This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). (2002). Measurement System Analysis, Reference Manual, 3rd ed.Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG)2002Measurement System AnalysisReference Manual, 3rd edSearch in Google Scholar
Barbosa, G. F., Peres, G. F., & Hermosilla, J. L. G. (2014). R&R (repeatability and reproducibility) gage study applied on gaps’ measurements of aircraft assemblies made by a laser technology device. Production Engineering - Research and Development 8(4), 477-489. doi: 10.1007/s11740-014-0553-zBarbosaG. F.PeresG. F.HermosillaJ. L. G.2014R&R (repeatability and reproducibility) gage study applied on gaps’ measurements of aircraft assemblies made by a laser technology deviceProduction Engineering - Research and Development8447748910.1007/s11740-014-0553-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bhakhri, R., & Belokar, R.M. (2017). Quality Improvement Using GR&R: A Case Study. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(6), 3018-3023.BhakhriR.BelokarR.M.2017Quality Improvement Using GR&R: A Case StudyInternational Research Journal of Engineering and Technology4630183023Search in Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, S. J. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters New York, United States: Wiley.BoxG. E. P.HunterW. G.HunterS. J.1978Statistics for ExperimentersNew York, United StatesWileySearch in Google Scholar
Breyfogle, F. W., & Meadows, B. (2001). Bottom-Line Success with Six Sigma Milwaukee, United States: Quality Progress, ASQ.BreyfogleF. W.MeadowsB.2001Bottom-Line Success with Six SigmaMilwaukee, United StatesQuality Progress, ASQSearch in Google Scholar
Breyfogle, F. W., Cupello, J. M., & Meadows, B. (2001a). Managing Six Sigma: A Practical Guide to Understanding, Assessing, and Implementing the Strategy That Yields Bottom-Line Success New York, United States: Wiley.BreyfogleF. W.CupelloJ. M.MeadowsB.2001aManaging Six Sigma: A Practical Guide to Understanding, Assessing, and Implementing the Strategy That Yields Bottom-Line SuccessNew York, United StatesWileySearch in Google Scholar
Burdick, R. K., Borror, C. M., & Montgomery, D. C. (2003). A review of measurement systems capability analysis. Journal of Quality Technology 35(4), 342-354.BurdickR. K.BorrorC. M.MontgomeryD. C.2003A review of measurement systems capability analysisJournal of Quality Technology35434235410.1080/00224065.2003.11980232Search in Google Scholar
Burdick, R. K., Park, Y. J., & Montgomery, D. C. (2005). Confidence intervals for misclassification rates in a gauge R&R study. Journal of Quality Technology 37(4), 294-303.BurdickR. K.ParkY. J.MontgomeryD. C.2005Confidence intervals for misclassification rates in a gauge R&R studyJournal of Quality Technology37429430310.1080/00224065.2005.11980332Search in Google Scholar
Diering, M., Hamrol, A., & Kujawińska, A. (2015). Measurement System Analysis Combined with Shewhart’s Approach. Key Engineering Materials 637, 7-11.DieringM.HamrolA.KujawińskaA.2015Measurement System Analysis Combined with Shewhart’s ApproachKey Engineering Materials63771110.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.637.7Search in Google Scholar
Dolezal, K. K., Burdick, R. K., & Birch, N. J. (1998). Analysis of a two-factor R&R study with fixed operators. Journal of Quality Technology 30(2), 163-170.DolezalK. K.BurdickR. K.BirchN. J.1998Analysis of a two-factor R&R study with fixed operatorsJournal of Quality Technology30216317010.1080/00224065.1998.11979835Search in Google Scholar
Engel, J., & De Vries, B. (1997). Evaluating a well-known criterion for measurement precision. Journal of Quality Technology 29(4), 469-476.EngelJ.De VriesB.1997Evaluating a well-known criterion for measurement precisionJournal of Quality Technology29446947610.1080/00224065.1997.11979798Search in Google Scholar
Gorman, D., & Bower, K.M. (2002). Measurement System Analysis And Destructive Testing, Six Sigma Forum Magazine. American Society for Quality 1(4), 16-19.GormanD.BowerK.M.2002Measurement System Analysis And Destructive Testing, Six Sigma Forum MagazineAmerican Society for Quality141619Search in Google Scholar
