[1. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe. Official Journal of the European Union. Vol. L152. 2008, No 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Air Quality Standards. European Commission. Environment, 2015 (online). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/standards.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Air Quality in Europe – 2019 Report. European Environment Agency. EEA Report 10, 2019 (online). https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2019.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Brunekreef, B., S. T. Holgate. Air Pollution and Health. – The Lancet, Vol. 360, 2002, No 9341, pp. 1233-1242.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Guarnieri, M., J. R. Balmes. Outdoor Air Pollution and Asthma. – The Lancet, Vol. 383, 2014, No 9928, pp. 1581-1592.10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60617-6]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Hu, W., K. Mengersen, A. McMichael, S. Tong. Temperature, Air Pollution and Total Mortality During Summers in Sydney, 1994-2004. – International Journal of Biometeorology, Vol. 52, 2008, No 7, pp. 689-696.10.1007/s00484-008-0161-8]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Livieris, I. E., S. Stavroyiannis, E. Pintelas, P. Pintelas. A Novel Validation Framework to Enhance Deep Learning Models in Time-Series Forecasting. – Neural Computing and Applications, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05169-y10.1007/s00521-020-05169-y]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Durão, R. M., M. T. Mendes, M. J. Pereira. Forecasting O3 Levels in Industrial Area Surroundings up to 24 h in Advance, Combining Classification Trees and MLP Models. – Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 7, 2016, pp. 961-970.10.1016/j.apr.2016.05.008]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Biancofiore, F., M. Busilacchio, M. Verdecchia, B. Tomassetti, E. Aruffo, S. Bianco, S. Di Tommaso, C. Colangeli, G. Rosatelli, P. Di Carlo. Recursive Neural Network Model for Analysis and Forecast of PM10 and PM2.5. – Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 8, 2017, No 4, pp. 652-659.10.1016/j.apr.2016.12.014]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Bougoudis, I., K. Demertzis, L. Iliadis. HISYCOL a Hybrid Computational Intelligence System for Combined Machine Learning: The Case of Air Pollution Modelling in Athens. – Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 27, 2016, No 5, pp. 1191-1206.10.1007/s00521-015-1927-7]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Zhang, H., S. Zhang, P. Wang, Y. Qin, H. Wang. Forecasting of Particulate Matter Time Series Using Wavelet Analysis and Wavelet-ARMA/ARIMA Model in Taiyuan, China. – Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vol. 67, 2017, No 7, pp. 776-788.10.1080/10962247.2017.1292968]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Gardner, M. W., S. R. Dorling. Statistical Surface Ozone Models: An Improved Methodology to Account for Non-Linear Behavior. – Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 34, 2000, pp. 21-34.10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00359-3]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Singh, K. P., S. Gupta, P. Rai. Identifying Pollution Sources and Predicting Urban Air Quality Using Ensemble Learning Methods, – Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 80, 2013, pp. 426-437.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.023]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Bai, Y., Y. Li, X. Wang, J. Xie, C. Li. Air Pollutants Concentrations Forecasting Using Back Propagation Neural Network Based on Wavelet Decomposition with Meteorological Conditions. – Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 7, 2016, No 3, pp. 557-566.10.1016/j.apr.2016.01.004]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Dotse, S.-Q., M. I. Petra, L. Dagar, L. C. De Silva. Application of Computational Intelligence Techniques to Forecast Daily PM10 Exceedances in Brunei Darussalam. – Atmospheric Pollution Research, Vol. 9, 2018, No 2, pp. 358-368.10.1016/j.apr.2017.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Roy, S. S., C. Pratyush, C. Barna. Predicting Ozone Layer Concentration Using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines, Random Forest and Classification and Regression Tree. – In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Vol. 634. 2018, pp. 140-152.10.1007/978-3-319-62524-9_11]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Liu, B., C. Shi, J. Li, Y. Li, J. Lang, R. Gu. Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods to Forecast Air Quality Index. – In: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Vol. 542. 2019, pp. 235-245.10.1007/978-981-13-3648-5_27]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Masih, A. Comparative Analysis of Tree, Meta-Learning and Function Classifiers to Predict the Atmospheric Concentration of NO2. – Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, Vol. 8, 2020, No 1, pp. 31-39.10.5890/JEAM.2020.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Masmoudi, S., H. Elghazel, D. Taieb, O. Yazar, A. Kallel. A Machine-Learning Framework for Predicting Multiple Air Pollutants’ Concentrations Via Multi-Target Regression and Feature Selection. – In: Science of the Total Environment. Vol. 715. 2020, 136991.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13699132041079]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Martínez-España, R., A. Bueno-Crespo, I. Timón, J. Soto, A. Muñoz, J. M. Cecilia. Air-Pollution Prediction in Smart Cities through Machine Learning Methods: A Case of Study in Murcia, Spain. – Journal of Universal Computer Science, Vol. 24, 2018, No 3, pp. 261-276.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Veleva, E., I. Zheleva. GARCH Models for Particulate Matter PM10 Air Pollutant in the City of Ruse, Bulgaria. – In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2025, 2018, 040016.10.1063/1.5064900]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Joharestani, M. Z., C. Cao, X. Ni, B. Bashir, S. Talebiesfandarani. PM2.5 Prediction Based on Random Forest, XGBoost, and Deep Learning Using Multisource Remote Sensing Data. – Atmosphere, Vol. 10, 2019, No 7, 373.10.3390/atmos10070373]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Breiman, L. Random Forests. – Machine Learning, Vol. 45, 2001, No 1, pp. 5-32.10.1023/A:1010933404324]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Box, G. E. P., G. M. Jenkins. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Revised Edition. San Francisco. San Francisco, Holden-Day, 1976.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Gocheva-Ilieva, S. G., D. S. Voynikova, M. P. Stoimenova, A. V. Ivanov, I. P. Iliev. Regression Trees Modeling of Time Series for Air Pollution Analysis and Forecasting. – Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 31, 2019, No 12, pp. 9023-9039.10.1007/s00521-019-04432-1]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Weaver, K. F., V. Morales, S. L. Dunn, K. Godde, P. F. Weaver. Pearson’s and Spearman’s Correlation. – In: An Introduction to Statistical Analysis in Research, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 2017, Ch. 10, pp. 435-471.10.1002/9781119454205]Search in Google Scholar