Carob trees (
Sugars and bioactive phenolic compounds are the main components of carob tree pulps (10). Indeed, pulps are considered as an interesting source of sugars which determine its organoleptic quality and its commercial value (1,11). They present a significant concentration of bioactive principles that often reflect a considerable antioxidant potential (12) and confer an important medicinal and functional properties (3,4). Besides, it is proven that the carob pulps contain a reasonable amount of mineral elements (2) which contribute a considerable nutritional value. In addition, it is known that geographical origin influences this biochemical composition. Indeed, the genetic and environmental expressions were known by its considerable effect on enzymatic activities that are involved in the biosynthesis and biodegradation of several primary and secondary metabolites (15). Therefore, pulps collected from Portugal (16) contain higher concentrations of total polyphenols than those collected from Algeria (12) and Tunisia (17). Besides, it has been also proved that the ripening process alters significantly this composition. Indeed, during the increasing of ripening level several primary and secondary metabolites are activated, then each compound will serve to an appropriate function to determine the final fruit characteristics. Accordingly, it was showed that the carob pods achieved the highest sucrose content at the ripe stage (11), consequently the industries producing the carob syrup, carob powder and bioethanol could to be interested in mature carob pods. However, in nutritional and functional term, the immature fruits are the preferred, since they contained the highest levels of phenolic content at the unripe stage (12).Therefore, it is necessary to study the biochemical variation of the carob pods harvested from different regions of Tunisia and evaluate its susceptibility to ripening process. This study aims to classify different carob provenance at different harvest dates based on their sugar content and bioactive phenolic compounds.
Fresh carob fruits were harvested in 2015 at different dates during ripening (06 June: unripe stage, 06 July: mid-ripe stage, 03 August: ripe stage), from different Tunisian areas, which were in the south, center and north of Tunisia (
Water content of tested provenances was determined by placing the pods in oven drying at 60 to 70 degrees until obtaining a stable weight (18).
The ash and minerals content of carob pods were assessed according to Oziyci et al. (2). One g from each dried carob powder was placed in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 6 h and the results were expressed as a percentage of dry weight. The minerals elements (iron, sodium, zinc, potassium and magnesium) of ashes samples were determined according to Elfalleh et al. (19). The cooled ashes were dissolved in 5 mL ultrapure water and 1 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid and were subjected to boiling. The obtained mixture was filtered, and the obtained filtrates were adjusted to 100 mL with ultrapure water and quantified by Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS).
The extraction process of carbohydrate from carob pods was performed using a reflux system as reported by Chaira et al. (20). Fructose, glucose and sucrose were measured by using an Agilent HPLC-RID System (HP. 1100) (21). The separation was performed on a ZORBAX column (Eclipse plus Column C18: 250 mm × 4.6 mm i.d., 5 μm). The detection was executed with RID-10 detector. The column temperature was maintained at 40°C. The mobile phase was composed of 75 % water and 25% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The concentration was determined by applied the external standards methods. The standards solutions (fructose, glucose, sucrose and maltose) were prepared in acetonitrile/water and used for calibration curves (at different concentrations within the range of 25-300 μg/mL. The peck surface was calculated by using Shimadzu LabSolutions software version.5.42.
The extraction procedure of phenolic compounds was carried out using conventional system. Carob powders were subjected to cold maceration using water solvent. 10 g of each sample were homogenized in 100 mL of distilled water and shaken for 90 min in darkness. The obtained extracts were centrifuged twice (5000 rpm, 10 min) and stored at 4°C for further uses.
