[Act No. 50/1976 about territorial planning and construction order (Construction Law) in wording of later issued provisions (for instance, in wording of Act No. 103/1990, Act No. 262/1992, and Act No. 237/2000).]Search in Google Scholar
[Agenda 2l (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro (United Nations), A/Conf. l5l/4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bański, J. & Janicki W. (2013). The influence of the EU’s eastern frontier on the socioeconomic situation of border areas. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(3), 299–313. DOI: 10.1177/0969776411432991.10.1177/0969776411432991]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastian, O., Krönert, R. & Lipský Z. (2006). Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales – a challenge for landscape planning. Landsc. Ecol., 21(3), 359–374. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1.10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bastian, O., Cudlín, P., Pechanec, V., Brzoska, P., Štěrbová, L., Včeláková, R., Purkyt, J. & Grunewald K. (2020). Assessments of biodiversity and habitat services in cities – exemplified by Dresden (Germany) and Liberec (Czech Republic). Ekológia (Bratislava), 39(2), 174−189. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2020-0013.10.2478/eko-2020-0013]Search in Google Scholar
[Bezák, P. (2006). Integrated approach to the evaluation landscape on the example of research in National Park Poloniny (in Slovak). In Z. Izakovičová (Ed.), Integrovaný manažment krajiny – základný nástroj implementácie trvalo udržateľného rozvoja (pp. 125–130). Bratislava: ÚKE SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bugár, G., Pucherová, Z. & Veselovská K. (2020). Mosaic landscape structures in relation to the land use of Nitra district. Ekológia (Bratislava), 39(3), 277−288. DOI: 10.2478/eko-2020-0022.10.2478/eko-2020-0022]Search in Google Scholar
[Caims, Jr. J., Crawford, T.V. & Salwasser H. (Eds.) (1994). Implementing integrated environmental management. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Convention on Cooperation for the Protection and Sustainable use of the Danube River (Danube River Protection Convention) (1994). International Commission for the protection of the Danube river, June 29 1994, Sofia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Convention on the Protection of the Alps (Alpine Convention) (1996). D Decision 96/191/EC of 26 February 1996 concerning the conclusion of the Convention on the Protection of the Alps.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crossman, N.D. & Bryan B.A. (2007). Ecological restoration priorities for achieving integrated environmental and economic objectives. In R.G.H. Bunce, R.H.G. Jongman, L. Hojas & S. Weel (Eds.), 25 years of Landscape Ecology: Scientific Principles in Practices. Proceedings of the 7th IALE World Congress, Wageningen. IALE Publication Series, 4(2), 973–974.]Search in Google Scholar
[Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the Habitat directive).]Search in Google Scholar
[Csorba, P. & Szabó Sz. (2009). Degree of human transformation of landscapes: a case study from Hungary. Hungarian Geographical Bulletin, 58(2), 91–99. https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/hungeobull/article/view/3149]Search in Google Scholar
[Dick, J., Turkelboom, F., Woods, H., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Primmer, E., Saarela, S.-R., Bezák, P., Mederly, P., Leone, M., Verheyden, W., Kelemen, E., Hauck, J., Andrew, C., Antunes, P., Aszalos, R.., Baro, F., Barton, D.N., Berry, P., Bugter, R., Carvalho, L., Czucz, B., Dunford, R., Garcia Blanco, G., Geamana, N, Giuca, R., Grizetti, B., Izakovičová, Z., Kertész, M., Kopperoinen, L., Langemeyer, J., Montenegro Lapola, D., Liquete, C., Luque, S., Martinez Pastur, G., Martín-López, B., Mukhopadhyay, R., Niemelä, J.K., Odee, D., Luis Peri, P., Pinho, P., Buerger Patricio-Roberto, G., Preda, E., Priess, J., Röckmann, C., Santos, R., Silaghi, D., Smith, R., Vadineanu, A., Tjalling van der Wal, J., Arany, I., Badea, O., Bela, G., Boros, E., Bucur, M., Blumentrath, S., Calvache, M., Carmen, E., Clemente, P., Fernandes, J., Ferraz, D., Fongar, C., Garcia-Llorante, M., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gundersen, V., Haavardsholm, O., Kaloczkai, A., Khalalwe, T., Kiss, G., Köhler, B., Lazanyi, O., Lellei-Kovacs, E., Lichungu, R., Lindhjem, H., Magare, C., Mustajoki, J., Ndege, C., Nowell, M., Nuss Girona, S., Ochieng, J., Anders, O., Palomo, I., Pataki, G., Reinvang, R., Rusch, G.M., Saarikosk, H., Smith, A., Soy Massoni, E., Stange, E., Vågnes Traaholt, N., Vari, A., Verweij, P., Vikström, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V.J. & Zulian G. (2018). Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept : Results from 27 case studies. Ecosystem Services, 29, 552‒565. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015.10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy.]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE).]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control.]Search in Google Scholar
[Directive 2009/147/ECof the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (codified version of Directive 79/409/EEC as amended).]Search in Google Scholar
