Access to medically assisted reproduction for legal persons: Possible?

ASSISTED HUMAN REPRODUCTION ACT (S.C. 2004, c. 2), [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/A-13.4/page-1.html.Search in Google Scholar

ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TREATMENT ACT NO. 76 OF 2008, [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: http://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/Domino/Web_Notes/LDMS/PubStatbook.nsf/f932b66241ecf1b7ca256e92000e23be/3ADFC9FBA2C0F526CA25751C0020E494/$FILE/08-076a.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

BENATAR, D. (2013): Nebýt či být: O utrpení, které přináší příchod na tento svět [Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence], trans. D. Micka. Prague: Dybbuk.Search in Google Scholar

BLYTH, E. (2008): To Be or not to Be? A Critical Appraisal of the Welfare of Children Conceived through New Reproductive Technologies. In: International Journal of Children’s Rights, 16(4), pp. 505-522.10.1163/157181808X304563Search in Google Scholar

BLYTH, E., BURR, V. & FARRAND, A. (2008): Welfare of the child assessments in assisted conception: A social constructionist perspective. In: Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(1), pp. 31-43.10.1080/02646830701691301Search in Google Scholar

BLYTH, E. & CAMERON, C. (1998): The welfare of the child. In: Human Reproduction, 13(9), pp. 2339-2355.10.1093/humrep/13.9.2339Search in Google Scholar

BREWAEYS, A., PONJAERT, I., VAN HALL, E., & GOLOMBOK, S. (1997): Donor insemination: child development and family functioning in lesbian mother families. In: Human Reproduction, 12(6), pp. 1349-1359.10.1093/humrep/12.6.1349Search in Google Scholar

DANIELS, K. R., BLYTH, E., HALL, D., HANSON, K. M. (2000): The Best Interests of the Child in Assisted Human Reproduction: The Interplay between the State, Professionals, and Parents. In: Politics and the Life Sciences, 19(1), pp. 33-44.10.1017/S0730938400008881Search in Google Scholar

DE GEYTER, CH., BOEHLER, B., & REITER-THEIL, S. (2010): Differences and similarities in the attitudes of paediatricians, gynaecologists and experienced parents to criteria delineating potential risks for the welfare of children to be conceived with assisted reproduction. In: Swiss Medical Weekly, 140: w13064, [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: http://www.smw.ch/content/smw-2010-13064/.10.4414/smw.2010.13064Search in Google Scholar

DE LACEY, S. L., PETERSON, K., & MC MILLAN, J. (2015): Child interests in assisted reproductive technology: How is the welfare principle applied in practice? In: Human Reproduction, 30(3), pp. 616-624.10.1093/humrep/deu343Search in Google Scholar

DE WERT, G., DOLNDORP, W., SHENFIELD, F., BARRI, P., DEVROPEY, P., DIEDRICH, K., TARLATZIS, B., PROVOOST, V., & PENNINGS, G. (2014): ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 23: Medically assisted reproduction in singles, lesbian and gay couples, and transsexual people. In: Human Reproduction, 29(9), pp. 1859-1865.10.1093/humrep/deu183Search in Google Scholar

DONDORP, W. (2012): Lesbian couples sharing biological motherhood: IVF for reproductively healthy women? 28th Annual Meeting of ESHRE in Istanbul, Turkey, from 1 to 4 July 2012.Search in Google Scholar

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2009): Human Enhancement Study, IP/A/STOA/FWC/2005-28/SC35, 41 & 45, [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2009/417483/IPOL-JOIN_ET(2009)417483_EN.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

FASOULIOTIS, S. & SCHENKER, J. G. (1999): Social aspects in assisted reproduction. In: Human Reproduction Update, 5(1), pp. 26-39.10.1093/humupd/5.1.26Search in Google Scholar

GAUS, G. F. (2001): What is deontology? Part one: orthodox views. In: Journal of Value Inquiry, 35(1), pp. 27-42.10.1023/A:1010359613871Search in Google Scholar

GOLOMBOK, S. (1998): New families, old values: considerations regarding the welfare of the child. In: Human Reproduction, 13(9), pp. 2339-2355.10.1093/humrep/13.9.2342Search in Google Scholar

GOOLD, I. (2005): Should older and postmenopausal women have access to assisted reproductive technology? In: Monash Bioethics Review, 24(1), pp. 27-46.10.1007/BF03351426Search in Google Scholar

GROVER, S. A., SHMORGUNA, Z., MOSKOVTSEVA, S. I., BARATZA, A., & LIBRACH, C. L. (2013): Assisted reproduction in a cohort of same-sex male couples and single men. In: Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 27(2), pp. 217-221.10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.05.003Search in Google Scholar

GRAHAM, S. & BRAVERMAN, A. (2012): ARTs and the Single Parent. In: M. Richards, G. Pennings & J. Appleby (eds.): Reproductive Donation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189-210.10.1017/CBO9781139026390.011Search in Google Scholar

GURNHAM, D. & MIOLA, J. (2012): Reproduction, Rights, and the Welfare Interests of Children: The Times They Aren’t A-Changin’. In: King’s Law Journal, 23(1), pp. 29-50.10.5235/096157612800081196Search in Google Scholar

HARRIS, J. (2004): On Cloning: Thinking in Action. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203440636Search in Google Scholar

HARRIS, J. (1990): Wrongful Birth. In: D. R. Bromham, M. E. Dalton & J. C. Jackson (eds.): Philosophical Ethics in Reproductive Medicine. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 156-170.Search in Google Scholar

HUMAN ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY ACT NO 92 OF 2004, [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0092/latest/DLM319241.html.Search in Google Scholar

HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY ACT NO. 22 OF 2008, [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/22/contents.Search in Google Scholar

HURSTHOUSE, R. (2013): Virtue Ethics. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.): The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/ethics-virtue.Search in Google Scholar

LANCET EDITORIAL (1993): Too old to have a baby? In: Lancet, 34, pp. 1344-1345.Search in Google Scholar

LANDAU, R. (2004): The promise of post-menopausal pregnancy. In: Social Work in Health Care, 41(1), pp. 53-69.10.1300/J010v40n01_04Search in Google Scholar

LARCHER, V. (2007): Ethical issues in respect of children born after assisted reproduction technologies. In: Archives of Disease in Childhood, 92(8), pp. 670-671.10.1136/adc.2007.120535Search in Google Scholar

LAW ON MEDICALLY ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND THE DISPOSITION OF SUPERNUMERARY EMBRYOS AND GAMETES (2007): Act No. 6/7 of 2007.Search in Google Scholar

LEE, R. G. & MORGAN, D. (2001): Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Regulating the Reproductive Revolution. London: Blackstones Press.Search in Google Scholar

LEE, E., MACVARISH, J., & SHELDON, S. (2014): Assessing child welfare under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: a case study in medicalisation? In: Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(4), pp. 500-515.10.1111/1467-9566.12078Search in Google Scholar

MARTIN, E. A. (2003): Oxford Dictionary of Law (7th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

MC LANAHAN, S. & SANDEFUR, G. (1996): Growing Up with a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Harvard: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv22tnmnnSearch in Google Scholar

MUMFORD, S. E., CORRIGAN, E. & HULL, M. G. R. (1998): Access to assisted conception: a framework of regulation. In: Human Reproduction, 13(9), pp. 2349-2355.10.1093/humrep/13.9.2349Search in Google Scholar

PEARN, J. H. (1997): Gatekeeping and assisted reproductive technologies: the rights and responsibilities of doctors. In: Medical Journal of Australia, 167(6), pp. 318-320.10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb125078.xSearch in Google Scholar

PENNINGS, G. (1995): Age and assisted reproduction. In: Medicine and Law, 14(7-8), pp. 531-41.Search in Google Scholar

