Open Access

Agile Project Management Tools: A Brief Comprative View


Cite

1. PMI. Pulseof Profession. 2017, 26 July 2019. https://www.pmi.org/Search in Google Scholar

2. Mishra, D., A. Mishra. Complex Software Project Development: Agile Methods Adoption. – Journalof Software Maintenanceand Evolution: Researchand Practice, Vol. 23, 2011, No 8, pp. 549-564.Search in Google Scholar

3. Beck, K., etal. Manifestofor Agile Software Development. 2001. https://agilemanifesto.org/Search in Google Scholar

4. Matta, M., M. Marchesi. Understanding Approval Ratingof Agile Project Management Tools Using Twitter. – In: Proc. of 10th International Joint Conferenceon Software Technologies (ICSOFT'15), IEEE, 2015.10.5220/0005557201680173Search in Google Scholar

5. Versionone. 8th Annual Stateof Agile Survey, 2013. http://www.versionone.com/pdf/2013-state-of-agile-survey.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

6. Mishra, A., D. Mishra. Software Project Management Tools: A Brief Comparative View. – ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 38, 2013, No 3, pp. 1-4.10.1145/2464526.2464537Search in Google Scholar

7. Lin, J., etal. Studying Task Allocation Decisionsof Novice Agile Teamswith Datafrom Agile Project Management Tools. – In: Proc. of 29th ACM/IEEE International Conferenceon Automated Software Engineering, ACM, 2014.10.1145/2642937.2642959Search in Google Scholar

8. Hanakawa, N., K. Okura. A Project Management Support Tool Using Communicationfor Agile Software Development. – In: 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, IEEE, 2004.Search in Google Scholar

9. Versionone I. 8th Annual Stateof Agile Survey. VersionOne. 2014, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

10. Raith, F., I. Richter, R. Lindermeier. How Project-Management-Toolsare Usedin Agile Practice: Benefits, Drawbacksand Potentials. – In: Proc. of 21st International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium, ACM, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

11. Boehm, B., R. Turner. Management Challengesto Implementing Agile Processesin Traditional Development Organizations. – IEEE Software, Vol. 22, 2005, No 5, pp. 30-39.10.1109/MS.2005.129Search in Google Scholar

12. Damian, D. E. H., etal. Using Different Communication Mediain Requirements Negotiation. – IEEE Software, Vol. 17, 2000, No 3, pp. 28-36.10.1109/52.896247Search in Google Scholar

13. Babar, M. A., B. Kitchenham, R. Jeffery. Comparing Distributedand Face-to-Face Meetingsfor Software Architecture Evaluation: A Controlled Experiment. – Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 13, 2008, No 1, pp. 39-62.10.1007/s10664-007-9052-6Search in Google Scholar

14. Babar, M. A., etal. An Empirical Studyof Groupware Supportfor Distributed Software Architecture Evaluation Process. – Journalof Systemsand Software, Vol. 79, 2006, No 7, pp. 912-925.10.1016/j.jss.2005.06.043Search in Google Scholar

15. Azizyan, G., M. K. Magarian, M. Kajko-Matsson. Surveyof Agile Tool Usageand Needs. – In: 2011 Agile Conference, IEEE, 2011.10.1109/AGILE.2011.30Search in Google Scholar

16. Ebert, C. Managing Global Software Projects Software Project Managementina Changing World. G. Ruhe, C. Wohlin, Eds. Springer, 2014.10.1007/978-3-642-55035-5_9Search in Google Scholar

17. Highsmith, J. R. Agile Project Management: Creating Innovative Products. Pearson Education, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

18. Jira Software. July 26 2019. https://www.atlassian.com/software/jira.Search in Google Scholar

19. Rodríguez, J. P., C. Ebert, A. Vizcaino. Technologiesand Toolsfor Distributed Teams. – IEEE Software, Vol. 27, 2010, No 5, pp. 10-14.10.1109/MS.2010.126Search in Google Scholar

20. Perez, J. J., S. Guckenheimer. Software Engineeringwith Microsoft Visual Studio Team System. Pearson Education, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

21. Dubakov, M., P. Stevens. Agile Tools: The Good, the Badandthe Ugly. Report, Target Process, Inc, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

22. Taheri, M., S. M. Sadjadi. A Feature-Based Tool-Selection Classificationfor Agile Software Development. – In: SEKE, 2015.10.18293/SEKE2015-234Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1314-4081
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Computer Sciences, Information Technology