Knowledge management at Ukrainian industrial enterprises in the context of innovative development

Aymen R. A., Alhamzah, A., & Bilal, B. (2019). A Multi-Level Study of Influence Knowledge Management Small and Medium Enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 21–31.AymenR. AAlhamzahABilalB.2019A Multi-Level Study of Influence Knowledge Management Small and Medium EnterprisesPolish Journal of Management Studies191213110.17512/pjms.2019.19.1.02Search in Google Scholar

Bandarian, R. (2007). Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2(4), 73–85.BandarianR.2007Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logicJournal of Technology Management and Innovation247385Search in Google Scholar

Bilovodska, О. А. (2018). Marketynhova polityka rozpodilu innovatsiynoyi produktsiyi promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Marketing policy of distribution of innovative products of industrial enterprises]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Centr uchbovoi literatury.BilovodskaО. А2018Marketynhova polityka rozpodilu innovatsiynoyi produktsiyi promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Marketing policy of distribution of innovative products of industrial enterprises]Kyiv, UkraineCentr uchbovoi literaturySearch in Google Scholar

Blanc, B. L., & Bouillon, J. L. (2012). Organizational devices for knowledge management: Proposal for a crossover perspective between knowledge sciences and communication sciences. VINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems, 42(3/4), 382–395. doi: 10.1108/03055721211267503BlancB. L.BouillonJ. L.2012Organizational devices for knowledge management: Proposal for a crossover perspective between knowledge sciences and communication sciencesVINE: The journal of information and knowledge management systems423/438239510.1108/03055721211267503Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Borjigen, C. (2015). Mass collaborative knowledge management: Towards the next generation of knowledge management studies. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(3), 325–342.BorjigenC.2015Mass collaborative knowledge management: Towards the next generation of knowledge management studiesProgram: Electronic Library and Information Systems49332534210.1108/PROG-02-2015-0023Search in Google Scholar

BreakFast (2016). Ukraina v Globalnom reytinge innovatsiy [Ukraine in the Global ranking of innovations]. Retrieved from http://www.break-fast.com.ua/ukrainav-mirovom-rejtinge-innovacij/BreakFast2016Ukraina v Globalnom reytinge innovatsiy [Ukraine in the Global ranking of innovations]Retrieved from http://www.break-fast.com.ua/ukrainav-mirovom-rejtinge-innovacij/Search in Google Scholar

Bučková, J. (2015). Corporate culture as an important factor in the implementation of knowledge management. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(3), 51–61.BučkováJ2015Corporate culture as an important factor in the implementation of knowledge managementForum Scientiae Oeconomia335161Search in Google Scholar

Downs J. B., Hossfeld, O., & Velamuri, V. K. (2019). The EC-LQO five-factor framework: An alternative lens for business model innovation in highly knowledge-intensive industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40(3), 309–320.DownsJ. BHossfeldO.VelamuriV. K.2019The EC-LQO five-factor framework: An alternative lens for business model innovation in highly knowledge-intensive industriesManagerial and Decision Economics40330932010.1002/mde.3003Search in Google Scholar

European Innovation Scoreboard (2016). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_enEuropean Innovation Scoreboard2016Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_enSearch in Google Scholar

European Innovation Scoreboard (2018). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_enEuropean Innovation Scoreboard2018Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_enSearch in Google Scholar

Eurostat (2019). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostatEurostat2019Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostatSearch in Google Scholar

Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., & Wiklund, J. (2018). Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1). doi: 10.5465/amp.2017.0206FiniR.RasmussenE.SiegelD.WiklundJ.2018Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal ImpactsAcademy of Management Perspectives32110.5465/amp.2017.0206Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fitri, H., Nugraha, A. T., Hakimah, Y., & Manihuruk, Ch. (2019). Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge and Competency Through Intellectual Capital. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 132–141. doi: 10.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.11FitriH.NugrahaA. THakimahYManihurukCh2019Strategic Management of Organizational Knowledge and Competency Through Intellectual CapitalPolish Journal of Management Studies19213214110.17512/pjms.2019.19.2.11Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Formánek, I. (2015). Knowledge management as an important part of strategic management. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(3), 45–50.FormánekI2015Knowledge management as an important part of strategic managementForum Scientiae Oeconomia334550Search in Google Scholar