Geographic data of carob tree provenances
Code | Origin | Longitude | Latitude | Bioclimatic zone |
---|---|---|---|---|
SK | Skhira | 34°18’32.82”N | 10°02’57.63”E | Arid with soft winter |
KE | Ksour Essef | 35°25’03.26”N | 10°59’51.57”E | Semi-arid with soft winter |
MN | Monastir | 35°39’55.61”N | 10°51’33.33”E | Semi-arid with soft winter |
TN | Tunis | 36°50’11.93”N | 10°11’41.34”E | Semi-arid with soft winter |
ZG | Zaghouan | 36°24’32.83”N | 10°08’32.83”E | Arid with soft winter |
GB | Gabes | 33°52’49.29”N | 10°05’26.80”E | Arid with soft winter |
Variation of moisture (%) and ash (%) content of carob pods provenances during ripening process
Water content (%) | Ash (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
code | Unripe | Mid-ripe | Ripe | Unripe | Mid-ripe | Ripe |
SK | 63.31±1.11Ca | 51.47±2.17Ba | 9.03±2.13Aa | 4.27±0.26Bcb | 3.96±0.03Bc | 3.22±0.09Ab |
KE | 76.65±1.13Ce | 62.01±2.19Bc | 13.73±3.22Ac | 3.30±0.14Ba | 3.22±0.04Bb | 2.72±0.05Aa |
MN | 70.16±3.15Cc | 60.20±3.21Bbc | 11.54±2.45Ab | 3.81±0.17Bb | 2.64±0.06Aa | 2.70±0.06Aa |
TN | 76.56±1.09Ce | 62.93±1.75Bc | 14.27±2.17Ac | 4.97±0.05Cde | 4.75±0.06Bd | 3.45±0.06Ab |
ZG | 72.79±1.05Cd | 58.34±3.17Bbc | 11.30±2.45Ab | 4.49±0.25Bcd | 3.01±0.04Ab | 2.51±0.31Aa |
GB | 68.67±2.10Cb | 56.14±1.5Bab | 9.38±1.10Aa | 5.16±0.11Be | 4.71±0.22Ad | 4.58±0.15Ac |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=3). Different capital letters represent significant variation (p<0.05) between ripening stages; different lowercase leters represent significant difference variation (p<0.05) between provenances according to Tukey test.
Total polyphenols (TP) content was evaluated in obtained extracts by using the Folin-Ciocalleu colorimetric assays as described by Assadi et al. (21). Each prepared extract (100 μL) was mixed with concentrated Folin- Ciocalteu solution (500 μL) and sodium carbonate solution (4 mL, 1 M). The absorbance was measured at 765 nm by means of a UV-visible spectrophotometer (T60 UV-visible spectrophotometer) after incubation for 90 min in dark condition. Gallic acid was used as a standard and results were expressed as gram Gallic acid equivalent per 100 g of dry weight (g GAE/ 100 g DW).
Total flavonoids content was investigated by using spectrophotometrically method according to Bahorun et al.(22). One milliliter of each extract was homogenized with one milliliter of 10% aluminum trichloride solution. The obtained mixtures were incubated for 30 min at room temperature for immediate absorbance, which was carried out by using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (T60 UV-visible spectrophotometer) at 430 nm. Rutin was used as a standard and the results were expressed as gram rutin equivalent per 100 g of dry weight (g RE/ 100 g DW).
The condensed tannin content of obtained extracts was determined using colorimetric methods demonstrated by Khali et al. (23). Concentrated hydrochloric acid (750 μL) was mixed with 1.5 mL of vanillin solution (4%) prepared in methanol and 250 μL of each sample. The obtained aliquots were incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The absorbance was measured at 500 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (T60 UV-visible spectrophotometer). Catechin was used as a standard and results were expressed as gram catechin equivalent per 100 g of dry weight (g CE/ 100 g DW).
The Antioxidant activity of prepared extracts was measured in terms of their capacity to trap the free radical by using DPPH assay as described by Benchikh et al. (12). DPPH solution (0.2 mM) previously prepared in methanol was mixed with 25 μL of each extract and slowly shacked. The obtained samples were incubated for 30 min in dark condition before being measured at 517 nm by using a visible a UV-visible spectrophotometer (T60 UV-visible spectrophotometer). Trolox was used as a standard and results were expressed as Trolox equivalent (TE) per 100 g of dry weight (g TE/ 100 g DW).
