[Bach, Kent. 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonomi, Andrea. 1983. Eventi mentali. Milan: Il Saggiatore.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burge, Tyler. 1979. Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–122.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 1992. Explaining Language Use. Philosophical Topics 20: 205–231.10.5840/philtopics19922017]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Crane, Tim. 2001. Elements of Mind: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crane, Tim. Forthcoming. Is Intentionality a Relation? Rabindra Bharati Journal of Philosophy (Calcutta).]Search in Google Scholar
[Davidson, Donald. 1980a. Action, Reasons, and Causes. The Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963): 685–700; rpt. in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–19.10.2307/2023177]Search in Google Scholar
[Davidson, Donald. 1980b. Mental Events. In Experience and Theory, ed. by L. Foster, J.W. Swanson. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press (1970), 79–101; rpt. in Essays on Actions and Events cit., 207–227.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, Martin. 2000. Externalism, Architecturalism, and Epistemic Warrant. In Knowing Our Own Minds, ed. by C. Wright, B.C. Smith and C. Macdonald. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199241406.003.0012]Search in Google Scholar
[Descartes, René. 1985. Objections and Replies. in The Philosophical Works of Descartes, ed. by J. Cottingham, R. Stoothof, and D. Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818998]Search in Google Scholar
[Dretske, Fred. 1981. Knowledge and the Flow of Information. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, Steve. 1994. Externalism in the Philosophy of Mind. Aldershot: Avebury.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evans, Gareth. 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Farkas, Katalin. 2003. What is Externalism? Philosophical Studies 112: 187–208.10.1023/A:1023002625641]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, Kit. 1995. Ontological Dependence. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95: 269–289.10.1093/aristotelian/95.1.269]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, Jerry A. 1982. Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology. In Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science, ed. by H. Dreyfus. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 277–303.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, Jerry A. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5684.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fodor, Jerry A. 1994. The Elm and the Expert. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2693.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibbons, John. 1993. Identity without Supervenience. Philosophical Studies 70: 59–79.10.1007/BF00989662]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jacquette, Dale. 1994. Philosophy of Mind. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, Jaegwon. 1996. Philosophy of Mind. Boulder: Westview Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, Jaegwon. 1998. Mind in a Physical World. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4629.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Loar, Brian. 1988. Social and Psychological Content. In Contents of Thoughts, ed. by A.H. Grimm, D. Merrill. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press, 93–110, 121–138.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDowell, John. 1998. Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality. The Journal of Philosophy 95: 431–490.10.2307/2564576]Search in Google Scholar
[McGinn, Colin. 1989. Mental Content. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Millikan, Ruth G. 1984. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4124.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Mulligan, Kevin, Smith, Barry. 1986. A Relational Theory of the Act. Topoi 5: 115–130.10.1007/BF00139225]Search in Google Scholar
[Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’ In Language, Mind, and Knowledge, ed. by K. Gunderson. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 131–193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Recanati, François. 1993. Direct Reference. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenkrantz, Gary. 1984. Nonexistent Possibles and Their Individuation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 22: 127–147.10.5840/gps1984227]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenkrantz, Gary. 1985/6. On Objects Totally Out Of This World. Grazer Philosophische Studien 25/26: 197–208.10.5840/gps1985/8625/268]Search in Google Scholar
[Segal, Gabriel M. 2000. A Slim Book about Narrow Content. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6275.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Simons, Peter. 1983. Contents and Objects. In Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, ed. by P. Weingartner, J. Czermak. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 81–84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomasson, Amie L. 1999. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527463]Search in Google Scholar
[Voltolini, Alberto. 2000. Are All Alleged Possible Objects There? Topoi 19: 209–219.10.1023/A:1006437301069]Search in Google Scholar
[Voltolini, Alberto. 2002. Why It Is Hard to Naturalize Attitude Aboutness. In Belief and Meaning, Essays at the Interface. Philosophical Analysis 3, ed. by W. Hinzen, H. Rott. Frankfurt a.M: Hänsel-Hohenhausen, 157–179.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, Timothy. 2000. The Necessary Framework of Objects. Topoi 19: 201–208.10.1023/A:1006405915896]Search in Google Scholar
[Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