Ibidunni, A. S., Olokundun, M. A., Motilewa, D. B., Atolagbe, T. M., & Osibanjo, O. A. (2018). Group-tacit knowledge and organisational effectiveness: analysis of effects using a mixed method approach. Business: Theory and Practice, 19, 135–145. doi: 10.3846/btp.2018.14IbidunniA. S.OlokundunM. A.MotilewaD. B.AtolagbeT. M.OsibanjoO. A.2018Group-tacit knowledge and organisational effectiveness: analysis of effects using a mixed method approachBusiness: Theory and Practice1913514510.3846/btp.2018.14Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Illiashenko, N. S. (2019). Upravlinnya vyperedzhayuchym innovatsiynym rozvytkom promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of advanced innovative development of industrial enterprises]. Sumy, Ukraine: Trytoria.IlliashenkoN. S.2019Upravlinnya vyperedzhayuchym innovatsiynym rozvytkom promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of advanced innovative development of industrial enterprises]Sumy, UkraineTrytoriaSearch in Google Scholar

Illiashenko, S., & Rot-Sierov, Y. (2016). Knowledge as a factor of organization’s competitive benefits: prospects for Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХ, 156(1–2), 49–53.IlliashenkoS.Rot-SierovY.2016Knowledge as a factor of organization’s competitive benefits: prospects for UkraineEconomic Annals-ХХ1561–2495310.21003/ea.V156-0011Search in Google Scholar

Industriya 4.0 v Ukrayini (2018). Industriya 4.0 v mashynobuduvanni. Stan v Ukrayini ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Industry 4.0 in machine-building industry. State of Ukraine and prospects for development]. Retrieved from https://industry4-0-ukraine.com.ua/Industriya 4.0 v Ukrayini2018Industriya 4.0 v mashynobuduvanni. Stan v Ukrayini ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Industry 4.0 in machine-building industry. State of Ukraine and prospects for development]Retrieved from https://industry4-0-ukraine.com.ua/Search in Google Scholar

Informator (2019). Bloomberg nazvav novu pozytsiyu Ukrayiny u reytynhu naybilʹsh innovatsiynykh ekonomik svitu [Bloomberg has announced Ukraine’s new ranking in the rating of the most innovative economies in the world]. Retrieved from https://informator.news/bloomberg-nazvav-novu-pozytsiyu-ukrajinyu-rejtynhu-najbilsh-innovatsijnyh-ekonomik-svitu/Informator2019Bloomberg nazvav novu pozytsiyu Ukrayiny u reytynhu naybilʹsh innovatsiynykh ekonomik svitu [Bloomberg has announced Ukraine’s new ranking in the rating of the most innovative economies in the world]Retrieved from https://informator.news/bloomberg-nazvav-novu-pozytsiyu-ukrajinyu-rejtynhu-najbilsh-innovatsijnyh-ekonomik-svitu/Search in Google Scholar

Instytut ekonomichnykh doslidzhenʹ ta politychnykh konsulʹtatsiy (2016). Shchorichna otsinka dilovoho klimatu [Annual assessment of the business climate]. Retrieved from http://www.ier.com.ua/ua/sme_development/ABCA?pid=6494Instytut ekonomichnykh doslidzhenʹ ta politychnykh konsulʹtatsiy2016Shchorichna otsinka dilovoho klimatu [Annual assessment of the business climate]Retrieved from http://www.ier.com.ua/ua/sme_development/ABCA?pid=6494Search in Google Scholar

Khedhaouria, A. & Jamal, A. (2015). Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(5), 932–948.KhedhaouriaA.JamalA.2015Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teamsJournal of Knowledge Management19593294810.1108/JKM-01-2015-0039Search in Google Scholar

Kovtunenko, Yu. V. (2012). Osoblyvosti orhanizatsiyi protsesu komertsializatsiyi innovatsiynykh rozrobok vysokotekhnolohichnykh pidpryyemstv [Organization features of the commercialization process of high-tech enterprises’ innovations]. Pratsi Odesʹkoho politekhnichnoho universytetu, 2(39), 313–317.KovtunenkoYu. V2012Osoblyvosti orhanizatsiyi protsesu komertsializatsiyi innovatsiynykh rozrobok vysokotekhnolohichnykh pidpryyemstv [Organization features of the commercialization process of high-tech enterprises’ innovations]Pratsi Odesʹkoho politekhnichnoho universytetu239313317Search in Google Scholar