Han, Y., & He, Z. (2007). An Applied Study of Destructive Measurement System Analysis. Second IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications.HanY.HeZ.2007An Applied Study of Destructive Measurement System AnalysisSecond IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and ApplicationsSearch in Google Scholar
Hoffa, D. W., & Laux, C. M. (2007). Gauge R&R: An Effective Methodology for Determining the Adequacy of a New Measurement System for Micron-level Metrology. Journal of Industrial Technology 23(4).HoffaD. W.LauxC. M.2007Gauge R&R: An Effective Methodology for Determining the Adequacy of a New Measurement System for Micron-level MetrologyJournal of Industrial Technology234Search in Google Scholar
Ishikawa, K. (1982). Guide to quality control White Plains, United States: Quality Resources.IshikawaK.1982Guide to quality controlWhite Plains, United StatesQuality ResourcesSearch in Google Scholar
Juran, J. M. (1990). Quality control handbook (4th ed.). New York, United States: McGraw Hill.JuranJ. M.1990Quality control handbook (4th ed.)New York, United StatesMcGraw HillSearch in Google Scholar
Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 5th ed New York, United States: McGraw-Hill.JuranJ. M.GodfreyA. B.1999Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 5th edNew York, United StatesMcGraw-HillSearch in Google Scholar
Liangxing, S., Wei, C., & Liang, F. L. (2014). An Approach for Simple Linear Profile Gauge R&R Studies. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2014, 816980.LiangxingS.WeiC.LiangF. L.2014An Approach for Simple Linear Profile Gauge R&R StudiesDiscrete Dynamics in Nature and Society816980Search in Google Scholar
Mast, D. J., & Trip, R. (2005). Gage R&R studies for destructive measurements. Journal of Quality Technology, 37(1), 40-49.MastD. J.TripR.2005Gage R&R studies for destructive measurementsJournal of Quality Technology371404910.1080/00224065.2005.11980299Search in Google Scholar
Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) Work Group. (2010).Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) Work Group2010Search in Google Scholar
Messina, W. S. (1987). Statistical Quality Control for Manufacturing Managers, New York, United States: Wiley.MessinaW. S.1987Statistical Quality Control for Manufacturing ManagersNew York, United StatesWileySearch in Google Scholar
Miller, I., & Freund, J. (1965). Probability and Statistics for Engineers. New Jersey, United States: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.MillerI.FreundJ.1965Probability and Statistics for EngineersNew Jersey, United StatesPrentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsSearch in Google Scholar
Minitab. (2002). Minitab Statistical Software. Release 13. Pennsylvania, United States: State College.Minitab2002Minitab Statistical Software. Release 13Pennsylvania, United StatesState CollegeSearch in Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. C. (2001). Design and Analysis of Experiments, fifth edition. New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons.MontgomeryD. C.2001Design and Analysis of Experiments, fifth editionNew York, United StatesJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. C. (2013). Introduction to Statistical Quality Controlseventh edition New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons.MontgomeryD. C.2013Introduction to Statistical Quality Controlseventh editionNew York, United StatesJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar
Pan, J. H. (2004). Determination of the optimal allocation of parameters for gauge repeatability and reproducibility study. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 21(6), 672-682.PanJ. H.2004Determination of the optimal allocation of parameters for gauge repeatability and reproducibility studyInternational Journal of Quality and Reliability Management21667268210.1108/02656710410542061Search in Google Scholar
Pan, J. H. (2006). Evaluating the gauge repeatability and reproducibility for different industries. Quality and Quantity 40(4), 499-518.PanJ. H.2006Evaluating the gauge repeatability and reproducibility for different industriesQuality and Quantity40449951810.1007/s11135-005-1100-ySearch in Google Scholar
