[Allison, F.E. (1973). Soil organic matter and its role in crop production. Amsterdam, London: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barbati, A., Corona, P. & Marchetti M. (2007). European forest types. Categories and types for sustainable forest man-agement reporting and policy. Copenhagen, Luxembourg: European Environment Agency.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, T.W. & Hager H. (2000). Physical top soil properties in pure stands of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and mixed species stands in Austria. For. Ecol. Manag., 136, 159-172. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00286-8.10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00286-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Borken, W., Xu, Y.-J., Davidson, E.A. & Beese F. (2002). Site and temporal variation of soil respiration in European beech, Norway spruce, and Scots pine forests. Global Change Biology, 8(12), 1205-1216. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365- 2486.2002.00547.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[Box, G.E.P. & Cox D.R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B, 26, 211-246. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2984418.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x]Search in Google Scholar
[BuČek, A., Maděra, P. & ÚŘadníČek L. (2007). Ecological network creation in the Czech Republic. Journal of Land-scape Ecology, 1: 12-24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Casper, B.B. & Jackson R.B. (1997). Plant competition underground. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 28, 545-570. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.545.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.545]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, M., Hahn, K., Mountford, E. P., Ódor, P., Standová, T, Rozenbergar, D., Diaci, J., Wijdeven, S., Meyer, P., Winter, S. & VrŠka T (2005). Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves. For. Ecol.Manag., 210, 267-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032.10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.032]Search in Google Scholar
[Cienciala, E., Exnerová, Z., Mackě, J. & Henžlík V. (2006). Forest topsoil organic carbon content in Southwest Bo- hemia region. J. For. Sci., 52, 387-398.10.17221/4519-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Chytrý, M. (2012). Vegetation of the Czech Republic: diversity ecology, history and dynamics. Preslia, 84, 427-504.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chytrý, M., KuČera, T. & KoČí M. (Eds.) (2001). Katalog biotopů České republiky. Praha: AOPK ČR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Craine, J.M. (2007). Plant strategy theories: replies to Grime and Tilman. J. Ecol, 95, 235-240. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2745.2007.01212.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[Culek, M. (Ed.) (1996). Biogeografické Členění České republiky. Praha: Enigma.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davi, H., Dufrêne, E., Granier, A., Le Dantec, V., Barbaroux, C, Francois, C. & Bréda N. (2005). Modelling carbon and water cycles in a beech forest. Part II: Validation of the main processes form organ to stand scale. Ecol.Model., 185, 387-407. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.003.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Demek, J. (1987). Hory a nížiny. Zeměpisný lexikon ČSR. Praha: Academia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diaci, J. & Rozenbergar D. (2003). Interactions of light, soil properties and regeneration in the Slovenian Dinaric Alps: Patterns in virgin and managed forests. In F. Hamor & B. Commarmot (Eds.), Natural forests in the tem-perate zone of Europe - values and utilization (pp. 58-59). Mukachevo, Rakhiv, Birmensdorf: Carpathian Bio- sphere Reserve, Swiss Federal Research Institute.]Search in Google Scholar
[Driessen, P., Deckers, J. & Nachtergaele F. (Eds.) (2001). Lecture notes on the major soils of the world. Rome: FAO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellenberg, H. (1996). Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer und historischer Sicht. Stuttgart: Verlag Eugen Ulmer GmbH.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finzi, A.C., Canham, CD. & van Breemen N. (1998). Canopy tree soil interactions within temperate forests: Species efects on pH and cations. Ecol. Appl., 8, 447-454. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0447:CTSIWT]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitzsimmons, K.E., Markoviě, S.B. & Hambach U. (2012). Pleistocene environmental dynamics recorded in the loess of the middle and lower Danube basin. Quaternary Science Reviews, 41, 104-118. DOI: 10.1016/j.quasci- rev.2012.03.002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaston, K.J. & Spicer J.I. (2004). Biodiversity: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gégout, J.-C. & Križová E. (2003). Comparison of indicator values of forest understory plant species in Western Carpathians (Slovakia) and Vosges Mountains (France). For. Ecol. Manag., 182, 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/S0378- 1127(03)00068-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Godefroid, S., Massant, W. & Koedam N. (2005). Variation in the herb species response and the humus quality across a 200-year chronosequence of beech and oak plantations in Belgium. Ecography, 28, 223-235. DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03877.x.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.03877.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Gömöry, D., Hynek, V. & Paule V. (1998). Original article Delineation of seed zones for European beech (Fa-gus sylvatica L.) in the Czech Republic based on isozyme gene markers. Ann. For. Sci., 55, 425-436. DOI: 10.1051/forest:19980403.10.1051/forest:19980403]Search in Google Scholar
[Green, R.N., Trowbridge, R.L. & Klinka K. (1993). Towards a taxonomic classification of humus forms. For. Sci. (Monograph 29), 39(Suppl. 1), a0001-z0002.10.1093/forestscience/39.s1.a0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Grunda, B. (1993). Objemová hmotnost pědy v půdní mikrobiologii. Lesnictví-Forestry, 41, 38-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[HoráČek, M., HoluŠa, O. & Samec P. (2011). Line of border of the Polonic and Westcarpathian biogeographical sub- provinces in the Czech Republic. Acta Musei Beskidensis, 3, 17-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houba, V.G.J., van der Lee, J.J., Novozamsky I. & Walinga I. (1989). Soil analysis procedures. Soil and plant analysis, Part 5. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, Z. (2012). Flora and phytogeography of the Czech Republic. Preslia, 84, 505-573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knollová, I. & Chytrý M. (2004). Oak-hornbeam forests of the Czech Republic: geographical and ecological ap- proaches to vegetation classification. Preslia, 76, 291-311.]Search in Google Scholar
