On Haslanger’s Meta-Metaphysics: Social Structures and Metaphysical Deflationism

Andreasen, R. 2000. Race: biological reality or social construct? Philosophy of Science 67: S653–66.10.1086/392853Search in Google Scholar

Ásta K. Sveinsdóttir. 2011. The metaphysics of sex and gender. In Feminist Metaphysics: Explorations in the Ontology of Sex, Gender and the Self, ed. by C. Witt. Springer, 47–65.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, E. 2014. Going beyond the fundamental: feminism in contemporary metaphysics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104(3): 335–51.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2014.00376.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Barnes, E. 2017. Realism and social Structure. Philosophical Studies 174(10): 2417–33. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-016-0743-y10.1007/s11098-016-0743-ySearch in Google Scholar

Bettcher, T. 2013. Trans women and the meaning of ‘woman’. In Philosophy of Sex: Contemporary Readings, Sixth Edition, ed. by A. Soble, N. Power and R. Halwani. Rowan and Littlefield, 233–50.Search in Google Scholar

Boghossian, P. 2006. Fear of Knowledge: Against Relativism and Constructivism, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199287185.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 2011. Verbal disputes. Philosophical Review 120(4): 515–66.10.1215/00318108-1334478Search in Google Scholar

Díaz-León, E. 2012. Social kinds, conceptual analysis, and the operative concept: a reply to Haslanger. Humana.Mente—Journal of Philosophical Studies 22: 57–74.Search in Google Scholar

Díaz-León, E. 2015. In defence of historical constructivism about races. Ergo 2(21): 247–62.Search in Google Scholar

Díaz-León, E. 2016. Woman as a politically significant term: a solution to the puzzle. Hypatia 31(2): 245–58.10.1111/hypa.12234Search in Google Scholar

Díaz-León, E. (ms.) Substantive metaphysical debates about gender and race: verbal disputes and metaphysical deflationism. Glasgow, J. 2009. A Theory of Race. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. 2000. Gender and race: (what) are they? (What) do we want them to be? Nous 34(1): 31–55.10.1111/0029-4624.00201Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. 2005. What are we talking about? The semantics and politics of social kinds. Hypatia 20(4): 10–26.10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00533.xSearch in Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. 2006. What good are our intuitions? Philosophical analysis and social kinds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Sup. Vol. 80(1): 89–118.Search in Google Scholar

Haslanger, S. 2016. What is a (social) structural explanation? Philosophical Studies 173: 113–30.10.1007/s11098-014-0434-5Search in Google Scholar

Jeffers, C. 2013. The cultural theory of race: yet another look at Du Bois’s ‘The Conservation of Races’. Ethics 123(3): 403–26.10.1086/669566Search in Google Scholar

Jenkins, K. 2016. Amelioration and inclusion: gender identity and the concept of Woman. Ethics 126(2): 394–421.10.1086/683535Search in Google Scholar

Ludwig, D. 2015. Against the new metaphysics of race. Philosophy of Science 82(2): 244–65.10.1086/680487Search in Google Scholar

Mallon, R. 2006. Race: normative, not metaphysical or semantic. Ethics 116(3): 525–51.10.1086/500495Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola, M. 2011. Ontological commitments, sex and gender. In Feminist Metaphysics: Explorations in the Ontology of Sex, Gender and the Self, ed. by C. Witt. Springer, 67–83.Search in Google Scholar

Mikkola, M. 2016. Feminist metaphysics and philosophical methodology. Philosophy Compass 11(11): 661–70.10.1111/phc3.12349Search in Google Scholar

Plunkett, D. 2015. Which concepts should we use? Metalinguistic negotiations and the methodology of philosophy. Inquiry 58(7–8): 828–74.10.1080/0020174X.2015.1080184Search in Google Scholar

Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, Truth and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511625398Search in Google Scholar

Schaffer, J. 2009. On what grounds what. In Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology, ed. by D. Chalmers, D. Manley and R. Wasserman. Oxford University Press, 347–83.Search in Google Scholar

Saul, J. 2012. Politically significant terms and philosophy of language: methodological issues. In Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy, ed. by S. Crasnow and A. Superson. Oxford University Press, 195–216.Search in Google Scholar

Sider, T. 2017. Substantivity in feminist metaphysics. Philosophical Studies 174(10): 2467–78. DOI:10.1007/s11098-016-0739-7.10.1007/s11098-016-0739-7Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, Q. 2014. A radical solution to the race problem. Philosophy of Science 81(5): 1025–38.10.1086/677694Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thomasson, A. 2007. Ordinary Objects. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195319910.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Thomasson, A. 2008. Existence questions. Philosophical Studies 141(1): 63–78. Thomasson, A. 2015. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford University Press.10.1007/s11098-008-9263-8Search in Google Scholar

Thomasson, A. 2017. Metaphysical disputes and metalinguistic negotiation. Analytic Philosophy 58(1): 1–28.10.1111/phib.12087Search in Google Scholar

Witt, C. 2011. The Metaphysics of Gender. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740413.001.0001Search in Google Scholar