[Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 20-32.10.1162/rest.91.1.20]Search in Google Scholar
[Aghion, P., Carlin, W., & Schaffer, M. (2002). Competition, innovation and growth in transition: Exploring the interactions between policies. William Davidson Working Paper 501. The William Davidson Institute.10.2139/ssrn.311407]Search in Google Scholar
[Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.10.2307/2951599]Search in Google Scholar
[Ahn, S. (2002). Competition, innovation and productivity growth: A review of theory and evidence. OECD. Economics Department Working Papers 317, 1-78.10.2139/ssrn.318059]Search in Google Scholar
[Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Comparing financial systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 465-476.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Asiedu, E., & Freeman, J. A. (2009). The effect of corruption on investment growth: Evidence from firms in Latin America, Sub-Saharan Africa and transition countries. Review of Development Economics, 13(2), 200-214.10.1111/j.1467-9361.2009.00507.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Aubert, J.-E. (2005). Promoting innovation in developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, No. 3554.10.1596/1813-9450-3554]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayyagari, M., Demirgtic-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Firm innovation in emerging markets: The role of finance, governance and competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1545-1580.10.1017/S0022109011000378]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayyagari, M., Demirgtic-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2010). Are innovating firms victims or perpetrators? Tax evasion, bribe payments, and the role of external finance in developing countries. Policy Research Working Paper Series 5389, The World Bank.10.1596/1813-9450-5389]Search in Google Scholar
[Ayyagari, M., Demirgtic-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2007). Firm innovation in emerging markets: The roles of governance and finance. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4157, The World Bank.10.1596/1813-9450-4157]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumol, W. J. (1980). Public and private enterprises in a mixed economy (ed.). New York: St. Martin’s Press.10.1007/978-1-349-16394-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Bellos, S., & Subasat, T. (2012). Corruption and foreign direct investment: A panel gravity model approach. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64(4), 565-574.10.1111/j.1467-8586.2010.00370.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloom, N., & Reenen, J. V. (2010). Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? The Journal of Economic Perspective, 24(1), 203-224.10.1257/jep.24.1.203]Search in Google Scholar
[Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 529-554.10.1111/1467-937X.00097]Search in Google Scholar
[Boardman, A. F., & Vining, A. R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1-33.10.1086/467167]Search in Google Scholar
[Bozec, R., Breton, G., & Cote, L. (2002). The performance of state-owned enterprises revisited. Financial Accountability and Management, 18(4), 383-407.10.1111/1468-0408.00158]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, A. (1995). Should Telstra be privatized? Paper presented at the 24th Conference of Economics, Griffith University, Adelaide.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cameron, G. (1996). Innovation and economic growth. CEPDP, 277. Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campos, N. F., Dimova, R., & Saleh, A. (2010). Whither corruption? A quantitative survey of the literature on corruption and growth. IZA Discussion Paper. Institute for the study of Labor (IZA).10.2139/ssrn.1716129]Search in Google Scholar
[Capobianco, A., & Christiansen, H. (2011). Competitive neutrality and state-owned enterprises: Challenges and policy options. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers No. 1, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlin, W., Fries, S., Schaffer, M., & Seabright, P. (2001). Competition and enterprise performance in transition economies: Evidence from a cross-country survey. Working Paper 63. EBRD, London, UK.10.2139/ssrn.270320]Search in Google Scholar
[Chang, J. (2007). State-owned enterprise reform. United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), New York, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christiansen, H. (2013). Balancing commercial and non-commercial priorities of state-owned enterprises. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers No. 6, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 78(2), 232-243.10.2307/2109925]Search in Google Scholar
[Cox, R. F., Issa, R. R. A., & Ahrens, D. (2003). Management’s perception of key performance indicators for construction. Journal of Construction, Engineering and Management, 129(2), 142-151.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:2(142)]Search in Google Scholar
[De Rosa, D., Gooroochurn, N., & Gorg, H. (2010). Corruption and productivity firm-level evidence from BEEPS survey. Kiel Working Paper 1632. Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany.10.1596/1813-9450-5348]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd edition). London: Pinter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fries, S., Lysenko, T., & Polenac, S. (2003). The 2002 business environment and enterprise performance survey: Results from a survey of 6,100 firms. EBRD Working paper 84, EBRD, London, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 32(6), 899-933.10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaviria, A. (2002). Assessing the effects of corruption and crime on firm performance: Evidence from Latin America. Emerging Markets Review, 3, 245-268.10.1016/S1566-0141(02)00024-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Habiyaremye, A., & Raymond, W. (2013). Transnational corruption and innovation in transition economies. UNU-MERIT Working Papers. Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hana, U. (2013). Competitive advantage achievement through innovation and knowledge. Journal of Competitiveness, 5(1), 82-96.10.7441/joc.2013.01.06]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, J. A. (1992). Innovation, firm size and firm age. Small Business Economics, 4(1), 37-44.10.1007/BF00402214]Search in Google Scholar
[Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2003). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture and influence in transition economies. Journal of Competitive Economics, 31, 751-773.10.1016/j.jce.2003.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, corruption and influence in transition. World Bank Working Paper 2444. World Bank, Washington, USA.10.1596/1813-9450-2444]Search in Google Scholar
[Holcomb, T. R., Holmes, M. R. Jr., & Connely, B. L. (2009). Making the most of what you have: Managerial ability as a source of resource value creation. Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 457-485.10.1002/smj.747]Search in Google Scholar
[Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial, behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufmann, D., & Wei, S.-J. (2000). Does grease money speed up the wheels of commerce? IMF Working Paper 00/64. IMF, Washington, USA.10.5089/9781451848557.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Krammer, S. M. S. (2013, June). Greasing the wheels of change: The impact of corruption on firms? Innovation in transition economies. Paper presented at 35th Druid Celebration Conference, Barcelona, Spain.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kueng, P. (2000). Process performance measurement system: A tool to support process-based organizations. Total Quality Management, 11(1), 67-85.10.1080/0954412007035]Search in Google Scholar
[La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57(3), 1147–1170.10.1111/1540-6261.00457]Search in Google Scholar
[Laux, J. K., & Molot, M. A. (1988). State capitalism: Public enterprise in Canada. Cornell University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lederman, D. (2010). An international multilevel analysis of product innovation. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 606-619.10.1057/jibs.2009.30]Search in Google Scholar
[Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8, 8-14. Reprint in A. J. Heidenhaimer, M. Johnson, & V. T. Le Vine (Eds.), Political corruption: A handbook (pp. 389-403). Oxford: Transaction Books.10.1177/000276426400800303]Search in Google Scholar
[Leys, C. (1965). What is the problem about corruption? Journal of Modern African Studies, 3, 215-230. Reprint in A. J. Heidenhaimer, M. Johnson, & V. T. Le Vine (Eds.), Political corruption: A handbook (pp. 389-403). Oxford: Transaction Books.10.1017/S0022278X00023636]Search in Google Scholar
[Lui, F. T. (1985). An equilibrium queuing model of bribery. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 760-781.10.1086/261329]Search in Google Scholar
[Luo, Y. (2005). An organizational perspective of corruption. Management and Organizational Review, 1(1), 119-154.10.1111/j.1740-8784.2004.00006.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mahagaonkar, P. (2009). Corruption and innovation. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, 25, 81-97.10.1007/978-1-4419-1228-2_5]Search in Google Scholar
[McCann, P., & Oxley, L. (2012). Innovation, entrepreneurship, geography and growth. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(3), 373-376.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00720.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Megginson, W. L., Nash, N. C., & Van Randenborgh, M. (1994). The financial and operating performance of newly privatized firms: An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 49, 403-452.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb05147.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitra, P., Muravyev, A., & Schaffer, M. E. (2009). Convergence in institutions and market outcomes. Policy Research Working Paper 4819. World Bank, Washington, USA.10.1596/1813-9450-4819]Search in Google Scholar
[Molero, J., & Garcia, A. (2008). Factors affecting innovation revisited. WP 05/08. Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Campus de Somosaguas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musacchio, A., Pineda Ayerbe, E. I., & García, G. (2015). State-owned enterprise reform in Latin America: Issues and possible solutions. Inter American Development Bank discussion paper No. IDB-DP-401.10.18235/0000128]Search in Google Scholar
[Musacchio, A. (2013). The Ivey Business Journal interview: Aldo Musacchio. Ivey Business Journal.]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1993). Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? American Economic Review, 83(2), 409-414.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nickell, S. (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 724-746.10.1086/262040]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2015). Guidelines on corporate governance of state-owned enterprises. OECD Publishing, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2011). State-owned enterprises governance reform: An inventory of recent change. OECD Publishing, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. 3rd Edition, OECD Publishing, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. (1999). From boosting innovation: The cluster approach. OECD Proceedings. OECD, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raffo, J., Ghuillery, S., & Miotti, L. (2008). Northern and southern innovativity: A comparison across European and Latin American countries. European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 219-239.10.1080/09578810802060777]Search in Google Scholar
[Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71-S102.10.1086/261725]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenberg, N. (2004). Innovation and economic growth. OECD, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7-31.10.1108/02651339410057491]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawang S. (2011). Key performance indicators for innovation implementation: Perceptions vs. actual usage. Asia Pacific Management Review. 16(1), 23-29.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schumpeter, J. A. (1911). Theorie der wirtschaftlichen entwicklung. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(2), 405-437.10.1111/1536-7150.00167]Search in Google Scholar
[Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus private ownership. Journal of Economic Perspective, 12, 133-150.10.1257/jep.12.4.133]Search in Google Scholar
[Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108(3), 599-617.10.2307/2118402]Search in Google Scholar
[Vial, V., & Hanoteau, J. (2010). Corruption, manufacturing plant growth, and the Asian paradox: Indonesian evidence. World Development, 38(5), 693-705.10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldemar, F. S. (2012). New products and corruption: Evidence from Indian firms. The Developing Economies, 50(3), 268-284.10.1111/j.1746-1049.2012.00171.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, L., & Yung, K. (2011). Do state enterprises manage earnings more than privately owned firms? The case of China. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 38(7), 794-812.10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02254.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Wong, S. C. Y. (2004). Improving corporate governance in SOEs: An integrated approach. Corporate Governance International, 7(2), 5-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. (2014). Corporate governance of state-owned enterprises: A toolkit. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0222-5, World Bank, Washington DC, USA.10.1596/978-1-4648-0222-5DC]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[World Bank. (2006). Held by the visible hand: The challenge of SOE corporate governance for emerging markets. World Bank, Washington, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in business – the economics and politics of government ownership. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Economic Forum. (2016). Global competitiveness report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum, Geneva.]Search in Google Scholar