[Diviaková, A. (2011). Biotic complexes for the environmental management (in Slovak). Harmanec: VKÚ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Divíšek, J., Chytrý, M., Grulich, V. & Poláková L. (2014). Landscape classification of the Czech Republic based on the distribution of natural habitats. Preslia, 86(3), 209–231.]Search in Google Scholar
[Europäische Raumordnungs Charta (1983). Institut für Landes- und stadtent wicklungs forschung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Comission (2018). Cohesion Policy Legislative Package 2021‒2027 (COM (2018) 375 final).]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2019a). European Union Strategy for the Danube Region (EUCDR).). FINAL VERSION 11th July 2019 (V1) endorsed by EUSDR NCs handed over to the European Commission / DG Regio on 11th July 2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2019b). Report from the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the implementation of EU macro-regional strategies, Brussels, COM(2019) 21final.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission (2020). Action Plan replacing Staff Working Document SEC(2010) 1489 final accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions concerning the European Union Strategy for the Danube Region, Brussels, SWD (2020) 59 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Landscape Convention (2000). Council of Europe. Florence.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fontaine, C.M., Dendoncker, N., De Vreese, R., Jacquemin, I., Marek, A., Van Herzele, A., Devillet, G., Mortelmans, D. & François L. (2014). Towards participatory integrated valuation and modelling of ecosystem services under land-use change. Journal of Land Use Science, 9, 278–303. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2013.786150.10.1080/1747423X.2013.786150]Search in Google Scholar
[Haber, W. (2008). Naturschutz in der Kulturlandschaft – ein Widerspruch in sich? Laufener Spezialbeiträge, 1(8), 15–25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hagmann, J., Chuma, E., Murwira, K., Connolly, M. & Ficarelli P. (2002): Success factors in integrated natural resource management R&D: lessons from practice. Conserv. Ecol., 5(2), 29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2627182610.5751/ES-00298-050229]Search in Google Scholar
[ICPDR (2015a) The Danube River Basin District Management Plan - Update 2015. Vienna.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICPDR (2015b). Flood Risk Management Plan for the Danube River Basin District. Vienna.]Search in Google Scholar
[ICPDR (2018). Update of the ICPDR Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change. Vienna.]Search in Google Scholar
[IPBES (2015). Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualization of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (deliverable 3 (d)). Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.]Search in Google Scholar
[Izakovičová, Z. (1995). Ecological interpretations and evaluation of encounters of interests in landscape. Ekológia (Bratislava), 14(3), 261–275.]Search in Google Scholar
[Izakovičová, Z. (2000). Evaluation of the stress factors in the land-scape. Ekológia (Bratislava), 19(1), 92−103.]Search in Google Scholar
[Izakovičová, Z. & Kozová M. (2008). Integrated landscape management – an instrument supporting sustainable development of a landscape (in Slovak). Enviromagazín (Mimoriadne číslo), 13, 8–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Izakovičová, Z., Miklós, L. & Miklósová V. (2018). Integrative assessment of land use conflicts. Sustainability, 10(9), 3270. DOI: 10.3390/su10093270.10.3390/su10093270]Search in Google Scholar
[Izakovičová, Z., Miklós, L., Miklósová, V. & Petrovič F. (2019). The integrated approach to landscape management ‒ Experience from Slovakia. Sustainability, 11(17), 4554. DOI: 10.3390/su11174554.10.3390/su11174554]Search in Google Scholar
[Jakubcová, A., Grežo, H., Hrešková, A. & Petrovič F. (2016). Impacts of flooding on the quality of life in rural regions of Southern Slovakia. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 11(1), 221–237. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-014-9363-x.10.1007/s11482-014-9363-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, C.M. (2009). Cross-border regions and territorial restructuring in Central Europe: Room for more trans-boundary space. European Urban and Regional Studies, 16(2), 177–191. DOI: 10.1177/0969776409102190.10.1177/0969776409102190]Search in Google Scholar
[Jongman, R.H.G. (1995). Nature Conservation Planning in Europe: Developing Ecological Networks. Landsc. Urban Plann., 32(3), 169–183. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(95)00197-O.10.1016/0169-2046(95)00197-O]Search in Google Scholar
[Jongman, R.H.G. (Ed.) (2003). The new dimensions of the European landscapes. Netherlands: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuus, M. (2011). Whose regional expertise? Political geographies of knowledge in the European Union. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(3), 275–288. DOI: 10.1177/0969776411406034.10.1177/0969776411406034]Search in Google Scholar
