Drivers and barriers to innovation in the Australian public service: A qualitative thematic analysis

Altshuler, A. A., & Behn, R. D. (2010). Innovation in American government: Challenges, opportunities, and dilemmas Washington, United States: Brookings Institution Press.AltshulerA. A.&BehnR. D.2010Innovation in American government: Challenges, opportunities, and dilemmasWashington, United StatesBrookings Institution PressSearch in Google Scholar

Australian Public Service Commission. (2011). State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2010-11 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2011State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2010-11Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar

Australian Public Service Commission. (2014). State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2013-2014 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2014State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2013-2014Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar

Australian Public Service Commission. (2016). State of the Service Report 2015-16 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2016State of the Service Report 2015-16Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar

Australian Public Service Commission. (2017). State of the Service Report 2016-17 Canberra, Australia: ACT.Australian Public Service Commission2017State of the Service Report 2016-17Canberra, AustraliaACTSearch in Google Scholar

Barnett, J., Vasileiou, K., Djemil, F., Brooks, L., & Young, T. (2011). Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 11(1), 1-12.BarnettJ.VasileiouK.DjemilF.BrooksL.&YoungT.2011Understanding innovators’ experiences of barriers and facilitators in implementation and diffusion of healthcare service innovations: a qualitative studyBMC Health Services Research1111–1210.1186/1472-6963-11-342326542422176739Search in Google Scholar

Bason, C. (2010). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society Bristol, United Kingdom: Bristol University Press.BasonC.2010Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better societyBristol, United KingdomBristol University Press10.2307/j.ctt9qgnsdSearch in Google Scholar

Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). Innovation in the public sector New York, United States: Palgrave Macmillan.BekkersV.EdelenbosJ.&SteijnB.2011Innovation in the public sectorNew York, United StatesPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9780230307520Search in Google Scholar

Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of Policy Process (2nd ed.). Colorado, United States: Westview.BerryF. S.&BerryW. D.2007Innovation and diffusion models in policy researchInA. SabatierP.EdTheories of Policy Process2nd edColorado, United StatesWestviewSearch in Google Scholar

Bloch, C. (2010). Towards a conceptual framework for measuring public sector innovation. Measuring innovation in the public sector in the Nordic countries: Toward a common statistical approach^‟“Copenhagen Manual”BlochC.2010Towards a conceptual framework for measuring public sector innovationMeasuring innovation in the public sector in the Nordic countries: Toward a common statistical approach^‟ “Copenhagen Manual”Search in Google Scholar

Borins, S. (2006). The challenge of innovation in government: Endowment for the business of government Arlington, United States: PricewaterhouseCoopers.BorinsS.2006The challenge of innovation in government: Endowment for the business of governmentArlington, United StatesPricewaterhouseCoopersSearch in Google Scholar

Bowden, A. (2005). Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of Learning. Public Policy and Administration 20(3), 56-68.BowdenA.2005Knowledge for Free? Distributed Innovation as a Source of LearningPublic Policy and Administration20356–6810.1177/095207670502000306Search in Google Scholar

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2), 27-40.BowenG. A.2009Document analysis as a qualitative research methodQualitative Research Journal9227–4010.3316/QRJ0902027Search in Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77-101.BraunV.&ClarkeV.2006Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology3277–10110.1191/1478088706qp063oaSearch in Google Scholar

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods Oxford, United States: Oxford University Press.BrymanA.&BellE.2015Business research methodsOxford, United StatesOxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.CreswellJ. W.2013Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches4th edSage publicationsSearch in Google Scholar

Currie, G., Humphreys, M., Ucbasaran, D., & McManus, S. (2008). Entrepreneurial leadership in the English public sector: paradox or possibility? Public Administration 86(4), 987-1008.CurrieG.HumphreysM.UcbasaranD.&McManusS.2008Entrepreneurial leadership in the English public sector: paradox or possibility?Public Administration864987–100810.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00736.xSearch in Google Scholar

Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART 19(3), 495-522.DamanpourF.&SchneiderM.2009Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managersJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART193495–52210.1093/jopart/mun021Search in Google Scholar

