Micro-macro transition for numerical simulation of submerged membrane bioreactor

1Khan MA, Huu HN, Wenshan G, Yiwen L, Soon WCh, Dinh DN, Long DN, Heng I. Can membrane bioreactor be a smart option for water treatment. Bior. Techn. Reports 2018; (4): 80-87.KhanMAHuuHNWenshanGYiwenLSoonWChDinhDNLongDNHengICan membrane bioreactor be a smart option for water treatmentBior. Techn. Reports20184808710.1016/j.biteb.2018.09.002Search in Google Scholar

2Robles Á, Ruano MV, Charfi A, Lesage G, Heran M, Harmand J, Seco A, Steyer JP, Batstone DJ, Kim J, Ferrer J. A review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) focused on modelling and control aspects. Bior. Technology 2018; 270: 612-6263.RoblesÁRuanoMVCharfiALesageGHeranMHarmandJSecoASteyerJPBatstoneDJKimJFerrerJA review on anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBRs) focused on modelling and control aspects. BiorTechnology2018270612626310.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.049Search in Google Scholar

3Galinha CF, Sanches S, Crespo JG. Fundamental modelling of membrane systems. Membrane bioreactors 2018; 6: 209-249.GalinhaCFSanchesSCrespoJGFundamental modelling of membrane systemsMembrane bioreactors2018620924910.1016/B978-0-12-813483-2.00006-XSearch in Google Scholar

4Pellegrin ML, Aguinaldo J, Arabi S, Sadler ME, Greiner AD, Wong J, Dow A, Burbano MS, Danker B, Diamond J. Membrane Processes. Water Envir. Research 2018; 90 (10):1457-1536.PellegrinMLAguinaldoJArabiSSadlerMEGreinerADWongJDowABurbanoMSDankerBDiamondJMembrane Processes. Water EnvirResearch201890101457153610.2175/106143018X15289915807272Search in Google Scholar

5Tsibranska I, Vlaev S, Tylkowski B. The problem of fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors - Model validation and experimental evidence. Phys. Sc. Reviews 2018; 3(1): 14-19.TsibranskaIVlaevSTylkowskiBThe problem of fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors - Model validation and experimental evidencePhys. Sc. Reviews201831141910.1515/9783110482065-010Search in Google Scholar

6Sengur R, Deveci G, Kaya R, Turken T, Guclu S, Imer DY. A review: CFD modeling of submerged membrane bioreactors (sMBRs). Desalinat Water Treatment 2015; 55(7):1747–61.SengurRDeveciGKayaRTurkenTGucluSImerDYA review: CFD modeling of submerged membrane bioreactors (sMBRs)Desalinat Water Treatment201555717476110.1080/19443994.2014.934737Search in Google Scholar

7Boyle-Gotla A, Jensen PD, Yap SD, Pidou M, Wang Y, Batstone DJ. Dynamic multidimensional modelling of submerged membrane bioreactor fouling. J. Memb. Sci. 2014; 467: 153-161.Boyle-GotlaAJensenPDYapSDPidouMWangYBatstoneDJDynamic multidimensional modelling of submerged membrane bioreactor foulingJ. Memb. Sci201446715316110.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.028Search in Google Scholar

8Khalili-Garakani A, Mehrnia MR, Mostoufi N, Sarrafzadeh MH. Analyze and control fouling in an airlift membrane bioreactor: CFD simulation and experimental studies. Process biochemistry 2011; 46(5): 1138-1145.Khalili-GarakaniAMehrniaMRMostoufiNSarrafzadehMHAnalyze and control fouling in an airlift membrane bioreactor: CFD simulation and experimental studiesProcess biochemistry20114651138114510.1016/j.procbio.2011.01.036Search in Google Scholar

9Trad Z, Vial C, Fontaine JP, Larroche C. Modeling of hydrodynamics and mixing in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Chem. Eng. Journal 2015; 282: 77-90.TradZVialCFontaineJPLarrocheCModeling of hydrodynamics and mixing in a submerged membrane bioreactorChem. Eng. Journal2015282779010.1016/j.cej.2015.04.119Search in Google Scholar

10Böhm L, Drews A, Prieske H, Bérubé PR, Kraume M. The Importance of Fluid Dynamics for MBR Fouling Mitigation. Bioresource Technology 2012; 122: 50-61.BöhmLDrewsAPrieskeHBérubéPRKraumeMThe Importance of Fluid Dynamics for MBR Fouling MitigationBioresource Technology2012122506110.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.06922704186Search in Google Scholar

11Vlaev S, Tsibranska I, Dzhonova-Atanasova D. Hydrodynamic characterization of dual-impeller submerged membrane bioreactor relevant to single-use bioreactor options. Chem. Eng. Research and Design 2018; 132: 930-941.VlaevSTsibranskaIDzhonova-AtanasovaDHydrodynamic characterization of dual-impeller submerged membrane bioreactor relevant to single-use bioreactor optionsChem. Eng. Research and Design201813293094110.1016/j.cherd.2018.02.004Search in Google Scholar

12Wang B, Zhang K, Field RW. Novel aeration of a large‐scale flat sheet MBR: A CFD and experimental investigation. AIChE Journal 2018; 64(7): 2721-2736.WangBZhangKFieldRWNovel aeration of a large‐scale flat sheet MBR: A CFD and experimental investigationAIChE Journal20186472721273610.1002/aic.16164Search in Google Scholar

13Wu Q, Yan X, Xiao K, Guan J, Li T, Liang P, Huang X. Optimization of membrane unit location in a full-scale membrane bioreactor using computational fluid dynamics. Bioresource technology 2018; 249: 402-409.WuQYanXXiaoKGuanJLiTLiangPHuangXOptimization of membrane unit location in a full-scale membrane bioreactor using computational fluid dynamicsBioresource technology201824940240910.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.20929059623Search in Google Scholar

14Wang Y, Brannock M, Cox S, Leslie G. CFD simulations of membrane filtration zone in a submerged hollow fibre membrane bio-reactor using a porous media approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2010; 363: 57–66.WangYBrannockMCoxSLeslieGCFD simulations of membrane filtration zone in a submerged hollow fibre membrane bio-reactor using a porous media approachJ. Membr. Sci2010363576610.1016/j.memsci.2010.07.008Search in Google Scholar

15Yang M, Yu D, Liu M, Zheng L, Zheng X, Wei Y, Wang F, Fan Y. Optimization of MBR hydrodynamics for cake layer fouling control through CFD simulation and RSM design. Bioresource technology 2017; 227: 102-111.YangMYuDLiuMZhengLZhengXWeiYWangFFanYOptimization of MBR hydrodynamics for cake layer fouling control through CFD simulation and RSM designBioresource technology201722710211110.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.02728013126Search in Google Scholar

16Gaucher C, Jaouen P, Legentilhomme P, Comiti J. Suction effect on the shear stress at a plane ultrafiltration ceramic membrane surface. Separation science and technology 2002; 37(10): 2251-2270.GaucherCJaouenPLegentilhommePComitiJSuction effect on the shear stress at a plane ultrafiltration ceramic membrane surfaceSeparation science and technology200237102251227010.1081/SS-120003512Search in Google Scholar

17Fimbres-Weihs GA, Wiley DE. Review of 3D CFD modeling of flow and mass transfer in narrow spacer-filled channels in membrane modules. Chem. Eng. and Processing: Process Intensification 2010; 49(7): 759-781.Fimbres-WeihsGAWileyDEReview of 3D CFD modeling of flow and mass transfer in narrow spacer-filled channels in membrane modulesChem. Eng. and Processing: Process Intensification201049775978110.1016/j.cep.2010.01.007Search in Google Scholar

18Koutsou CP, Karabelas AJ, Kostoglou M. Fluid Dynamics and Mass Transfer in Spacer-Filled Membrane Channels: Effect of Uniform Channel-Gap Reduction Due to Fouling. Fluids 2018; 3(1): 1-20.KoutsouCPKarabelasAJKostoglouMFluid Dynamics and Mass Transfer in Spacer-Filled Membrane Channels: Effect of Uniform Channel-Gap Reduction Due to FoulingFluids20183112010.3390/fluids3010012Search in Google Scholar

19Voncken RJW, Roghair I, Van Sint Annaland M. Mass transfer phenomena in fluidized beds with horizontally immersed membranes: A numerical investigation. Chem. Eng. Science, 2018; 191: 369-382.VonckenRJWRoghairIVanSint Annaland MMass transfer phenomena in fluidized beds with horizontally immersed membranes: A numerical investigationChem. Eng. Science201819136938210.1016/j.ces.2018.07.005Search in Google Scholar

20Dzhonova-Atanasova D, Tsibranska I, Vlaev S. Flow Behaviour in a Membrane Cross-Flow Filtration Cell: Experimental Observations and CFD Modelling. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy 2017; 52(1): 58-65.Dzhonova-AtanasovaDTsibranskaIVlaevSFlow Behaviour in a Membrane Cross-Flow Filtration Cell: Experimental Observations and CFD ModellingJournal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy20175215865Search in Google Scholar

21Dzhonova-Atanasova D, Tsibranska I. Paniovska S. CFD Simulation of Cross-Flow Filtration. Chem Eng. Transactions 2018; 70: 2041-2046.Dzhonova-AtanasovaDTsibranskaIPaniovska SCFD Simulation of Cross-Flow Filtration. Chem Eng. Transactions20187020412046Search in Google Scholar

22Bérubé PR, Afonso G, Taghipour F, Chan CCV. Quantifying the shear at the surface of submerged hollow fiber membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 2006; 279(1-2): 495-505.BérubéPRAfonsoGTaghipourFChanCCVQuantifying the shear at the surface of submerged hollow fiber membranesJournal of Membrane Science20062791-249550510.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.043Search in Google Scholar

23Amini E, Mehrnia MR, Mousavi SM, Azami H, Mostoufi N. Investigating the effect of sparger configuration on the hydrodynamics of a full-scale membrane bioreactor using computational fluid dynamics. RSC Advances 2015; 5(127): 105218-105226.AminiEMehrniaMRMousaviSMAzamiHMostoufiNInvestigating the effect of sparger configuration on the hydrodynamics of a full-scale membrane bioreactor using computational fluid dynamicsRSC Advances2015512710521810522610.1039/C5RA18727CSearch in Google Scholar

24Naessens W, Maere T, Ratkovich N, Vedantam S, Nopens I. Critical review of membrane bioreactor models – Part 2: Hydrodynamic and integrated models. Bioresource Technology 2012; 122: 107–18.NaessensWMaereTRatkovichNVedantamSNopensICritical review of membrane bioreactor models – Part 2: Hydrodynamic and integrated modelsBioresource Technology20121221071810.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.07122721683Search in Google Scholar

25Kostoglou M, Karabelas AJ. On population balance modeling of membrane bioreactor operation with periodic back‐washing. AIChE Journal 2011; 57(8): 2274-2281.KostoglouMKarabelasAJOn population balance modeling of membrane bioreactor operation with periodic back‐washingAIChE Journal20115782274228110.1002/aic.12426Search in Google Scholar

26Zuthi MFR, Ngo HH, Guo WS. Modelling bioprocesses and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor (MBR): a review towards finding an integrated model framework. Bioresource technology 2012; 122: 119-129.ZuthiMFRNgoHHGuoWSModelling bioprocesses and membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor (MBR): a review towards finding an integrated model frameworkBioresource technology201212211912910.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.09022608936Search in Google Scholar

27Stein K. Development and application of microsieves. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2000. ISBN 90-36514754SteinKDevelopment and application of microsieves. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands2000ISBN 90-36514754Search in Google Scholar

28Moutafchìeva D, Iliev V. Influence of geometrical and operational parameters on the performance of bubble reactor with immersed membrane module. Materials, Methods & Technologies 2018; 12: 275-285.MoutafchìevaDIlievVInfluence of geometrical and operational parameters on the performance of bubble reactor with immersed membrane moduleMaterials, Methods & Technologies201812275285Search in Google Scholar