Open Access

Analysis Procedure of Inspection Errors Based on MSA Attribute Study Data Set for the Improvement Purposes: Part 1 – Methodolodgy

   | Oct 27, 2020

Cite

AIAG, 2010. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA), Reference Manual, 4th Edition.Search in Google Scholar

Akutsu M., 1995. Ergonomic Design Approach for Improving Industrial Visual Inspection - Study on Structure and Optimum Feeding Rate in Visual Sorting Inspection. The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 31, 426-427.10.5100/jje.31.Supplement_426Search in Google Scholar

Bożek M., Kujawińska A., Rogalewicz M., Diering M., Gosciniak P., Hamrol A., 2017. Improvement of catheter quality inspection process, MATEC Web of Conferences, 121.10.1051/matecconf/201712105002Search in Google Scholar

Bożek M., Rogalewicz M., 2013. The inefficiency of the final control causes the low efficiency of the manufacturing process, Engineering of Machines, 18, 1, pp. 84-56.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 3746.10.1177/001316446002000104Search in Google Scholar

Diering M., Dyczkowski K., 2016. Assessing the Raters Agreement in the Diagnostic Catheter Tube Connector Production Process Using Novel Fuzzy Similarity Coefficient, Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 228-232.10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797870Search in Google Scholar

Diering M., Dyczkowski K., Hamrol A. 2015. Estimating the level of conformity of assessments in visual inspection - problems in determining Kappa coefficients [in Polish], Publishing House of the Polish Society for Production Management, pp. 257-268.Search in Google Scholar

Durivage M. A., 2015. Practical Attribute and Variable Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). A Guide for Conducting Gage R&R Studies and Test Method Validations, ASQ Quality Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gangala C., Modi M., Manupati VK., Varela MLR., Machado J., Trojanowska J., 2017. Cycle Time Reduction in Deck Roller Assembly Production Unit with Value Stream Mapping Analysis, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 571, pp. 509-518.10.1007/978-3-319-56541-5_52Search in Google Scholar

Grabowska M., Takala J., 2018. Assessment of Quality Management System Maturity, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 889-898.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_86Search in Google Scholar

Grissinger M., 2003. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Can Help Guide Error-Prevention Efforts, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 28, 1, p. 8.Search in Google Scholar

Gwet K. L., 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Multiple Raters. 4th Edition, LLC, Gaithersburg, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Hamrol A., 2015. Strategies and practices of efficient operation. Lean, Six Sigma and others [in Polish], Warsaw, Publisher: PWN.Search in Google Scholar

Hamrol A., 2000. Process diagnostics as a means of improving the efficiency of quality control, Production Planning & Control, 11, 8, pp. 797-805.10.1080/095372800750038409Search in Google Scholar

Hinckley C. M., 2003. Make no mistake - Errors can be controlled, Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12, 5, pp. 359-365.10.1136/qhc.12.5.359174377014532368Search in Google Scholar

Hubbard D. W., 2014. How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business. 3rd Edition, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Klaput P., Vykydal D., 2018. Effect of the number of non-conforming samples on the Kappa indicator values, MATEC Web of Conferences 183, pp. 1-6.10.1051/matecconf/201818303014Search in Google Scholar

Knop K., Borkowski S., 2011. The estimation of alternative control efficiency with the use of the Cohen’s kappa coefficient, Management and Production Engineering Review, 2, 3, pp. 19-27.Search in Google Scholar

Knop K., Ingaldi M., Smilek-Starczynowska M., 2018. Reduction of Errors of the Conformity Assessment During the Visual Inspection of Electrical Devices, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 857-867.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_83Search in Google Scholar

Kujawinska A., Vogt K., Diering M., Rogalewicz M., Waigaonkar S.D., 2018. Organization of Visual Inspection and Its Impact on the Effectiveness of Inspection, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 899-909.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_87Search in Google Scholar

Liker J. K., Meier D., 2006. The Toyota Way Fieldbook. A Practical Guide for Implementing Toyota’s 4Ps, New York, London: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Lughofer E., 2011. Evolving Fuzzy Systems – Methodologies, Advanced Concepts and Applications, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-18087-3Search in Google Scholar

Martin M., 2013. Business Efficiency For Dummies, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Munoz S. R., Bangdiwala S. I., 1997. Interpretation of Kappa and B statistics measures of agreement, Journal of Applied Statistics, 24, 1, pp. 105-112.10.1080/02664769723918Search in Google Scholar

Nowicka-Skowron M., Ulewicz R., 2015. Problems in the implementation of lean concept in the metal industry companies, 25th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, pp. 1962-1967.Search in Google Scholar

Reinfuss R., 2012. MBO - a simple and effective management technique for your company [in Polish], Gliwice, Publisher: Onepress, Helion.Search in Google Scholar

Rosandich R.G., 1997. Intelligent Visual Inspection. Using artificial neural networks, London, UK: Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4613-1201-7Search in Google Scholar

Sim J., Wright Ch. C., 2005. The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements, Physical Therapy, 85, 3, pp. 257-268.10.1093/ptj/85.3.257Search in Google Scholar

Smith B., 1993. Making war on defects: six sigma design, IEEE Spectrum, 30, 9, pp. 43-7.10.1109/6.275174Search in Google Scholar

Starzyńska B., Szajkowska K., 2018. Diering M., Rocha A., Reis L. P., A Study of Raters Agreement in Quality Inspection with the Participation of Hearing Disabled Employees, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 881-888.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_85Search in Google Scholar

Stoklosa P., 2019. Feel the PISMOEA by nose, so elements of the measurement system [in Polish], available on: https://www.pronost.pl/artykuly/46-spc-msametrologia/189-poczuj-pismoea-nosem-czyli-elementy-systemu-pomiarowego, date of access: 27.02.2020.Search in Google Scholar

Tang W., Hu J., Zhang H., Wu P., He H., 2015. Kappa coefficient: a popular measure of rater agreement, Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 27, 1, pp. 62-67.Search in Google Scholar

Tran TA, Luu-Nhan K., Ghabour R., Daroczi M., 2020. The use of Lean Six-Sigma tools in the improvement of a manufacturing company – case study, Production Engineering Archives 2020, 26, 1, 30-35. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.07.10.30657/pea.2020.26.07Search in Google Scholar

Webber L., Wallace M., 2007. Quality Control for Dummies, Hoboken, NJ (USA): Wiley Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Wheeler D. J., 1999. Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos. 2nd Revised Edition, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA: SPC Press.Search in Google Scholar

VDA 5, 2011. Capability of Measurement Processes, 2nd Edition, Berlin: VDA.Search in Google Scholar