Pande, P., Neuman, R., & Cavanagh, R. (2002). The Six Sigma Way: Team Field Book New York, United States: McGraw-Hill.PandeP.NeumanR.CavanaghR.2002The Six Sigma Way: Team Field BookNew York, United StatesMcGraw-HillSearch in Google Scholar
Persijn, M., & Nuland, Y. V. (1996). Relation between measurement system capability and process capability. Quality Engineering, 9(1), 95-97.PersijnM.NulandY. V.1996Relation between measurement system capability and process capabilityQuality Engineering91959710.1080/08982119608919020Search in Google Scholar
Peruchi, R. S., Balestrassi, P. P., Paiva, A. P., Ferreira, J. R., & Carmelossi, M. D. (2013). A new multivariate gage R&R method for correlated characteristics. International Journal of Production Economics 144(1), 301-315.PeruchiR. S.BalestrassiP. P.PaivaA. P.FerreiraJ. R.CarmelossiM. D.2013A new multivariate gage R&R method for correlated characteristicsInternational Journal of Production Economics144130131510.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.018Search in Google Scholar
Phillips, A. R., Jeffries, R., Schneider, J., & Frankoski, S. P. (1997). Using Repeatability and Reproducibility Studies to Evaluate a Destructive Test Method. Journal of Quality Engineering 10(2), 283-290.PhillipsA. R.JeffriesR.SchneiderJ.FrankoskiS. P.1997Using Repeatability and Reproducibility Studies to Evaluate a Destructive Test MethodJournal of Quality Engineering10228329010.1080/08982119708919135Search in Google Scholar
Smith, R. R., McCrary, S. W., & Callahan, R. N. (2007). Gauge repeatability and reproducibility studies and measurement system analysis: A multimethod exploration of the state of practice. Journal of Quality Technology 23(1), 1-11.SmithR. R.McCraryS. W.CallahanR. N.2007Gauge repeatability and reproducibility studies and measurement system analysis: A multimethod exploration of the state of practiceJournal of Quality Technology231111Search in Google Scholar
Sujová, A., Marcineková, K., & Simanová, Ľ. (2019). Influence of Modern Process Performance Indicators on Corporate Performance — the Empirical Study. Engineering Management in Production and Services 11(2), 119-129. doi: 10.2478/emj-2019-0015SujováA.MarcinekováK.SimanováĽ.2019Influence of Modern Process Performance Indicators on Corporate Performance — the Empirical StudyEngineering Management in Production and Services11211912910.2478/emj-2019-0015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tsai, P. (1989). Variable gauge repeatability and reproducibility study using the analysis of variance method. Quality Engineering 1(1), 107-115.TsaiP.1989Variable gauge repeatability and reproducibility study using the analysis of variance methodQuality Engineering1110711510.1080/08982118808962642Search in Google Scholar
Vardeman, S. B., & Job, J. M. (1999). Statistical quality assurance methods for engineers New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.VardemanS. B.JobJ. M.1999Statistical quality assurance methods for engineersNew York, United StatesJohn Wiley & Sons, IncSearch in Google Scholar
Wesff, E. (2012). Chinese OEM reduces returns with improved product testing. The Global Voice of Quality 4(2), 1-6.WesffE.2012Chinese OEM reduces returns with improved product testingThe Global Voice of Quality4216Search in Google Scholar
Wheeler, D. J. (1990). Evaluating the Measurement Process when Testing is Destructive TAPPI Polymers and Laminations Conference. Boston, United States: TAPPI Press.WheelerD. J.1990Evaluating the Measurement Process when Testing is DestructiveTAPPI Polymers and Laminations ConferenceBoston, United StatesTAPPI PressSearch in Google Scholar
Zimon, D. (2017). The Influence of Quality Management Systems for Improvement of Logistics Supply in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana 8(4), 643-655.ZimonD.2017The Influence of Quality Management Systems for Improvement of Logistics Supply in PolandOeconomia Copernicana8464365510.24136/oc.v8i4.39Search in Google Scholar
