholar

[38] Panke, D. (2018). Research design and method selection: making good choices in social sciences. Newbury Park: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Pappalardo, G., Sisto, R. & Pecorino, B. (2018). Is the partnership governance able to promote endogenous rural development? A preliminary assessment under the adaptive co-management approach. European Countryside 10(4), 543–565. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-0031.10.2478/euco-2018-0031Search in Google Scholar

[40] Patkós, Cs. (2018). Specialities in institutionalisation on Hungarian LEADER local action groups. European Countryside 10(4), 89–106. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2018-006.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Péter, O. (2014). A helyi gazdaságfejlesztés aspektusai Fertőd példáján. Jelenkori Társadalmi és Gazdasági Folyamatok 9(1–2), 47–56.10.14232/jtgf.2014.1-2.47-53Search in Google Scholar

[42] Péti, M. (2016). A helyi gazdaságfejlesztés megjelenése az Országos Fejlesztési és Területfejlesztési Koncepcióban és a partnerségi megállapodásban. In: Schwarcz, Gy. & Nagy, N., eds., Önfenntartó falu, fenntartható vidék: jó gyakorlatok, kreatív megoldások: helyi gazdaságfejlesztés a Kárpát-medencében (pp. 49–53). Budapest: Nemzetstratégiai Kutatóintézet.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Pike, A., ed. (2011). Brands and branding geographies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.10.4337/9780857930842Search in Google Scholar

[44] Quendler, E. (2018). CommunalAudit, a guide for municipalities in Austria to foster inclusive and sustainable development. Studies in Agricultural Economics 120, 17–24. DOI: 10.7896/j.1720.10.7896/j.1720Search in Google Scholar

[45] Rablen, M. D. (2012). The promotion of local wellbeing: a primer for policymakers. Local Economy 27(3), 297–314. DOI: 10.1177/0269094211434488.10.1177/0269094211434488Search in Google Scholar

[46] Rapkay, B., Illés, S. & Stárics, R. (2013). A helyi gazdaságfejlesztés egyes gondolati előzményei és következményei. Földrajzi Közlemények 137(1), 28–39.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Reese, L. A. & Rosenfeld, R. A. (2001). What is the question to which the answer is: local civic culture? Economic Development Quarterly 15(4), 323–326. DOI: 10.1177/089124240101500406.10.1177/089124240101500406Search in Google Scholar

[48] Šery, M. (2014). The identification of residents with their region and the continuity of socio-historical development. Moravian Geographical Reports 22(3), 53–64. DOI: 10.2478/mgr-2014-0018.10.2478/mgr-2014-0018Search in Google Scholar

[49] Simon, S. & Randalls, S. (2016). Geography, ontological politics and the resilient future. Dialogues in Human Geography 6(1), 3–18. DOI: 10.1177/2043820615624047.10.1177/2043820615624047Search in Google Scholar

[50] Simonyi, P., Illés, S., Zsótér, B. & Rapkay, B. (2013). Local economic development in the Hungarian countryside: the heritage of paternalism. Central European Regional Policy and Human Geography 3(2), 41–53.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Skerratt, S. (2013). Localism: identifying complexities and ways forward for research and practice. Local Economy 28(3), 237–239. DOI: 10.1177/0269094213485529.10.1177/0269094213485529Search in Google Scholar

[52] Smith, I. & Atkinson, R. (2011). Mobility and the smart, green and inclusive Europe. Local Economy 26(6–7), 562–576. DOI: 10.1177/0269094211418899.10.1177/0269094211418899Search in Google Scholar

[53] Smith, M., Sulyok, J., Jancsik, A., Puczkó, L., Kiss, K., Sziva, I., Papp-Váry, Á. F. & Michalkó, G. (2018). Nomen est omen – Tourist image of the Balkans. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin 67(2), 173–188. DOI: 10.15201/hungeobull.67.2.5.10.15201/hungeobull.67.2.5Search in Google Scholar

[54] Szabó, D. (2017). Determining the target groups of Hungarian short food supply chains based on consumer attitude and socio-demographic factors. Studies in Agricultural Economics 119, 115–122. DOI: 10.7896/j.1705.10.7896/j.1705Search in Google Scholar

[55] Szabó, Sz. (2012). Kiút az elmaradottságból? A Sellyei kistérség esélyei egy fókuszcsoportos interjú tapasztalatai alapján. Comitatus 22(9–10), 55–68.Search in Google Scholar

[56] Szücs, J. (1988). Three historical regions of Europe. In: Keane, J., ed., Civil society and state (pp. 291–332). London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Végh, K. & Illés, S. (2011). Hypothetical models of food consumption behaviour by the elderly. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Walburn, D. (2011). Is there a fresh chance for local authorities to take the lead in local economic development? Local Economy 26(2), 75–81. DOI: 10.1177/0269094210397429.10.1177/0269094210397429Search in Google Scholar

[59] Webster, N. A. (2017). Rural-to-rural translocal practices: Thai women entrepreneurs in the Swedish countryside. Journal of Rural Studies 56, 219–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.016.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.09.016Search in Google Scholar

[60] Zsoter, B., Schmidt, A. & Trandafir, N. (2014). Research of satisfaction related to investments (2006–2010) accomplished by the local council in Sandorfalva for durable development. Quaestus 3(5), 107–114.Search in Google Scholar

[61] Zsótér, B. & Tóth, A. (2014). Examination of satisfaction related to investments (2006–2011) accomplished by the local council in Abony. Analecta Technica Szegedinensia 1(1), 33–37. DOI: 10.14232/analecta.2014.1.33-37.10.14232/analecta.2014.1.33-37Search in Google Scholar

[62] Barca, F. (2009). An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, commissioner for regional policy. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/regi/dv/barca_report_/barca_report_en.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[63] Illés, S. & Simonyi, P. (2016). A helyi gazdaságfejlesztés, településfejlesztés új, a belső erőforrásokra építő módszertanának és új modelljének kidolgozása, a kitörési irányok és a jó gyakorlatok beazonosítása. (Kézirat), Budapest: Aktív Társadalom Alapítvány.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1803-8417
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Ecology, other