[Martinez-Harms, M.J., Bryan, B.A., Balvanera, P., Law, E.A., Rhodes, J.R., Possingham, H.P. & Wilson K.A. (2015). Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biol. Conserv., 184, 229–238. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024.10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Mezősi, G., Csorba, P., Bata, T., Blanka, V. & Ladányi Zs. (2016). Similarity assessment of natural landscapes based on taxonomic distance. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 14(3), 679–693. DOI: 10.15666/aeer/1403_679693.10.15666/aeer/1403_679693]Search in Google Scholar
[Miklós, L. & Izakovičová Z. (1997). Landscape as a geosystem (in Slovak). Bratislava: Veda, vydavateľstvo SAV.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miklós, L., Kočická, E., Diviaková, A. & Belaňová E. (2011). Integrated landscape management (in Slovak). Harmanec: VKÚ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miklós, L., Kočická, E., Kočický, D. & Diviaková A. (2015). Geosystémy ako krajinnoekologická základňa pre integrovaný manažment krajiny. Zvolen: Vydavateľstvo TU.]Search in Google Scholar
[Naveh, Z. & Lieberman A. (1993). Landscape ecology - Theory and application. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4757-2331-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 153–171. DOI: 10.1177/0969776403010002004.10.1177/0969776403010002004]Search in Google Scholar
[Primmer, E. & Furman E. (2012). Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: Do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems? Ecosystem Services, 1(1), 85–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008.10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Roggeri, A. (2015). Could macro-regional strategies be more successful? European Structural Investment Funds Journal, 3(3), 145‒155.]Search in Google Scholar
[Siebert, R., Artner, A., Dobrovodská, M., Grotkovská, L., Kortekaas, H.K., Imrichová, Z., Izakovičová, Z., Kenderessy, P., Krange, O., Midgley, Moyzeová, M., Oszlányi, J., Palarie, T., Skogen, K., Sunyer, C., Szeker, K., Toogood, M., Vadineanu, A. & Válkovcová Z. (2004). Mobilizing the European social research potential in support of biodiversity and ecosystem management. International Report –Sobio.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sielker, F. (2016). A stakeholder-based EU territorial cooperation: the example of European macro-regions. European Planning Studies, 24(11), 1995–2013. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1221383.10.1080/09654313.2016.1221383]Search in Google Scholar
[Sielker, F. & Mirtl J. (2017). Positioning EU Macro-regions – When Sectoral Policies Meet Cohesion Policy. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 5(3), 223–234.]Search in Google Scholar
[Slocombe, D.S. (1998). Lessons from experience with ecosystem-based management. Landsc. Urban Plann., 40, 31–39. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00096-0.10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00096-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Stelfox, B.J. (2004). The role of integrated landscape management to assist with exploring the past, present and future effects of landscape activities on Alberta´s boreal fish communities. In Scrimgeour, G.J., Eisler, G., McCulloch, B., Solins, U. & Monita M. (Eds.), Forest Land-Fish conference II – Ecosystem Stewardship through Collaboration (pp. 1−9). Proc. Forest-Land-Fish Conf. II, April 26-28, 2004. Edmonton, Alberta.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szaro, C.R., Sexton, W.T. & Malone Ch.R. (1998). The emergence of ecosystem management as a tool for meeting people’s needs and sustaining ecosystems. Landsc. Urban Plann., 40, 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00093-5.10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00093-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Szmigiel-Rawska, K. (2014). Sustainability of cross-border cooperation: PHARE CBC partnership development paths. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 513–526. DOI: 10.1177/0969776414526734.10.1177/0969776414526734]Search in Google Scholar
[Špinerová, A. (2010). Landscape-ecological limits for agricultural use of the Ilíjsky brook basin (in Slovak). Harmanec: VKÚ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tress, B. & Tress G. (2001). Capitalising on multiplicity: a transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landsc. Urban Plann., 57, 143–157. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00200-6.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00200-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Wascher, D.M. (Ed.) (2005). European landscape character areas – typologies, cartography and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes. Final project report as deliverable from the EU’s Accompanying Measure project European Landscape Character Assessment Initiative (ELCAI), funded under the 5th Framework Programme on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (4.2.2). Wageningen: Landscape Europe.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wrbka, T., Erb, K.H., Schulz, N.B., Peterseil, J., Hahn, C. & Haberl H. (2004). Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy, 21, 289–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.012.10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Wrbka, T., Zmelik, K. & Grünweis F.M. (Eds.) (2009). The European Green Belt: Border. Wilderness. Future. Weitra: Bibliothek der Provinz.]Search in Google Scholar