Demircioglu, M. A. (2018). The Effects of Empowerment Practices on Perceived Barriers to Innovation: Evidence from Public Organizations. International Journal of Public Administration 41(15), 1302-1313.DemirciogluM. A.2018The Effects of Empowerment Practices on Perceived Barriers to Innovation: Evidence from Public OrganizationsInternational Journal of Public Administration41151302–131310.1080/01900692.2017.1387143Search in Google Scholar

Demircioglu, M. A., & Audretsch, D. B. (2017). Conditions for innovation in public sector organizations. Research Policy 46(9), 1681-1691.DemirciogluM. A.&AudretschD. B.2017Conditions for innovation in public sector organizationsResearch Policy4691681–169110.1016/j.respol.2017.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Deschamps, J. P. (2005). Different leadership skills for different innovation strategies. Strategy & Leadership 33(5), 31-38.DeschampsJ. P.2005Different leadership skills for different innovation strategiesStrategy & Leadership33531–3810.1108/10878570510616861Search in Google Scholar

Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2012). Management research London, United Kingdom: Sage.Easterby-SmithM.ThorpeR.&JacksonP. R.2012Management researchLondon, United KingdomSageSearch in Google Scholar

Eggers, W. D., & Singh, S. K. (2009). The Public innovator’s playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government Cambridge, United States: Ash Institute, Harvard Kennedy School.EggersW. D.&SinghS. K.2009The Public innovator’s playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in governmentCambridge, United StatesAsh Institute, Harvard Kennedy SchoolSearch in Google Scholar

Elison, S., Ward, J., Davies, G., & Moody, M. (2014). Implementation of computer-assisted therapy for substance misuse: a qualitative study of Breaking Free Online using Roger’s diffusion of innovation theory. Drugs and Alcohol Today 14(4), 207-218.ElisonS.WardJ.DaviesG.&MoodyM.2014Implementation of computer-assisted therapy for substance misuse: a qualitative study of Breaking Free Online using Roger’s diffusion of innovation theoryDrugs and Alcohol Today144207–21810.1108/DAT-05-2014-0025Search in Google Scholar

Evans, A. J., & Burger, V. L. J. (2016). An empirical investigation into innovation drivers and barriers in public sector organisations. International Journal of Innovation Science 8(4), 404-422.EvansA. J.&BurgerV. L. J.2016An empirical investigation into innovation drivers and barriers in public sector organisationsInternational Journal of Innovation Science84404–42210.1108/IJIS-06-2016-0006Search in Google Scholar

Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(1), 80-92.FeredayJ.&Muir-CochraneE.2006Demonstrating rigor using Thematic Analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme developmentInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods5180–9210.1177/160940690600500107Search in Google Scholar

Franza, R. M., & Grant, K. P. (2006). Improving federal to private sector technology transfer. Research Technology Management 49(3), 36-40.FranzaR. M.&GrantK. P.2006Improving federal to private sector technology transferResearch Technology Management49336–4010.1080/08956308.2006.11657376Search in Google Scholar

Glor, E. D. (1998). What do we know about enhancing creativity and innovation? A review of literature. The Innovation Journal 3(1), 1-8.GlorE. D.1998What do we know about enhancing creativity and innovation? A review of literatureThe Innovation Journal311–8Search in Google Scholar

Golembiewski, R. T., & Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational innovation and the science/craft of management. Current Topics in Management 5, 263-280.GolembiewskiR. T.&VigodaE.2000Organizational innovation and the science/craft of managementCurrent Topics in Management5263–280Search in Google Scholar

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods 18(1), 59-82.GuestG.BunceA.&JohnsonL.2006How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and VariabilityField Methods18159–8210.1177/1525822X05279903Search in Google Scholar

Hadfield, L. (2010). Balancing on the edge of the archive: the researcher’s role in collecting and preparing data to deposit. Timescapes Working Paper Series 2010(2), 60-74.HadfieldL.2010Balancing on the edge of the archive: the researcher’s role in collecting and preparing data to depositTimescapes Working Paper Series2010260–74Search in Google Scholar

Hamson, N. (2004). Why innovation doesn’t work: and what to do about it. The Innovation Journal 9(1), 1-7.HamsonN.2004Why innovation doesn’t work: and what to do about itThe Innovation Journal911–7Search in Google Scholar

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9), 1277-1288.HsiehH.-F.&ShannonS. E.2005Three approaches to qualitative content analysisQualitative Health Research1591277–128810.1177/104973230527668716204405Search in Google Scholar

