[Aira, M., Monroy, F. & Domínguez J. (2009). Changes in bacterial numbers and microbial activity of pig slurry during gut transit of epigeic and anecic earthworms. J. Hazard. Mater., 162(2−3), 1404−1407. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.031.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.03118639984]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Andersen, S.M., Johnsen, K., Sorensen, J., Nielsen, P. & Jacobsen C.S. (2000). Pseudomonas frederiksbergergensis sp. nov., isolated from soil at a coal gasification site. Int. J. Syst. Evolutionary Microbiol., 50, 1957−1964. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-50-6-1957.10.1099/00207713-50-6-195711155968]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barančoková, M. & Barančok P. (2015). Distribution of the traditional agricultural landscape types reflecting geological substrate and slope processes in the Kysuce region. Ekológia (Bratislava), 34(4), 339−355. DOI: 10.11515/eko-2015-0031.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergogne-Bérézin, E. & Towner K.J. (1996). Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 9(2), 148−165. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.9.2.148.10.1128/CMR.9.2.1481728888964033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bossio, D.A., Fleck, J.A., Scow, K.M. & Fujii R. (2006). Alteration of soil microbial communities and water quality in restored wetlands. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 1223–1233. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.027.10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.027]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brackin, R., Robinson, N., Lakshmanan, P. & Schmidt S. (2013). Microbial function in adjacent subtropical forest and agricultural soil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 57, 68–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.015.10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.015]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brown, G.G. & Doube B. (2004). Functional interactions between earthworms, microorganisms, organic matter and plants. In C.A. Edwards (Ed.), Earthworm ecology (pp. 213−240). London, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brussaard, L., de Ruiter, P.C. & Brown G.G. (2007). Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 121, 233−244. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013.10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cartwright, J.M. (2015). Average Well Color Development (AWCD) data based on Community Level Physiological Profiling (CLPP) of soil samples from 120 point locations within limestone cedar glades at Stones River National Battlefield near Murfreesboro, Tennessee. Tennesee: U.S. Geological Survey data release. DOI: 10.5066/F7N-V9G9C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Central Control and Testing Institute in Agriculture (2013). Results of agrochemical testing of soils in Slovakia during 2006−2011. (XII. Cycle). Bratislava: CCTIA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coq, S., Barthès, B.G., Oliver, R., Rabary, B. & Blanchart E. (2007). Earthworm activity affects soil aggregation and organic matter dynamics according to the quality and localization of crop residues – an experimental study (Madagascar). Soil Biol. Biochem., 39(8), 2119−2128. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.019.10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.03.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Cordova-Rosa, S.M., Dams, R.I. & Radetski M.R. (2009). Remediation of phenol-contaminated soil by a bacterial consortium and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. J. Hazard. Mater., 164(1), 61−66. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.120.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.12018774223]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Reich, P.B., Khachane, A.N., Campbell, C.D., Thomas, N., Freitag, T.E., Al-Soud, W.A., Sørensen, S., Bardgett, R.D. & Singh B.K. (2016). It is elemental: soil nutrient stoichiometry drives bacterial diversity. Environmental Microbiology, 19(3), 1176−1188. DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.13642.10.1111/1462-2920.1364227943556]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ditterich, F., Poll, Ch., Pronk, K.J., Heister, K., Chandan, A., Rennert, T., KÖgel-Knabner, I. & Kandeler E. (2016). Succession of soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in artificial soils. Pedobiologia, 59, 93−104. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.03.002.10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.03.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Domínguez, J., Aira, M. & Gomez-Brandon M. (2010). Vermicomposting: earthworm enhances the work of microbes. In H. Insam, I. Frank-Whittle & M. Goberna (Eds.), Microbes at work: from waste to resources (pp. 93−110). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04043-6_5.10.1007/978-3-642-04043-6_5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Don, A., Schumacher, J. & Freibauer A. (2011). Impact of tropical land-use change on soil organic carbon stocks - a meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 17, 1658–1670. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02336.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dubey, S.K., Tripathi, A.K. & Upadhyay B.N. (2006). Exploration of soil bacterial communities for their potential as bioresource. Bioresour. Technol., 97, 2217−2224. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.06.00810.1016/j.biortech.2005.06.00816198103]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[FAO (2014). World reference base for soil resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Rome: FAO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiala, K. (1999). Soil samples methods of partial monitoring system – Soil (in Slovak). Bratislava:VÚPaOP.]Search in Google Scholar
