Case Studies Using the Polygraph to Assist in Assessing Sexual Risk in Three Clerics

British Psychological Society (2004), A review of the Current Scientific Status and Fields of Application of Polygraphic Deception Detection. Available from: http://www.bps.org.ukSearch in Google Scholar

Ben-Shakhar, G. (2008), The case against the use of polygraph examinations to monitor post-conviction sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 13 (2), 191–207.10.1348/135532508X298577Search in Google Scholar

Blair, J.P. (2009), Interviewing and interrogation. in: D.T. Wilcox (ed.), The Use of the Polygraph in Assessing, Treating and Supervising Sex Offenders: A Practitioner’s Guide. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9780470743232.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Collins, N. (2019), The Utility of Polygraph With Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham.Search in Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1985), Telling Lies. New York: Norton and Company Incorporated.Search in Google Scholar

Grubin, D., Madsen, L., Parsons, S., Sosnowski, D., Warberg, B. (2004), A prospective study of the impact of polygraphy on high-risk behaviours in adult sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 209–222.10.1177/10790632040160030315326881Search in Google Scholar

Grubin, D. (2006), Polygraph pilot report: Final report. London: Home Office.Search in Google Scholar

Grubin, D. (2008), The case for polygraph testing of sex offenders. Legal and Crimino-logical Psychology, 13, 177–189.10.1348/135532508X295165Search in Google Scholar

Hart, S.D., Kropp, P.R., Laws, D.R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K.A. (2003), The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Search in Google Scholar

Heil, P., English, K. (2009), Sex Offender Polygraph Testing in the United States: Trends and Controversies. in: D.T. Wilcox (ed.), The Use of the Polygraph in Assessing, Treating and Supervising Sex Offenders: A Practitioner’s Guide. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9780470743232.ch10Search in Google Scholar

Jack, A., & Wilcox, D.T. (2018), The psychological assessment of clerics. Pastoral Psychology, 67 (1), 55–64.10.1007/s11089-017-0784-y575627929367786Search in Google Scholar

Khan, J., Nelson, R., Handler, M. (2009), An exploration of emotion and cognition during polygraph testing. Polygraph, 38 (3), 184–197.Search in Google Scholar

National Research Council (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Offender Management Act (2007), Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Office of Public Sector Information. Available from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/21/part/3Search in Google Scholar

Prochaska, J.O., & DiClemente, C.C. (1983), Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51 (3), 390–395.10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390Search in Google Scholar

Sosnowski, D., & Wilcox, D.T. (2009), Exploring Sex Offender Research and Practice With the Employment of Polygraphy. Presentation to Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers Annual Conference. Dallas, Texas.Search in Google Scholar

The Economist (2019), Testing the test – Lie-detectors might be useful. 01/26. London, (55) The Economist group.Search in Google Scholar

Walczyk, J.J., Sewell, N., & DiBenedetto, M.B. (2018), A review of approaches to detecting malingering in forensic contexts and promising cognitive load-inducing lie detection techniques. Frontiers in psychiatry, 9, 700.10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00700630818230622488Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T. (2000), Application of the clinical polygraph examination to the assessment, treatment and monitoring of sex offenders. The Journal of Sexual Aggression, 5, 134–152.10.1080/13552600008413304Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T. (2009), Opportunities and responsibilities. in: D.T. Wilcox (ed.), The use of the polygraph in assessing, treating and supervising sex offenders. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9780470743232Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T. (2013), Ethical practice in the use of the polygraph in working with sex offenders. in: K. Harrison & B. Rainey (eds.), Legal and ethical aspects of sex offender treatment and management (388–405). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9781118314876.ch23Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T. (2019), A polygraph assisted psychological assessment of risk of sexual harm posed by a priest. European Polygraph, 2 (19).10.2478/ep-2019-0006Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T. & Donathy, M.L. (2008), The utility of the polygraph with sex offenders in England. Conference Permanente Europeenne de la Probation. Available from: http://www.cep-probation.org/news/65/46/the-utility-of-the-polygraph-with-sex-offenders-in-englandSearch in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T. & Donathy, M.L. (2014), British experiences of Polygraph testing Sexual Offenders: An update. European Polygraph, 8(1), 23–28.10.2478/ep-2014-0002Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T., O’Keefe, Z., Oliver, C. (2009), Case Studies in the Utility of the Poly-graph. in: D.T. Wilcox (ed.), The Use of the Polygraph in Assessing, Treating and Supervising Sex Offenders: A Practitioner’s Guide. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.10.1002/9780470743232.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T., & Sosnowski, D. (2005), Polygraph examination of British sexual offenders: A pilot study on sexual history disclosure testing. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11 (1), 3–25.10.1080/13552600410001667797Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, D.T., Sosnowski, D., Warberg, B., & Beech, A.R. (2005), Sexual history disclosure using the polygraph in a sample of British sex offenders in treatment. Polygraph Journal, 34 (3), 171–181.10.1080/13552600410001667797Search in Google Scholar

Wood, J.L., Alleyne, E., Ó Ciardha, C., & Gannon, T.A. (2020), An Evaluation of Polygraph Testing by Police to Manage Individuals Convicted or Suspected of Sexual Offending. University of Kent. Unpublished.Search in Google Scholar