This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Ahmos, D. P., Duchon, D., McDaniel, R. R. Jr, & Huonker, J. W. (2002). What a Mess! Participation as a Simple Managerial Rule to ‘Complexify’ Organizations. Journal of Management Studies 39(2), 189-206. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00288AhmosD. P.DuchonD.McDanielR. R. Jr&HuonkerJ. W.2002What a Mess! Participation as a Simple Managerial Rule to ‘Complexify’ OrganizationsJournal of Management Studies39218920610.1111/1467-6486.00288Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ashkenas, R. (2007). Simplicity-Minded Management. Harvard Business Review 85(12), 101-109.AshkenasR.2007Simplicity-Minded ManagementHarvard Business Review8512101109Search in Google Scholar
Bieńkowska, A., & Tworek, K. (2019). Job performance model based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC) Raporty Wydziału Informatyki i Zarządzania Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Ser. PRE nr 7 [Reports of the Faculty of Computer Science and Management of the Wrocław University Science of Technology, Ser. PRE No. 7].BieńkowskaA.&TworekK.2019Job performance model based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC)Raporty Wydziału Informatyki i Zarządzania Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Ser. PRE nr 7 [Reports of the Faculty of Computer Science and Management of the Wrocław University Science of Technology, Ser. PRE No. 7]Search in Google Scholar
Bodell, L. (2016). Why Simple Wins: Escape the Complexity Trap and Get to Work That Matters Routledge.BodellL.2016Why Simple Wins: Escape the Complexity Trap and Get to Work That MattersRoutledge10.4324/9781315212616Search in Google Scholar
Brandes, D. (2013). Einfach managen: Komplexität vermeiden, reduzieren und beherrschen Frankfurt, Germany: Redline Verlag.BrandesD.2013Einfach managen: Komplexität vermeiden, reduzieren und beherrschenFrankfurt, GermanyRedline VerlagSearch in Google Scholar
Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation London, Great Britain: Tavistock.BurnsT.&StalkerG. M.1961The management of innovationLondon, Great BritainTavistockSearch in Google Scholar
Campos, L. M. S., de Melo Heizen, D. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Cauchick, M. P. A. (2015). Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies. Journal of Cleaner Production 99, 286-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.019CamposL. M. S.de Melo HeizenD. A.VerdinelliM. A.&CauchickM. P. A.2015Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companiesJournal of Cleaner Production9928629610.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Collinson, S., & Jay, M. (2012). From Complexity to Simplicity: Unleash Your Organisation’s Potential Palgrave Macmillan.CollinsonS.&JayM.2012From Complexity to Simplicity: Unleash Your Organisation’s PotentialPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9781137006226Search in Google Scholar
Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., & Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value”. California Management Review 56(2), 130-153. doi: 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130CraneA.PalazzoG.SpenceL. J.&MattenD.2014Contesting the value of “creating shared value”California Management Review56213015310.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Croasmun, J. T., & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social Sciences. Journal of Adult Education 40(1), 19-22.CroasmunJ. T.&OstromL.2011Using Likert-Type Scales in the Social SciencesJournal of Adult Education4011922Search in Google Scholar
Crozier, M. (1993). Przedsiębiorstwo na podsłuchuL’Entreprise à l’écoute Warszawa, Poland: PWE.CrozierM.1993Przedsiębiorstwo na podsłuchuL’Entreprise à l’écouteWarszawa, PolandPWESearch in Google Scholar
Cunha, M. P., & Rego, A. (2010). Complexity, Simplicity, Simplexity. European Management Journal, 28 85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2009.04.006CunhaM. P.&RegoA.2010Complexity, Simplicity, SimplexityEuropean Management Journal28859410.1016/j.emj.2009.04.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations Sage Publications.DonaldsonL.2001The contingency theory of organizationsSage Publications10.4135/9781452229249Search in Google Scholar
Donaldson, L. (2006). The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunities. In R. M. Burton, B. Eriksen, D. D. Håkonsson, & C. C. Snow (Eds.), Organization Design. The Evolving State-of-the-Art (pp. 19-40). Boston: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-387-34173-0DonaldsonL.2006The contingency theory of organizational design: challenges and opportunitiesBurtonR. M.EriksenB.HåkonssonD. D.&SnowC. C.Organization Design. The Evolving State-of-the-Art1940BostonSpringerRetrieved fromhttps://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/0-387-34173-010.1007/0-387-34173-0_2Search in Google Scholar
Drucker, P. (1993). The Practice of Management New York, United States: Harper Business.DruckerP.1993The Practice of ManagementNew York, United StatesHarper BusinessSearch in Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. H., & Sull, D. N. (2001). Strategy as Simple Rules. Harvard Business Review, 79(1), 106-116.EisenhardtK. H.&SullD. N.2001Strategy as Simple RulesHarvard Business Review791106116Search in Google Scholar
