Relations between risk attitudes, culture and the endowment effect

Andreoni, J., & Sprenger, C. (2010). Certain and Uncertain Utility. The Allais Paradox and Five Decision Theory Phenomena. Levine’s Working Paper Archive 926159295. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semantic-scholar.org/83da/ed55d89ad8d0b94ac72e509dbb11-8983-f069.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Baillon, A., Bleichrodt, H., & Liu, N. (2016). Group Decision rules and group rationality under risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 52(2), 99-116.10.1007/s11166-016-9237-8Search in Google Scholar

Bakacsi, Gy. (2015). Valtozo vezetesi paradigma – valtozo megbizo ugynok problema? [Changing leader-paradigm – changing principal-agent problem?]. In Gy. Bakacsi & K. Balaton (Eds.), Vezetes es szervezet tarsadalmi kontextusban: Tanulmanyok Dobak Miklos 60. szuletesnapja tiszteletere (pp. 29-54). Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Press.Search in Google Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H. (2008). New Paradoxes of Risky Decision Making. Psychological Review, 115(2), 463-501.10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.46318426300Search in Google Scholar

Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgement and Decision Making, 11(1), 33-47.10.1017/S1930297500000334Search in Google Scholar

Calabuig, V., Fatas, E., Olcina, G., & Rodriguez-Lara, I. (2016). Carry a big stick, or no stick at all Punishment and endowment heterogeneity in the trust game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 157, 153-171.10.1016/j.joep.2016.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Camerer, C. (1998). Bounded Rationality in Individual Decision Making. Experimental Economics, 1, 163-183.10.1023/A:1009944326196Search in Google Scholar

Centre for Decision Sciences, DOSPERT ORG. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/decisionsciences.columbia.edu/dospert/Search in Google Scholar

Chang, S., Dee, T. S., Tse, C. W., & Yu, L. (2016). Be a Good Samaritan to a Good Samaritan: Field evidence of other-regarding preferences in China. China Economic Review, 41, 23-33. Doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2016.08.00710.1016/j.chieco.2016.08.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dawes, M. R., & Thaler, R. (1988). Anomalies Cooperation. Journal of Economics Perspectives, 2(3), 187-197.10.1257/jep.2.3.187Search in Google Scholar

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner., G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522-550.10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.xSearch in Google Scholar

Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fishbacher, U. (2008). Testing theories of fairness – Intentions matter. Games and Economic Behavior, 62(1), 287-303.10.1016/j.geb.2007.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Farago, K., & Kiss, O. (2005). Risk-taking Entreprenuers: the Role of Uncertainty, Stake and Framing. Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle, LX(1), 203-223.10.1556/mpszle.60.2005.1-2.11Search in Google Scholar

Farago, K. (2005). A kockazatvallalas vizsgalata terepkiserletekben. Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle, LX(3), 343-370.10.1556/mpszle.60.2005.3.4Search in Google Scholar

Farago, K. (2008). Siker, kockazatvallalas es versenges szervezetekben. Alkalmazott Pszichologia, 1-2, 7-29.Search in Google Scholar

Farago, K. (2008). The Effect of Accumulated Resources on Risk Taking in Memory of Ferenc Merei. Magyar Pszichologiai Szemle, 63(4), 651-675.10.1556/mpszle.63.2008.4.3Search in Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425, 785-791. Doi: 10.1038/nature0204310.1038/02043Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ferreira, M. (2018). Risk Seeker or Risk Averse? Cross- Country Differences in Risk Attitudes Towards Financial Investment. In A. Samson (Ed.), The Behavioral Economics Guide 2018. Retrieved from http://www.behavioraleconomics.comSearch in Google Scholar

Guiso, L., & Paiella, M. (2008). Risk Aversion, Wealth, and Background Risk. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6), 1109-1150.10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.6.1109Search in Google Scholar

Hanoch, Y., Johnson, J. G., Wilke, A. (2006). Domain Specificity in Experimental Measures and Participant Recruitment An Application to Risk-Taking Behavior. Psychological Sciences, 17(4), 300-306.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01702.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hertvig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions From Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice. Psychological Sciences, 15(8), 534-539.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. London, United Kingdom: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2018). The Hofstede Centre. Retrieved from https://geert-hofstede.comSearch in Google Scholar

Hsee, C. K., & Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-National Differences in Risk Preference and Lay Predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 165-179.10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<165::AID-BDM316>3.0.CO;2-NSearch in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking fast and slow. New York, United States: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1991). The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 193-206.10.1257/jep.5.1.193Search in Google Scholar

Kolnhofer-Derecskei, A. (2017). The Indifferent, the Good Samaritan, the Brave and the Agent in Allais Paradox situation – or How Endowment Effect Influences Our Decision in Case of Allais Paradox? Organizacija, 50(4), 299-313.10.1515/orga-2017-0022Search in Google Scholar

Kolnhofer-Derecskei, A., & Nagy, V. (2016). Under Risk. In R. Reicher (Ed.), Proceedings of FIKUSZ ’16 Symposium for Young Researchers (pp. 161-172). Retrieved from https://kgk.uni-obuda.hu/sites/default/files/16_De-rec-skei_Nagy.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Luigi, G., & Paiella, M. (2008). Risk aversion, wealth, and background risk. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(6), 1109-1150.10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.6.1109Search in Google Scholar

Morris, M. W., Leung, K., Ames, D., Lickel, B. (1999). Views from Inside and Outside: Integrating Emic and Etic Insights about Culture and Justice Judgment. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 781-796.10.5465/amr.1999.2553253Search in Google Scholar

Palmer, C. J., Paton, B., Ngo, T. T., Thomson, R. H., Hohwy, J., & Miller, S. M. (2013). Individual differences in Moral Behaviour: A Role for Response to Risk and Uncertainty? Neuroethics, 6, 91-103.10.1007/s12152-012-9158-4Search in Google Scholar

Radnoti, I. (2010), A kockazatvallalasi szandek merese. XXI. Szazad – Tudomanyos Kozlemenyek, 24, 31-54.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, H. (1978). Rational Decision-Making in Business Organization. Nobel Memorial Lecture, 8th of December 1978.Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.10.1126/science.185.4157.1124Search in Google Scholar

Vasvari, T. (2015). Risk. Risk Perception, Risk Management – a Review of the Literature. Public Finance Quarterly, 60(1), 29-48.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, M., Oliver, M., & Hens, R. (2017). The impact of culture on loss aversion. Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 270-281.10.1002/bdm.1941Search in Google Scholar

Weber, E. U., Blais, A. R., & Betz, N. (2002). A domainspecific risk attitude scale: Measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 263-290.10.1002/bdm.414Search in Google Scholar

Weber, E. U., & Hsee, C. (1998). Cross Cultured Differences in Risk Perception, but Cross Cultural Similarities in Attitudes Towards Perceived Risk. Management Science, 44(9), 1205-1217.10.1287/mnsc.44.9.1205Search in Google Scholar