[Banks, R. Richard; and Ford, Richard Thompson. 2009. (How) does unconscious bias matter? Law, politics, and racial inequality. Emory Law Journal 58: 1053.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brownstein, Michael; Madva, Alex; and Gawronski, Bertram. (Under review.) Understanding implicit bias: putting the criticism into perspective.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carnes, M. et. al. 2015. Effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Academic Medicine 90 (2): 221–30.10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552]Search in Google Scholar
[Cox, William; and Devine, Patricia. 2016. Experimental research on shooter bias: ready (or relevant) for the courtroom? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 5: 236–8.10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.07.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Devine, Patricia et. al. 2012. Long-term reduction in implicit race bias: a prejudice habit-breaking intervention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48: 1267–78.10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dotson, Kristie. 2014. Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology 28(2): 115–38.10.1080/02691728.2013.782585]Search in Google Scholar
[Egan, Andy. 2011. Comments on Gendler’s ‘The epistemic costs of implicit bias’. Philosophical Studies 156: 65–79.10.1007/s11098-011-9803-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Gendler, Tamar. 2011. On the epistemic costs of implicit bias. Philosophical Studies 156: 33–63.10.1007/s11098-011-9801-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Introduction. In Resisting Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–34.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haslanger, Sally. 2015. Social structure, narrative and explanation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45(1): 1–15.10.1080/00455091.2015.1019176]Search in Google Scholar
[Joy-Gaba, Jennifer. 2011. From Learning to Doing. PhD Dissertation University of Virginia.]Search in Google Scholar
[Madva, Alex. 2016. Virtue, social knowledge, and implicit bias. In Implicit Bias and Philosophy, ed. by Michael Brownstein and Jennifer Saul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713241.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Madva, Alex. 2017. Biased against de-biasing. Ergo 4(6).10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Medina, José. 2012. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Plant, E. A.; and Peruche, B. M. 2005. The consequences of race for police officers’ responses to criminal suspects. Psychological Science 16(3): 180–3.10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00800.x15733196]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Puddifoot, Katherine. 2017. Dissolving the epistemic/ethical dilemma over implicit bias. Philosophical Explorations 20(sup1): 73–93.10.1080/13869795.2017.1287295]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Saul, Jennifer. 2017. Implicit bias, stereotype threat, and epistemic injustice. In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, ed. by Ian James Kidd, José Medina and Gaile Pohlhaus. New York: Routledge, 235–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Uhlmann, Eric; and Cohen, Geoffrey. 2006. ‘I think it, therefore it’s true’: effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 104: 207–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. 2015. Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department. < https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf>]Search in Google Scholar