[AIAG, 2010. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA), Reference Manual, 4th Edition.]Search in Google Scholar
[Akutsu M., 1995. Ergonomic Design Approach for Improving Industrial Visual Inspection - Study on Structure and Optimum Feeding Rate in Visual Sorting Inspection. The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, 31, 426-427.10.5100/jje.31.Supplement_426]Search in Google Scholar
[Bożek M., Kujawińska A., Rogalewicz M., Diering M., Gosciniak P., Hamrol A., 2017. Improvement of catheter quality inspection process, MATEC Web of Conferences, 121.10.1051/matecconf/201712105002]Search in Google Scholar
[Bożek M., Rogalewicz M., 2013. The inefficiency of the final control causes the low efficiency of the manufacturing process, Engineering of Machines, 18, 1, pp. 84-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen J., 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 10, 3746.10.1177/001316446002000104]Search in Google Scholar
[Diering M., Dyczkowski K., 2016. Assessing the Raters Agreement in the Diagnostic Catheter Tube Connector Production Process Using Novel Fuzzy Similarity Coefficient, Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 228-232.10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797870]Search in Google Scholar
[Diering M., Dyczkowski K., Hamrol A. 2015. Estimating the level of conformity of assessments in visual inspection - problems in determining Kappa coefficients [in Polish], Publishing House of the Polish Society for Production Management, pp. 257-268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durivage M. A., 2015. Practical Attribute and Variable Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA). A Guide for Conducting Gage R&R Studies and Test Method Validations, ASQ Quality Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gangala C., Modi M., Manupati VK., Varela MLR., Machado J., Trojanowska J., 2017. Cycle Time Reduction in Deck Roller Assembly Production Unit with Value Stream Mapping Analysis, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 571, pp. 509-518.10.1007/978-3-319-56541-5_52]Search in Google Scholar
[Grabowska M., Takala J., 2018. Assessment of Quality Management System Maturity, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 889-898.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_86]Search in Google Scholar
[Grissinger M., 2003. Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Can Help Guide Error-Prevention Efforts, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 28, 1, p. 8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gwet K. L., 2014. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Multiple Raters. 4th Edition, LLC, Gaithersburg, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamrol A., 2015. Strategies and practices of efficient operation. Lean, Six Sigma and others [in Polish], Warsaw, Publisher: PWN.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamrol A., 2000. Process diagnostics as a means of improving the efficiency of quality control, Production Planning & Control, 11, 8, pp. 797-805.10.1080/095372800750038409]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinckley C. M., 2003. Make no mistake - Errors can be controlled, Quality and Safety in Health Care, 12, 5, pp. 359-365.10.1136/qhc.12.5.359174377014532368]Search in Google Scholar
[Hubbard D. W., 2014. How to Measure Anything: Finding the Value of Intangibles in Business. 3rd Edition, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klaput P., Vykydal D., 2018. Effect of the number of non-conforming samples on the Kappa indicator values, MATEC Web of Conferences 183, pp. 1-6.10.1051/matecconf/201818303014]Search in Google Scholar
[Knop K., Borkowski S., 2011. The estimation of alternative control efficiency with the use of the Cohen’s kappa coefficient, Management and Production Engineering Review, 2, 3, pp. 19-27.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knop K., Ingaldi M., Smilek-Starczynowska M., 2018. Reduction of Errors of the Conformity Assessment During the Visual Inspection of Electrical Devices, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 857-867.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_83]Search in Google Scholar
[Kujawinska A., Vogt K., Diering M., Rogalewicz M., Waigaonkar S.D., 2018. Organization of Visual Inspection and Its Impact on the Effectiveness of Inspection, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 899-909.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_87]Search in Google Scholar
[Liker J. K., Meier D., 2006. The Toyota Way Fieldbook. A Practical Guide for Implementing Toyota’s 4Ps, New York, London: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lughofer E., 2011. Evolving Fuzzy Systems – Methodologies, Advanced Concepts and Applications, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-18087-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin M., 2013. Business Efficiency For Dummies, Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Munoz S. R., Bangdiwala S. I., 1997. Interpretation of Kappa and B statistics measures of agreement, Journal of Applied Statistics, 24, 1, pp. 105-112.10.1080/02664769723918]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowicka-Skowron M., Ulewicz R., 2015. Problems in the implementation of lean concept in the metal industry companies, 25th Anniversary International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, pp. 1962-1967.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reinfuss R., 2012. MBO - a simple and effective management technique for your company [in Polish], Gliwice, Publisher: Onepress, Helion.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosandich R.G., 1997. Intelligent Visual Inspection. Using artificial neural networks, London, UK: Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4613-1201-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Sim J., Wright Ch. C., 2005. The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements, Physical Therapy, 85, 3, pp. 257-268.10.1093/ptj/85.3.257]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith B., 1993. Making war on defects: six sigma design, IEEE Spectrum, 30, 9, pp. 43-7.10.1109/6.275174]Search in Google Scholar
[Starzyńska B., Szajkowska K., 2018. Diering M., Rocha A., Reis L. P., A Study of Raters Agreement in Quality Inspection with the Participation of Hearing Disabled Employees, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, Advances in Manufacturing, Springer Inter. Pub., Cham, pp. 881-888.10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_85]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoklosa P., 2019. Feel the PISMOEA by nose, so elements of the measurement system [in Polish], available on: https://www.pronost.pl/artykuly/46-spc-msametrologia/189-poczuj-pismoea-nosem-czyli-elementy-systemu-pomiarowego, date of access: 27.02.2020.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang W., Hu J., Zhang H., Wu P., He H., 2015. Kappa coefficient: a popular measure of rater agreement, Shanghai Arch Psychiatry, 27, 1, pp. 62-67.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tran TA, Luu-Nhan K., Ghabour R., Daroczi M., 2020. The use of Lean Six-Sigma tools in the improvement of a manufacturing company – case study, Production Engineering Archives 2020, 26, 1, 30-35. DOI: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.07.10.30657/pea.2020.26.07]Search in Google Scholar
[Webber L., Wallace M., 2007. Quality Control for Dummies, Hoboken, NJ (USA): Wiley Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wheeler D. J., 1999. Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos. 2nd Revised Edition, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA: SPC Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[VDA 5, 2011. Capability of Measurement Processes, 2nd Edition, Berlin: VDA.]Search in Google Scholar