[
1. Aouni, B., Doumpos, M., Pérez-Gladish, B., Steuer, R. E. (2018). On the increasing importance of multiple criteria decision aid methods for portfolio selection, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 69, No. 10, pp. 1525-1542.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Arkan, T. (2016). The Importance of Financial Ratios in Predicting Stock Price Trends: A Case Study in Emerging Markets. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, Vol. 1, No. 69, pp. 13-26.10.18276/frfu.2016.79-01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Astuty, P. (2017). The Influence of Fundamental Factors and Systematic Risk to Stock Prices on Companies Listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XX, No. 4A, pp. 230-240.10.35808/ersj/830
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Bernardo, J. J., Blin, J. M. (1977). A Programming Model of Consumer Choice Among Multi-Attributed Brands. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 111-118.10.1086/208686
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Fazli, S., Jafari, H. (2002). Developing a hybrid multi-criteria model for investment in stock exchange. Management Science Letters, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 457-468.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Ginting, G., Fadlina, M., Siahaan, A. P. U., Rahim, R. (2017). Technical Approach of TOPSIS in Decision Making. International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering & Research, Vol. 3, No. 8, pp. 58-64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Graham, B., Zweig, J., Buffett, W. (2003). The Intelligent Investor. Harper Collins Publishers, London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Hatami-Marbini, A., Kangi, F. (2017). An extension of fuzzy TOPSIS for a group decision making with an application to Tehran stock exchange. Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 52, pp. 1084-1097.10.1016/j.asoc.2016.09.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Hsu, L. C. (2014). A hybrid multiple criteria decision-making model for investment decision making. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 509-529.10.3846/16111699.2012.722563
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Kou, G., Lu, Y., Peng, Y., Shi, Y. (2012). Evaluation of classification algorithms using MCDM and rank correlation. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 197-225.10.1142/S0219622012500095
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Marasović, B. (2009). Comparison of Optimal Portfolios Selected by Multicriterial Model Using Absolute and Relative Criteria Values. Investigacion Operacional, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 20-31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Marasović, B., Babić, Z. (2011). Two-step multi-criteria model for selecting optimal portfolio. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 58-66.10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment. Yale UniversityPress, NewHaven, CT.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Marqués, A. I., García, V., Sánchez, J. S. (2020). Ranking-based MCDM models in financial management applications: analysis and emerging challenges. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 9, pp. 171-193.10.1007/s13748-020-00207-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Miťková, V., Mlynarovič, V. (2007). A performance and risk analysis on the Slovak private pension funds market. Ekonomický časopis (Journal of Economics), Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 232-249.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Podvezko, V. (2011). The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 134-146.10.5755/j01.ee.22.2.310
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Poklepović, T., Babić, Z. (2014). Stock selection using a hybrid MCDM approach. Croatian Operational Research Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 273-290.10.17535/crorr.2014.0013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 83-98.10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Statman, M. (2014). Behavioral finance: Finance with normal people. Borsa Istanbul Review, Vol. 14, pp. 65-73.10.1016/j.bir.2014.03.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Velasquez, M., Hester, P. T. (2013). An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods. International Journal of Operations Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 56-66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Vetschera, R., De Almeida, A. T. (2012). A PROMETHEE-based approach to portfolio selection problems. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 39, pp. 1010-1020.10.1016/j.cor.2011.06.019
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Xidonas, P., Mavrotas, G., Psarras, J. (2009). A multicriteria methodology for equity selection using financial analysis. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 3187-3203.10.1016/j.cor.2009.02.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Zagreb Stock Exchange (2019). Regulated Market Store Overview. Available at: https://zse.hr/default.aspx?id=26495 [11 January 2019].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z. (2011). Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods in economics: an overview. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 397-427.10.3846/20294913.2011.593291
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M. (2002). Multi-criteria decision aid in financial decision making: methodologies and literature review. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 11, pp. 167-186.10.1002/mcda.333
]Search in Google Scholar
