Development of intelligent agents through collaborative innovation

Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.BaldwinC.von HippelE.2011Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative InnovationOrganization Science2261399141710.1287/orsc.1100.0618Search in Google Scholar

Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., & Hagedoorn, J. (2017). The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8–40.BogersM.ZobelA. K.AfuahA.AlmirallE.BrunswickerS.DahlanderL.HagedoornJ.2017The open innovation research landscape: Established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysisIndustry and Innovation24184010.1080/13662716.2016.1240068Search in Google Scholar

Ciechanowski, L., Przegalinska, A., Magnuski, M., & Gloor, P. (2018). In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human-chatbot interaction. Future Generation Computer Systems, 92, 539–548.CiechanowskiL.PrzegalinskaA.MagnuskiM.GloorP.2018In the shades of the uncanny valley: An experimental study of human-chatbot interactionFuture Generation Computer Systems9253954810.1016/j.future.2018.01.055Search in Google Scholar

Cornelissen, J. P. (2011). Sensemaking Under Pressure: The Influence of Professional Roles and Social Accountability on the Creation of Sense. Organization Science, 23(1), 118–137. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0640CornelissenJ. P.2011Sensemaking Under Pressure: The Influence of Professional Roles and Social Accountability on the Creation of SenseOrganization Science23111813710.1287/orsc.1100.0640Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cuevas-Rodríguez, G., Cabello-Medina, C., & Carmona-Lavado, A. (2014). Internal and external social capital for radical product innovation: do they always work well together? British Journal of Management, 25(2), 266–284.Cuevas-RodríguezG.Cabello-MedinaC.Carmona-LavadoA.2014Internal and external social capital for radical product innovation: do they always work well together?British Journal of Management25226628410.1111/1467-8551.12002Search in Google Scholar

Cui, A. S., & Wu, F. (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 516–538.CuiA. S.WuF.2016Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performanceJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science44451653810.1007/s11747-015-0433-xSearch in Google Scholar

Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6), 699–709.DahlanderL.GannD. M.2010How open is innovation?Research Policy39669970910.4337/9781848441248.00009Search in Google Scholar

El Kadiri, S., Terkaj, W., Urwin, E. N., Palmer, C., Kiritsis, D., & Young, R. (2015). Ontology in Engineering Applications. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, 225, 5–9.El KadiriS.TerkajW.UrwinE. N.PalmerC.KiritsisD.YoungR.2015Ontology in Engineering ApplicationsLecture Notes in Business Information Processing2255910.1007/978-3-319-21545-7_11Search in Google Scholar

Eslami, M. H., & Lakemond, N. (2016). Knowledge integration with customers in collaborative product development projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 31(7), 889–900.EslamiM. H.LakemondN.2016Knowledge integration with customers in collaborative product development projectsJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing31788990010.1108/JBIM-05-2014-0099Search in Google Scholar

Frankelius, P. (2009). Questioning two myths in innovation literature. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 20, 40–51.FrankeliusP.2009Questioning two myths in innovation literatureThe Journal of High Technology Management Research20405110.1016/j.hitech.2009.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Gallaud, D. (2013). Collaborative Innovation and Open Innovation. Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 236–241.GallaudD.2013Collaborative Innovation and Open InnovationEncyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship23624110.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_500Search in Google Scholar

Glezer, C. (2002), A conceptual model of an interorganizational intelligent meeting-scheduler (IIMS). Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12, 47–70.GlezerC.2002A conceptual model of an interorganizational intelligent meeting-scheduler (IIMS)Journal of Strategic Information Systems12477010.1016/S0963-8687(02)00034-3Search in Google Scholar

Gordini, N., & Veglio, V. (2017). Customers churn prediction and marketing retention strategies. An application of support vector machines based on the AUC parameter-selection technique in B2B e-commerce industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 62, 100–107.GordiniN.VeglioV.2017Customers churn prediction and marketing retention strategies. An application of support vector machines based on the AUC parameter-selection technique in B2B e-commerce industryIndustrial Marketing Management6210010710.1016/j.indmarman.2016.08.003Search in Google Scholar

Grönroos, C. (2001). The Perceived Service Quality Concept – A Mistake? Managing Service Quality, 11(3), 150–152.GrönroosC.2001The Perceived Service Quality Concept – A Mistake?Managing Service Quality11315015210.1108/09604520110393386Search in Google Scholar

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.), 163–194.GubaE. G.LincolnY. S.1994Competing paradigms in qualitative researchHandbook of Qualitative Research2nd ed.163194Search in Google Scholar

