Workers or Consumers: Who Pays for Low-Carbon Transition – Theoretical Analysis of Welfare Change in General Equilibrium Setting

Anderson, S. P., De Palma, A., & Thisse, J. F. (1987). The CES is a discrete choice model? Economics Letters, 24(2), 139–140. AndersonS. P. De PalmaA. ThisseJ. F. 1987 The CES is a discrete choice model? Economics Letters 24 2 139 140 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90239-4 Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, S. P., De Palma, A., & Thisse, J. F. (1988). The CES and the logit: Two related models of heterogeneity. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18(1), 155–164. AndersonS. P. De PalmaA. ThisseJ. F. 1988 The CES and the logit: Two related models of heterogeneity Regional Science and Urban Economics 18 1 155 164 10.1016/0166-0462(88)90009-9 Search in Google Scholar

Antosiewicz, M., Nikas, A., Szpor, A., Witajewski-Baltvilks, J., & Doukas, H. (2020). Pathways for the transition of the polish power sector and associated risks. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.008. AntosiewiczM. NikasA. SzporA. Witajewski-BaltvilksJ. DoukasH. 2020 Pathways for the transition of the polish power sector and associated risks Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35 271 291 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.008. 10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.008 Search in Google Scholar

Ashenfelter, O. C., Farber, H., & Ransom, M. R. (2010). Labor market monopsony. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(2), 203–210. AshenfelterO. C. FarberH. RansomM. R. 2010 Labor market monopsony Journal of Labor Economics 28 2 203 210 10.1086/653654 Search in Google Scholar

Balistreri, E. J., & Rutherford, T. F. (2013). Computing general equilibrium theories of monopolistic competition and heterogeneous firms. In P. Dixon, D. Jorgenson (Eds.), Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling (pp. 1513–1570). Elsevier. BalistreriE. J. RutherfordT. F. 2013 Computing general equilibrium theories of monopolistic competition and heterogeneous firms In DixonP. JorgensonD. (Eds.), Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling 1513 1570 Elsevier 10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00023-7 Search in Google Scholar

Baran, J., Szpor, A., & Witajewski-Baltvilks, J. (2020). Low-carbon transition in a coal-producing Country: A labour market perspective. Energy Policy, 147, 111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111878. BaranJ. SzporA. Witajewski-BaltvilksJ. 2020 Low-carbon transition in a coal-producing Country: A labour market perspective Energy Policy 147 111878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111878. 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111878 Search in Google Scholar

Boeters, S., & Savard, L. (2013). The labor market in computable general equilibrium models. In P. Dixon, D. Jorgenson (Eds.), Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling (pp. 1645–1718). Elsevier. BoetersS. SavardL. 2013 The labor market in computable general equilibrium models In DixonP. JorgensonD. (Eds.), Handbook of computable general equilibrium modeling 1645 1718 Elsevier 10.1016/B978-0-444-59568-3.00026-2 Search in Google Scholar

Böhringer, C. (2000). Cooling down hot air: A global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies. Energy Policy, 28(11), 779–789. BöhringerC. 2000 Cooling down hot air: A global CGE analysis of post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies Energy Policy 28 11 779 789 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00060-4 Search in Google Scholar

Böhringer, C., & Rutherford, T. F. (2000). Decomposing the cost of kyoto: A global CGE analysis of multilateral policy impacts. ZEW Discussion Paper No 00-11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.374764. BöhringerC. RutherfordT. F. 2000 Decomposing the cost of kyoto: A global CGE analysis of multilateral policy impacts ZEW Discussion Paper No 00-11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.374764. 10.2139/ssrn.374764 Search in Google Scholar

Böhringer, C., Rivers, N. J., Rutherford, T. F., & Wigle, R. (2012). Green jobs and renewable electricity policies: Employment impacts of ontario’s feed-in tariff. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/1935-1682.3217. BöhringerC. RiversN. J. RutherfordT. F. WigleR. 2012 Green jobs and renewable electricity policies: Employment impacts of ontario’s feed-in tariff The BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 12 1 https://doi.org/10.1515/1935-1682.3217. 10.1515/1935-1682.3217 Search in Google Scholar

Booth, A. L., & Katic, P. (2011). Estimating the wage elasticity of labour supply to a firm: What evidence is there for monopsony? Economic Record, 87(278), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00728.x. BoothA. L. KaticP. 2011 Estimating the wage elasticity of labour supply to a firm: What evidence is there for monopsony? Economic Record 87 278 359 369 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00728.x. 10.1111/j.1475-4932.2011.00728.x Search in Google Scholar

Bureau, B. (2011). Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France. Energy Economics, 33(1), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.011. BureauB. 2011 Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France Energy Economics 33 1 121 130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.011. 10.1016/j.eneco.2010.07.011 Search in Google Scholar

Cronin, J. A., Fullerton, D., & Sexton, S. (2019). Vertical and horizontal redistributions from a carbon tax and rebate. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), S169–S208. CroninJ. A. FullertonD. SextonS. 2019 Vertical and horizontal redistributions from a carbon tax and rebate Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6 S1 S169 S208 10.3386/w23250 Search in Google Scholar

Da Silva Freitas, L. F., de Santana Ribeiro, L. C., de Souza, K. B., & Hewings, G. J. D. (2016). The distributional effects of emissions taxation in Brazil and their implications for climate policy. Energy Economics, 59, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.021. Da Silva FreitasL. F. de Santana RibeiroL. C. de SouzaK. B. HewingsG. J. D. 2016 The distributional effects of emissions taxation in Brazil and their implications for climate policy Energy Economics 59 37 44 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.021. 10.1016/j.eneco.2016.07.021 Search in Google Scholar

Davis, L. W., & Knittel, C. R. (2019). Are fuel economy standards regressive? Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), S37–S63. https://doi.org/10.1086/701187. DavisL. W. KnittelC. R. 2019 Are fuel economy standards regressive? Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6 S1 S37 S63 https://doi.org/10.1086/701187. 10.3386/w22925 Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, P., & Rimmer, M. T. (2002). Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy: A practical guide and documentation of MONASH (Vol. 256). Elsevier. DixonP. RimmerM. T. 2002 Dynamic general equilibrium modelling for forecasting and policy: A practical guide and documentation of MONASH 256 Elsevier Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, P., & Rimmer, M. T. (2008). Welfare effects of unilateral changes in tariffs: The case of motor vehicles and parts in Australia. Working Paper No. G-177, Centre of Policy Studies (CoPS). DixonP. RimmerM. T. 2008 Welfare effects of unilateral changes in tariffs: The case of motor vehicles and parts in Australia Working Paper No. G-177, Centre of Policy Studies (CoPS). Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, P., Jerie, M., & Rimmer, M. T. (2016). Modern trade theory for CGE modelling: The Armington, Krugman and Melitz models. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 1(1), 1–110. DixonP. JerieM. RimmerM. T. 2016 Modern trade theory for CGE modelling: The Armington, Krugman and Melitz models Journal of Global Economic Analysis 1 1 1 110 10.21642/JGEA.010101AF Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2020). Commission Welcomes the Political Agreement on the Just Transition Fund. Press Release, December 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2354 [Accessed 4 January 2021]. European Commission 2020 Commission Welcomes the Political Agreement on the Just Transition Fund Press Release December 2020 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_2354 [Accessed 4 January 2021]. Search in Google Scholar

Growiec, J. (2013). A microfoundation for normalized CES production functions with factor-augmenting technical change. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(11), 2336–2350. GrowiecJ. 2013 A microfoundation for normalized CES production functions with factor-augmenting technical change Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37 11 2336 2350 10.1016/j.jedc.2013.06.006 Search in Google Scholar

Hanslow, K. (2000). A General Welfare Decomposition for CGE Models. GTAP Technical Paper No. 19, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/185.pdf. HanslowK. 2000 A General Welfare Decomposition for CGE Models GTAP Technical Paper No. 19, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/resources/download/185.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Huang, H., Roland-Holst, D., Wang, C., & Cai, W. (2020). China’s income gap and inequality under clean energy transformation: A CGE model assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119626. HuangH. Roland-HolstD. WangC. CaiW. 2020 China’s income gap and inequality under clean energy transformation: A CGE model assessment Journal of Cleaner Production 251 119626 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119626 Search in Google Scholar

Huff, K., & Hertel, T. W. (2001). Decomposing welfare changes in GTAP. GTAP Technical Paper No. 308, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University. https://ideas.repec.org/p/gta/techpp/308.html. HuffK. HertelT. W. 2001 Decomposing welfare changes in GTAP GTAP Technical Paper No. 308, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University https://ideas.repec.org/p/gta/techpp/308.html. Search in Google Scholar

IPCC (2014). Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. IPCC 2014 Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/. Search in Google Scholar

Kiuila, O. (2018). Decarbonisation perspectives for the polish economy. Energy Policy, 118(C), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.048. KiuilaO. 2018 Decarbonisation perspectives for the polish economy Energy Policy 118 C 69 76 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.048. 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.048 Search in Google Scholar

Küster, R., Ellersdorfer, I. R., & Fahl, U. (2007). A CGE analysis of energy policies considering labor market imperfections and technology specifications. FEEM Working Paper No. 7.2007. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960725. KüsterR. EllersdorferI. R. FahlU. 2007 A CGE analysis of energy policies considering labor market imperfections and technology specifications FEEM Working Paper No. 7.2007. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.960725. 10.2139/ssrn.960725 Search in Google Scholar

Leipprand, A., & Flachsland, C. (2018). Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German Debate on the future of coal. Energy Research & Social Science, 40, 190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004. LeipprandA. FlachslandC. 2018 Regime destabilization in energy transitions: The German Debate on the future of coal Energy Research & Social Science 40 190 204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004. 10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.004 Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, A. (2019). Energy efficiency standards are more regressive than energy taxes: Theory and evidence. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 6(S1), S7–S36. LevinsonA. 2019 Energy efficiency standards are more regressive than energy taxes: Theory and evidence Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 6 S1 S7 S36 10.3386/w22956 Search in Google Scholar

Manning, A. (2003). Monopsony in motion: Imperfect competition in labor markets. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ManningA. 2003 Monopsony in motion: Imperfect competition in labor markets New Jersey Princeton University Press Search in Google Scholar

Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M. D., & Green, J. R. (1995). Microeconomic theory (Vol. 1). New York: Oxford University Press. Mas-ColellA. WhinstonM. D. GreenJ. R. 1995 Microeconomic theory 1 New York Oxford University Press Search in Google Scholar

Matveenko, A. (2020). Logit, CES, and rational inattention. Economics Letters, 186, 108537. MatveenkoA. 2020 Logit, CES, and rational inattention Economics Letters 186 108537 10.1016/j.econlet.2019.108537 Search in Google Scholar

Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725. MelitzM. J. 2003 The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity Econometrica 71 6 1695 1725 10.3386/w8881 Search in Google Scholar

Rengs, B., Scholz-Wäckerle, M., & van den Bergh, J. (2020). Evolutionary macroeconomic assessment of employment and innovation impacts of climate policy packages. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169, 332–368. RengsB. Scholz-WäckerleM. van den BerghJ. 2020 Evolutionary macroeconomic assessment of employment and innovation impacts of climate policy packages Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 169 332 368 10.1016/j.jebo.2019.11.025 Search in Google Scholar

Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O’Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., … & Tavoni, M. (2017). The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Global Environmental Change, 42, 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009. RiahiK. van VuurenD. P. KrieglerE. EdmondsJ. O’NeillB. C. FujimoriS. TavoniM. 2017 The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview Global Environmental Change 42 153 168 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009 Search in Google Scholar

Rogelj, J., Popp, A., Calvin, K. V., Luderer, G., Emmerling, J., Gernaat, D., … & Tavoni, M. (2018). Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 325–332. RogeljJ. PoppA. CalvinK. V. LudererG. EmmerlingJ. GernaatD. TavoniM. 2018 Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C Nature Climate Change 8 4 325 332 10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 Search in Google Scholar

Sartor, O. (2018). Implementing coal transitions. Insights from case studies of major coal-consuming economies. IDDRI and Climate Strategies. SartorO. 2018 Implementing coal transitions. Insights from case studies of major coal-consuming economies IDDRI and Climate Strategies Search in Google Scholar

Skoczkowski, T., Bielecki, S., Kochański, M. & Korczak, K. (2020). Climate-change induced uncertainties, risks and opportunities for the coal-based region of Silesia: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. 35, 460–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.001. SkoczkowskiT. BieleckiS. KochańskiM. KorczakK. 2020 Climate-change induced uncertainties, risks and opportunities for the coal-based region of Silesia: Stakeholders’ perspectives Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 35 460 481 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.001. 10.1016/j.eist.2019.06.001 Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, T., Colombier, M., Sartor, O., Garg, A., Tiwari, V., Burton, J., … & Wiseman, J. (2018). The 1.5 °C target and coal sector transition: At the limits of societal feasibility. Climate Policy, 18(3), 335–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540. SpencerT. ColombierM. SartorO. GargA. TiwariV. BurtonJ. WisemanJ. 2018 The 1.5 °C target and coal sector transition: At the limits of societal feasibility Climate Policy 18 3 335 351 https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540. 10.1080/14693062.2017.1386540 Search in Google Scholar

Swilling, M., Musango, J., & Wakeford, J. (2016). Developmental states and sustainability transitions: Prospects of a just transition in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 650–672, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716. SwillingM. MusangoJ. WakefordJ. 2016 Developmental states and sustainability transitions: Prospects of a just transition in South Africa Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18 5 650 672 2016 https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716. 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716 Search in Google Scholar

Turnheim, B., & Geels, F. W. (2012). Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British Coal Industry (1913–1997). Energy Policy, 50(C), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060. TurnheimB. GeelsF. W. 2012 Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: Lessons from the history of the British Coal Industry (1913–1997) Energy Policy 50 C 35 49 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060 Search in Google Scholar