[1. Shatenstein, S.: Smoke in the machine: industry's nervous puff over Tobacco Control report; Tob. Control 11 (2002) 174–175.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Baker, R.R.: The development and significance of standards for smoking-machine methodology; Beitr. Tabakforsch. Int. 20 (2002) 23–41.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bialous, S.A. and D. Yach: Whose standard is it, anyway? How the tobacco industry determines the International Orga-nization for Standardization (ISO) standards for tobacco and tobacco products; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 96–104.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Baker, R.R.: Whose standard is it anyway? Letter to the Edi-tor; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 394.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Jacob, F.: Whose standard is it anyway? Letter to the Editor; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 394–395.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bialous, S.A. and D. Yach: Author's (sic) reply; Tob. Control 10 (2001) 395–396.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Kozlowski, L.T. and R.J. O'Connor: Filter ventilation is a defective design because of misleading taste, bigger puffs, and blocked vents: Tob. Control 11 Supplement 1 (2002) i40–i50.10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i40176606111893814]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Lewis, L.S.: Filter vent blocking. Letter to the Editor; Tob. Control 11 (2002) 285.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Kozlowski, L.T. and R.J. O'Connor: Authors’ reply: Tob. Control 11 (2002) 285–286.]Search in Google Scholar
