Belief and normativity

Bilgrami, A. 1992. Belief and Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1515/9783110886504.121Search in Google Scholar

Boghossian, P. 2003. The normativity of content. Philosophical Issues13: 31–45.10.1111/1533-6077.00003Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1994. Making it Explicit.Harvard: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Broome, J. 1999. Normative Requirements. Ratio, repr. in Dancy 2000.10.1111/1467-9329.00101Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bykvist, K. & Hattiangadi, A. 2007. Does ThoughtImply Ought? Analysis67 (296): 277–285.10.1111/j.1467-8284.2007.00691.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dancy, J., ed. 2000. Normativity.Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1998. ‘Reply to Pascal Engel,’ in L. Hahn, ed. The Philosophy of Donald Davidson,460–1.Search in Google Scholar

Engel, P. 2000. Wherein lies the normative dimension in mental content? PhilosophicalStudies. 2000, 100, 3, 305-32110.1023/A:1018680726427Search in Google Scholar

Engel, P. 2002. TruthBucks: Acumen.10.1017/UPO9781844653393Search in Google Scholar

Engel, P. 2005. Truth and the aim of Belief, in D. Gillies, ed. Laws and Models in Science, London: King’s College Publications, 79–99.Search in Google Scholar

Engel, P. 2006. Epistemic norms and rationality,’ in W. Strawinski, M. Grygianca, & A. Brodek, eds., Mysli o Jezyku, nauce I wartosciach, Ksiega ofiarowana Jackowi Juliuzowi Jadakiemu, Warsawa: Semper, 355–370.Search in Google Scholar

Engel, P. (to appear) Davidson on epistemic norms, in C. Amoretti & N. Vassalo, Davidson: Language, Mind and Interpretation.Munich: Ontos Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, G. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gibbard, A. 2003. Thoughts and Norms. Philosophical Issues13: 83-98.10.1111/1533-6077.00006Search in Google Scholar

Glüer K, 2001. Dreams and Nightmares. Conventions, Norms, and Meaning in Davidson’s Philosophy of Language, in Kotatko, P. Pagin, G. Segal, eds., 2001: 53-74.Search in Google Scholar

Glüer, K & Wikforss, A. (to appear) Against Content Normativity.Search in Google Scholar

Haack S. 1997. The Ethics of Belief Reconsidered, in L. Hahn, The Philosophy of Roderick Chisholm.Open Court, La sale, Ill., repr. in Zagzebski and Fairweather 2000.Search in Google Scholar

Heal, J. 1986. The disinterested Search for Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society97–108.10.1093/aristotelian/88.1.97Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, F. 2000. Cognitivism, Normativity, Belief, in Dancy 2000.Search in Google Scholar

James, W. 1896. The Will to Believe, reed. New York Dover Books, 1956.Search in Google Scholar

Kappel, K. (to appear) Comments on Piller.Search in Google Scholar

Kolodny, N. 2005. Why be Rational? Mind114:509-562.10.1093/mind/fzi509Search in Google Scholar

Kotatko, P. Pagin, P. & Segal, G., eds. 2001. Interpreting Davidson, Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mulligan, K. 1999. Justification, Rule Breaking and the Mind. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society99 (2):123–139.10.1111/1467-9264.00051Search in Google Scholar

Ogien, R. 2003. Le rasoir de Kant. L’Eclat, Paris, Tel Haviv.10.7202/004963arSearch in Google Scholar

Owens, D. 2003 Does Belief Have an Aim? Philosophical Studies115, No. 3.Search in Google Scholar

Peacocke, C. 1992. A Study of ConceptsCambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piller, C. (to appear) Desiring the Truth and Nothing but the Truth, in A.Haddock, A. Millar and D. Pritchard, eds., Epistemic Value,Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Railton, P. 1994. Truth, Reason, and the Regulation of Belief, in Engel, P. 2000 ed. Believing and Accepting, Dordrecht, Kluwer repr in Railton 2003.10.2307/1522874Search in Google Scholar

Railton, P. 1999 Normative Force and Normative Freedom, in Dancy 2000 and in his Rules, Values and Norms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003: 179–208.Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, T. Davidson’s Theory of Mind is Non Normative, Philosophers’ Imprint3 (1): 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Shah, N. 2003.How Truth Regulates Belief. Philosophical Review: 113.10.1215/00318108-113-4-577Search in Google Scholar

Shah, N. and Velleman, D. 2005. Doxastic deliberation. Philosophical Review114, 2: 497-534.10.1215/00318108-114-4-497Search in Google Scholar

Sorensen, R. 1988. Blindspots.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sosa, E. 2007. A Virtue Epistemology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199297023.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Steglich-Petersen, A. 2006. The Aim of Belief: no Norm Needed. The Philosophical Quarterly 56, 225: 500-516.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.455.xSearch in Google Scholar

Stocker, M. 1990. Plural and Conflicting Values.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Velleman, D. 2000. On the Aim of Belief, in his The Possibility of Practical Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198238256.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wedgwood, R. 2002. The Aim of Belief. Philosophical Perspectives16: 276–297.10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.10Search in Google Scholar

Wedgwood, R. 2007 Normativism Defended, in Cohen, J. and Mc Laughlin, J. eds. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind,Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Wedgwood, R. 2007. The Nature of Normativity.Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199251315.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wikforss, A. 2001. Semantic Normativity. Philosophical Studies102: 203–226.10.1023/A:1004746319850Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zangwill, N. 2005. The Normativity of the Mental. Philosophical Explorations8, 1, March: 1–19.10.1080/1386979042000336126Open DOISearch in Google Scholar