Kuzmin A. E., & Kostsyk R. S. (2013). Vybir metodiv komertsializatsii innovatsiinoi produktsii pidpryiemstv [The choice of commercialization methods of enterprises innovative products]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 9, 6–8.KuzminA. EKostsykR. S2013Vybir metodiv komertsializatsii innovatsiinoi produktsii pidpryiemstv [The choice of commercialization methods of enterprises innovative products]Ekonomika ta derzhava968Search in Google Scholar

Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2012). Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business models. VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 42(1), 94–116. doi: 10.1108/03055721211207789.LandryR.AmaraN.2012Elucidation and enhancement of knowledge and technology transfer business modelsVINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems4219411610.1108/03055721211207789Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Maceika, A., & Jančiauskas, B. (2012). Innovative knowledge: its origin, detachment and usage in production practice. Business: Theory and Practice, 13(3), 228–233. doi: 10.3846/btp.2012.24MaceikaA.JančiauskasB2012Innovative knowledge: its origin, detachment and usage in production practiceBusiness: Theory and Practice13322823310.3846/btp.2012.24Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Majewska, M., & Szulczyńska, U. (2014). Methods and Practices of Tacit Knowledge Sharing Within an Enterprise: an Empirical Investigation. Oeconomia Copernicana, 5(2), 35–48. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2014.012MajewskaM.SzulczyńskaU2014Methods and Practices of Tacit Knowledge Sharing Within an Enterprise: an Empirical InvestigationOeconomia Copernicana52354810.12775/OeC.2014.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mardania, A., Nikoosokhanb, S., Moradib, M., & Doustarb, M. (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 12–26.MardaniaA.NikoosokhanbS.MoradibM.DoustarbM.2018The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation PerformanceThe Journal of High Technology Management Research291122610.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002Search in Google Scholar

Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and Technology Commercialization. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1401–1423.MarkmanG. D.SiegelD. S.WrightM.2008Research and Technology CommercializationJournal of Management Studies4581401142310.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00803.xSearch in Google Scholar

Massingham, P. (2014). An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resources. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18(6), 1075–1100. doi: 10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449MassinghamP.2014An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resourcesJournal of Knowledge Management1861075110010.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Naqshbandib, M. M., & Jasimuddin, S. M. (2018). Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. International Business Review, 27(3), 701–713.NaqshbandibM. M.JasimuddinS. M.2018Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationalsInternational Business Review27370171310.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Olefirenko, O. M. (2016). Komertsializatsiya innovatsiy yak obyektyvnyy chynnyk efektyvnoho funktsionuvan-nya promyslovoho pidpryyemstva [Commercialization of innovations as an objective factor of effective functioning of an industrial enterprise]. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnya, 5(05), 179–183.OlefirenkoO. M.2016Komertsializatsiya innovatsiy yak obyektyvnyy chynnyk efektyvnoho funktsionuvan-nya promyslovoho pidpryyemstva [Commercialization of innovations as an objective factor of effective functioning of an industrial enterprise]Skhidna Yevropa: konomika, biznes ta upravlinnya505179183Search in Google Scholar

Olefirenko, O. M. (2017). Upravlinnya komertsializatsiyeyu innovatsiy promyslovykh pidpryyemstv: aspekty zbutovoyi polityky [Management of commercialization of innovations of industrial enterprises: aspects of sales policy]. Sumy, Ukraine: Trytoria.OlefirenkoO. M.2017Upravlinnya komertsializatsiyeyu innovatsiy promyslovykh pidpryyemstv: aspekty zbutovoyi polityky [Management of commercialization of innovations of industrial enterprises: aspects of sales policy]Sumy, UkraineTrytoriaSearch in Google Scholar

Prokopenko, O., Holmberg, R., & Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Information and communication technologies support for the participation of universities in innovation networks (comparative study). Innovative Marketing, 14(3), 17–29.ProkopenkoO.HolmbergR.OmelyanenkoV.2018Information and communication technologies support for the participation of universities in innovation networks (comparative study)Innovative Marketing143172910.21511/im.14(3).2018.03Search in Google Scholar

Ringel, M., Manly, J., & Möller, C. (2018). The Most Innovative Companies 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/collections/most-innovative-companies-2018RingelM.ManlyJMöllerC2018The Most Innovative Companies 2018Retrieved from https://www.bcg.com/publications/collections/most-innovative-companies-2018Search in Google Scholar

