[Agirre, Eneko, and Edmonds, Philip. Eds. 2006. Word Sense Disambiguation: Algorithms and Applications. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-4809-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Asher, Nicholas and Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bach, Kent. 2007. The Excluded Middle. Semantic Minimalism Without Minimal Propositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 435-442.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00626.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Beaver, David. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beretta, Alan, Fiorentino, Robert and Poeppel, David. 2005. The Effects of Homonymy and Polysemy on Lexical Access: An MEG Study. Cognitive Brain Research 24: 57-65.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Bicknell, Klinton, Elman, Jeffrey L., Hare, Mary, McRae, Ken and Kutas, Marta. 2010. Effects of Event Knowledge in Processing Verbal Arguments. Journal of Memory & Language 63: 489-505.10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Borg, Emma. 2004. Minimal Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199270252.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, Emma. 2007. Minimalism versus Contextualism in Semantics. In Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Edited by Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, Emma. 2009. Semantic Minimalism. In The Routledge Pragmatics Encyclopedia, edited by Louise Cummings. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, Emma. 2010. Minimalism and the Content of the Lexicon. In Meaning and Context. Edited by Luca Baptista and Erich Rach. Bern: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borg, Emma. 2012. Pursuing Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588374.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Susan W. 2008. Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Colorado Research in Linguistics 21: 1-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cappelen, Herman and Lepore, Ernest. 2005. Insensitive Semantics: A Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. London: Wiley.10.1002/9780470755792]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2002. On Nature and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coltheart, Max. 1999. Modularity and Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3: 115-120.10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01289-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cover, Thomas M. and Thomas, Joy A. 2006. Elements of Information Theory. 2nd edn. London: Wiley.10.1002/047174882X]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, Wayne A. 2013. On Nonindexical Contextualism. Philosophical Studies 163: 561-574.10.1007/s11098-011-9831-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Devitt, Michael. 2013. Is There a Place for Truth-Conditional Pragmatics? Teorema XXXII/2: 85-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, Vyvyan. 2009. How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models, and Meaning Construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199234660.003.0007]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, Jerry A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Folk, Jocelyn R. and Morris, Robin K. 2003. Effects of Syntactic Category Assignment on Lexical Ambiguity Resolution in Reading: An Eye Movement Analysis. Memory & Cognition 31: 87-99.10.3758/BF03196085]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Frazier, Lyn and Rayner, Keith. 1990. Taking on Semantic Commitments: Processing Multiple Meanings vs. Multiple Senses. Journal of Memory and Language 29: 181-200.10.1016/0749-596X(90)90071-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Giora, Rachel. 2003. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Giora, Rachel. 2012. The Psychology of Utterance Processing: Context vs Salience. In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Edited by Kasia M. Jaszczolt and Keith Allan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139022453.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Harley, Trevor A. 2014. The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory, 4th edn. New York, NY: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, Irene. 1983. On the Projection Problem for Presuppositions. In Second Annual West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Edited by Dan Flickinger and Michael Westcoat. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, Irene. 1988. The Semantics of Deinite and Indeinite Noun Phrases. New York, NY: Garland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarema, Gonia and Libben, Gary. Eds. 2007. The Mental Lexicon: Core Perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780080548692]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaszczolt, Kasia M. 2007. On Being Post-Gricean. In Interpreting Utterances: Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Edited by Randi A. Nilsen, Nana A. A. Amfo and Kaja Borthen. Oslo: Novus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kamp, Hans and Reyle, Uwe. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-1616-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and Grammar: The Semantics of Relative and Absolute Gradable Adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 1-45.10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, Christopher and McNally, Louise. 2010. Color, Context and Compositionality. Synthese 174: 79-98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klein, Devorah E. and Murphy, Gregory L. 2001. The Representation of Polysemous Words. Journal of Memory and Language 45: 259-282.10.1006/jmla.2001.2779]Search in Google Scholar
[Klepousniotou, Ekaterini. 2002. The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity: Homonymy and Polysemy in the Mental Lexicon. Brain and Language 81: 205-223.10.1006/brln.2001.2518]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Korta, Kepa and Perry, John. 2006. Varieties of Minimalist Semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 451-459.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2006.tb00628.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Levinson, Stephen J. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[MacFarlane, John. 2007. Semantic Minimalism and Nonindexical Contextualism. In Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Edited by Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacFarlane, John. 2009. Nonindexical Contextualism. Synthese 166: 231-250.10.1007/s11229-007-9286-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Manning, Christopher D. and Schütze, Hinrich. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mason, Robert A. and Just, Marcel A. 2007. Lexical Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension. Brain Research 1146: 115-127.1743389110.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.076]Search in Google Scholar
[Matsuki, Kazunaga, Chow, Tracy, Hare, Mary, Elman, Jeffrey L., Scheepers, Christoph and McRae, Ken. 2011. Event-based Plausibility Immediately Influences On-Line Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 37: 913-934.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morris, Robin K. 2006. Lexical Processing and Sentence Context Effects. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Edited by Matthew J. Traxler and Morton. A. Gernsbacher, 2nd edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.10.1016/B978-012369374-7/50011-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Murphy, M. Lynne. 2010. Lexical Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pelczar, Michael. 2000. Wittgensteinian Semantics. Noûs 34: 483-516.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piantadosi, Steven T., Tily, Harry and Gibson, Edward. 2012. The Communicative Function of Ambiguity in Language. Cognition 122: 280-291.10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinker, Steven and Bloom, Paul. 1990. Natural Language and Natural Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 707-784.10.1017/S0140525X00081061]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle, John. 1980. The Background of Meaning. In Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Edited by John Searle, Ferenc Kiefer and Manfred Bierwisch. Dordrecht: Reidel.]Search in Google Scholar
[Seidenberg, Mark S., Tanenhaus, Michael K., Leiman, James M. and Bienkowski, Marie. 1982. Automatic Access of the Meanings of Ambiguous Words in Context: Some Limitations of Knowledge-Based Processing. Cognitive Psychology 14: 489-573.10.1016/0010-0285(82)90017-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Small, Steven, Cottrell, Garrison, and Tanenhaus, Michael K. Eds. 1988. Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: Perspectives from Psycholinguistics, Neuropsychology, and Artiicial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spivey, Michael, McRae, Ken, and Joanisse, Marc. Eds. 2012. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139029377]Search in Google Scholar
[Stojanovic, Isidora. 2008. The Scope and the Subtleties of the Contextualism/Literalism/Relativism Debate. Language and Linguistics Compass 2: 1171-1188.10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00086.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Swinney, David A. 1979. Lexical Access During Sentence Comprehension: (Re) Consideration of Context Effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645-659.10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90355-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tanenhaus, Michael K., Leiman, James and Seidenberg, Mark. 1979. Evidence for Multiple Stages in the Processing of Ambiguous Words in Syntactic Contexts. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 427-440.10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90237-8]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Traxler, Matthew J. 2011. Introduction to Psycholinguistics: Understanding Language Science. London: Wiley-Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Van der Sandt, Rob. 1992. Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution. Journal of Semantics 9: 333-377.10.1093/jos/9.4.333]Search in Google Scholar