[Correia, Fabrice. 2005. Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.10.2307/j.ctv2nrzj0h]Search in Google Scholar
[Everett, Anthony. 2005. Against fictional realism. Journal of Philosophy 102(12): 624–49.10.5840/jphil2005102129]Search in Google Scholar
[Everett, Anthony. 2013 The Nonexistent. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199674794.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. 1995. Ontological dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95: 269–90.10.1093/aristotelian/95.1.269]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitting, Melvin; and Mendelsohn, Richard. 1998. First-Order Modal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5292-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Fontaine, Matthieu. 2019. Hintikka, free logician—singular terms in world lines semantic. Logica Universalis 13: 179–201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fontaine, Matthieu; and Rahman, Shahid. 2010. Fiction, creation and fictionality. Methodos 10: http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/2343.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fontaine, Matthieu; and Rahman, Shahid. 2014. Towards a semantics for the artifactual theory of fiction and beyond. Synthese 191(3): 499–516.10.1007/s11229-013-0287-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Friend, Stacie. 2007. Fictional characters. The Philosophy Compass 2(2): 141–56.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00059.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Friend, Stacie. 2017. The real foundation of fictional worlds. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95(1): 29–42.10.1080/00048402.2016.1149736]Search in Google Scholar
[García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2015. Is fictional reference rigid? Organon F 22 (Supplementary Issue 1): 145–68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintikka, Jaakko. 1969. Models for Modalities. Dordrecht: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1711-4_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintikka, Jaakko. 1970a. Objects of knowledge and belief: acquaintances and public figures. Journal of Philosophy 67(21): 869–83.10.2307/2024039]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintikka, Jaakko. 1970b. The semantics of modal notions and the indeterminacy of ontology. Synthese 21(3): 408–24.10.1007/BF00484808]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintikka, Jaakko; and Hintikka, Merrill. 1989. The Logic of Epistemology and the Epistemology of Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2647-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Hintikka, Jaakko; and Sandu, Gabriel. 1995. The fallacies of the new theory of reference. Synthese 104(2): 245–83.10.1007/BF01063872]Search in Google Scholar
[Howell, Robert. 2002. Review of Fiction and Metaphysics by Amie L. Thomasson. The Philosophical Quarterly 52(207): 282–4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Priest, Graham. 2005. Towards Non-Being. The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199262543.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, Saul. 1963. Semantical considerations of modal logic. Acta Philosophica Fennica 16: 83–94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Kripke, Saul. 2013. Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures. Reprint with emendations of six lectures given at Oxford University between October 30th and December 4th, 1973. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199928385.003.0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, David. 1978. Truth in fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 15: 37–46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin-Löf, Per. 1984. Intuitionistic Type Theory: Notes by Giovanni Sambin of a series of lectures given in Padua, June 1980. Naples: Bibliopolis.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rahman, Shahid; McConaughey, Zoe; Klev, Ansten; and Clerbout, Nicolas. 2018. Immanent Reasoning of Equality in Action–A Plaidoyer for the Play Level. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-91149-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Simons, Peter. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomasson, Amie. 1999. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527463]Search in Google Scholar
[Tulenheimo, Tero. 2017. Objects and Modalities—A Study in the Semantics of Modal Logic. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-53119-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Voltolini, Alberto. 2006. How Ficta Follow Fiction: A Syncretistic Account of Fictional Entities. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-5147-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Voltolini, Alberto. 2012. Crossworks ‘identity’ and intrawork* identity of a fictional character. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4(262): 561–76.10.3917/rip.262.0561]Search in Google Scholar
[Yagisawa, Takashi. 2001. Against creationism in fiction. Noûs 35(15): 153–72.10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.8]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, John. 1974. The Logic of Fiction: A Philosophical Sounding of Deviant Logic. The Hague: Mouton.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, John. 2013. Errors of Reasoning: Naturalizing the Logic of Inference. London: College Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, John. 2018. Truth in Fiction—Rethinking its Logic. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-72658-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Woods, John; and Isenberg, Jillian. 2010. Psychologizing the semantics of fiction. Methodos 10: http://methodos.revues.org/2387.10.4000/methodos.2387]Search in Google Scholar