Gummesson, E. (2002). Relationship marketing and a new economy: it’s time for deprogramming. Journal of Services Marketing, 16, 585–589.GummessonE.2002Relationship marketing and a new economy: it’s time for deprogrammingJournal of Services Marketing1658558910.1108/08876040210447315Search in Google Scholar

Hargrave, T. J., & van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864–888.HargraveT. J.van de VenA. H.2006A collective action model of institutional innovationAcademy of Management Review31486488810.5465/amr.2006.22527458Search in Google Scholar

Ibrahim, A. (2019). A Study About Using a Cognitive Agent in Replacing Level 1 and 2 Service Desk Activities. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 307–316.IbrahimA.2019A Study About Using a Cognitive Agent in Replacing Level 1 and 2 Service Desk ActivitiesAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing30731610.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_27Search in Google Scholar

Jer, R., Kim, D., & Bello, D. C. (2017). Relationship-based product innovations: Evidence from the global supply chain. Journal of Business Research, 80, 127–140.JerR.KimD.BelloD. C.2017Relationship-based product innovations: Evidence from the global supply chainJournal of Business Research8012714010.1016/j.jbusres.2017.07.008Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25.KaplanA. M.HaenleinM.2019Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligenceBusiness Horizons621152510.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Miles, M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, United States: Sage Publications.MilesM.HubermanA. M.1994Qualitative Data Analysis2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, United StatesSage PublicationsSearch in Google Scholar

Morgan, A., & Piccinini, G. (2018). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of intentionality. Minds & Machines, 28(1), 119–139.MorganA.PiccininiG.2018Towards a cognitive neuroscience of intentionalityMinds & Machines28111913910.1007/s11023-017-9437-2Search in Google Scholar

Mou, Y., & Xu, K. (2017). The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-Artificial Intelligence social interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 432–440.MouY.XuK.2017The media inequality: Comparing the initial human-human and human-Artificial Intelligence social interactionsComputers in Human Behavior7243244010.1016/j.chb.2017.02.067Search in Google Scholar

Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994). Computers are social actors. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM, 72–78.NassC.SteuerJ.TauberE. R.1994Computers are social actorsProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM7278Search in Google Scholar

Nicholson, J. D., LaPlaca, P., Al-Abdin, A., Breese, R., & Khan, Z. (2018). What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work: A contribution on contributions. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 206–219.NicholsonJ. D.LaPlacaP.Al-AbdinA.BreeseR.KhanZ.2018What do introduction sections tell us about the intent of scholarly work: A contribution on contributionsIndustrial Marketing Management7320621910.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.014Search in Google Scholar

Nilsson, N. (1998). Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis. Morgan Kaufmann.NilssonN.1998Artificial Intelligence: A New SynthesisMorgan KaufmannSearch in Google Scholar

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.PowellW. W.KoputK. W.Smith-DoerrL.1996Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnologyAdministrative Science Quarterly41111614510.2307/2393988Search in Google Scholar

Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, United States: Prentice Hall.RussellS. J.NorvigP.2009Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach3rd ed.Upper Saddle River, United StatesPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar

Russell, S., Dewey, D., & Tegmark, M. (2015). Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligence. Ai Magazine, 36(4), 105–114.RussellS.DeweyD.TegmarkM.2015Research priorities for robust and beneficial artificial intelligenceAi Magazine36410511410.1609/aimag.v36i4.2577Search in Google Scholar

Shakshuki, E., Koo, H., Benoit, D., & Silve, D. (2008), A distributed multi-agent meeting scheduler. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 74, 279–296.ShakshukiE.KooH.BenoitD.SilveD.2008A distributed multi-agent meeting schedulerJournal of Computer and System Sciences7427929610.1016/j.jcss.2007.04.019Search in Google Scholar

Syama, N., & Sharmab, A. (2018). Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practice. Industrial Marketing Management, 69, 135–146.SyamaN.SharmabA.2018Waiting for a sales renaissance in the fourth industrial revolution: Machine learning and artificial intelligence in sales research and practiceIndustrial Marketing Management6913514610.1016/j.indmarman.2017.12.019Search in Google Scholar

Vendrell-Herrero, F., Bustinza, O.F., Parry, G., & Georgantzis, N. (2017). Servitization, digitization and supply chain interdependency. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 69–81.Vendrell-HerreroF.BustinzaO.F.ParryG.GeorgantzisN.2017Servitization, digitization and supply chain interdependencyIndustrial Marketing Management60698110.1016/j.indmarman.2016.06.013Search in Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations, 3rd ed. Sage.WeickK. E.1995Sensemaking in organisations3rd ed.SageSearch in Google Scholar

Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD.2005Organizing and the Process of SensemakingOrganization Science16440942110.1287/orsc.1050.0133Search in Google Scholar