Rot-Sierov, Ye. V. (2016). Rol i mistse znan u komertsializatsiyi innovatsiy yak instrumentu realizatsiyi potentsialu pidpryyemstva [The role and place of knowledge in the commercialization of innovations as a tool for realization of enterprise potential]. Prychornomorsʹki ekonomichni studiyi, 12(2), 33–37.Rot-SierovYe. V2016Rol i mistse znan u komertsializatsiyi innovatsiy yak instrumentu realizatsiyi potentsialu pidpryyemstva [The role and place of knowledge in the commercialization of innovations as a tool for realization of enterprise potential]Prychornomorsʹki ekonomichni studiyi1223337Search in Google Scholar

Shypulina, Yu. S. (2017). Upravlinnya rozvytkom innovatsiynoyi kulʹtury promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of development of innovative culture of industrial enterprises]. Sumy, Ukraine: TOV “Trytoria”.ShypulinaYu. S2017Upravlinnya rozvytkom innovatsiynoyi kulʹtury promyslovykh pidpryyemstv [Management of development of innovative culture of industrial enterprises]Sumy, UkraineTOV “Trytoria”Search in Google Scholar

Soskin, O. I. (2014). Narodnyy kapitalizm: ekonomichna model dlya Ukrayiny [People’s capitalism: an economic model for Ukraine]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Vydavnyctvo “IST”.SoskinO. I.2014Narodnyy kapitalizm: ekonomichna model dlya Ukrayiny [People’s capitalism: an economic model for Ukraine]Kyiv, UkraineVydavnyctvo “IST”10.21003/Soskin_Monograph_NATIONAL_CAPITALISMSearch in Google Scholar

Stankiewicz, J. S., & Moczulska, M. (2015). The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research results. Oeconomia Copernicana, 6(2), 37–51. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2015.011StankiewiczJ. S.MoczulskaM.2015The involvement of employees in knowledge management in the light of the research resultsOeconomia Copernicana62375110.12775/OeC.2015.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

State Statistics Service of Ukraine [Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny] (2019). Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/State Statistics Service of Ukraine[Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny]2019Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/Search in Google Scholar

The Global Innovation Index (2019). Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator.The Global Innovation Index2019Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator.Search in Google Scholar

Turkey: WIPO Releases (2018). World Intellectual Property Indicators Report. Retrieved from http://www.mondaq.com/turkey/x/782720/Trademark/WIPO+Releases+2018+World+Intellectual+Property+Indicators+ReportTurkey: WIPO Releases2018World Intellectual Property Indicators ReportRetrieved from http://www.mondaq.com/turkey/x/782720/Trademark/WIPO+Releases+2018+World+Intellectual+Property+Indicators+ReportSearch in Google Scholar

Ukrstat (2018). Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Retrieved from https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_nauka_2017.pdfUkrstat2018Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]Kyiv, UkraineDerzhavna sluzhba statystyky UkrayinyRetrieved from https://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/09/zb_nauka_2017.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Ukrstat (2019). Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrayiny. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/09/zb_nauka_2018.pdfUkrstat2019Naukova ta innovatsiyna diyalnist Ukrayiny: statystychnyy zbirnyk [Scientific and innovative activity of Ukraine: statistical yearbook]Kyiv, UkraineDerzhavna sluzhba statystyky UkrayinyRetrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/09/zb_nauka_2018.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

World Intellectual Property Organization (2019). Retrieved from https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/keysearch.htm?keyId=231World Intellectual Property Organization2019Retrieved from https://www3.wipo.int/ipstats/keysearch.htm?keyId=231Search in Google Scholar

Yahiaei, M., & Hasanzadeh, A. (2018). Presentation a technology commercialization model in ICT knowledge base companies. Investment Knowledge, 7(26), 63–82.YahiaeiM.HasanzadehA.2018Presentation a technology commercialization model in ICT knowledge base companiesInvestment Knowledge7266382Search in Google Scholar

Zahra, S. A., Kaul, A., & Bolívar-Ramos, M. T. (2018). Why Corporate Science Commercialization Fails: Integrating Diverse Perspectives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1). Retrieved from https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amp.2016.0132ZahraS. A.KaulABolívar-RamosM. T2018Why Corporate Science Commercialization Fails: Integrating Diverse PerspectivesAcademy of Management Perspectives321Retrieved from https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amp.2016.013210.5465/amp.2016.0132Search in Google Scholar