[Aristotle. Metaphysics. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by J. Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.]Search in Google Scholar
[Armstrong, David. 1983. What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Belnap, Nuel. 1993. Rigorous definitions. Philosophical Studies 72: 115-146.10.1007/BF00989671]Search in Google Scholar
[Bird, Alexander. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Bryson. 2004. Knowledge and non-contradiction. In The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, edited by G. Priest, Jc. Beall and B. Armour-Garb. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265176.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Dummett, Michael. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth.]Search in Google Scholar
[Englebretsen, George. 1981. Logical Negation. Assen: Van Gorcum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, Gottlob. 1879-1891. Logic. In Posthumous Writings, translated by P. Long and R. White, edited by H. Hermes, F. Kambartel and F. Kaulbach. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, Gottlob. 1919. Negation. In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by P. Geach and M. Black. Oxford: University College London Press, 1960.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frege, Gottlob. 1980. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Translated by H. Kaal, edited by G. Gabriel, H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, C. Thiel and A. Veraart. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haack, Susan. 1978. Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812866]Search in Google Scholar
[Kahane, Howard. 1995. Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric (7th ed.) Belmont: Wadsworth.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kalish, Donald; Montague, Richard and Mar, Gary. 1980. Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning (2nd ed.) New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacFarlane, John. 2011. What is assertion? In Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, edited by J. Brown and H. Cappelen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573004.003.0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, Ben. 2014. The Logical and Philosophical Foundations of True Contradictions (PhD thesis). London: University College London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Price, Huw. 1990. Why ‘not’? Mind 99: 221-238.10.1093/mind/XCIX.394.221]Search in Google Scholar
[Priest, Graham. 2006. In Contradiction: A Study of the Transconsistent (2nd ed.) Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.003.0015]Search in Google Scholar
[Rumfitt, Ian. 2000. ‘Yes’ and ‘no’. Mind 109: 781-823.10.1093/mind/109.436.781]Search in Google Scholar
[Smiley, Timothy. 1996. Rejection. Analysis 56: 1-9.10.1093/analys/56.1.1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Smith, Peter. 2003. An Introduction to Formal Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strawson, Peter F. 1993. Logical appraisal. In A Philosophical Companion to First-Order Logic, edited by R. I. G. Hughes. Indianapolis: Hackett.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tahko, Tuomas E. 2009. The law of non-contradiction as a metaphysical principle. Australasian Journal of Logic 7: 32-47.10.26686/ajl.v7i0.1806]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, Timothy. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar