[Burdick, R.K., Borror, C.M., Montgomery, D.C., 2003. A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis, Journal of Quality Technology, 35, 342–354. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2003.1198023210.1080/00224065.2003.11980232]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[García, A.C., Río, A.G., 2013. Number of distinct data categories and gage repeatability and reproducibility, A double (but single) requirement. Measurement, 46 (8), 2514–2518, DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.06510.1016/j.measurement.2013.04.065]Search in Google Scholar
[Klaput, P., Plura, J., 2011. The importance of graphical tools for measurement systems analysis, Proceedings of QMOD Conference on Quality and Service Sciences 2011, Pamplona: Universidad Navarra, 1010-1028.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikulová, P., Plura, J., 2018. Comparison of approaches to gauge repeatability and reproducibility analysis, 12th International Conference Quality Production Improvement QPI 2018, Zaborze, 183-189.10.1051/matecconf/201818303015]Search in Google Scholar
[Montgomery, D.C., 2009. Introduction to statistical quality control. 6th ed. Hoboken, N. J.: Wiley, New Jersey.]Search in Google Scholar
[MSA Work Group, 2010. Measurement System Analysis, Reference Manual, fourth ed. Chrysler Group LLC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plura, J., 2001. Quality Planning and Continuous Quality Improvement (In Czech), first ed. Computer Press, Prague, 244 pp., ISBN 80-7226-543-1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plura, J., Klaput P., 2011. The possibilities of confidence improvement of measurement systems analyses results, 21th International Conference on metallurgy and Materials - METAL, Brno, Czech republic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wheeler, D. J., 2006. EMP III: Evaluating the Measurement Process & Using Imperfect Data, Third ed. SPC Press, Knoxville, Tennessee.]Search in Google Scholar