Kao, J. (2007). Innovation nation: How America is losing its innovation edge, why it matters, and what we can do to get it back New York, United States: Free Press.KaoJ.2007Innovation nation: How America is losing its innovation edge, why it matters, and what we can do to get it backNew York, United StatesFree PressSearch in Google Scholar

Kellough, J. E., & Nigro, L. G. (2002). Pay for performance in Georgia State Government: Employee perspectives on Georgia gain after 5 years. Review of Public Personnel Administration 22(2), 146-166.KelloughJ. E.&NigroL. G.2002Pay for performance in Georgia State Government: Employee perspectives on Georgia gain after 5 yearsReview of Public Personnel Administration222146–16610.1177/0734371X0202200206Search in Google Scholar

Kelly, G., Mulgan, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reform London, United Kingdom: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.KellyG.MulganG.&MuersS.2002Creating public value: An analytical framework for public service reformLondon, United KingdomStrategy Unit, Cabinet OfficeSearch in Google Scholar

Koch, P., & Hauknes, J. (2005). On innovation in the public sector: Academic Summary Report of Publin Oslo, Norway: NIFU STEP, Publin Report No. D20.KochP.&HauknesJ.2005On innovation in the public sector: Academic Summary Report of PublinOslo, NorwayNIFU STEP, Publin Report No. D20Search in Google Scholar

Langergaard, L. L., & Scheuer, D. J. (2012). Towards a deeper understanding of public sector innovation. In A. L. Macaulay, I. Miles, J. Wilby, L. Y. Tan, L. Zhao, & B. Theodoulidis (Eds.), Case Studies in Service Innovation (pp. 167-193). New York, United States: Springer New York.LangergaardL. L.&ScheuerD. J.2012Towards a deeper understanding of public sector innovationInL. MacaulayA.MilesI.WilbyJ.Y. TanL.ZhaoL.&TheodoulidisB.EdsCase Studies in Service Innovationpp167–193New York, United StatesSpringer New York10.1007/978-1-4614-1972-3_31Search in Google Scholar

Latham, J. R. (2014). Research design canvas: A framework for designing and aligning the “DNA” of your study Monument, Colorado: Leadership Plus Design, Ltd.LathamJ. R.2014Research design canvas: A framework for designing and aligning the “DNA” of your studyMonument, ColoradoLeadership Plus Design, LtdSearch in Google Scholar

Management Advisory Committee [MAC]. (2010). Empowering change: Fostering innovation in the Australian public service Canberra, Australia: Australian Public Service Commission.Management Advisory Committee [MAC]2010Empowering change: Fostering innovation in the Australian public serviceCanberra, AustraliaAustralian Public Service CommissionSearch in Google Scholar

May, T. (2001). Social research Buckingham, United Kingdom: Open University Press.MayT.2001Social researchBuckingham, United KingdomOpen University PressSearch in Google Scholar

Miller, R. (1999). The Internet in twenty years: cyberspace, the next frontier? Foresight 1(5), 467-472.MillerR.1999The Internet in twenty years: cyberspace, the next frontier?Foresight15467–47210.1108/14636689910802359Search in Google Scholar

Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review 10(1), 3-20.MooreM.&HartleyJ.2008Innovations in governancePublic Management Review1013–2010.1080/14719030701763161Search in Google Scholar

Mulgan, G., & Albury, D. (2003). Innovation in the public sector London, United Kingdom: Cabinet office.MulganG.&AlburyD.2003Innovation in the public sectorLondon, United KingdomCabinet officeSearch in Google Scholar

Myers, M. D. (1994). A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 4(4), 185-201.MyersM. D.1994A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is projectAccounting, Management and Information Technologies44185–20110.1016/0959-8022(94)90022-1Search in Google Scholar

Napier, C. J. (1989). Research directions in accounting history. The British Accounting Review 21(3), 237-254.NapierC. J.1989Research directions in accounting historyThe British Accounting Review213237–25410.1016/0890-8389(89)90095-4Search in Google Scholar

Nathan, H., & Thomas, C. (2012). A thematic analysis of a leadership speaker series. Journal of Management Development 31(8), 826-844.NathanH.&ThomasC.2012A thematic analysis of a leadership speaker seriesJournal of Management Development318826–84410.1108/02621711211253277Search in Google Scholar