Fuchs, C., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2009). Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelines. Die Betriebswirtschaft 69(2), 195-210. Retrieved from https://temme.wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/fuchs_diamantopoulos_2009.pdfFuchsC.&DiamantopoulosA.2009Using single-item measures for construct measurement in management research: Conceptual issues and application guidelinesDie Betriebswirtschaft692195210Retrieved fromhttps://temme.wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/fuchs_diamantopoulos_2009.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Gribbin J. (2004). Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of Life London, Great Britain: Allen-Lane.GribbinJ.2004Deep Simplicity: Chaos, Complexity and the Emergence of LifeLondon, Great BritainAllen-LaneSearch in Google Scholar
Hamann, P. M. (2017). Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly 67(4), 227-289. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-017-0132-4HamannP. M.2017Towards a contingency theory of corporate planning: a systematic literature reviewManagement Review Quarterly674227289Retrieved fromhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11301-017-0132-410.1007/s11301-017-0132-4Search in Google Scholar
Hamel, G. (2008). The future of management. Human Resource Management International Digest, 16(6). doi:10.1108/hrmid.2008.04416fae.001HamelG.2008The future of managementHuman Resource Management International Digest16610.1108/hrmid.2008.04416fae.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hartley, J. (2014). Some thoughts on Likert-type scales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14(1), 83-86. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70040-7HartleyJ.2014Some thoughts on Likert-type scalesInternational Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology141838610.1016/S1697-2600(14)70040-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hase, S. (2002), Simplicity in complexity: Capable people and capable organisations need each other Paper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Association conference, Melbourne, April.HaseS.2002Simplicity in complexity: Capable people and capable organisations need each otherPaper presented at the Australian Vocational Education and Training Association conferenceMelbourneSearch in Google Scholar
Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., Tworek, K., Walecka-Jankowska, K., & Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A. (2017). Community-oriented culture and simple organizational structure. Organization and Management, 4A 75-93. Retrieved from http://kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KZiF/czasopisma/oik/numery/Documents/2017_NR_4A_(179).pdfHopejM.KamińskiR.TworekK.Walecka-JankowskaK.&Zgrzywa-ZiemakA.2017Community-oriented culture and simple organizational structureOrganization and Management4A7593Retrieved fromhttp://kolegia.sgh.waw.pl/pl/KZiF/czasopisma/oik/numery/Documents/2017_NR_4A_(179).pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Hopej-Kamińska, M., Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A., Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., & Martan, J. (2015). Simplicity as a Feature of an Organizational Structure. Argumenta Oeconomica, 1(34), 259-276. doi: 10.15611/aoe.2015.1.10Hopej-KamińskaM.Zgrzywa-ZiemakA.HopejM.KamińskiR.&MartanJ.2015Simplicity as a Feature of an Organizational StructureArgumenta Oeconomica13425927610.15611/aoe.2015.1.10Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leff, S., & Zolkos, R. (2015). Taming organisational complexity – start at the top A report from The Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved from https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/EIU_SAP_Taming%20organisational%20complexity_PDF_0.pdfLeffS.&ZolkosR.2015Taming organisational complexity – start at the topA report from The Economist Intelligence Unit. Retrieved fromhttps://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/EIU_SAP_Taming%20organisational%20complexity_PDF_0.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1995). Simplicity as a Strategy-making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on Performance. Academy of Management Journal 38(5), 1386-1407. doi: 10.5465/256862LumpkinG. T.&DessG. G.1995Simplicity as a Strategy-making Process: The Effects of Stage of Organizational Development and Environment on PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal3851386140710.5465/256862Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maeda, J. (2006). The Laws of Simplicity. Design, Technology, Business, Life Cambridge, Great Britain: MIT Press.MaedaJ.2006The Laws of Simplicity. Design, Technology, Business, LifeCambridge, Great BritainMIT PressSearch in Google Scholar
Maletic, M., Maletic, D., Dahlgaard, J., Dahlgaard-Park, S. M., & Gomišcek, B. (2015). Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance? International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 7(2), 184-200. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0025MaleticM.MaleticD.DahlgaardJ.Dahlgaard-ParkS. M.&GomišcekB.2015Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance?International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences72184200https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-002510.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0025Search in Google Scholar
Marion, R. (1999). The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social systems SAGE. doi: 10.4135/9781452234052MarionR.1999The edge of organization: Chaos and complexity theories of formal social systemsSAGE10.4135/9781452234052Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Matić, I. (2012). Measuring the effects of learning on business performances: Proposed performance measurement model. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 18(1), 278-284. Retrieved from http://www.jaabc.com/Jaabc18-1September-2012Matic.htmlMatićI.2012Measuring the effects of learning on business performances: Proposed performance measurement modelThe Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge181278284Retrieved fromhttp://www.jaabc.com/Jaabc18-1September-2012Matic.htmlSearch in Google Scholar
McAdam, R., Miller, K., & McSorley, C. (2019). Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment. International Journal of Production Economics 207, 195-209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003McAdamR.MillerK.&McSorleyC.2019Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignmentInternational Journal of Production Economics207195209https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.00310.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003Search in Google Scholar
Miller, D. (1993). The Architecture of Simplicity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 116-138. doi: 10.5465/amr.1993.3997509MillerD.1993The Architecture of SimplicityThe Academy of Management Review18111613810.5465/amr.1993.3997509Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the Research New Jersey, United States: Prentice Hall.MintzbergH.1979The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of the ResearchNew Jersey, United StatesPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar
Morrish, J. (2008). Simplicity: Not as Easy as it Looks. Management Today, April 43-45.MorrishJ.2008Simplicity: Not as Easy as it LooksManagement Today, April4345Search in Google Scholar
Osbert-Pociecha, G. (2013). Zmiany upraszczające w organizacji – wyniki badań sondażowych [Simplifying changes in the organization – results of survey research]. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, 4(17), 95-108. Retrieved from http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-78d3caad-72f8-4bb8-a554-d6f40bd961a1?q=bwmeta1.element.desklight-33961a22-3c1e-43be-8f3f-6e62c8de0b32;7&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESSOsbert-PociechaG.2013Zmiany upraszczające w organizacji – wyniki badań sondażowych [Simplifying changes in the organization – results of survey research]Nauki o Zarządzaniu41795108Retrieved fromhttp://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-78d3caad-72f8-4bb8-a554-d6f40bd961a1?q=bwmeta1.element.desklight-33961a22-3c1e-43be-8f3f-6e62c8de0b32;7&qt=CHILDREN-STATELESSSearch in Google Scholar
Peters, T., & Waterman, R. (2004). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies New York, United States: Harper Business Essentials.PetersT.&WatermanR.2004In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run CompaniesNew York, United StatesHarper Business EssentialsSearch in Google Scholar
Sandlin, J. A., & Walther, C. S. (2009). Complicated Simplicity. Moral Identity Formation and Social Movement Learning in the Voluntary Simplicity Movement. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(4), 298-317. doi: 10.1177/0741713609334137SandlinJ. A.&WaltherC. S.2009Complicated Simplicity. Moral Identity Formation and Social Movement Learning in the Voluntary Simplicity MovementAdult Education Quarterly59429831710.1177/0741713609334137Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Scherer, J., Hartschen, M., Bruegger, C., & Hagmann, P. J. (2013). Simplicity for Business Success! Strategies for Simple Products, Services and Processes Offenbach, Germany: Verlag.SchererJ.HartschenM.BrueggerC.&HagmannP. J.2013Simplicity for Business Success! Strategies for Simple Products, Services and ProcessesOffenbach, GermanyVerlagSearch in Google Scholar
Segall, K. (2013). Insanely Simple: The Obsession That Drives Apple’s Success New York, United States: Penguin Group.SegallK.2013Insanely Simple: The Obsession That Drives Apple’s SuccessNew York, United StatesPenguin GroupSearch in Google Scholar
Segall, K. (2016). Think simple: how smart leaders defeat complexity New York, United States: Penguin.SegallK.2016Think simple: how smart leaders defeat complexityNew York, United StatesPenguinSearch in Google Scholar
Stephenson, J., & Weil, S. (1992). Four themes in educating for capability. Quality in Learning. A Capability Approach in Higher Education London, Great Britain: Kogan Page.StephensonJ.&WeilS.1992Four themes in educating for capability. Quality in Learning. A Capability Approach in Higher EducationLondon, Great BritainKogan PageSearch in Google Scholar
Welch, J., & Welch, S. (2005). Winning New York, United States: Harper Business.WelchJ.&WelchS.2005WinningNew York, United StatesHarper BusinessSearch in Google Scholar
