Open Access

Team Learning Processes and Activities in Organization: A Case Study


Cite

Argyris, C. & Schon, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Philippines: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Ashauer, S. A. & Macan, T. (2013). How Can Leaders Foster Team Learning? Effects of Leader-Assigned Mastery and Performance Goals and Psychological Safety. The Journal of Psychology, 147(6), 541-561.10.1080/00223980.2012.719940Search in Google Scholar

Babnik, K., Trunk Širca, N. & Dermol, V. (2014). Individuals learning in work teams: Support to knowledge management initiatives and an important source of organizational learning. Science Direct, 124, 178-185.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.475Search in Google Scholar

Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2012). Three conceptual themes for future research on teams. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 5(1), 45-48.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01403.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bell, B. S., Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Blawath, S. (2012). Team learning: A theoretical integration and review. In S. W. J. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology Vol. 2. (pp. 859-909). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Berber, N. & Slavić, A. (2016). Obuka ljudskih resursa u Srbiji na bazi CRANET istraživanja. Ekonomske teme, 54(4), 535-548.Search in Google Scholar

Bunderson, J. S. & Reagans, R. E. (2011). Power, Status, and Learning in Organizations. Organization Studies, 22(5), 1182-1194.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Cunningham, J. B. & McCrum-Gardner, E. (2007). Power, effect and sample size using GPower: practical issues for researchers and members of research ethics committees. Evidence Based Midwifery, 5(4), 132-136.Search in Google Scholar

Decuyper, S., Dochy, F. & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organisations. Educational Research Review, 5(2), 111–133.10.1016/j.edurev.2010.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behaviour in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.10.2307/2666999Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A.C., Bohmer, R. & Pisano, G. (2001). Speeding Up Team Learning. Harvard Business Review, 125-132.Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A.C., Winslow, A. B., Bohmer, R. M. & Pisano, G. P. (2003). Learning How and Learning What: effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 197-223.10.1111/1540-5915.02316Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking Up in the Operating Room: How Team Leaders Promote Learning in Interdisciplinary Action Teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1420-1452.10.1111/1467-6486.00386Search in Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. C., Dillon, J.R. & Roloff, K.S. (2007). Three Perspectives on Team Learning. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 269-314.10.5465/078559811Search in Google Scholar

Eddy, E. R., Tannenbaum, S. I. & Mathieu, J. E. (2013). Helping teams to help themselves: comparing two team-led debriefing methods. Personnel Psychology, 66, 975-1008.10.1111/peps.12041Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, A. P. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Porter, C., West, B. J. & Moon, H. (2003). Team Learning: Collectively Connecting the Dots. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 821-835.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.821Search in Google Scholar

Farquhar, D. J. (2012). Case Study Research for Business. London: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446287910Search in Google Scholar

Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 78-91.Search in Google Scholar

Garvin, D.A., Edmondson, A.C. & Gino, F. (2008). Is Yours a Learning Organization? Harvard Business Review, 86(3), 109-116.Search in Google Scholar

George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update, Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, C. B. & Vermeulen, F. (2003). A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 202–239.10.2307/3556657Search in Google Scholar

Goldsmith, M., Morgan, H. & Ogg, A. J. (2004). Leading Organizational Learning, Harnessing the Power of Knowledge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Graetz, F. & Smith, A. (2005). Organizing Forms in Change Management: The Role of Structures, Processes and Boundaries in a Longitudinal Case Analysis. Journal of Change Management, 5(3), 311-328.10.1080/14697010500226723Search in Google Scholar

Guchait, P. & Hamilton, K. (2013). The temporal priority of team learning behaviors vs. shared mental models, in service management teams. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 19-28.Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, S., Peterson, R. S. & Anand N. (2014). The Process of Team Boundary Spanning in Multi-Organizational Contexts. Small Group Research, 45(5), 506-538.10.1177/1046496414534474Search in Google Scholar

Hedlund, E. & Österberg, J. (2013). Team Training, Team Learning, Leadership and Psychology Safety: A Study of Team Training and Team Learning Behavior during a Swedish Military Staff Exercise. Sociology Mind, 3(1), 89-98.10.4236/sm.2013.31014Search in Google Scholar

Kayes, D. C. & Burnett, G. (2006). Team Learning in Organizations: A Review and Integration, OLKC Conference at the University of Warwick, Coventry.Search in Google Scholar

Kayes A. & Kayes D.C. (2011). Team Learning. In: The Learning Advantage. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. & Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lazarević, S. & Krstić, A. (2013). Characteristics of Team Learning in Contemporary Organizations. In: Chova G. L., Martinez L. A. & Torres C. I. (Eds.): 5th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies - EDULEARN13 (pp. 411-420), 1st-3rd July, Barcelona, Spain.Search in Google Scholar

Lazarević, S. (2014). Team learning in the function of the development of the bureaucratic organization as a learning organization. Тhemes, 2, 837-853.Search in Google Scholar

Lazarević, S. & Lukić, J. (2015). Building Smart Organization Throught Learning and Development of Employees. In: Grozdanić R. & Jovančević D. (Eds.), Creative Education for Employment Growth (pp. 256-268), Monography from The Fourth International Conference EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, Belgrade.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2017). Team Learning: New Insights Through a Temporal Lens. Small Group Research, 48(2), 123-130.10.1177/1046496416689308Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, B. & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319-340.10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535Search in Google Scholar

McShane, S. & Von Glinow, M. (2009). Organizational Behaviour. Irwin: McGraw Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Fjeldstad, Ø. D., Miles, G. & Lettl, C. (2010). Designing Organizations to Meet 21st-Century Opportunities and Challenges. Organizational Dynamics, 39(2), 90-103.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2010.01.009Search in Google Scholar

Mohrman, S. A., Cohen, S. G., & Morhman, A. M., Jr. (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

Petković, M. & Lukić, J. (2014). New organizational forms supported by the information and communication technology: the case of Serbian ICT industry. Facta Universitatis: Economics and Organization, 11(2), 101-115.Search in Google Scholar

Sarin, S., & McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34, 707–740.10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02350.xSearch in Google Scholar

Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Sole, D. & Edmondson, A. (2002). Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management, 13, 17-34.10.1111/1467-8551.13.s2.3Search in Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., Mathieu, J. E., Salas, E. & Cohen, D. (2012). Teams Are Changing: Are Research and Practice Evolving Fast Enough? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 2-24.10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01396.xSearch in Google Scholar

Van der Haar, S., Segers, M. & Jehn, K. A. (2013). Towards a contextualized model of team learning processes and outcomes. Educational Research Review, 10, 1-12.10.1016/j.edurev.2013.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Wiedow, A., Konradt, U., Ellwart, T. & Steenfatt, C. (2013). Direct and Indirect Effects of Team Learning on Team Outcomes: A Multiple Mediator Analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 17(4), 232-251.10.1037/a0034149Search in Google Scholar

Woerkom, M. & Croon, M. (2009). The relationships between team learning activities and team performance. Personnel Review, 38(5), 560-577.10.1108/00483480910978054Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Method. CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Zellmer-Bruhn, M. & Gibron, C. (2006). Multinational organization context: implications for team learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 501-518.10.5465/amj.2006.21794668Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2217-3668
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Business and Economics, Political Economics, other, Business Management