Neuman, W. L. (2005). Social research methods, quantitative and qualitative approaches (6th ed.). Boston, United States: Pearson.NeumanW. L.2005Social research methods, quantitative and qualitative approaches(6th ed.)Boston, United StatesPearsonSearch in Google Scholar

Page, S. (2005). What’s new about the new public management? Administrative change in the human services. Public Administration Review 65(6), 713-727.PageS.2005What’s new about the new public management? Administrative change in the human servicesPublic Administration Review656713–72710.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00500.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pärna, O. (2014). Managerial and contextual factors influencing innovation in information technology-based public sector services: an exploratory cross-national study. (Doctoral Dissertation), University of Tartu.PärnaO.2014Managerial and contextual factors influencing innovation in information technology-based public sector services: an exploratory cross-national studyDoctoral DissertationUniversity of TartuSearch in Google Scholar

Pollach, I. (2012). Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysis. Organizational Research Methods 15(2), 263-287.PollachI.2012Taming textual data: The contribution of corpus linguistics to computer-aided text analysisOrganizational Research Methods152263–28710.1177/1094428111417451Search in Google Scholar

Raipa, A., & Giedraityte, V. (2014). Innovation process barriers in public sector: A comparative analysis in Lithuania and the European Union. International Journal of Business and Management 9(10), 10-26.RaipaA.&GiedraityteV.2014Innovation process barriers in public sector: A comparative analysis in Lithuania and the European UnionInternational Journal of Business and Management91010–2610.5539/ijbm.v9n10p10Search in Google Scholar

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Research methods for business students Harlow, United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.SaundersM.LewisP.&ThornhillA.2003Research methods for business studentsHarlow, United KingdomPrentice HallSearch in Google Scholar

Setnikar, C., S., & Petkovšek, V. (2013). Private and public sector innovation and the importance of cross-sector collaboration. Journal of Applied Business Research 29(6), 1597-1606.SetnikarC. S.&PetkovšekV.2013Private and public sector innovation and the importance of cross-sector collaborationJournal of Applied Business Research2961597–160610.19030/jabr.v29i6.8197Search in Google Scholar

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences 15(3), 398-405.VaismoradiM.TurunenH.&BondasT.2013Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive studyNursing & Health Sciences153398–40510.1111/nhs.1204823480423Search in Google Scholar

Varney, D. S. (2006). Service transformation: A better service for citizens and businesses, a better deal for the taxpayer London, United Kingdom: TSO.VarneyD. S.2006Service transformation: A better service for citizens and businesses, a better deal for the taxpayerLondon, United KingdomTSOSearch in Google Scholar

Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017a). Exploring leadership styles for innovation: an exploratory factor analysis. Engineering Management in Production and Services 9(1), 7-17.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2017aExploring leadership styles for innovation: an exploratory factor analysisEngineering Management in Production and Services917–1710.1515/emj-2017-0001Search in Google Scholar

Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017b). Statistical data analysis of culture for innovation using an open data set from the Australian Public Service. In A. Calì, P. Wood, N. Martin, & A. Poulovassilis (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 10365, pp. 78-89). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2017bStatistical data analysis of culture for innovation using an open data set from the Australian Public ServiceInCalìA.WoodP.MartinN.&PoulovassilisA.EdsLecture Notes in Computer ScienceVol. 10365pp78–89Cham, SwitzerlandSpringer International Publishing10.1007/978-3-319-60795-5_7Search in Google Scholar

Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2017c). Workplace innovation: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation. Management and Production Engineering Review 8(2), 57-68.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2017cWorkplace innovation: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis for construct validationManagement and Production Engineering Review8257–6810.1515/mper-2017-0018Search in Google Scholar

Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. A. (2018). Pathways to workplace innovation and career satisfaction in the public service: The role of leadership and culture. International Journal of Organizational Analysis 26(5), 890-914.WipulanusatW.PanuwatwanichK.&StewartR. A.2018Pathways to workplace innovation and career satisfaction in the public service: The role of leadership and cultureInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis265890–91410.1108/IJOA-03-2018-1376Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods Beverly Hills, United States: Sage publications.YinR. K.2013Case study research: Design and methodsBeverly Hills, United StatesSage publicationsSearch in Google Scholar