PENNINGS, G. (1999): The welfare of the child. In: Human Reproduction, 14(5), pp. 1146-1150.10.1093/humrep/14.5.1146Search in Google Scholar

PENNINGS, G. (2001): Postmenopausal women and the right of access to oocyte donation. In: Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18(2), pp. 174-175.10.1111/1468-5930.00184Search in Google Scholar

PENNINGS, G. (2011): Evaluating the welfare of the child in same-sex families. In: Human Reproduction, 26(7), pp. 1609-1615.10.1093/humrep/der109Search in Google Scholar

PENNINGS G., DE WERT, G., SHENFIELD, F., COHEN, J., DEVROEY, P. & TARLATZIS, B. (2006): ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 11: Posthumous assisted reproduction. In: Human Reproduction, 21(12), pp. 3050-3053.10.1093/humrep/del287Search in Google Scholar

PENNINGS, G., DE WERT, G., SHENFIELD, F., COHEN, J., TARLATZIS, B., & DEVROPEY, P. (2007): ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 13: The welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. In: Human Reproduction, 22(10), pp. 2585-2588.10.1093/humrep/dem237Search in Google Scholar

PETERSON, M. (2005): Assisted reproductive technologies and equity of access Issues. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(5), pp. 280-285.10.1136/jme.2003.007542Search in Google Scholar

RAUTAKALLIO-HOKKANEN, S. (2018): European Policy Audit on Fertility. Council of Europe meeting: “Access and diversity of medically assisted reproduction in Europe“, Strasbourg, France, 22 ‐ 23 February 2018.Search in Google Scholar

SHELDON, S., LEE, E. & MACVARISH, J. (2015): ‘Supportive Parenting’, Responsibility and Regulation: The Welfare Assessment under the Reformed Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (1990). In: The Modern Law Review, 78(3), pp. 461-492.10.1111/1468-2230.12124Search in Google Scholar

SHENFIELD, F., PENNINGS, G., COHEN, J., DEVROEY, P, DE WERT, G. & TARLATZIS, B. (2005): ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 10: Surrogacy. In: Human Reproduction, 20(10), pp. 2705-2707.10.1093/humrep/dei147Search in Google Scholar

SMAJDOR, A. (2015): Do women have a right to freeze their eggs? In: BioNews, 17(815), 17 August 2015.Search in Google Scholar

SOBOTKA, T. (2010): Shifting Parenthood to Advanced Reproductive Ages: Trends, Causes and Consequences. In: J. C. Tremmel (ed.): A young generation under pressure? Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 129-154.10.1007/978-3-642-03483-1_7Search in Google Scholar

SOLBERG, B. (2008): Getting beyond the welfare of the child in assisted reproduction. In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(6), pp. 373-376.10.1136/jme.2008.028126Search in Google Scholar

SPRIGGS, M. & CHARLES, T. (2003): Should HIV discordant couples have access to assisted reproductive technologies? In: Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(6), pp. 325-329.10.1136/jme.29.6.325Search in Google Scholar

STERN, J. E., CRAMER, C. P., GRFEEN, R. M., GARROD, A. & DEVRIES, K. O. (2003): Determining access to assisted reproductive technology: reactions of clinic directors to ethically complex case scenarios. In: Human Reproduction, 18(6), pp. 1343-1352.10.1093/humrep/deg250Search in Google Scholar

STUHMCKE, A. (1997): Lesbian access to in vitro fertilisation. In: Australia Gay Lesbian Law Journal, 7(1997), pp. 15-40.10.1300/J041v07n02_03Search in Google Scholar

THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE (1989): Report on Human Artificial Procreation, [online] [Retrieved February 2, 2018]. Available at: https://rm.coe.int/16803113e4.Search in Google Scholar

ZEILER, K. & MALMQUIST, A. (2014): Lesbian shared biological motherhood: the ethics of IVF with reception of oocytes from partner. In: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 17(3), pp. 347-355.10.1007/s11019-013-9538-5Search in Google Scholar