[KuČera, A., RejŠek, K., Dundek, P., Marosz, K., Samec, P. & Sýkora J. (2011). Specification of the beechwood soil environment based on chosen soil properties, aiming at the Faseta paupera habitat. J. For. Sci., 57, 185-191.10.17221/66/2010-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Lisá, L. & Uher P. (2006). Provenance of Würmian loess and loess-like sediments of Moravia and Silesia (Czech Republic): a study of zircon typology and cathodoluminiscence. Geol. Carpathica, 57, 397-403.]Search in Google Scholar
[Magri, D., Vendramin, G.G., Comps, B., Dupanloup, I., Geburek, T., Gömöry D., LataŁowa, M., Litt, T., Paule, L., Roure, J.M., Tantau, I., van der Knaap, W.O., Petit, R.J. & de Beaulieu J.-L. (2006). A new scenario for the Quarternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. NewPhytol., 171, 199-221. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Ngao, J., Epron, D., Brechet, C. & Granier A. (2005). Estimating the contribution of leaf litter decomposi- tion to soil CO2 efux in a beech forest using 13C-depleted litter. Global Change Biology, 11(10), 1768-1776. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.01014.x.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.01014.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Patzel, N. & Ponge J.-F. (2001). The heterogeneity of humus components in a virgin beech forests. Eur. J. Soil Biol., 37, 117-124. DOI: 10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01076-7.10.1016/S1164-5563(01)01076-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Pott, R. (2000). Palaeoclimate and vegetation - long-term vegetation dynamics in central Europe with particular reference to beech. Phytocoenologia, 30, 285-333. DOI: 10.1127/phyto/30/2000/285.10.1127/phyto/30/2000/285]Search in Google Scholar
[Purdon, M., Cienciala, E., Metelka, V., Beranová, J., Hunová, I. & Černý M. (2004). Regional variation in forest health under long-term air pollution mitigated by lithological conditions. For. Ecol. Manag., 195, 355-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.039.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.039]Search in Google Scholar
[Qian, H. & Ricklefs R.E. (2004). Geographical distribution and ecological coservatism of disjunct genera of vascular plants in eastern Asia and eastern North America. J. Ecol, 92, 253-265. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00868.x.10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00868.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rand, W.M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American StatisticalAssociation, 66, 846-850. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356.10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356]Search in Google Scholar
[Seynave, I., Gégout, J.-G., Hervé, J.-C, Dhôte, J.-F., 2008: Is the spatial distribution of European beech (Fagus syl-vatica L.) limited by its potential height growth? Journal of Biogeography 35: 1851-1862. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365- 2699.2008.01930.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmid, I. (2002). The influence of soil type and interspecific competition of the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3, 339-346. DOI: 10.1078/1439-1791-00116.10.1078/1439-1791-00116]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, J. (Ed.) (2003). Monitorovací plochy soustavy NATURA 2000 v České republice (1. Část). Brno: Paido. Simon, J. (2004). Management strategies on territories with special status of protection in the Czech Republic. J. For.Sci., 50, 510-513.10.17221/4648-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, J. (Ed.) (2010). Strategie managementu lesních území se zvláŠtním statutem ochrany. Obecná Část I. Kostelec nad Černými lesy: Lesnická práce.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sugiero, D., Jaszczak, R., Rączka, G., Strzelinski, P., Węgiel, A. & Wierzbicka A. (2009). Species composition in low mountain beech (Fagus sylvatica) stands in the Bieszczady National Park under the global warming. J. For. Sci., 55, 244-250.10.17221/15/2009-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Svobodová, H., Reille, M. & Goeury C. (2001). Past vegetation dynamics of Vltavský luh, upper Vltava river valley in th Šumava mountains. Czech Republic. Veg. Hist. Archaebot, 10, 185-199. DOI: 10.1007/PL00006930.10.1007/PL00006930]Search in Google Scholar
[Tan, K.H. (2003). Humic matter in soil and the environment: principles and controversies. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.10.1201/9780203912546]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA-NRSC (1996). Soil survey laboratory methods manual. Washington.]Search in Google Scholar
[van der Poel, P.W. (1976). Influence of environmental factors in the growth of the beech. Catena, 3, 203-214. DOI: 10.1016/0341-8162(76)90010-2.10.1016/0341-8162(76)90010-2]Search in Google Scholar
[VavŘíČek, D., Šimková, P., Samec, P. & Formánek P. (2006). Soil aspects of forest site revitalization afer windrow cultivation by heavy mechanization on the KruŠné hory Mts. Plateau. J. For. Sci., 52, 1-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verdú, M., Dávila, P., García-Fayos, P., Flores-Hernandes, N. & Valiente-Banuet A. (2003). ’Convergent’ traits of Mediterranean woody plants belong to pre-mediterranean linkage. Biol. J. Linn. Soc, 78, 415-427. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00160.x.10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00160.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Viewegh, J. (2002). South-Moravian foodplain forest herb vegetation in the period 1978-1997. J. For. Sci., 48, 88-92.10.17221/11859-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Voženílek, V. (2000). Regionální Členění reliéfu ČR, mapa 1: 1 250 000. Olomouc: Katedra geografe UP Olomouc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walkley A. & Black I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjaref method for determinating soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci., 37, 29-38.10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003]Search in Google Scholar
[Wheeler, P.A. & Ward R.B. (1998). Te non-toxic farming handbook. Austin: Acres U.S.A.]Search in Google Scholar
[White, R.E. (1987). Introduction to the principles and practice of soil science. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publica- tions.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zar, J. (1994). Biostatistical analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Int.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zinke, P.J. (1962). The pattern of influence of individual forest trees on soil properties. Ecology, 43, 130-133. DOI: 10.2307/1932049.10.2307/1932049]Search in Google Scholar