Statistical analyses were carried out using Xlstat software Ver. 2017 (
The variation of moisture and ash content during repining were determined and the results were expressed as a percentage (
The statistical comparison (
Changes in minerals compounds content of carob provenances during ripening process
Mineral compound | Stage | SK | KE | MN | TN | ZG | GB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fe (μ mol/g DW) | Unripe | 0,40±0,00Cc | 0,21±0,00Bb | 0,37±0,00Cc | 0,25±0,00Bb | 0,17±0,00Ca | 0,91±0,00Cd |
Mid-ripe | 0,15±0,00Bb | 0,14±0,00Ab | 0,21±0,00Bc | 0,15±0,00Ab | 0,09±0,00Ba | 0,18±0,00Bc | |
Ripe | 0,14±0,00Ac | 0,14±0,00Ac | 0,18±0,00Ad | 0,15±0,00Ac | 0,06±0,00Aa | 0,095±0,00Ab | |
Na (μ mol/g DW) | Unripe | 4,56±0,05Ca | 7,27±0,02Cd | 5,44±0,00Cb | 4,55±0,03Ca | 6,24±0,03Cc | 7,18±0,03Bd |
Mid-ripe | 4,01±0,04Bb | 6,67±0,03Bd | 5,00±0,87Bc | 3,56±0,04Ba | 5,29±0,08Bc | 7,26±0,01Ae | |
Ripe | 3,72±0,00Ab | 6,04±0,87Ad | 3,96±0,89Ab | 1,94±0,03Aa | 4,86±0,09Ac | 7,59±0,19Ae | |
Zn (μ mol/g DW) | Unripe | 0,032±0,06Aa | 0,05±0,00Aa | 0,028±0,00Aa | 0,06±0,00Aa | 0,05±0,00Aa | 0,04±0,00Aa |
Mid-ripe | 0,04±0,09Aa | 0,05±0,00Aa | 0,014±0,00Aa | 0,04±0,00Aa | 0,05±0,00Aa | 0,04±0,00Aa | |
Ripe | 0,05±0,00Aa | 0,05±0,00Aa | 0,01±0,00Aa | 0,03±0,00Aa | 0,01±0,00Aa | 0,02±0,00Aa | |
K (μ mol/g DW) | Unripe | 132,35±0,36Cd | 94,38±0,09Cb | 80,47±0,62Ca | 174,25±15,5Ce | 114,6±0,21Cc | 164,14±0,5Ce |
Mid-ripe | 114,72±2,26Bd | 83,27±0,66Bc | 53,79±0,06Ba | 120,93±6,20Be | 68,64±0,39Bb | 162,88±0,38Bf | |
Ripe | 68,15±0,45Ac | 46,19±0,92Aa | 44,46±0,83Aa | 99,25±7,39Ad | 58,87±0,43Ab | 157,93±0,37Ae | |
Mg (μ mol/g DW) | Unripe | 6,17±1,43Aa | 6,54±0,94Aa | 3,65±1,23Aa | 7,91±0,4Aa | 7,06±1,07Aa | 4,89±0,92Aa |
Mid-ripe | 6,07±1,25Aa | 6,44±1,23Aa | 1,81±0,37Aa | 4,94±0,03Aa | 6,31±1,22Aa | 4,86±0,57Aa | |
Ripe | 4,39±0,84Aa | 6,25±0,97Aa | 1,38±0,19Aa | 4,15±0,4Aa | 1,25±0,72Aa | 2,8±0,09Aa |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=3). Fe, iron; Na, sodium; Zn, zind; K, potassium; Mg, magnesium; DW, dry weight. Different capital letters represent significant variation (p<0.05) between ripening stages; different lowercase letters represent significant difference variation (p<0.05) between provenances according to Tukey test.
ing yield of potassium, the sodium (Na) and magnesium (Mg) were present also in important amounts, while, iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) detected as trace elements.
The sucrose, fructose and glucose contents in carob pods at three different ripening stages, harvested from different Tunisian regions were shown in
Sugars profile of carob pods provenances influenced by ripening process
Carbohydrates | Stages | SK | KE | MN | TN | ZG | GB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fructose fructose/ (μ g mol DW) | Unripe | 1386.41±4.16Cd | 1355.62±4.16Cc | 1196.67±0.00Ca | 1304.85±6.66Cb | 1463.8±10.81Ce | 1461.3±4.16Ce |
Mid-ripe | 1340.64±4.16Bf | 1046.88±4.99Ba | 1086.82±0.00Bb | 1126.77±1.66Bc | 1150.07±2.50Bd | 1252.43±7.49Be | |
Ripe | 1118.45±1.66Ac | 989.46±5.83Aa | 980.3±0.00Aa | 1066.02±2.50Ab | 1090.98±3.33Ac | 1061.03±7.49Ab | |
Glucose glucose/ (μ g mol DW) | Unripe | 694.88±0.00Cd | 548.42±19.14Cc | 520.95±3.33Cc | 486.00±3.33Cb | 532.61±0.83Cc | 376.15±0.83Ca |
Mid-ripe | 314.57±0.83Ba | 436.07±0.00Bd | 348.69±2.50Bb | 484.34±7.49Be | 401.12±1.66Bc | 352.85±1.66Bb | |
Ripe | 297.09±3.33Ab | 307.08±2.50Ab | 309.58±0.83Ab | 270.46±3.33Aa | 366.17±1.66Ac | 281.28±4.16Aa | |
Sucrose sucrose/ (μ g mol DW) | Unripe | 299.15±1.75Ab | 444.13±4.38Ae | 481.79±1.75Af | 349.08±0.88Ac | 422.66±4.38Ad | 242.65±6.57Aa |
Mid-ripe | 414.78±5.26Ba | 2064.7±2.19Bd | 2525.91±0.44Bf | 685.46±3.94Bb | 2461.52±3.07Be | 1841.32±0.88Bc | |
Ripe | 2256.1±1.31Cc | 3097.49±4.82Cf | 2592.04±0.88Cd | 2095.8±3.50Cb | 2881.99±6.57Ce | 2035.79±1.75Ca |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=3). Different capital letters represent significant variation (p<0.05) between ripening stages; different lowercase letters represent significant difference variation (p<0.05) between provenances according to Tukey test.
obvious accumulation of sucrose. At the end of maturity all the provenances reached the highest sucrose amounts, which recorded significant difference between them. Indeed, the highest amount of sucrose was achieved by “KE” provenance (3097±4.82 μ mol/ g DW) and the lowest is attained by “GB” provenance (2035,79±1,75 μ mol/ g DW). Furthermore, our samples exhibited variation in the evolutionary behavior of sucrose. In fact, the provenances “SK” and “TN” showed two evolutional phases: a slight increase (from unripe to mid-ripe stage), followed by a speedy increment (from mid-ripe to ripe stage), while, the other provenances revealed a brutal increase followed by a slight raise.
The yields (%) of dry aqueous extracts obtained from different provenances at different ripening stages were calculated and represented in
The total polyphenols, flavonoids and condensed tannins concentrations in carob pods were investigated at three ripening stages (
Changes in bioactive compounds content of carob pods provenances during ripening process
Parameters | Stages | SK | KE | MN | TN | ZG | GB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yield (%) | Unripe | 20.40±0.42Ac | 15.40±0.71Aa | 19.80±0.85Ac | 17.50±0.64Aab | 16.40±0.14Aa | 19.50±0.49Abc |
Mid-ripe | 35.80±0.99Ba | 52.20±0.57Bc | 52.00±0.28Bc | 37.90±0.21Ab | 57.20±0.42Bd | 50.70±0.35Bc | |
Ripe | 53.90±0.35Cabc | 63.20±0.71Cd | 54.70±1.91Cb | 50.60±0.57Ba | 56.80±0.14Cc | 52.70±0.35Cab | |
Total polyphenols(TP) (g GAE/ 100 g DW) | Unripe | 12.91±0.11Ce | 12.11±0.66Cd | 10.96±0.09Cc | 4.57±0.12Ba | 13.46±0.06Ce | 10.14±0.10Cb |
Mid-ripe | 5.33±0.01Bed | 4.25±0.02Bb | 4.66±0.05Bbc | 3.58±0.08Aa | 5.09±0.11Bcd | 5.67±0.07Be | |
Ripe | 2.72±0.10Aa | 3.24±0.23Ab | 3.22±0.24Ab | 3.11±0.12Ab | 3.09±0.11Aab | 4.92±007Ac | |
Total flavonoids(TF) (mg RE/ 100 g DW) | Unripe | 537.78±1.07Cbc | 522.65±5.51Bb | 560.80±2.71Cbc | 275.91±2.54Ca | 528.26±3.52Cbc | 562.91±8.20Bc |
Mid-ripe | 184.32±0.46Bd | 124.80±0.03Ab | 204.87±1.47Be | 103.01±0.61Ba | 167.97±0.54Bc | 254.37±2.12Af | |
Ripe | 68.14±0.21Aa | 117.89±3.71Ab | 174.06±1.44Ac | 62.75±0.16Aa | 121.36±0.49Ab | 220.93±0.45Ad | |
Condensed tannins(CT) (g CE/100 g DW) | Unripe | 5.96±0.06Cd | 4.75±0.05Cc | 1.18±0.03Ba | 1.27±0.04Ba | 6.67±0.05Ce | 3.31±0.02Cb |
Mid-ripe | 1.52±0.01Be | 0.84±0.01Bb | 0.45±0.01Aa | 0.49±0.01Aa | 1.13±0.01Bc | 1.32±0.01Bd | |
Ripe | 0.30±0.00Aa | 0.33±0.00Aab | 0.38±0.00Ab | 0.38±0.00Ab | 0.58±0.01Ac | 0.58±0.01Ac |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=3). DW, dry weight; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; RE, rutin equivalent; CE, catechin equivalent. Different capital leters represent significantvariation (p<0.05) between ripening stages; different lowercase leters represent significant difference variation (p<0.05) between provenances according to Tukey test.
Changes in antiradical activity of carob pods provenances during ripening process
Antiradical activity | stages | SK | KE | MN | TN | ZG | GB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DPPH (g TE/ 100 g DW) | Unripe | 30.39±0.45Cd | 29.57±0.39Cc | 26.18±0.78Cb | 20.98±0.15Ca | 32.78±0.78Ce | 25.74±0.18Cb |
Mid-ripe | 14.29±0.59Bd | 12.67±0.48Bb | 13.56±0.66Bc | 9.36±0.64Ba | 14.98±0.16Bd | 16.93±0.24Be | |
Ripe | 5.59±0.38Ab | 9.46±0.41Ac | 10.29±0.26Ad | 4.56±0.45Aa | 9.76±0.47Ac | 11.47±0.48Ae |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SD (n=3). DW, dry weight; TE, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity. Diferent capital leters represent significant variation (p<0.05) between ripening stages; diferent lowercase leters represent significant diference variation (p<0.05) between provenances according to Tukey test.
level, the lowest content was seen in “TN” provenance (275.91 ± 2.54 g ER / 100 g MS).
The DPPH free radical-scavenging activity was studied during development of carob fruits and the results were represented in
Previous published data were revealed that carob pods contained considerable amounts of minerals (2,13), important levels of bioactive compounds (12) and was considered as interesting source of carbohydrates(1,11) as well antioxidant principles (12). However, its valuation is mainly depends on their nutritional and functional compounds which are accumulated and degraded during ripening process (3,12). Indeed, the users are always looking for a well-finished quality to satisfy their needs, maybe it can be the astringency, the sweetness or the abundance of nutritive or functional principles (24). In this term the present investigation focused to determine the changes in a significant range of photochemical compounds of carob pods as influenced by ripening stages and provenance in order to extend the use of carob pods.
The storage conditions was correlated with water content (25) which affected the sensorial parameters and nutritional quality of fruits. However, the decline pattern of moisture recorded by selected provenances was necessary to maintain the nutritional quality of mature fruits during storage. This behavior would also enhance the percentage of solid compounds which explains the hardness character of mature pulps. Therefore, we could guess that the “SK” and “GB” provenances are characterized by the hardest texture and predict they will maintain its sensorial and nutritional properties for a longer period. Therefore, fruit that contain considerable amounts of mineral elements could be found as a good source of mineral supplement in food diets. However, several investigation reported the mineral composition of the pods (2,13,26), but no available information about its variation during ripening.
It was seen that ash and mineral elements contents revealed a downward trend, which was related to the mobility of mineral elements in phloem from pods to another parts of fruits such as seeds which are known by their highest ash content (2,27,28). Their participation in various metabolic pathways justify also this behavior (29). In our investigation, the changes that were produced during ripening conferred significant mineral yields at the end of maturity, but it remains lower than those recorded by the wild and grafted pods harvested from Antalya (2). Besides, it was shown that the ash and minerals contents are susceptible to climate and environmental change which introduced by geographical origin variation. This behavior might be explained by the fact that the transfer of mineral salts in the phloem depends mainly on the environment where the carob trees are grown and the plant state (28). Indeed, the minerals convey from the soil to the plant depends on their availability in the soil, the presence of water and its quality that promotes their absorption and affects the roots state; growth and activity (30). Moreover, the sugars confer particular organoleptic properties and defines the commercial value for carob pods (24). Again, the sugars contents were reported previously by Ayaz
Besides, the sucrose was found as a discriminant factor between provenances, since it was present as the predominant sugar in the mature stage and its concentrations varied significantly between the provenances. This variation was generally due to genetic and environmental exhibition that could modify the activity of the enzymes involved in biosynthesis and decomposition of sugars including sucrose phosphate synthase and acid invertase (15,37). Moreover, in sensorial and nutritional term the mature pods obtained from “KE” would be the most appreciated by consumers as a delicious and energetic fruit, since it revealed the highest sugar content. It deserves an industrial development to enhance the yield of syrup, juice and carob flour preparation as well bioethanol production.
The polyphenols were the most important secondary metabolites and considered as an interesting compound define the nutritional and functional fruits quality (12,38). As the primary metabolites, this groups of molecules recorded important variation during ripening(12), since some authors revealed that during ripening of fruits the evolutionary behavior of secondary metabolisms was highly associated with that of primary ones (28,39). Indeed, the biosynthesis and biodegradation of these latest would generate the abundance or the deficiency of substrates which contribute to the biosynthesis of secondary metabolisms. The analysis of carob TP content showed a gradual decrease during ripening to attain the lowest levels at the end of the maturity. However, they remain higher than those demonstrated by El-sherif
The observed progressive patterns were in agreement with the results reported by Benchikh
The antioxidant capacity followed the same change pattern shown by the bioactive compounds content which confirms the high correlation between the amounts of bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity assessed by DPPH test (28,47). The same results were reported by Benchikh
Our findings showed that biochemical composition and organoleptic properties were considerably influenced by the ripening and the geographic origin. However, in the studied provenances, ripening was accompanied by a remarkable regression in phenolic compounds correlated with downtrend of antioxidant activity, an interesting decrease in minerals content and a considerable accumulation of sucrose. The behavior exhibited by each component justified the fact that carob fruit could be used largely in all ripening stages depending in targeted nutrient. Therefore, the green carob pods were considered as an interesting source of natural antioxidant for pharmaceutical uses, while the mature pods should be selected as a good sugar source for juice extraction, cacao substitution and bioethanol production.