Open Access

Operationalising Responsible Research and Innovation – tools for enterprises


Cite

Fig. 1

Example of a RRI scorecardSource: author’s elaboration on the basis of (Pavie et al., 2014; Hedstrom, 2019) and RRI Tools.
Example of a RRI scorecardSource: author’s elaboration on the basis of (Pavie et al., 2014; Hedstrom, 2019) and RRI Tools.

Examples of RRI maturity models

Maturity levelLevel name byPavie et al. (2014)Level name-byStahl et al. (2017)Level name-byHedstrom (2019)
1Comply with the lawUnawareEngaging
2Anticipating future legal requirementsExploratory/reactiveAccelerating
3Thinking the value chain as an ecosystemDefinedLeading
4Developing responsible products and servicesProactiveTransforming
5Leading the change (communicating and educating to responsibility, create standards, developing responsible business models)Strategic-

Boundaries of the research field and research focus regarding RRI

Responsible Research and Innovation
Research SubdisciplinePublic GovernanceScience and Technology StudiesBusiness Ethics / CSRPhilosophy of ManagementInnovation and Technology Management
Systemic dimensionmicromesomacro
Sectoral dimensionIndustry/BusinessPublic Administration/Policy BodiesUniversities and Research Institutions
Organisational dimensionMicro (individuals in an organisation)Meso (teams)Macro (organization as a whole)
Place in innovation ecosystemInputThroughputOutput
Innovation typeLow-tech innovationHigh-tech innovation

Conceptual distinction between normative and processual approach to RRI

Responsible Research and InnovationRRI as a normative goalTo tackle the Grand Challenges, solve moral/ethical issues connected scientific and technological development
RRI as a normative processMaking sure that the R&I activities follow the principles of anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity and responsiveness

Definitions and interpretations of RRI

Author(s)Definition/InterpretationDistinguishing elements
Sutcliffe (2011)1. The deliberate focus of research and the products of innovation to achieve a social or environmental benefit2. The consistent, ongoing involvement of society, from beginning to end of the innovation process, including the public & non-governmental groups, who are themselves mindful of the public good3. Assessing and effectively prioritising social, ethical and environmental impacts, risks and opportunities, both now and in the future, alongside the technical and commercial4. Where oversight mechanisms are better able to anticipate and manage problems and opportunities and which are also able to adapt and respond quickly to changing knowledge and circumstances5. Where openness and transparency are an integral component of the research and innovation processSocial or environmental benefit as the main goalInvolvement of societyAssessing social, ethical and environmental risksAnticipatory and adaptiveOpen and transparent
Grunwald (2011)RRI as a new umbrella term with new accentuations which may be characterized by:- involving ethical and social issues more directly in the innovation process by - integrative approaches to development and innovation;- bridging the gap between innovation practice, engineering ethics, technology assessment, governance research and social sciences (STS);- giving new shape to innovation processes and to technology governance according to responsibility reflections in all of its three dimensions mentioned above;- in particular, making the distribution of responsibility among the involved actors as transparent as possibleDistribution of ResponsibilityReflection about responsibility at all levels of the innovation process
Geoghegan-Quinn (2012)Responsible Research and Innovation means that societal actors work together during the whole research and innovation process in order to better align both the process and its outcomes, with the values, needs and expectations of European society. RRI is an ambitious challenge for the creation of a Research and Innovation policy driven by the needs of society and engaging all societal actors via inclusive participatory approachesAlignment of processes and its outcomes with the society’s values, needs and expectations
von Schomberg (2012)A transparent, interactive process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive with a view to the (ethical) acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process and its marketable products (in order to allow a proper embedding of scientific and technological advances in our society)Multidirectional (mutual) responsibility of societal actorsEthical acceptabilitySocial desirability
van den Hoven (2013 and 2014)Responsible Innovation is an activity or process which may give rise to previously unknown designs either pertaining physical world (...), the institutional world (...) or combinations of these, which when implemented expand the set of relevant feasible options regarding solving a set of moral problemsProviding new options for solving pertaining moral/ethical problems
Stigloe et al. (2013)Responsible innovation means taking care of the future through collective stewardship of science and innovation in the presentFuture-oriented look at collective responsibility
Owen et al. (2013)The first and foremost task for responsible innovation is then to ask what futures do we collectively want science and innovation to bring about, and on what values are these based?Collective nature of RRI processesFuture orientation
Stahl (2013)RRI is a higher-level responsibility that aims to shape, maintain, develop, coordinate and align existing and novel research and innovation-related processes, actors and responsibilities with a view to ensure desirable and acceptable research outcomesRRI as meta-responsibility
Pavie and Carthy (2013)RRI is an iterative process throughout which the project’s impacts on social, economic and environmental factors are, where possible, measured and otherwise taken into account at each step of development of the project, thereby guaranteeing control over, or at least awareness of, the innovation’s impacts throughout the entire life cycleRelevance for business contextReflection on impact through the entire product life cycle
Wilford (2015)RRI re-engages the individual with personal responsibility at the same time as reinforcing institutional responsibility. This means that RRI creates a step-change in the way that those who are engaged in research and innovation should consider the impact of what they doCombination of personal responsibility and institutional responsibility
Gianni (2016)RRI is a model and an active process by which we can achieve the social objectives set by the European Commission, i.e. the development of research and innovation for the sake of increasing the general level of well-being in democratic societies.Duality of RRI: model (normative dimension) and process (processual dimension)RRI valid in a democratic society