[Firestone, M., Balser, T. & Herman D. (1997). Defining soil quality in terms of microbial community structure. Annual Reports of Research Projects. Berkeley: University of California.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frac, M., Oszust, K. & Lipiec J. (2012). Community level physiological profiles (CLPP) characterization and microbial activity of soil amended with dairy sewage sludge. Sensors, 12, 3253−3268. DOI: 10.3390/s120303253.10.3390/s120303253337657022737006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Frank, J.F. (1997). Milk and dairy products. In M.P. Doyle, L.R. Beuchat & T.J. Montville (Eds.), Food microbiology, fundamentals and frontiers (pp. 101). Washington: ASM Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fierer, N. & Lennon J. (2011). The generation and maintenance of diversity in microbial communities. Am. J. Bot., 98(3), 439–448. DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000498.10.3732/ajb.100049821613137]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[García-Orenes, F., Morugán-Coronado, A., Zornoza, R. & Scow K. (2013). Changes in soil microbial community structure influenced by agricultural management practices in a Mediterranean Agro-Ecosystem. PLoS One, 8(11), e80522. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080522.10.1371/journal.pone.0080522383237524260409]Search in Google Scholar
[Garland, J.L. (1997). Analysis and interpretation of community-level physiological profiles in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 24, 289−300. DOI: 10.1111/j.15746941.1997.tb00446.x.10.1111/j.15746941.1997.tb00446.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Giller, P.S. (1996). The diversity of soil communities, the “poor man’s tropical forest”. Biodivers. Conserv., 5, 135−168.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomez, E., Garland, J. & Conti M. (2004). Reproducibility in the response of soil bacterial community level physiological profiles from a land use intensification gradient. Appl. Soil Ecol., 26, 21–30. DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.007.10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Herlemann, D.P.R, Labrenz, M., Jürgens, K., Bertilsson, S., Waniek, J.J. & Andersson A.F. (2011) Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME, 5, 1571–1579. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2011.41.10.1038/ismej.2011.41317651421472016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ikemoto, S., Suzuki, K., Kaneko, T. & Komagata K. (1980). Characterization of strains of Pseudomonas maltophilia which do not require methionine. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 30, 437−447. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-30-2-437.10.1099/00207713-30-2-437]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jaďuďová, J., Kanianska, R., Kizeková, M. & Makovníková J. (2016). Evaluation of habitat provision on the basis of carabidae diversity in Slovak Permanent Grasslands. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 44, 1−5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jat, L.K., Singh, Y.V., Meena, S.K., Meena, S.K., Parihar, M., Jatav, H.S., Meena, R.K & Singh V. (2015). Does integrated nutrient management enhance agricultural productivity? Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 9(2), 1211−1221.]Search in Google Scholar
[Júdová, J., Kurjakova, L., Talan, T., Pajtasova, M. & Petrášová A. (2015). Microbial communities of Slovakia peatlands and oil spring. In 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM 2015: Water resources, forest, marine and ocean ecosystems (pp. 221−230). 18-24 June 2015, Albena, Bulgaria.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kanianska, R., Kizeková, M., Nováček, M. & Zeman M. (2014). Land-use and land-cover changes in rural areas during different political systems: A case study of Slovakia from 1782 to 2006. Land Use Policy, 36, 554−566. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.018.10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.018]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kanianska, R., Jaďuďová, J., Makovníková, J. & Kizeková M. (2016). Assessment of relationships between earthworms and soil abiotic and biotic factors as a tool in sustainable agricultural. Sustainability, 8(9), 906. DOI: 10.3390/SU8090906.10.3390/8090906]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaschuk, G., Alberton, O. & Hungria M. (2009). Three decades of soil microbial biomass studies in Brazilian ecosystems: Lessons learned about soil quality and indications for improving sustainability. Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.020.10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.08.020]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kersters, K., Ludwig, W., Vancanneyt, M., De Vos, P., Gills, M. & Schleifer K.H. (1996). Recent changes in the classification of the pseudomonads: an overview. Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 19, 465−477. DOI: 10.1016/S0723-2020(96)80020-8.10.1016/S0723-2020(96)80020-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kirkham, F.W., Mountford, J.O. & Wilkins R.J. (1996). The effects of nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus addition on the vegetation of a Somerset peat moor under cutting management. J. Appl. Ecol., 33, 1013–1029.10.2307/2404682]Search in Google Scholar
[Kumar, A., Meena, R., Meena, V.S., Bisht, J.K. & Pattanayak A. (2016). Towards the stress management and environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 821−822. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.163.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.163]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lauber, C.L., Hamady, M., Knight, R. & Fierer N. (2009). Pyrosequencing-based assessment soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 75, 5111–5120. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00335-09.10.1128/AEM.00335-09272550419502440]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ložek, V. (1973). Nature in the quaternary (in Czech). Praha: Academia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Madigan, M.T., Martinko, J.M., Dunlap, P.V. & Clark D.V. (2008). Brock biology of microorganisms. New York: Pearson Higher Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Markande, A.R. & Nerurkar A.S. (2016). Bioemulsifier (BE-AM1) produced by Solibacillus silvestris AM1 is a functional amyloid that modulates bacterial cell-surface properties. Biofouling, 32(10), 1153−1162. DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2016.1232716.10.1080/08927014.2016.123271627669827]Search in Google Scholar
[McGuire, K.L. & Treseder K.K. (2010). Microbial communities and their relevance for ecosystem models: Decomposition as a case study. Soil Biol. Biochem., 42, 529–535. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.016.10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Meyer, A., Focks, A., Radl, V., Keil, D., Welzl, G., Schöning, I., Boch, S., Marhan, S., Kandeler, E. & Schloter M. (2013). Different land use intensities in grassland ecosystems drive ecology of microbial communities involved in nitrogen turnover in soil. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e73536. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073536.10.1371/journal.pone.0073536376535124039974]Search in Google Scholar
[Palleroni, N.J. (1993). Pseudomonas classification. A new case history in the taxonomy of Gram-negative bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek, 64(3−4), 231−251. DOI: 10.1007/BF00873084.10.1007/BF008730848085787]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Palleroni, N.J. & Bradbury J.F. (1993). Stenotrophomonas, a new bacterial genus for Xanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1980) Swings et al. 1983. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 43(3), 606−609. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-43-3-606.10.1099/00207713-43-3-6068347518]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pampulha, M.E. & Oliveira A. (2006). Impact of an herbicide combination of bromoxynil and prosulfuron on soil microorganisms. Curr. Microbiol., 53, 238−243. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-006-0116-4.10.1007/s00284-006-0116-416855810]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Patra, A.K., Abbadie, L., Clays-Josserand, A., Degrange, V., Grayston, S.J., Guillaumaud, N., Loiseau, P., Louault, F., Mahmood, S., Nazaret, S., Philippot, L., Poly F., Prosser J.I. & Le Roux X. (2006). Effects of management regime and plant species on the enzyme activity and genetic structure of N-fixing, denitrifying and nitrifying bacterial communities in grassland soils. Environmental Microbiology, 8(6), 1005–1016. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.00992.x.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.00992.x16689721]Search in Google Scholar
[Ranjard, L., Poly, F., Combrisson, J., Richaume, A., Gourbiere, F., Thioulouse, J. & Nazaret S. (2000). Heterogenous cell density and genetic structure of bacterial pools associated with various soil microenvironments as determined by enumeration and DNA fingerprinting approach (RISA). Microb. Ecol., 39, 263−272. DOI: 10.1007/s002480000032.10.1007/s002480000032]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Roger-Estrade, J., Anger, C., Bertrand, M. & Richard G. (2010). Tillage and soil ecology: Partners for sustainable agriculture. Soils Tillage Res., 111, 33−40. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2010.08.010.10.1016/j.still.2010.08.010]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rosello-Mora, R. & Amann R. (2001). The species concept for prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 25, 39−67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00571.x.10.1111/j.1574-6976.2001.tb00571.x11152940]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smith, A.P., Marín-Spiotta, E., de Graaff, M.A. & Balser T.C. (2014). Microbial community structure varies across soil organic matter aggregate pools during tropical land cover change. Soil Biol. Biochem., 77, 292–303. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.030.10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.05.030]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thurston, J.M. (1969). The effect of liming and fertilizers on the botanical composition of permanent grassland and the yield of hay. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Urbanová, M., Šnajdr, J. & Baldrian P. (2015). Composition of fungal and bacterial communities in forest litter and soil is largely determined by dominant trees. Soil Biol. Biochem., 84, 53–64. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.011.10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.011]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wolf, A., Fritze, A., Hagemann, M. & Berg G. (2002). Stenotrophomonas rhizophila sp. Nos., a novel plant-associated bacterium with atifungal properties. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 52, 1937−1944. DOI: 10.1099/00207713-52-6-1937.10.1099/00207713-52-6-193712508851]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zak, D.R., Holmes, W.E., White, D.C., Peacock, A.D. & Tilman D. (2003). Plant diversity, soil microbial communities, and ecosystem function. Ecology, 84, 2042–2050. DOI: 10.1890/02-0433.10.1890/02-0433]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar