[1. Angst G, Mueller KE, Kögel-Knaber I, Freeman KH, Mueller CW. Aggregation controls the stability of lignin and lipids in clay-sized particulate and mineral associated organic matter. Biogeochem 2017; 132: 307–324.10.1007/s10533-017-0304-2]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Pavlů L, Mühlhanselová M. Differences in Humic Acids Structure of Various Soil Types Studied by DRIFT Spectroscopy. Soil Water Res 2018;13(1): 29–35.10.17221/76/2017-SWR]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Weil RR, Brady NC. The Nature and Properties of Soils. Edition:15th, Publisher: Pearson Education, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Jokic A, Wang MC, Liu C, Frenkel AI, Huang PM. Integration of the polyphenol and Maillard reactions into a unified abiotic pathway for humification in nature: the role of δ-MnO2. Org Geochem 2004; 35: 747-762.10.1016/j.orggeochem.2004.01.021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Zhang Y, Yue D, Ma H. Darkening mechanism and kinetics of humification process in catechol-Maillard system. Chemosphere 2015;130: 40-45.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.051]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Matei S, Matei GM, Dumitru S, Ignat P. Research on the role of microbial consortium in biosynthesis of humic precursors based on secondary metabolites. Ann Univ Craiova – Agriculture, Montanology, Cadastre 2016; 46: 348-356.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. López-González JA, Suárez-Estrella F, Vargas-García MC, López MJ, Jurado MM, Moreno J. Dynamics of bacterial microbiota during lignocellulosic waste composting: studies upon its structure, functionality and biodiversity. Bioresour Technol 2015;175: 406-416.10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.123]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Rigane H. Chtourou M, Mahmoud IB, Medhioub K, Ammar E. Polyphenolic compounds progress during olive mill wastewater sludge and poultry manure co-composting, and humic substances building (Southeastern Tunisia). Waste Manage Res 2015; 33: 73-80.10.1177/0734242X14559594]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dumitru M, Manea A(coord). Methods of chemical and microbiological analysis (utilized in soil monitoring system), (in Romanian), Ed. SITECH, Craiova, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Papacostea, P. Biologia Solului (Soil Biology). Bucharest, RO: Scientific and Encyclopaedic Publishing House, 1976.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Matei S. Determination of soil respiration and microbial biomass. In: Dumitru M, Manea A (coord.). Methods of chemical and microbiological analysis (utilized in soil monitoring system), (in Romanian). Ed. SITECH, Craiova, 2011: 283-288.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Bergey DH, Holt JG. Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th Ed, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. U.S.A. 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Domsch KH, Gams W. Fungi in agricultural soils. Vol 1-2, eds.T&A Constable Ltd.Edinburg, London, 1970.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Watanabe T. Pictorial Atlas of Soil and Seed Fungi: Morphologies of Cultured Fungi and Key to Species 2nd ed., CRC PRESS, Boca Raton London, New York, Washington D.C., 2002.10.1201/9781420040821]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Sadej W, Zolnowski AC, Marczuk O. Content of phenolic compounds in soils originating from two long-term fertilization experiments. Arch Environ Prot 2016; 42(4): 104-113.10.1515/aep-2016-0047]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Lowe LE. Total and Labile Polysaccharide Analysis of Soils. In: MR Carter (ed.) Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993; 373-376.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Bradford MM. A rapid sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-Dye Binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72:248-254.10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Kononova MN, Belcikova NP. Uskorenâe metodâ opredelnia sostava gummusa mineralnâh pociv. Pocive-denie 1961;10: 75-87.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Zalecka A, Kahl J, Doesburg P, Pyskow B, Huber M, Skjerbaek, Ploeger A. Standardization of the Steigbild Method. Biol Agr Hort 2010; 27: 41-57.10.1080/01448765.2010.10510429]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Vasu A, Neacşu M, Daniliuc D. Ecopedological Characterization of grassland representative units from mountain regions, for establishing requirements for improvement technologies, Lucr St ICPCP Măgurele, Braşov, Vol.IX, Bucharest, 1986.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Florea N, Bălăceanu V, Răuță C, Canarache A. (red coord) Methodology for elaboration of pedologic studies Part III Ecopedological Parameters (in Romanian), MA, ASAS, ICPA Bucharest, 1987.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Ponomarenko EV, Anderson DW. Importance of charred organic matter in Black Chernozem soils of Saskatchewan”. Can J Soil Sci 2001;81(3): 285–297.10.4141/S00-075]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Piccolo A. The Supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Adv Agron 2002; 75:57–134.10.1016/S0065-2113(02)75003-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[24. Muscolo A, Sidari M, Nardi S. Humic substance: relationship between structure and activity. deeper information suggests univocal findings. J Geochem Exp 2013; 129: 57–63.10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.10.012]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Inderjit, Mallik AU. Effect of phenolic compounds on selected soil properties. Forest Ecol Manag 1997; 92(1-3): 11–18.10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03957-6]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Hoostal MJ, Bouzat JL. The modulating role of dissolved organic matter on spatial patterns of microbial metabolism in Lake Erie sediments. Microb Ecol 2008; 55(2): 358–368.10.1007/s00248-007-9281-717607503]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[27. Meier CL, Bowman WD. Phenolic-rich leaf carbon fractions differentially influence microbial respiration and plant growth. Oecologia 2008; 158(1): 95–107.10.1007/s00442-008-1124-918704503]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Cheshire MV. Origin and stability of soil polysaccharides. J Soil Sci 1977; 28:1-10.10.1111/j.1365-2389.1977.tb02290.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[29. Schimel PJ, Weintraub MN. Interactions between Carbon and Nitrogen Mineralization and Soil Organic Matter Chemistry in Arctic Tundra Soils. Ecosystems 2003; 6(2): 0129-0143.10.1007/s10021-002-0124-6]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Min K, Freeman C, Kang H, Choi SU. The regulation by phenolic compounds of soil organic matter dynamics under changing environment. Bio Med Res Int 2015; ID 825098, 11pages, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/82509810.1155/2015/825098460610726495314]Search in Google Scholar